Skip to main content
Log in

The Geoheritage of Madeira: Implications for Natural Heritage and Geotourism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The island of Madeira forms part of the Madeira Archipelago, an Autonomous Region of Portugal, in the NE Atlantic Ocean. The Madeira Archipelago was built on 140-million-year-old oceanic crust. The exposed geology of Madeira is comprised of the Miocene (> 5.6 million years old) Basal (Inferior), Pleistocene-Miocene (1.8–5.6 million years old) Intermediate Volcanic, Pleistocene (0.7–1.8 million years old) Upper (Superior) Volcanic, and Holocene-Pleistocene (0.007-0.7 million years old) Upper (Superior) Volcanic complexes, generating the landforms and landscapes for which the island is renowned. There are at least 17 geosites on Madeira, including those in the Ponta de São Lourenço, Porto da Cruz, São Vicente Valley, Pico Ruivo, and Ponta da Cruz areas. Geotourism is not as well developed as cultural or biodiversity tourism on Madeira, however, it represents another way for tourists to explore the island’s natural heritage if done in a sustainable manner. Future studies are required to better delineate and set up georoutes on Madeira, particularly in the Ponta de São Lourenço, Porto da Cruz, and São Vicente Valley areas. It is envisaged that the aforementioned geosites could be linked by a single georoute around Madeira, the Madeira Georoute. Further investigation of the geosites identified by this study is required to ensure that these sites are managed and conserved, thereby protecting the geoheritage of Madeira. Geoconservation, sustainable tourism and the cooperation between the public and government authorities (including geologists) are required to improve geotourism on Madeira. The application of the Inventario Español de Lugares de Interés Geológico (IELIG) and Geosite Assessment (GA) models are required to assess and manage threats to Madeira’s geoheritage sites. Such threats include coastal erosion and human activities, such as mass tourism and urban expansion. It is proposed that the government of the Autonomous Region of Madeira in consultation with local and regional stakeholders should submit an application to create a UNESCO Global Geopark on the island of Madeira. This territorial sustainable development approach should be implemented based on the principles of geotourism, geoconservation, and geoeducation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

There are no additional data associated with this contribution. The only table in this contribution is Table 1 (Geosites of Madeira).

References

  • Aldao C, Mihalic TA (2020) New frontiers in travel motivation and social media: the case of Longyearbyen, the high Arctic. Sustainability 12(15):5905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida A, Correia A (2010) Tourism development in Madeira: an analysis based on the life cycle approach. Tourism Econ 16(2):427–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arouca Declaration (2011) Arouca Declaration on Geotourism. International Congress – Geotourism in Action, Arouca, Portugal

  • Basiri S, Vatandoust R, Emami SMA, Ahmadi H (2014) The historical and intellectual course of development in preserving the cultural heritage from the perspective of conceptual status of integrity. J Hist Cult 46(1):85–108 (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard-Griffiths J, Gruau G, Cornen G, Azambre B, Macé J (1997) Continental lithospheric contribution to alkaline magmatism: isotopic (nd, Sr, Pb) and geochemical (REE) evidence from Serra De Monchique and Mount Ormonde complexes. J Petrol 38(1):115–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd J, Ayon H, Robadue D, Vásconez J, Noboa R (1994) Características de la linea costera del Ecuador y recomendaciones para su manejo (Shoreline characteristics and management recommendations for the coast of Ecuador). Technical Report 2076. CRC, PMRC, and USAID (in Spanish)

  • Borges PAV, Abreu C, Aguiar AMF, Carvalho P, Fontinha S, Jardim R, Melo I, Oliveira P, de Sequeira MM, Sérgio C, Serrano ARM, Sim-Sim M, Vieira P (2008) Terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity of the Madeira and Selvagens archipelagos. In: Borges PAV, Abreu C, Aguiar AMF, Carvalho P, Jardim R, Melo I, Oliveira P, Sérgio C, Serrano ARM, Vieira P (eds) A list of the Terrestrial Fungi, Flora, and Fauna and Selvagens archipelagos. Funchal and Angra do Heroísmo. Direcção Regional do Ambiente da Madeira and Universidade dos Açores, pp 13–25

  • Brilha J (2016) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage 8:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brum da Silveira A, Madeira J, Ramalho R, Fonseca P, Prada S (2010) Carta Geólogica Da Ilha Da Madeira 1:50 000. Secretaria Regional dos Recoursos Naturalais, Regiâo Autónimo da Madeira e Universidade de Madeira

  • Brum da Silveira A, Prada S, Ramalho R, Madeira J, Fonseca P, Canha E, Brilha J (2012) Inventariação do Património Geológico da Ilha da Madeira. Secretaria Regional do Ambiente e Recursos Naturais - Relatório Final, 414 pp. https:/geodiversidade.madeira.gov.pt

  • Burton CJ, MacDonald JG (2008) A field guide to the geology of Madeira. Geol Soc Glasgow, p 120

  • Carrión-Mero P, Borja-Bernal C, Herrera-Franco G, Morante-Carballo F, Jaya-Montalvo M, Maldonado-Zamora A, Paz-Salas N, Berrezueta E (2021b) Geosites and geotourism in the local development of communities of the andes mountains. A case study. Sustainability 13(9):4624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chingombe W (2019) Preliminary geomorphosites assessment along the Panorama route of Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Geoj Tour Geosites 27(4):1261–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • De Canha ERAA (2007) Património Natural da Ilha da Madeira. Estudio de um local de interesse geológico: Cone de Piroclastos da Na Sr.a da Piedade. Universidade da Madeira, Funchal, Portugal, Dissertações de Mestrado em Ciências da Terra a da Vida, p 187

  • Dowling RK (2011) Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage 3(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK (2013) Global geotourism – an emerging form of sustainable tourism. Czech J Tour 2(2):59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK, Newsome D (2006) Geotourism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK, Newsome D (2010) Global geotourism perspectives. Goodfellow, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK, Newsome D (2018) Handbook of geotourism. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte A, Braga V, Marques C, Sá AA (2020) Geotourism and territorial development: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Geoheritage 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00478-z

  • Escorihuela J (2017) The contribution of geotourism to the sustainable development: The role of geoethics. Arch Anthropol Open Acc 1(3):65–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Farsani NT, Coelho C, Costa C (2011) Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas. Int J Tour Res 13(1):68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farsani NT, Coelho CO, Costa CM, Amrikazemi A (2014) Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage 6:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulas C, Mouriki D, Dimitriou PD, Iliopoulos G (2012) Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage 4(3):177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Félix Mendoza ÁG, Campos Jiménez SE, Martí Noguera JJ, Mejía Ramos M (2017) Recuperación de destinos turísticos posterremoto: revisión del caso Ecuador. Rev Venez de Gerencia 22(80):639–656 (in Spanish)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Félix Mendoza ÁG, Mateos MR, Reinoso NG (2021) Perception and rating of tourism entrepreneurs in the recovery of travel destinations affected by social-natural disasters: Case study from the April 16th earthquake in Ecuador. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 64:102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Redwood City

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Fernández-Martínez E (2012) Mapping geosites for geoheritage management: A methodological proposal for the Regional Park of Picos de Europa (León, Spain). Environ Manage 50:789–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Cortés A, Carcavilla L, Diaz-Martinez E, Vegas J (2018) Documento metodológico para las elaboración del Inventario Español de Lugares de Interés Geológico (IELIG). Instituto Geológico y Minero de España

  • Geldmacher J, Hoernle K (2000) The 72 Ma geochemical evolution of the Madeira hotspot (eastern North Atlantic): recycling of Paleozoic (≤ 500 Ma) oceanic lithosphere. Earth Planet Sci Lett 183:73–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geldmacher J, van den Bogaard P, Hoernle KA, Schminke HU (2000) The 40Ar/39Ar age dating of the Madeira Archipelago and hotspot track (eastern North Atlantic). Geochem Geophys Geosyst 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GC000018

  • Gordon JE (2018) Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040136

  • Gray M (2013) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Grillo A, Rola A, Coelho B, Aguiar C, Ramalho E, Quintal L, Silva MR (2022) Estratégia Regional de Especializaçao Inteligente da Região Autónoma da Madeira (2021–2027). Secretaria Regional da Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia (SRE) e Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), 140 pp

  • Gursoy D, Rutherford D (2004) Host attitudes toward tourism: An improved structural model. Ann Tour Res 31(3):495–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy D, Jurowski C, Uysal M (2002) Resident attitudes: A structural modeling approach. Ann Tour Res 29(1):79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadian MSD, Suganda BR, Khadijah ULS, Yuliawati AK (2021) Evaluation of potential geo-tourism based on geo-diversity towards sustainable tourism at Citarum River. Stud Appl Econ 39(12). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i12.6265

  • Hermawan H, Brahmanto E (2018) Geowisata: Perencanaan pariwisata berbasis konservasi. Penerbit NEM (in Indonesian)

  • Herrera-Franco G, Montalván-Burbano N, Carrión-Mero P, Apolo-Masache B, Jaya-Montalvo M (2020) Research trends in Geotourism: A bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database. Geosciences 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100379

  • Hoernle K, Schmincke HU, Tilton G (1991) Sr, Nd and Pb isotope geochemistry of volcanics from Madeira and Porto Santo Islands, North Atlantic Ocean. Eos 72(528):44–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (1995a) Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environ Interpretation 10(2):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (1995b) Evaluating interpretation at Hunstanton. Earth Herit 4:20

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2000) European geotourism – geological interpretation and geoconservation promotion for tourists. In: Barretino D, Wimbledon WP, Gallego E (eds) Geological heritage: its conservation and management. Instituto Tecnologico Geominero de Espana, Madrid, pp 127–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2003) Geotourism in England: A two-region case study analysis. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham

  • Hose TA (2016) Geoheritage and geotourism: A European perspective. Boydell & Brewer Ltd., Martlesham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA, Vasiljević ĐA (2012) Defining the nature and purpose of modern geotourism with particular reference to the United Kingdom and South-East Europe. Geoheritage 4(1–2):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail N, Masron T, Ahmad A (2014) Cultural heritage tourism in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. SHS Web of Conferences 12:01059

  • Jokilehto J (2006) Considerations on authenticity and integrity in world heritage context. City Time 2(1)

  • Knobloch U, Robertson K, Aitken R (2017) Experience, emotion, and eudaimonia: A consideration of tourist experiences and well-being. J Trav Res 56(5):651–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2015) Documento Estratégico para o Turismo na RAM (2015–2020). Requested by the Associação Comercial e Industrial do Funchal – Câmara do Comércio e Indústria da Madeira, 87 pp

  • Kubalíková L, Kirchner K (2016) Geosite and geomorphosite assessment as a tool for geoconservation and geotourism purposes: A case study from Vizovická vrchovina Highland (Eastern part of the Czech Republic). Geoheritage 8:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald JG, Burton CJ (2018) A field guide to the geology of Madeira. Geol Soc Glasgow

  • Maghsoudi M, Moradi A, Moradipour F (2021) Aerial geotourism: New branch of geotourism for promoting geoconservation (Examples from Iran). Geoheritage 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00526-8

  • Mata J, Kerrich R, Macrae ND, Wu TW (1998) Elemental and isotopic (Sr, Nd, and Pb) characteristics of Madeira Island basalts: evidence for a complete HIMU – EM 1 plume fertilizing lithosphere. Can J Earth Sci 35:380–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez G, Fermeli G, Escorihuela J, Basso A, Moreira J (2011) What do we mean when we say Geotourism? International Congress – Geotourism in Action, Arouca, Portugal, 97–101

  • Morante-Carballo F, Domínguez-Cuesta MJ, Paz-Salas N, Malavé-Hernández J, Dueñas-Tovar J, Carrión-Mero P (2023) Evaluation of the potential of coastal cliffs as geosites for the promotion of geotourism. Geogr Sustain 4(4):356–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motte E, McInnes R (2019) Using artistic imagery to improve understanding of coastal landscape. Changes on the Rance Estuary (French Channel Coast). Geoheritage 11:961–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novarlia I (2023) A study of environmentally-sound geotourism potential in Sumedang Regency. ISS 2(5):1945–1952. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v2i5.410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsdóttir R (2019) Geotourism. Geosciences 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010048

  • Ólafsdóttir R, Dowling RK (2014) Geotourism and geoparks – A tool for geoconservation and rural development in vulnerable environments: A case study from Iceland. Geoheritage 6(1):71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsdóttir R, Tverijonaite E (2018) Geotourism: a systematic literature review. Geosciences 8(7):234. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira P, Pereira PT (2008) Who values what in a tourism destination? The case of Madeira Island. Tourism Econ 14(1):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijet-Migoń E, Migoń P (2022) Geoheritage and cultural heritage – A review of recurrent and interlinked themes. Geosciences 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020098

  • Poiraud A, Chevalier M, Claeyssen B, Biron PE, Joly B (2016) From geoheritage inventory to territorial planning tool in the Vercors massif (French Alps): Contribution of statistical and expert cross approaches. Appl Geogr 71:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourfaraj A, Ghaderi E, Jomehpour M, Ferdowsi A (2020) Conservation management of geotourism attractions in tourism destinations. Geoheritage 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00500-4

  • Pralong JP (2005) A method for assessing the tourism potential and use of geomorphological sites. Geomorphology 68(1–2):77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • ProGEO ICNF (2024) Geossitios. https://geossitios.progeo.pt/

  • Prosser CD, Bridgland DR, Brown EJ, Larwood JG (2011) Geoconservation for science and society: challenges and opportunities. P Geologist Assoc 122(3):337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regional Legislative Assembly of the Autonomous Region of Madeira (2004) Regional Legislative Decree 24/2004/M of August 20th. Região Autónoma da Madeira, Official Gazette no. 196/2004, Series I-A of 2004-08-20, 2 pp

  • Regional Secretariat for the Environment and Climate Change of Madeira (2015) Strategy for Conservation of the Geological Heritage of the Autonomous Region of Madeira. Região Autónoma da Madeira, Série 154, 16 pp

  • Reynard E, Giusti C (2018) The landscape and the cultural value of geoheritage. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, protection, management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 147–166

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha D, Duarte A (2022) The management of Arouca Geopark’s route of geosites: A strategic geologically based product in a geotourism destination. In: Braga V, Duarte A, Marques CS (eds) Economics and Management of Geotourism. Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management. Springer, Cham, pp 87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ALO, Rodrigues A, Peroff DM (2015) The sky and sustainable tourism development: A case study of a dark sky reserve implementation in Alqueva. Int J Tour Res 17(3):292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosana MFM, Mardiana U, Syafri I, Sulaksana N, Haryanto I (2006) Geologi kawasan Ciletuh Sukabumi: Karakteristik keunikan dan implikasinya. University of Padjadjaran, p 14. (in Indonesian)

  • Ruban DA, Zorina SO, Rebezov MB (2019) Dispersed geoheritage points of the Lagonaki Highland, SW Russia: Contribution to local geoheritage resource. Geosciences 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9090367

  • Schutte IC (2009) A strategic management plan for the sustainable development of geotourism in South Africa. PhD Thesis, North-West University

  • Sharples C (2002) Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service, Hobart, p 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Stueve AM, Cook SD, Drew D (2002) The geotourism study: phase 1 executive summary. Natl Geogr Traveler (TIA), pp 1–20

  • UNESCO (2008) World Heritage Committee. 32nd session, Quebec City, Canada. Draft Summary Record WHC-08/32.COM, 296 pp

  • UNESCO (2015) Statutes of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme. 38th General Conference of UNESCO (Resolution 38 C/23, document 38 C/14), 16 pp

  • UNESCO (2023) UNESCO Global Geoparks Map 2023. English edition. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385482

  • UNESCO (2024a) UNESCO Biosphere Reserves. Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme. https://www.unesco.org/en/mab/map?hub=66369

  • UNESCO (2024b) UNESCO names 18 new Geoparks. UNESCO press release, 27th March 2024. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-names-18-new-geoparks

  • UNESCO (1999) World Heritage Committee. 23rd session, Marrakesh, Morocco. Report WHC-99/CONF.209/22. 118 pp

  • Valls JF, Mota L, Vieira SCF, Santos R (2019) Opportunities for slow tourism in Madeira. Sustainability 11(17):4534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widom E, Hoernle KA, Shirey SB, Schmincke HU (1999) Os isotope systematics in the Canary Islands and Madeira: lithospheric contamination and mantle plume signature. J Petrol 40(2):279–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt B, Leask A, Barron P (2022) Designing dark tourism experiences: an exploration of edutainment interpretation at lighter dark visitor attractions. In: Isaac RK (ed) Dark tourism studies. Routledge, London, pp 75–91

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Xu K, Wu W (2022) Geoparks and geotourism in China: A sustainable approach to geoheritage conservation and local development—A review. Land 11(9):1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbyszewki G, Ferreira OV, Medeiros AC (1975) Carta geológica de Portugal na escala de 1:50 000. Serviços Geológicos de Portugal, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros N (2007) Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. The case of the Lesvos island – coastal geomorphosites. Geogr Helv 62(3):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editor for their efficient editorial handling of this contribution. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and insightful feedback, the implementation of which has improved the quality of this contribution.

Funding

The first author (P. Sotiriou) has been supported by a BMBF (Germany) research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Paul Sotiriou: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original draft preparation, Data Curation, Visualization, Writing – Reviewing and Editing. Pedro Nunes: Conceptualization, Writing – Reviewing and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Sotiriou.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sotiriou, P., Nunes, P. The Geoheritage of Madeira: Implications for Natural Heritage and Geotourism. Geoheritage 16, 74 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00982-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00982-6

Keywords

Navigation