Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring stakeholders’ sensemaking of the STEA���M” education policy in South Korea

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2011, South Korea introduced the Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education policy in line with the worldwide emphasis on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. This study aims to examine the perspectives of the stakeholders involved in the implementation of the STEAM education policy. To accomplish this, a qualitative research design was utilized, and inductive analysis was employed to collect and interpret the viewpoints of 13 stakeholders. These stakeholders encompassed policymakers, national institution directors, regional supervisors, administrators, principals, STEAM lead teachers, and mathematics teachers who created the STEAM-based curriculum in South Korea. Our findings reveal conflicting perspectives among the stakeholders regarding STEAM education. Our analysis also suggests that stakeholders’ participation in STEAM education is discontinuous and driven by the policy wave. Several impediments faced by mathematics teachers were also recognized, including obstacles in aligning STEAM-incorporated mathematics instruction with assessments, inadequate financial and curriculum assistance, and complications within the school climate. We discuss potential components that could affect the success of STEAM education and the conditions necessary for its successful implementation: (1) the need for consensus on the level of policy support; (2) the need for sustainable policy support; and (3) the need for policymakers’ consideration to connect the STEAM education policy with real mathematics classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(adapted from Holmlund et al., 2018, p. 4)

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Original survey sheet was provided in Korean.

References

  • Baek, Y., Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S. G., Park, J. Y., Lee, J., Jeong, J. S., Choi, Y., & Han, H. (2011). STEAM education in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottge, B., Rueda, E., & Skivington, M. (2006). Situating math instruction in rich problem-solving contexts: Effects on adolescents with challenging behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 31(4), 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, A. F., & Jones, N. D. (2020). Policies that define instruction: A systematic review of states’ and districts’ recommendations for evaluating special educators. Educational Researcher, 49(9), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20935039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, I., Hwang, S., & Yoo, J. (2016). Development and management of the advanced STEAM teacher training program. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, D. J. C., Akbar, B., Brummet, J., Flores, S., Gordon, A., Gray, B., & Murday, J. (2019). Convergence education—An international perspective. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21(11), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4638-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmlund, T. D., Lesseig, K., & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of “STEM education” in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Society for STEM Education (JSTEM) (2018). About JSTEM. Retrieved January 29, 2023, from https://www.j-stem.jp/about/.

  • Johnson, C. C., Walton, J. B., & Breiner, J. M. (2020). STEM policy in the United States and Canada. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 400–415). Routledge.

  • Kang, N. H. (2020). What can integrated STEAM education achieve? A South Korean case. In J. Anderson, & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated Approaches to STEM Education (pp. 227–249). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_13.

  • Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC). (2016). Introduction to STEAM education. KOFAC.

  • Laroche, H. (1995). From decision to action in organizations: Decision-making as a social representation. Organization Science, 6(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. (2022). Am I a STEAM teacher? Professional identity and PCK through STEAM project-based learning professional preparation. School Mathematics, 24(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2022.3.24.1.147. http://doi.org.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Bicer, A. (2019). Affective mathematics engagement: A comparison of STEM PBL versus Non-STEM PBL instruction. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 19(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00050-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Yao, J. X., Luo, T., & So, W. W. M. (2020). STEM policy in Asia. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 416–427). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman, A., Baker, J., & Bosacker, S. C. (2011). Surfacing and transferring expert knowledge: The sense-making interview. Human Resource Development International, 14(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.585071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2015). The 2015 revised science curriculum (74Vol., 2015Report no. vol.). Sejong: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [MOEST]. (2011). The second basic plan to foster and support the human resources in science and technology (2011–15). MEST.

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2007). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report. Boston College.

  • Mumcu, F., Uslu, N. A., & Yıldız, B. (2022). Teacher development in integrated STEM education: Design of lesson plans through the lens of computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 1–21.

  • National Institute of Educational Sciences (NIES)., P.R. of China. (2017). White paper on STEM education in China. Beijing: Unpublished report from National Institute of Educational Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1995). Concept mapping to facilitate teaching and learning. Prospects, 25(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, D. (2007). The race to the top: A review of government’s science and innovation policies. HM Treasury.

  • Schildt, H., Mantere, S., & Cornelissen, J. (2020). Power in sensemaking processes. Organization Studies, 41(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619847718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM education, and addressing the issues facing STEAM in the korean context. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 709–723. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our appreciation to the 13 anonymous interviewees who have demonstrated dedication to STEAM education in South Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oh Nam Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, C., Lee, Y., Lee, K. et al. Exploring stakeholders’ sensemaking of the STEA“M” education policy in South Korea. ZDM Mathematics Education 55, 1375–1389 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01513-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01513-3

Keywords

Navigation