Abstract
In 2011, South Korea introduced the Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education policy in line with the worldwide emphasis on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. This study aims to examine the perspectives of the stakeholders involved in the implementation of the STEAM education policy. To accomplish this, a qualitative research design was utilized, and inductive analysis was employed to collect and interpret the viewpoints of 13 stakeholders. These stakeholders encompassed policymakers, national institution directors, regional supervisors, administrators, principals, STEAM lead teachers, and mathematics teachers who created the STEAM-based curriculum in South Korea. Our findings reveal conflicting perspectives among the stakeholders regarding STEAM education. Our analysis also suggests that stakeholders’ participation in STEAM education is discontinuous and driven by the policy wave. Several impediments faced by mathematics teachers were also recognized, including obstacles in aligning STEAM-incorporated mathematics instruction with assessments, inadequate financial and curriculum assistance, and complications within the school climate. We discuss potential components that could affect the success of STEAM education and the conditions necessary for its successful implementation: (1) the need for consensus on the level of policy support; (2) the need for sustainable policy support; and (3) the need for policymakers’ consideration to connect the STEAM education policy with real mathematics classrooms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Original survey sheet was provided in Korean.
References
Baek, Y., Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S. G., Park, J. Y., Lee, J., Jeong, J. S., Choi, Y., & Han, H. (2011). STEAM education in Korea. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149–171.
Bottge, B., Rueda, E., & Skivington, M. (2006). Situating math instruction in rich problem-solving contexts: Effects on adolescents with challenging behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 31(4), 394–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100401.
Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145.
Gilmour, A. F., & Jones, N. D. (2020). Policies that define instruction: A systematic review of states’ and districts’ recommendations for evaluating special educators. Educational Researcher, 49(9), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20935039.
Hahn, I., Hwang, S., & Yoo, J. (2016). Development and management of the advanced STEAM teacher training program. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0399.
Herr, D. J. C., Akbar, B., Brummet, J., Flores, S., Gordon, A., Gray, B., & Murday, J. (2019). Convergence education—An international perspective. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21(11), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4638-7.
Holmlund, T. D., Lesseig, K., & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of “STEM education” in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–18.
Japan Society for STEM Education (JSTEM) (2018). About JSTEM. Retrieved January 29, 2023, from https://www.j-stem.jp/about/.
Johnson, C. C., Walton, J. B., & Breiner, J. M. (2020). STEM policy in the United States and Canada. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 400–415). Routledge.
Kang, N. H. (2020). What can integrated STEAM education achieve? A South Korean case. In J. Anderson, & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated Approaches to STEM Education (pp. 227–249). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_13.
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC). (2016). Introduction to STEAM education. KOFAC.
Laroche, H. (1995). From decision to action in organizations: Decision-making as a social representation. Organization Science, 6(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.1.62.
Lee, Y. (2022). Am I a STEAM teacher? Professional identity and PCK through STEAM project-based learning professional preparation. School Mathematics, 24(1), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2022.3.24.1.147. http://doi.org.
Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Bicer, A. (2019). Affective mathematics engagement: A comparison of STEM PBL versus Non-STEM PBL instruction. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 19(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00050-0.
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9.
Li, J., Yao, J. X., Luo, T., & So, W. W. M. (2020). STEM policy in Asia. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of Research on STEM Education (pp. 416–427). New York: Routledge.
Linderman, A., Baker, J., & Bosacker, S. C. (2011). Surfacing and transferring expert knowledge: The sense-making interview. Human Resource Development International, 14(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.585071.
Ministry of Education (2015). The 2015 revised science curriculum (74Vol., 2015Report no. vol.). Sejong: Author.
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [MOEST]. (2011). The second basic plan to foster and support the human resources in science and technology (2011–15). MEST.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2007). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report. Boston College.
Mumcu, F., Uslu, N. A., & Yıldız, B. (2022). Teacher development in integrated STEM education: Design of lesson plans through the lens of computational thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 1–21.
National Institute of Educational Sciences (NIES)., P.R. of China. (2017). White paper on STEM education in China. Beijing: Unpublished report from National Institute of Educational Sciences.
Novak, J. D. (1995). Concept mapping to facilitate teaching and learning. Prospects, 25(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334286.
Sainsbury, D. (2007). The race to the top: A review of government’s science and innovation policies. HM Treasury.
Schildt, H., Mantere, S., & Cornelissen, J. (2020). Power in sensemaking processes. Organization Studies, 41(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619847718.
Sim, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM education, and addressing the issues facing STEAM in the korean context. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 709–723. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0709.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our appreciation to the 13 anonymous interviewees who have demonstrated dedication to STEAM education in South Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, C., Lee, Y., Lee, K. et al. Exploring stakeholders’ sensemaking of the STEA“M” education policy in South Korea. ZDM Mathematics Education 55, 1375–1389 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01513-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01513-3