Abstract
Advanced mathematics is seen as an integral component of secondary teacher preparation, and thus most secondary teacher preparation programs require their students to complete an array of advanced mathematics courses. In recent years, though, researchers have questioned the utility of proposed connections between advanced and secondary mathematics. It is simply not clear in many cases—to researchers, teacher educators, and teachers themselves—exactly how advanced mathematics content is related to secondary content. In this paper, we propose using a conceptual analysis—a form of theory in which one explicitly describes ways of reasoning about a particular mathematical idea—to address this issue. Specifically, we use conceptual analyses for the foundational notions of equivalence and inverse to illustrate how the ways of reasoning needed to support productive engagement with tasks in advanced mathematics can mirror and reinforce those that are similarly productive in school mathematics. To do so, we propose conceptual analyses for the key concepts of equivalence and inverse and show how researchers can use these conceptual analyses to identify connections to school mathematics in advanced mathematical tasks that might otherwise be obscured and overlooked. We conclude by suggesting ways in which conceptual analyses might be productively used by both teacher educators and future teachers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We first encountered the term common characteristic in a study by Hamdan (2006) about the nature of elements that have been grouped together in an equivalence class.
For simplicity, in this paper the algebraic expressions we refer to are polynomial expressions in one variable over the real numbers.
Other aspects of and episodes from these sessions are discussed in Cook and Uscanga (2017).
References
Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. J., Hattikudur, S., McNeil, N. M., & Stephens, A. C. (2007). A longitudinal examination of middle school students’ understanding of the equal sign and equivalent equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 221–247.
Asghari, A. H., & Tall, D. (2005). Students’ experience of equivalence relations: A phenomenographic approach. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th PME International Conference, 81–88.
Bagley, S., Rasmussen, C., & Zandieh, M. (2015). Inverse, composition, and identity: The case of function and linear transformation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 36–47.
Baiduri, B. (2015). Mathematics education students’ understanding of equal sign and equivalent equation. Asian Social Science, 11(25), 15–24.
Baroody, A. J., & Lai, M. (2007). Preschoolers’ understanding of the addition–subtraction inverse principle: A Taiwanese sample. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(2), 131–171.
Berman, A., Koichu, B., & Shvartsman, L. (2013). Understanding equivalence of matrices. Proceedings of CERME, 8, 2296–2305.
Breda, A., Pino-Fan, L. R., & Font, V. (2017). Meta didactic-mathematical knowledge of teachers: Criteria for the reflection and assessment on teaching practice. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1893–1918.
Bukova-Güzel, E., Uğurel, I., Özgür, Z., & Kula, S. (2010). The review of undergraduate courses aimed at developing subject matter knowledge by mathematics student teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2233–2238.
Clay, E., Silverman, J., & Fischer, D. J. (2012). Unpacking online asynchronous collaboration in mathematics teacher education. ZDM, 44(6), 761–773.
Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547–589). Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (CBMS). (2012). The Mathematical Education of Teachers II. American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.
Cook, J. P., Reed, Z., & Lockwood, E. (2022a). An initial framework for analyzing students’ reasoning with equivalence across mathematical domains. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100935.
Cook, J. P., & Uscanga, R. (2017). Stages of development for the concept of inverse in abstract algebra. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on RUME (pp. 520–527).
Cook, J. P., Richardson, A., Strand, S., Reed, Z., & Melhuish, K. (2022b). Reasoning about inverses across algebraic contexts: Theory-building via a standalone literature review. In S. S. Karunakaran & A. Higgins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on RUME (pp. 124–134).
Dreher, A., Lindmeier, A., & Heinze, A. (2016). Conceptualizing professional content knowledge of secondary teachers taking into account the gap between academic and school mathematics. In Proceedings of the 40th PME Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 219–226). PME.
Dubinsky, E. (2002). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95–126). Springer.
Even, R. (2011). The relevance of advanced mathematics studies to expertise in secondary school mathematics teaching: Practitioners’ views. ZDM, 43(6), 941–950.
Godfrey, D., & Thomas, M. O. (2008). Student perspectives on equation: The transition from school to university. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 71–92.
Hamdan, M. (2006). Equivalent structures on sets: Equivalence classes, partitions and fiber structures of functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 127–147.
Hoth, J., Kaiser, G., Döhrmann, M., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2018). A situated approach to assess teachers’ professional competencies using classroom videos. In O. Buchbinder & S. Kuntze (Eds.), Mathematics teachers engaging with representations of practice (pp. 23–45). Springer.
Jeschke, C., Kuhn, C., Lindmeier, A., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Saas, H., & Heinze, A. (2019). What is the Relationship Between Knowledge in Mathematics and Knowledge in Economics? Investigating the professional knowledge of (pre-service) teachers trained in two subjects. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik, 65(4), 511–524.
Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Doehrmann, M., & Hoth, J. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—Cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 161–182.
Kieran, C., & Saldanha, L. (2005). Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) as a Tool for Coaxing the Emergence of Reasoning about Equivalence of Algebraic Expressions. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 3, pp. 193–200). PME.
Knuth, E., Stephens, A., McNeil, N., & Alibali, M. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 297–312.
Kondratieva, M., & Winsløw, C. (2018). Klein’s plan B in the early teaching of analysis: Two theoretical cases of exploring mathematical links. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 119–138.
Kontorovich, I., & Zazkis, R. (2017). Mathematical conventions: Revisiting arbitrary and necessary. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(1), 29–34.
Larsen, S. P. (2013). A local instructional theory for the guided reinvention of the group and isomorphism concepts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32, 712–725.
Larsen, S., Glover, E., Bergman, A. M., & Caughman, J. (2018). What kind of opportunities do abstract algebra courses provide for strengthening future teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching? In N. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 71–84). Springer.
McGowen, M. A., & Tall, D. O. (2013). Flexible thinking and met-befores: Impact on learning mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 527–537.
Molina, M., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2009). Elementary students’ understanding of the equal sign in number sentences. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 17, 341–368.
Pinto, M. M. F., & Schubring, G. (2018). The conception and development of textbooks for distance learning courses: A case study of a teacher education course. ZDM, 50(5), 893–906.
Pomerantsev, L., & Korosteleva, O. (2003). Do prospective elementary and middle school teachers understand the structure of algebraic expressions. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: THe Journal, 1(08), 1–10.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.
Solares, A., & Kieran, C. (2013). Articulating syntactic and numeric perspectives on equivalence: The case of rational expressions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 115–148.
Thompson, P. W. (2002). Didactic objects and didactic models in radical constructivism. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 197–220). Springer.
Uscanga, R., & Cook, J. P. (2022). Analyzing the Structure of the Non-examples in the Instructional Example Space for Function in Abstract Algebra. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00166-z
Vergnaud, G. (2012). Commentary 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(3), 439–445.
Vidakovic, D. (1996). Learning the concept of inverse function. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 15(3), 295–318.
Vlassis, J. (2008). The role of mathematical symbols in the development of number conceptualization: The case of the minus sign. Philosophical Psychology, 21(4), 555–570.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press.
Wasserman, N. H. (2016). Abstract algebra for algebra teaching: Influencing school mathematics instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(1), 28–47.
Wasserman, N. H. (2017). Exploring How Understandings from Abstract Algebra Can Influence the Teaching of Structure in Early Algebra. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(2), 81–103.
Wasserman, N. H. (2018). Exploring advanced mathematics courses and content for secondary mathematics teachers. In N. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 1–15). Springer.
Zazkis, R., & Marmur, O. (2018). Groups to the rescue: Responding to situations of contingency. In N. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 363–381). Springer.
Zwetzschler, L., & Prediger, S. (2013). Conceptual challenges for understanding the equivalence of expressions—a case study. In Proceedings of the 8th congress of European research in mathematics education (CERME 8) (pp. 558–567).
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. 2055590.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, J.P., Richardson, A., Reed, Z. et al. Using conceptual analyses to resolve the tension between advanced and secondary mathematics: the cases of equivalence and inverse. ZDM Mathematics Education 55, 753–766 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01495-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01495-2