Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential moderating roles of eudaimonic orientation (prioritizing authenticity, meaning, excellence, growth) and hedonic orientation (prioritizing pleasure, comfort) on the link between parental status and well-being. A sample of 473 parents and 138 nonparents from Canada and the United States completed a questionnaire assessing eudaimonic and hedonic motives for activities and well-being experiences in their private life. The sample was balanced by gender, country, and age group (ages ranged from 18 to 93). Multivariate regression analyses revealed a significant positive interaction between being a parent and eudaimonic orientation in predicting positive well-being experiences as a set. Follow-up analyses comparing results by gender revealed that eudaimonic orientation had an enhancing moderating effect on fathers’, but not mothers’, well-being. Univariate regression analyses showed that, for males, the interaction between eudaimonic orientation and parental status related specifically to life satisfaction, and experiences of meaning, elevation, self-connectedness, vitality, and relatedness. No significant interaction effect was found between parental status and hedonic orientation in predicting overall well-being. The results of our study suggest that the ways people construe and pursue the ‘good life’ have important implications for the well-being derived from parenthood—at least for fathers. Our findings also support evidence suggesting that eudaimonic and hedonic orientations constitute an important lens through which individuals interpret the well-being experienced in relation to different life contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The data used for this study is part of a larger data set previously published to study a different topic—the associations of well-being orientations with age and gender (Lefebvre & Huta, 2021).
References
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830764
Behzadnia, B., & Ryan, R. M. (2018). Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations in physical education and their relation with motivation and wellness. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 49(5), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP.2018.49.363
Bjørnskov, C. (2010). How comparable are the Gallup World Poll life satisfaction data? Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 11(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9121-6
Bostic, T. J., McGartland Rubio, D., & Hood, M. (2000). A validation of the Subjective Vitality Scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research, 52(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007136110218
Braaten, A., Huta, V., Tyrany, L., & Thompson, A. (2019). Hedonic and eudaimonic motives toward university studies: How they relate to each other and to well-being derived from school. Journal of Positive Psychology & Wellbeing, 3(2), 179–196. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/JPPW/article/view/123/61. Accessed 28 July 2021.
Collinson, D. L., & Hearn, J. (2005). Men and masculinities in work, organizations, and management. In Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 289–310). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233833.n17
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
DelleFave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5
Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105
Dunlop, W. L., Walker, L. J., Hanley, G. E., & Harake, N. (2017). The psychosocial construction of parenting: An examination of parenting goals and narratives in relation to well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1729–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9796-z
Evenson, R. J., & Simon, R. W. (2005). Clarifying the relationship between parenthood and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(4), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600403
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869
Giuntoli, L., Condini, F., Ceccarini, F., Huta, V., & Vidotto, G. (2021). The different roles of hedonic and eudaimonic motives for activities in predicting functioning and well-being experiences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(4), 1657–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00290-0
Halrynjo, S. (2009). Men’s work-life conflict: Career, care and self-realization: Patterns of privileges and dilemmas. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 98–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00432.x
Hansen, T. (2012). Parenthood and happiness: A review of folk theories versus empirical evidence. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 29–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9865-y
Hansen, T., Slagsvold, B., & Moum, T. (2009). Childlessness and psychological well-being in midlife and old age: An examination of parental status effects across a range of outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 94(2), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9426-1
Henderson, L. W., Knight, T., & Richardson, B. (2013). An exploration of the well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic behaviour. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.803596
Herbst, C. M., & Ifcher, J. (2016). The increasing happiness of US parents. Review of Economics of the Household, 14(3), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9302-0
Hörning, K. H., Gerhard, A., & Michailow, M. (1995). Time pioneers: Flexible working time and new lifestyles. Polity Press.
Huta, V. (2012). Linking peoples’ pursuit of eudaimonia and hedonia with characteristics of their parents: Parenting styles, verbally endorsed values, and role modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9249-7
Huta, V. (2015). The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 159–182). John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118996874.ch10
Huta, V. (2016). Eudaimonic and hedonic orientations: Theoretical considerations and research findings. In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 215–231). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_15
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4
Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
Huta, V. (2021). Healthy hedonism: What hedonically oriented people are good at [Conference presentation]. 7th IPPA World Congress, online.
Keizer, R., Dykstra, P. A., & Poortman, A.-R. (2010). The transition to parenthood and well-being: The impact of partner status and work hour transitions. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020414
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(3), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369469
Khandwala, Y. S., Zhang, C. A., Lu, Y., & Eisenberg, M. L. (2017). The age of fathers in the USA is rising: An analysis of 168 867 480 births from 1972 to 2015. Human Reproduction, 32(10), 2110–2116. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex267
King, L. A., & Napa, C. K. (1998). What makes a life good? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.156
Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (1994). Divergent worlds: The daily emotional experience of mothers and fathers in the domestic and public spheres. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1034
Le, B. M., & Impett, E. A. (2019). Parenting goal pursuit is linked to emotional well-being, relationship quality, and responsiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517747417
LeFebvre, A., & Huta, V. (2021). Age and gender differences in eudaimonic, hedonic, and extrinsic motivations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2299–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00319-4
Lyubomirsky, S., & Boehm, J. K. (2010). Human motives, happiness, and the puzzle of parenthood: Commentary on Kenrick et al. (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369473
Martinez, G., Daniels, K., & Chandra, A. (2012). Fertility of men and women aged 15–44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006–2010. National Health Statistics Reports, 51, 1–28.
McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494
McLanahan, S., & Adams, J. (1987). Parenthood and psychological well-being. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.001321
Meeussen, L., & Van Laar, C. (2018). Feeling pressure to be a perfect mother relates to parental burnout and career ambitions. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02113
Meier, A., Musick, K., Flood, S., & Dunifon, R. (2016). Mothering experiences: How single parenthood and employment structure the emotional valence of parenting. Demography, 53(3), 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0474-x
Meier, A., Musick, K., Fischer, J., & Flood, S. (2018). Mothers’ and fathers’ well-being in parenting across the arch of child development: Well-being in parenting by child age. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(4), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12491
Meiksins, P., & Whalley, P. (2002). Putting work in its place: A quiet revolution. ILR Press.
Merrick, A. D., Grieve, A., & Cogan, N. (2017). Psychological impacts of challenging behaviour and motivational orientation in staff supporting individuals with autistic spectrum conditions. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 21(7), 872–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316654857
Monte, L. M., & Knop, B. (2019). Men’s fertility & fatherhood: 2014. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2019/demo/p70-162.html. Accessed 28 July 2021.
Musick, K., Meier, A., & Flood, S. (2016). How parents fare: Mothers’ and fathers’ subjective well-being in time with children. American Sociological Review, 81(5), 1069–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416663917
Myrskylä, M., & Margolis, R. (2014). Happiness: Before and after the kids. Demography, 51(5), 1843–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0321-x
Nelson, S. K., Kushlev, K., English, T., Dunn, E. W., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). In defense of parenthood: Children are associated with more joy than misery. Psychological Science, 24(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612447798
Nelson, S. K., Kushlev, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The pains and pleasures of parenting: When, why, and how is parenthood associated with more or less well-being? Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 846–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035444
Nomaguchi, K., & Milkie, M. A. (2020). Parenthood and well-being: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12646
Pearce, K., Huta, V., & Voloaca, M. (2020). How eudaimonic and hedonic orientations map onto seeing beyond the ‘me, now, and tangible. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1791943
Rizzo, K. M., Schiffrin, H. H., & Liss, M. (2013). Insight into the parenthood paradox: Mental health outcomes of intensive mothering. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(5), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9615-z
Rothrauff, T., & Cooney, T. M. (2008). The role of generativity in psychological well-being: Does it differ for childless adults and parents? Journal of Adult Development, 15(3–4), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-008-9046-7
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719
Savolainen, J., Lahelma, E., Silventionen, K., & Gauthier, A. H. (2001). Parenthood and psychological well-being in Finland: Does public policy make a difference? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.32.1.61
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482
Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261883
Simon, R. W. (2008). The joys of parenthood, reconsidered. Contexts, 7(2), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2008.7.2.40
Stanca, L. (2012). Suffer the little children: Measuring the effects of parenthood on well-being worldwide. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(3), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.12.019
Umberson, D., & Gove, W. R. (1989). Parenthood and psychological well-being: Theory, measurement, and stage in the family life course. Journal of Family Issues, 10(4), 440–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251389010004002
Umberson, D., Pudrovska, T., & Reczek, C. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00721.x
Vittersø, J. (2004). Subjective well-being versus self-actualization: Using the flow-simplex to promote a conceptual clarification of subjective quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003910.26194.ef
Vittersø, J., Dyrdal, G. M. & Røysamb, E. (2005). Utilities and capabilities: A psychological account of the two concepts and their relation to the idea of a good life [Conference paper]. 2nd Workshop on Capabilities and Happiness, University of Milano, Bicocca, Italy.
Vittersø, J. (2013). Feelings, meanings, and optimal functioning: Some distinctions between hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. In The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 39–55). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14092-003
Waterman, A. S. (1990). Personal expressiveness: Philosophical and psychological foundations. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11(1), 47–73.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303002
White, M. P., & Dolan, P. (2009). Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1000–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02392.x
Zeng, Z., & Chen, H. (2020). Distinct associations of hedonic and eudaimonic motives with well-being: Mediating role of self-control. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), E5547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155547
Zuzanek, J., & Mannell, R. (1993). Gender variations in the weekly rhythms of daily behaviour and experiences. Journal of Occupational Science, 1(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.1993.9686376
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Courtney Gosselin: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – Manuscript preparation, Visualization Veronika Huta: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – Review and editing, Supervision Arthur Braaten: Data Curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – Review and editing
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Ethics approval for this study was granted by the University of Ottawa Health Sciences and Science Research Ethics Board (file number: H08-16-19).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gosselin, C.A., Huta, V. & Braaten, A. Eudaimonic Orientation Enhances the Well-Being Experienced by Fathers. Applied Research Quality Life 17, 2117–2138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-10020-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-10020-0