Skip to main content
Log in

Adolescent Judgments and Reasoning About the Failure to Include Peers with Social Disabilities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder often do not have access to crucial peer social activities. This study examines how typically developing adolescents evaluate decisions not to include a peer based on disability status, and the justifications they apply to these decisions. A clinical interview methodology was used to elicit judgments and justifications across four contexts. We found adolescents are more likely to judge the failure to include as acceptable in personal as compared to public contexts. Using logistic regression, we found that adolescents are more likely to provide moral justifications as to why failure to include is acceptable in a classroom as compared to home, lab group, and soccer practice contexts. Implications for intervention are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Institutes for Research (2007). 27th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Web site: www.ed.gov/offices/osers/osep.

  • Bauminger, N., & Kasari, C. (2000). Loneliness and friendships in high-functioning children with autism. Child Development, 71, 447–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., & Rutland, A. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 6, 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M., & Berger, B. D. (2011). Middle school students’ knowledge of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 732–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. M., Ferguson, J. E., Herzinger, C. V., Jackson, J. N., & Marino, C. A. (2004). Combined descriptive and explanatory information improves peers’ perceptions of autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 321–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, B., Kasari, C., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2007). Involvement or isolation? The social networks of children with autism in regular classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 230–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. S., Killen, M., & Ruck, M. (2008). It is who you know that counts: Intergroup contact and judgments about race-based exclusion. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 51–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P., Turiel, E., & Black, A. (1983). The effect of stimulus familiarity on the use of criteria and justifications in children’s social reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiSalvo, C. A., & Oswald, D. P. (2002). Peer-mediated interventions to increase the social interaction of children with autism consideration of peer expectancies. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17, 198–207.

  • Ghaziuddin, M., Ghaziuddin, N., & Greden, J. (2002). Depression in persons with autism: Implication for research and clinical care. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 299–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helwig, C. C., Hildebrandt, C., & Turiel, E. (1995). Children’s judgments about psychological harm in social context. Child Development, 66, 1680–1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, J., Carter, E., Bottema-Beutel, K., Harvey, M., & Gustafson, J. (in press). Efficacy of peer networds to increase social connections among high school students with and without autism. Exceptional Children.

  • Horn, S. S. (2006). Group status, group bias, and adolescents’ reasoning about the treatment of others in school contexts. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N., & Symes, W. (2011). Peer interaction patterns among adolescents with autistic spectrum disorders (ASDs) in mainstream school settings. Autism. doi:10.1177/1362361310387804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. P., & Frederickson, N. (2010). Multi-informant predictors of social inclusion for students with autism spectrum disorders attending mainstream schools. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1094–1103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasari, C., Locke, J., Gulsrud, A., & Rotheram-Fuller, E. (2011). Social networks and friendships at school: Comparing children with and without ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 533–544.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M. (2006). Children’s social and moral reasoning about exclusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., Crystal, D., & Watanabe, H. (2002a). The individual and the group: Japanese and American children’s evaluations of peer exclusion, tolerance of difference, and prescriptions for conformity. Child Development, 73, 1788–1802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., Kelly, M. C., Richardson, C., & Ruck, M. (2010). European American children’s and adolescents’ evaluations of interracial exclusion. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 283–300.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., Lee-Kim, J., McGlothlin, H., & Stangor, C. (2002b). How children and adolescents evaluate gender and racial exclusion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67, 1–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., Margie, N. G., & Sinno, S. (2006). Morality in the context of intergroup relationships. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 155–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., McGlothlin, H., & Lee-Kim, J. (2002c). Between individuals and culture: Individuals’ evaluations of exclusion from social groups. In H. Keller, Y. Poortinga, & A. Schoelmerich (Eds.), Between biology and culture: Perspectives on ontogenetic development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., & Hitti, A. (2013). Social exclusion in childhood: A developmental intergroup perspective. Child Development, 84, 772–790.

  • Killen, M., Pisacane, K., Lee-Kim, J., & Ardila-Rey, A. (2001). Fairness or stereotypes? Young children’s priorities when evaluating group exclusion and inclusion. Developmental Psychology, 37, 487–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (2009). Future directions: Social development in the context of social justice. Social Development, 19, 642–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Kim, S., Koegel, L., & Shwartzman, B. (2013). Improving socialization for high school students by using their preferred interests. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2121–2134.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Werner, G. A., Vismara, L. A., & Koegel, L. K. (2005). The effectiveness of contextually supported play date interactions between children with autism and typically developing peers. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, D. K. (2006). Moral stage theory. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 37–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavropoulou, S., & Sideridis, G. D. (2014). Knowledge of autism and attitudes of children towards their partially integrated peers with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, S. R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 351–372.

  • McCrum-Gardner, E. (2008). Which is the correct statistical test to use? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46, 38–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T., Solomon, O., & Sirota, K. G. (2001). Inclusion as social practice: Views of children with autism. Social Development, 10, 399–419.

  • Orsmond, G. I., Krauss, M. W., & Seltzer, M. N. (2004). Peer relationships and social and recreational activities among adolescents and adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 245–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, V., & Mesibov, G. B. (2005). Adolescents and adults with autism. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., pp. 338–353). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solish, A., Perry, A., & Minnes, P. (2010). Participation of children with and without disabilities in social, recreational and leisure activities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 226–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaim, K. F., & Morgan, S. B. (2001). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer with autistic behaviors: Does a brief educational intervention have an effect? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 195–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symes, W., & Humphrey, N. (2010). Peer-group indicators of social inclusion among pupils with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in mainstream secondary schools: A comparative study. School Psychology International, 31, 478–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Turiel, E. (2006). Thought, emotions, and social interactional processes in moral development. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 7–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (2008a). Social decisions, social interactions, and the coordination of diverse judgments. In U. Miller, J. I. M. Carpendale, N. Budwig, & B. Sokol (Eds.), Social life and social knowledge: Toward a process account of human development (pp. 255–276). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (2008b). Thought about actions in social domains: Morality, social conventions, and social interactions. Cognitive Development, 23, 136–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E., Killen, M., & Helwig, C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, functions, and vagaries. In J. Kagan & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 155–243). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Roekel, E., Scholte, R. H. J., & Didden, R. (2010). Bullying among adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence and perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 63–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., Cadwallader, T. W., Garza, N., & Cameto, R. (2004). Social activities of youth with disabilities. NLTS2 Data Brief, 3, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author received partial support in writing this manuscript from IES Grant No. R324B080005 and OSEP Grant No. H325D060036. We would like to thank the adolescents that participated in this research, Rose Cartwright and Christina Jones for their diligent work on this project, Jennifer Gilbert for statistical consultation, and Elliot Turiel for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristen Bottema-Beutel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bottema-Beutel, K., Li, Z. Adolescent Judgments and Reasoning About the Failure to Include Peers with Social Disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord 45, 1873–1886 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2348-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2348-7

Keywords

Navigation