Abstract
In all vertebrates, reproductive strategies are achieved by modulation of the neuroendocrine system in a similar manner and with minor variations among the different classes. Most of the available information on amphibian testicular cycles derive from anurans, and among these, water frogs have been extensively studied in terms of reproductive mechanisms and sex steroid correlation. Adiponectin (AdipoQ) and its receptors—AdipoR1 and AdipoR2—are essential for most of the normal testicular and sperm functions. In this study, the identification of AdipoQ and its two receptors was carried out by immunohistochemistry in the testis of adult males of Pelophylax bergeri. The AdipoQ system was observed in the frog spermatogenic cysts, in both germinal and Sertoli cells, as well as in the rete testis. AdipoQ and AdipoR1 were localized in germ-line cells, from spermatogonia to round spermatids, while AdipoR2 was detected in the elongated spermatids, spermatozoa, and Sertoli cells. AdipoR1 was also observed in the intratesticular canals of the rete testis. This preliminary study shows the AdipoQ system’s presence in the anurans’ testis. The results obtained could be a starting point for future functional studies aimed at defining the physiological role of the AdipoQ system in frog testicular functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Adiponectin (AdipoQ) is a protein composed of 247 amino acids (Nguyen 2020), that was discovered in 1995 as an adipocyte-specific factor. In fact, like most adipokines, it is produced by white adipose tissue, as precisely demonstrated by the 3T3‑L1 cell line (Fang and Judd 2018). AdipoQ is also called apM1 (adipose most abundant gene transcript I), Acrp30 (adipocyte complement-related protein), GBP28 (gelatin-binding protein 28), or AdipoQ (Caminos et al. 2008). AdipoQ is initially produced in monomeric form, and once circulating, undergoes a multimerization process, that is essential for the biological actions of the molecule. The monomeric form is modified into multiple isoforms: low-molecular weight (LMW) (trimer), middle-molecular weight (MMW) (hexamer), and high-molecular weight (HMW) (multimer); the latter is the most biologically active form (Caminos et al. 2008; Choi et al. 2020). To perform its functions, AdipoQ needs the bind with its two receptors, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2, first characterized by Yamauchi et al. (2003). The specific functions of AdipoQ depend on which receptor is expressed. AdipoR1 is more present in skeletal muscle with an affinity for the molecule’s globular and trimeric forms, which causes an enhancement of fat β-oxidation and glucose uptake. AdipoR2 is expressed in the liver with an affinity for the hexameric and multimeric forms, leading to increased fat β-oxidation and decreased gluconeogenesis (Lago et al. 2007). Later, the receptors’ expression has been also identified in the myocardium, macrophages, brain tissue, endothelial cells, lymphocytes, adipose tissue, and pancreatic β cells (Nguyen 2020). The AdipoQ presence has also been detected in several tissues including skeletal muscle, cardiomyocytes, osteoblasts, adrenal gland, placenta, and liver, and hence, the molecule could be considered a rather pleiotropic regulator of a large set of biological functions (Caminos et al. 2008). The AdipoQ system, given by the AdipoQ and its receptors, has been also detected in the testis of amniote models, showing its role in normal testicular and sperm functions, including the involvement in the regulation of spermatogenesis, gonadal steroid hormones, and sperm motility, as well as in the modulation of testicular oxidative stress (Caminos et al. 2008; Dutta et al. 2019). Furthermore, it has been proved that the AdipoQ system’s deficiency can cause an impairment of testicular functions (Choubey et al. 2019).
Beyond laboratory animals, AdipoQ and its receptors have been described in several organs, including the testis, in a wide range of species, comprising mammals, birds, and teleost fish (Civitarese et al. 2004; Ocón-Grove et al. 2008; Kondo et al. 2011; Martínez-Barbitta et al. 2023). However, to the author’s knowledge, no studies histologically describe the AdipoQ system in any organ or tissue in amphibians. These vertebrate anamniotes are characterized by a peculiar cystic spermatogenesis (Pudney 1995); hence, the study of the AdipoQ system in their testis could give new insights about the role of this molecule on testicular functions.
Accordingly, in this study, the presence and the localization of the AdipoQ system were evaluated for the first time on the testis of water frogs of peninsular Italy belonging to the B–H system (Berger 1988; Ludovisi et al. 2014).
Materials and methods
Study species
In peninsular Italy, water frogs constitute mixed populations consisting of the parental species P. bergeri and the hybrid P. kl. hispanicus (B–H system) (Berger 1988; Ludovisi et al. 2014). The latter is a kleptospecies derived from P. bergeri and P. ridibundus or P. kl. esculentus (Andreone et al. 2009). Certain authors classify P. bergeri and P. kl. hispanicus as a subspecies of P. lessonae (Camerano, 1882) and P. kl. esculentus, respectively. Specifically, P. lessonae lessonae is recognized as a distinct subspecies found in northern Italy, while P. lessonae bergeri as a separate subspecies located in peninsular Italy (Crochet and Dubois 2004; Lanza et al. 2006; Canestrelli and Nascetti 2008; Sindaco and Razzetti 2021). For the sake of simplicity, we refer to the parental species as P. bergeri in this context. B–H system frogs breed in small water bodies located in two sub-basins of the Tiber River (Central Italy), one of which is the Lake Trasimeno basin (Ludovisi et al. 2014). These frogs are characterized by an annual testis cycle according to which spermatogenesis resurges gradually in the spring months, continues through the summer and autumn, and shows a brief winter stasis. Slight variations occur according to the different geographical areas where specimens are collected (Rastogi et al. 1976).
Sample collection
Adult males (n = 10) of Pelophylax bergeri were collected in the Lake Trasimeno basin (Central Italy) in September. The taxonomic determination of the captured frogs was carried out by Southern hybridizations of genomic DNA, performed by using the satellite DNA RrS1 as a molecular marker (Mosconi et al. 2005). To carry out the analysis, the animals were sacrificed with 1% buffered tricaine-methane sulfonate (MS-222, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) and testes were removed and processed for histological examination.
Capture and handling of the specimens were conducted according to the permission granted by the Italian Ministry for Environment, Land and Sea Protection (0002093/PNM of 06.02.2015 and 0008363/PNM of 20.04.2018) and Italian Ministry of Health (08/2018-UT of 24/07/2018), respectively.
Morphological staining and immunohistochemistry
After collection, samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution in phosphate-buffered saline (0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4) at 4 °C. Subsequently, the fixed samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol solutions of increasing concentration and cleared in xylene to be included in paraffin wax. Five μm thick sections were cut with a rotatory microtome, mounted on poly-l-lysine-coated glass slides, and air-dried at 37 °C. Some sections of all specimens were stained with the hematoxylin–eosin solution to carry out a morphological evaluation.
The immunohistochemistry procedure on all samples was performed according to the following description (Dall’Aglio et al. 2021): the sections were subject both to dewaxing in xylene and to hydration through a series of ethanol concentrations until distilled water. Sections were microwaved for two 5-min cycles at 750 W in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) to expose the epitopes to the antibodies and immersed in a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 10 min to block the endogenous peroxidase activity. Incubation with 1:200 normal goat serum (S-1000-20, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was performed for 30 min to avoid non-specific bindings. Subsequently, different sections from the same sample were incubated overnight at room temperature (RT) with the following rabbit polyclonal primary antibodies: 1:100 anti-AdipoQ (MBS2028428, MyBioSource, CA, USA), 1:100 anti-AdipoR1 (LS-C151518, LifeSpan BioSciences, WA, USA), and 1:100 anti-AdipoR2 (ARP60819_P050, Aviva Systems Biology Corporation, CA, USA). The dilution used for each primary antibody was the best to obtain the intensity of the signal without background. On the second day, sections were incubated for 30 min with a 1:200 goat anti-rabbit biotin-conjugated (BA-1000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) secondary antibody. The avidin–biotin complex solution (PK-6100, Vectastain ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used to detect the immunological binding sites, which were revealed with DAB chromogen (SK-4100, DAB substrate kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Sections were also counterstained with hematoxylin.
Sections were washed with PBS between each incubation step, except after the addition of normal serum. Each step was performed at RT and slides were incubated in a humid chamber.
Negative control sections were incubated with normal rabbit IgG (I-1000-5, Novus Biological, Littleton, CO, USA) without applying the primary antibodies.
Results
The testis of P. bergeri we collected from the Lake Trasimeno basin in September still showed high spermatogenic activity, according to the frog seasonal testicular cycle (Fig. 1). The seminiferous lobules contained cysts of germinal cells, from spermatogonia to round spermatids, elongated spermatids sustained by Sertoli cells, and abundant spermatozoa detached from Sertoli cells. In some lobules residual released degenerating spermatozoa were observed in the lobule lumen.
In all samples examined, the immunohistochemical investigation highlighted the presence of the AdipoQ system at the level of the frog testis since the positivity was observed for the ligand AdipoQ and its two receptors AdipoR1 and AdipoR2.
AdipoQ immunostaining was detected in germ-line cells, from spermatogonia to round spermatids, while elongated spermatids and detached sperm cells were negative to the ligand (Fig. 2).
The immunostaining for AdipoR1 was detected in germ-line cells from spermatogonia to round spermatids (Fig. 3). In addition, the epithelial cells of the intratesticular canals of the rete testis appeared positive (Fig. 3c). No signal was observed in interstitial tissue (Fig. 3a), in spermatozoa (Fig. 3a), in elongated spermatids (Fig. 3b), and Sertoli cells (Fig. 4).
The immunopositivity for AdipoR2 was detected in the abundant spermatozoa detached from Sertoli cells (Fig. 5a, b), as well as in elongated spermatids and Sertoli cells before the spermiation (Fig. 5c). The remaining germ cell stages, the residual degenerating released spermatozoa, the rete testis and the interstitial tissue were negative.
No staining was observed in the negative controls performed for all molecules analysed in the work (data not shown).
Discussion
In recent years, scientific interest has been focused on adipokines which are currently studied under many aspects of metabolism. Adipokines are ubiquitous molecules that influence local tissue and whole organism physiology, such as AdipoQ (Trayhurn et al. 2006). AdipoQ system has been detected through the study of its gene transcripts and proteins in many vertebrates, including mammals, birds, and teleost fish (Tang et al. 2021). In amphibians, investigations concern only the mRNA expression during metamorphosis (i.e. Zhu et al. 2020). Particularly, in several amniotes, the AdipoQ system has been identified in the testis and its involvement in normal testicular and sperm functions has been demonstrated (Caminos et al. 2008; Ocón-Grove et al. 2008; Rahmanifar and Tabandeh 2012; Martínez-Barbitta et al. 2023). The current study is the first report that assesses the presence and the localization of AdipoQ and its receptors AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 in the testis of the water frog Pelophylax bergeri.
Although spermatogenesis is a conserved process in all vertebrates, there are differences in the mode of development and maturation of germ cells relative to the compartment in which these events take place. In amniotes (mammals, birds, and reptiles) spermatogenesis occurs in seminiferous tubules (acystic spermatogenesis); otherwise, in anamniotes (amphibians and fish) spermatogenesis takes place in cysts formed by Sertoli cells enclosing synchronously developing germ cells (cystic spermatogenesis) (Haczkiewicz et al. 2017; Roco et al. 2021; Svanholm et al. 2023). In addition, unlike the higher vertebrates, the germinal epithelium of the lower vertebrates has a transient nature, having to be replaced during successive breeding seasons, and requires the turnover of Sertoli cells (Pudney 1995; Roco et al. 2021).
Pelophylax bergeri examined in this study belongs, together with Pelophylax kl. hispanicus, to mixed populations of water frogs of peninsular Italy (B–H system) (Berger 1988) and are directly analogous to the central European lessonae–esculentus population system (L–E systems) (Uzzell and Berger 1975; Uzzell and Hotz 1979). Like these, water frogs of the B–H system have a potentially continuous type of spermatogenesis which implies that the process continues even during autumn (Lofts 1964; Rastogi et al. 1976, 1978; Chieffi et al. 1980). In addition, in Pelophylax water frogs, an annual cyclic pattern is also displayed by both interstitial cell and Sertoli cell activity (Lofts 1964; Rastogi 1976).
In the testes of P. bergeri sampled in September all the spermatogenic stages were present in the seminiferous lobules, and a considerable quantity of spermatozoa detached from Sertoli cells was observed; the interstitial tissue among lobules appeared poorly developed (Lofts 1964; Rastogi et al. 1976).
In all the adult males of P. bergeri the immunolocalization of AdipoQ and its receptors in the testis has provided results that are correlated with the characteristic reproductive pattern of the frogs. The immunoreactivity of both AdipoQ and AdipoR1 on the cystic germ cells, from spermatogonia to round spermatids, let us hypothesize a potential involvement in the development of the germ cells inside the cysts. In addition, the presence of AdipoR1 in frog intratesticular canals of the rete testis suggests that the receptor could be involved in sperm transport. AdipoR2 immunostaining was observed in both Sertoli cells with ovoid nucleus and elongated spermatids sustained by them, as well as in spermatozoa detached from Sertoli cells but not fully released in the lobule lumen. Based on such results, it might be assumed that AdipoR2 is involved in frog cystic cell maturation toward the new generation of spermatozoa. The lack of staining of the frog interstitial cells is probably circumstantial, due to the fact that they had not fully resumed their secretory activity yet, despite in Pelophylax water frogs it starts at the time of our animal sampling (Lofts 1964; Rastogi et al. 1978; Izzo et al. 2006). Therefore, it will be necessary to analyze water frog testis with interstitial cells showing a higher secretory activity.
Although preliminary, the results obtained in this study are a starting point for future functional studies, also taking into account other periods of the seasonal spermatogenic cycle, aimed to define the physiological role of AdipoQ system in frog testicular functions, as well as reported in amniotes (Caminos et al. 2008; Ocón-Grove et al. 2008). The annual spermatogenic cycle of Pelophylax water frogs is deeply conditioned by environmental and endogenous endocrine cues, along the hypothalamus–pituitary–gonad axis (Rastogi 1976; Minucci et al. 1992; Di Fiore et al. 2020). The endocrine route is integrated within the testis by internal modulators that regulate the germ cell progression and functions (Pierantoni et al. 2002; Meccariello et al. 2020). Recently, the modulation of the testicular cell-to-cell interactions by the Cx43 protein and kisspeptin system has been demonstrated to be involved in the anuran spermatogenesis (Izzo et al. 2006; Chianese et al. 2017). Similarly, the AdipoQ system could act as a modulator in the anuran reproductive processes acting through a paracrine and/or autocrine mechanism (Martin 2014). In P. bergeri, the presence of AdipoQ and receptor 1 in the cystic germ cells, from spermatogonia to round spermatids, suggests an autocrine mechanism of the molecule towards them while the presence of only receptor 2 in the Sertoli cells, elongated spermatids sustained by them, and detached spermatozoa suggests a paracrine action on these other cells. In addition to the autocrine and paracrine mechanisms, it is necessary to consider the possibility of an endocrine mechanism. AdipoQ in mammals is mainly secreted by white adipose tissue and is present in the circulation at high concentrations among other adipokines (Arita et al. 1999). As far as the amphibians are concerned, an important nutritional reserve for the gonads is the closely associated fat bodies that, in addition, seem to be included in the hypothalamus–hypophysial–gonadal axis, taking part in the reproductive processes (Chieffi et al. 1980). Considering the presence of AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 in the P. bergeri cysts, it cannot be excluded that an endocrine mechanism interacts with the local autocrine/paracrine one in the spermatogenesis and gonadal functions. Accordingly, the molecule may be produced by the fat bodies of the frog and intervene in gonadal development and functions. However, there are currently no studies attesting to the production of adipokines by fat bodies.
Adipokines in amphibians remain unexplored despite numerous studies that have demonstrated their importance and multiple actions in regulating several metabolic mechanisms in other vertebrate classes. Accordingly, due to the absence of information on the AdipoQ system in the testis of anurans, this study may open a new research topic facing with the role of the molecule in their reproductive biology.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Andreone FC, Corti Sindaco R, Romano A (2009) Pelophylax hispanicus. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2013. http://www.iucnredlist.org.
Arita Y, Kihara S, Ouchi N, Takahashi M, Maeda K, Miyagawa J, Hotta K, Shimomura I, Nakamura T, Miyaoka K, Kuriyama H, Nishida M, Yamashita S, Okubo K, Matsubara K, Muraguchi M, Ohmoto Y, Funahashi T, Matsuzawa Y (1999) Paradoxical decrease of an adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in obesity. BBRC 257(1):79–83. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.0255
Berger L (1988) On the origin of genetic systems in European water frog hybrids. Zoologica Poloniae 35:5–32
Caminos JE, Nogueiras R, Gaytán F, Pineda R, González CR, Barreiro ML, Castaño JP, Malagón MM, Pinilla L, Toppari J, Diéguez C, Tena-Sempere M (2008) Novel expression and direct effects of adiponectin in the rat testis. Endocrinology 149(7):3390–3402. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2007-1582
Canestrelli D, Nascetti G (2008) Phylogeography of the pool frog Rana (Pelophylax) lessonae in the Italian Peninsula and Sicily: multiple refugia, glacial expansions and nuclear-mitochondrial discordance. J Biogeogr 35:1923–1936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01946.x
Chianese R, Ciaramella V, Fasano S, Pierantoni R, Meccariello R (2017) Kisspeptin regulates steroidogenesis and spermiation in the anuran amphibian Pelophylax esculentus testis. Reproduction 154:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0030
Chieffi G, Rastogi RK, Milone M, Iela L (1980) Amphibian reproduction: reproductive physiology in the male Rana esculenta L. Ital J Zool 47:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/1125000800944032
Choi HM, Doss HM, Kim KS (2020) Multifaceted physiological roles of adiponectin in inflammation and diseases. Int J Mol Sci 21:1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041219
Choubey M, Ranjan A, Bora PS, Baltazar F, Martin LJ, Krishna A (2019) Role of adiponectin as a modulator of testicular function during aging in mice. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1865(2):413–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.11.019
Civitarese AE, Jenkinson CP, Richardson D, Bajaj M, Cusi K, Kashyap S, Berria R, Belfort R, DeFronzo RA, Mandarino LJ, Ravussin E (2004) Adiponectin receptors gene expression and insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic Mexican Americans with or without a family history of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 47:816–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-004-1359-x
Crochet PA, Dubois A (2004) Recent changes in the taxonomy of European amphibians and reptiles. In: Gasc JPA, Cabela J, Crnobrnja-Isailovic D, Dolmen K, Grossenbacher P, Haffner J, Lescure H, Martens JP, Martínez-Rica H, Maurin ME, Oliveira TS, Sofianodou M, Veith A, Zuiderwijk (eds) Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, pp 495–516
Dall’Aglio C, Maranesi M, Di Loria A, Piantedosi D, Ciaramella P, Alterisio MC, Lepri E, Mercati F (2021) Effects of obesity on adiponectin system skin expression in dogs: a comparative study. Animals (basel) 11(8):2308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082308
Di Fiore MM, Santillo A, Falvo S, Pinelli C (2020) Celebrating 50+ years of research on the reproductive biology and endocrinology of the green frog: an overview. Gen Comp Endocrinol 298:113578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113578
Dutta S, Sengupta P, Biswas A (2019) Adiponectin in male reproduction and infertility. Asian Pac J Reprod 8(5):244–250. https://doi.org/10.4103/2305-0500.268153
Fang H, Judd RL (2018) Adiponectin regulation and function. Compr Physiol 8(3):1031–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c170046
Haczkiewicz K, Rozenblut-Kościsty B, Ogielska M (2017) Prespermatogenesis and early spermatogenesis in frogs. Zoology 122:63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2017.01.003
Izzo G, d’Istria M, Ferrara D, Serino I, Aniello F, Minucci S (2006) Connexin 43 expression in the testis of the frog Rana esculenta. Zygote 14(4):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096719940600390X
Kondo H, Suga R, Suda S, Nozaki R, Hirono I, Nagasaka R, Kaneko G, Ushio H, Watabe S (2011) EST analysis on adipose tissue of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and tissue distribution of adiponectin. Gene 485(1):40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2011.05.035
Lago F, Dieguez C, Gómez-Reino J, Gualillo O (2007) Adipokines as emerging mediators of immune response and inflammation. Nat Rev Rheumatol 3(12):716–724. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0674
Lanza B, Lotti S, Catalani T (2006) Amphibia Anura donated by Benedetto Lanza to the Museo di Storia Naturale, University of Florence. Catalogue with morphological, taxonomic, biogeographical and biological data, plus an updating of the paper on Caudata. Atti Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale Di Trieste 52:87–202
Lofts B (1964) Seasonal changes in the functional activity of the interstitial and spermatogenetic tissues of the green frog, Rana esculenta. Gen Comp Endocrinol 4:550–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(64)90064-4
Ludovisi A, Rossi R, Paracucchi R, Selvaggi R, Fagotti A, Simoncelli F, Pascolini R, Di Rosa I (2014) The delayed effects of meteorological changes on the water frogs in Central Italy. Hydrobiologia 730:139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1828-2
Martin LJ (2014) Implications of adiponectin in linking metabolism to testicular function. Endocrine 46:16–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-013-0102-0
Martínez-Barbitta M, Maranesi M, Mercati F, Marini D, Anipchenko P, Grispoldi L, Cenci-Goga BT, Zerani M, Dall’Aglio C (2023) Presence, tissue localization, and gene expression of the adiponectin receptor 1 in testis and accessory glands of male rams during the non-breeding season. Animals 13(4):601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040601
Meccariello R, Fasano S, Pierantoni R (2020) Kisspeptins, new local modulators of male reproduction: a comparative overview. Gen Comp Endocrinol 299:113618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113618
Minucci S, Di Matteo L, Fasano S, Chieffi Baccari G, Pierantoni R (1992) Intratesticular control of spermatogenesis in the frog, Rana esculenta. J Exp Zool 264:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402640117
Mosconi G, Di Rosa I, Bucci S, Morosi L, Franzoni MF, Polzonetti-Magni AM, Pascolini R (2005) Plasma sex steroid and thyroid hormones profile in male water frogs of the Rana esculenta complex from agricultural and pristine areas. Gen Comp Endocrinol 142(3):318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2005.02.005
Nguyen TM (2020) Adiponectin: role in physiology and pathophysiology. Int J Prev Med 11:136. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_193_20
Ocón-Grove OM, Krzysik-Walker SM, Maddineni SR, Hendricks GL, Ramachandran R (2008) Adiponectin and its receptors are expressed in the chicken testis: influence of sexual maturation on testicular ADIPOR1 and ADIPOR2 mRNA abundance. Reproduction 136(5):627–638. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0446
Pierantoni R, Cobellis G, Meccariello R, Palmiero C, Fienga G, Minucci S, Fasano S (2002) The amphibian testis as model to study germ cell progression during spermatogenesis. Comp Biochem Physiol B 132:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00543-7
Pudney J (1995) Spermatogenesis in non mammalian vertebrates. MRT 32(6):459–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1070320602
Rahmanifar F, Tabandeh MR (2012) Adiponectin and its receptors gene expression in the reproductive tract of ram. Small Rumin Res 105(1–3):263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.11.019
Rastogi RK (1976) Seasonal cycle in anuran (Amphibia) testis: the endocrine and environmental controls. Boll Soc Zool Ital 43(1–2):151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250007609434893
Rastogi RK, Iela L, Saxena PK, Chieffi G (1976) The control of spermatogenesis in the green frog. Rana Esculenta J Exp Zool 196(2):151–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401960203
Rastogi RK, Iela L, Delrio G, Di Meglio M, Russo A, Chieffi G (1978) Environmental influence on testicular activity in the green frog, Rana esculenta. J Exp Zool 206:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402060106
Roco ÁS, Ruiz-García A, Bullejos M (2021) Testis development and differentiation in amphibians. Genes 12(4):578. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040578
Sindaco R, Razzetti E (2021) An updated check-list of Italian amphibians and reptiles. Nat Hist Sci 8(2):35–46. https://doi.org/10.4081/nhs.2021.519
Svanholm S, Roza M, Marini D, Brouard V, Karlsson O, Berg C (2023) Pubertal sexual development and endpoints for disrupted spermatogenesis in the model Xenopus tropicalis. Reprod Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108435
Tang N, Zhang X, Chen D, Li Z (2021) The controversial role of adiponectin in appetite regulation of animals. Nutrients 13(10):3387. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103387
Trayhurn P, Bing C, Wood IS (2006) Adipose tissue and adipokines-energy regulation from the human perspective. J Nutr 136(7 Suppl):1935S-1939S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.7.1935S
Uzzell T, Berger L (1975) Electrophoretic phenotypes of Rana ridibunda, Rana lessonae, and their hybridogenetic associate, Rana esculenta. Proc Acad Nat Sci 127:13–24
Uzzell T, Hotz H (1979) Electrophoretic and morphological evidence for two forms of green frogs (Rana esculenta complex) in peninsular Italy (Amphibia, Salientia). Mitteilungen Aus Dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 55:13–27
Yamauchi T, Kamon J, Ito Y, Tsuchida A, Yokomizo T, Kita S, Sugiyama T et al (2003) Cloning of adiponectin receptors that mediate antidiabetic metabolic effects. Nature 423:762–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01705
Zhu W, Chang L, Zhao T, Wang B, Jiang J (2020) Remarkable metabolic reorganization and altered metabolic requirements in frog metamorphic climax. Front Zool 17:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-020-00378-6
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Perugia within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Francesca Simoncelli: conceptualization, investigation, resources, visualization, writing—original draft; and Writing—review and editing. Francesca Mercati: conceptualization, investigation, resources, validation, visualization, writing—original draft; and writing—review and editing. Ines Di Rosa: validation, visualization, writing—original draft; and writing—review and editing. Elisa Palmioli: investigation, validation, visualization, writing—original draft; and writing—review and editing. Cecilia Dall’Aglio: resources, writing—review and editing. Daniele Marini: investigation, writing—review and editing. Anna Fagotti: conceptualization, resources, supervision, visualization, writing—original draft; and writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Simoncelli, F., Mercati, F., Di Rosa, I. et al. The immunolocalization of adiponectin and its receptors in the testis of the frog Pelophylax bergeri. Zoomorphology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-024-00654-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-024-00654-7