Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: generate I-D bibxml files via celery #7426

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

jennifer-richards
Copy link
Member

@jennifer-richards jennifer-richards commented May 16, 2024

As far as I can tell we don't actually test the bibxml_for_draft() method. I've added tests of the plumbing in the new task and its utility methods but testing the bibxml generation is beyond the scope of this PR...

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.93%. Comparing base (187c2c5) to head (74cb070).
Report is 125 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7426      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.98%   88.93%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         291      293       +2     
  Lines       40717    41122     +405     
==========================================
+ Hits        36233    36570     +337     
- Misses       4484     4552      +68     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rjsparks
Copy link
Member

What testing there is is through the view that uses the function. The test of that view is here:

def test_document_bibxml(self):

@rjsparks rjsparks merged commit ffb9eb1 into ietf-tools:main May 16, 2024
9 checks passed
@jennifer-richards jennifer-richards deleted the celery-bibxml branch May 17, 2024 13:39
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
2 participants