[SPARK-48833][SQL][VARIANT] Support variant in InMemoryTableScan
#47252
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cloud-fan
reviewed
Jul 23, 2024
| override def append(v: VariantVal, buffer: ByteBuffer): Unit = { | ||
| val varLenSize: Int = 4 + v.getValue().length + v.getMetadata().length | ||
| ByteBufferHelper.putInt(buffer, varLenSize) | ||
| ByteBufferHelper.putInt(buffer, v.getValue().length) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why not simply one int for value size and one int for metadata size?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was done initially to mimic the VariantVal unsafe row representation here. I can switch it to write one int for value and one int for metadata if you'd prefer
cloud-fan
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2024
|
the protobuf failure is unrelated, thanks, merging to master! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
adds support for variant type in
InMemoryTableScan, ordf.cache()by supporting writing variant values to an inmemory buffer.Why are the changes needed?
prior to this PR, calling
df.cache()on a df that has a variant would fail becauseInMemoryTableScandoes not support reading variant types.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no
How was this patch tested?
added UTs
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
no