When I see a facial reaction like this on a YT thumbnail, I don't click through
Infinite. When I was 16 I had a flat tire on my bike and being out in the country, I thumbed it & got picked up by Dick Burke, president of Intrepid Corp, which owned Trek bicycle co. I told him how impressed I was about how Trek became the biggest blah blah blah. Instead of accepting my flattery he explained how a company can get "too big", at which point the business starts to look like a big money funnel, and attracts the most unethical kind of shortsighted businesspeople who think the entire point of a company is anything for a buck, consuming everything in sight if it makes the owners one extra cent. They'll screw up your product lines and long term plans, cut costs on materials until your product QA goes to hell, replace all the human beings with machines, jack up the prices, and use all the $ to overpay the top brass, attracting the "owner class" to gamble their kids college money on your ability to do it again indefinitely. Dicks idea was that a business equally serves the customers as it does the employees. The point of a good business is to provide the most possible good for the most possible people, so the happier your customers are, the more people you can hire and pay well, and the better that company is doing. I can't imagine anyone having the guts to say the words "shareholder profits" to him while he was alive.it already costs them like 20 bucks to make an iphone. how much more profit do they really need?
Once everyone is out of work, they won't be needing these massively complex production facilities. The customer base will be shrinking down by a lot. Everyone racing to automate and eliminate jobs seems to be forgetting they need customers with money to consume whatever they are producing.
The official asinine click-bait face of YouTube.When I see a facial reaction like this on a YT thumbnail, I don't click through
View attachment 2391774
No smartphones are Made in AmericaThey’ll never move iPhone production to America.
There, I said it.
I think the problem is the supply chain is over there. They would have to ship all of the components to the US for assembly.If they manage to make the iPhone process mostly automatic, couldn't they just bring a factory to the US since it won't need the specialized workforce in volume that only developing countries can provide? I feel like there has to be some way for Apple to benefit from the CHIPS act other than the TSMC plant in I think Arizona?
Yep and they are already super proud of 'made in cailfornia'. It'll all be automated in the USA within 10 years.If Apple can almost totally automate iPhone production they can put it anywhere. Perhaps make the top spec iPhone in North America.
No smartphones are Made in America
No TVs are Made in America
No cameras are Made in America
No electronics arte Made in America
As much as they can possibly squeeze.it already costs them like 20 bucks to make an iphone. how much more profit do they really need?
But they absolutely depend on exploitative hiring practices to make those goods. None of the future sweatshops of the electronics world (India, Vietnam, Bangladesh, etc) are anywhere near ready from an infrastructure standpoint to take over the sheer quantity of the assembly China does for the rest of the world.So many complaints about what apple pays people to assemble. Soon, they will all be out of jobs and once again Apple will be blamed. They will complain about everyone and everything EXCEPT the government of these countries. Apple does not owe jobs to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Steve Jobs said in an interview before he died that iPhone production would never move to the US but the cost of assembly labor was not the main issue. Apple, at the time of the interview, needed about 50,000 associate-level industrial engineers to solve manufacturing issues. China is very good at churning out armies of associate degree level engineers in a way that the US just doesn’t. That was what Jobs cited as the biggest barrier to US manufacturing.This is probably Apple insulating itself against the possibility of having to exit China in a tariff war. Robotic assembly is one way to bring iPhone assembly to the United States. With American cost of living and wage expectations and unions, we’d be paying double or more for an iPhone. Cut the required number of workers by half and it suddenly starts to make sense.
Intel is the biggest beneficiary by dollar amount because they're building more foundries.from article: reduce the number of workers on iPhone assembly lines by as much as 50% over the following few years.
that's not even close to "mostly automatic".
CHIPS act money has been distributed, it was mainly for wafer fabrication/foundry with the biggest beneficiary: Intel.
Nah. We can just print more money. Everything is fine.Once everyone is out of work, they won't be needing these massively complex production facilities. The customer base will be shrinking down by a lot. Everyone racing to automate and eliminate jobs seems to be forgetting they need customers with money to consume whatever they are producing.
Skip to 12min in.
It’ll be incredibly expensive to automate everything since each new model would require a different setup. Also, most component suppliers are in Asia. A factory in North America would have to deal with additional logistical challenges because of that.If they manage to make the iPhone process mostly automatic, couldn't they just bring a factory to the US since it won't need the specialized workforce in volume that only developing countries can provide? I feel like there has to be some way for Apple to benefit from the CHIPS act other than the TSMC plant in I think Arizona?
They’re probably looking more for a production engineer than an assembly line worker.maybe that's what the alleged robot (Gurman, do you hear me?) is for?
I don't see how this automation allows to move to the countries mentioned (India, Vietnam, Thailand) other than # of skilled workers available?
Been saying this for years, and it's only getting worse. A lot of these companies don't care though, because the thinking is "Well, our workers are not our primary demographic." And when every company thinks that way, there is nobody left with money to buy anything.Once everyone is out of work, they won't be needing these massively complex production facilities. The customer base will be shrinking down by a lot. Everyone racing to automate and eliminate jobs seems to be forgetting they need customers with money to consume whatever they are producing.
Even scarier is that the AI doesn’t even have to *work* right for it to be slotted into businesses and local governmental functions.Been saying this for years, and it's only getting worse. A lot of these companies don't care though, because the thinking is "Well, our workers are not our primary demographic." And when every company thinks that way, there is nobody left with money to buy anything.
That is why I've been throwing every bit of money I can at investing, in hope of accumulating enough wealth that I can pay off my house before the AI takes my job. With my house paid off, at least I will have a roof over my head, though I'm not sure it will matter much if I can't afford food. However, my wife's job is very interpersonal involving helping people achieve healthy relationships, so I'm hopeful that won't be replaced as quickly. But I'm not sure who is going to be able to pay her? But assuming she can keep being paid, she would make enough for our family of four if our house was paid off and I lost my job. My fallback plan is to continue getting more skilled at making furniture in my workshop, in the hopes that I can sell it to higher end clientele who perhaps haven't lost their jobs yet because they are managers or have a lot of money in reserves.
But all of that even relies on a lot of things still working properly with the economy, and I just can't shake the feeling that it's not going to work out. A lot of people keep comparing AI to things like the Industrial Revolution and how people were worried about losing their jobs, and various factory line upgrades over the decades and advances in internet usage and e-commerce supplanting more workers. But I don't think most people seem to get it: AI is coming for all of our jobs in a very short time frame. Once you have AI working to help you make better AI, things will escalate very quickly. We've already started to see that in the past couple years. In past revolutions people had many years to adapt and find something similar that they can adapt their skills to and learn. That's just not really going to be possible with this.