Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 5

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Garage Band (TV series) → Grojband  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Garage band (TV series) → Grojband  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• GarageBand (TV series) → Grojband  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Garageband (TV series) → Grojband  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This TV series is not called "Garage Band". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - it's not called "Garage Band" but it's meant to be pronounced like "garage band", and it is the only TV show listed on Garage band (disambiguation). It's a plausible misspelling if someone has only heard the name of the show said vocally. BugGhost🪲👻 10:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as is as it's a valid connection and a possible spelling, as stated above by BugGhost

Thomson.janet101 (talk) 10:57, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: as per BugGhost rationale. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 05:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Yellow goods (construction and agriculture). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 13:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yellow plant → Heavy equipment  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

...because they're referred to as "plants" and are sometimes yellow? i don't get it. i'm not entirely sure if disambiguating or retargeting to a pre-existing disambiguation about something about things that are yellow and known as plants would be a better option than keeping or deleting, but will lean towards dabifying cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Common term in UK and Ireland. Could be retargeted to Yellow goods (construction and agriculture). Stifle (talk) 07:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Yellow goods (construction and agriculture) per Stifle. Tevildo (talk) 12:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above. If we had a list of plants (or flowers) that are yellow we could link the two by hatnotes but we don't. Yellow Flower and Yellow Flowers are not about flowers or plants and we appear to have no lists of any yellow things. Thryduulf (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Rodentolepis → Cestoda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target is a much-too-high-level taxon. I suggest deleting in order to avoid giving the impresion that we already have an article about this genus. Lophotrochozoa (talk) 21:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete so Rodentoleptis, the existing, but misspelled, article for the genus can be moved to the correct name.—Ketil Trout (^<><!) 03:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Ketil Trout. Plantdrew (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 14:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Furiosa Road → Mad Max: Fury Road  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how plausible this search term is but if kept, would Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga be a more appropriate target? मल्ल (talk) 22:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as is I take you you didn't watch "Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga", since that isn't a road movie. "Mad Max: Fury Road" is a road movie. "Furiosa Road" was a common nickname for the film when it was released. [1][2][3][4][5] -- so is a good search term. -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Andrew Tate#In Romania: 2022–present. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 13:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Tristan Tate → Andrew Tate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as misleading. This redirect was created a minute after the second deletion discussion closed, first pointing to the whole article and then to a subsection concerning the Romanian case(s), on what seems to me to be the very good reason that they are different people. During the GA drive this change was reverted. As it stands, the references to Tristan are sprinkled throughout the article, so it's hard to pick a single place to point the redirect at; but they are different people, and the current outcome suggests that to the unwary they aren't. Given the AfD outcome, I would suggest that deletion of the redirect and reliance on how search engines actually work is the best resolution of this so that those looking will get a succinct and accurate answer; failing that, the AfD could be reconsidered, or Andrew Tate's article could be so structured as to give a redirect some place to point to. The current arrangement, though, treats him like Zaphod Beeblebrox's second head. Mangoe (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment New RfD's go below the header, not above it. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Re-target to Andrew Tate#In Romania: 2022–present per WP:BLP1E, where is he referenced under "Tate brothers" (that can be amended to "Tate and his brother Tristan" for first usage). 1E was the strong argument for deletion of the article second time around, despite not being mentioned in the closing summary, so redirecting to any other part of the article doesn't make sense based on his notability. Additionally, a redirect that is used 20 times a day does appear useful, but being pointed at Andrew Tate directly can be confusing for readers, even if he is mentioned from the lead onwards. I'm not sure why TheMainLogan changed the redirect back in March. I'm otherwise convinced that this redirect existed long before March and that the page history is missing after the 2nd AfD, but could be wrong. Maybe an admin could clarify. CNC (talk) 01:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I won't even lie, I pointed the redirect at Andrew directly because they're basically the same guy. —theMainLogan (t•c) 15:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @TheMainLogan yeah but in my opinion, they are not. Tristan Tate is almost equally as well known as his brother, and is a different human being with his own life and internet personality. Sure, they live together, own the same cars, but they are still entirely different. Mr Vili talk 00:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "Tristan Tate is almost equally as well known as his brother, and is a different human being with his own life and internet personality. Sure, they live together, own the same cars, but they are still entirely different." Then why shouldn't he have his own article? —theMainLogan (t•c) 03:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Restore Tristan Tate Draft I believe the redirect should be deleted, and Tristan Tate is notable enough to have his own page, I suggest the original page be undeleted, and converted into a Draft where further editing can be done to the original page in order to move it into mainspace Mr Vili talk 08:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  While this isn't the place to debate notability (the talk page would be better) the source assessment in the 2nd AfD demonstrated only one article with WP:SIGCOV, hence notability was not proven beyond BLP1E. Since this AfD he is now accused in a second investigation in the UK, but per the closing summary of that AfD, WP:PERP is still an issue here. Even if another draft is worked on, the mainspace article still requires a decision on either deleting, keeping or redirecting. CNC (talk) 12:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine to the section per CommunityNotesContributor. This is without prejudice to the former article content being worked on in draft, but unless and until an article is accepted (and such an article would need to demonstrate notability unrelated to the single incident) readers are better served by the redirect pointing to the content in his brother's article. Thryduulf (talk) 10:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or Refine? Also, in response to CNC's queries, the page history is missing after the 2nd AfD because the article was deleted at the AfD, and the page created fresh as a redirect. Prior to deletion, the article was turned to a redirect to Andrew Tate for a short time per WP:TNT, and reverted within 3 hours.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refine to section per above. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Gallophone → Geographical distribution of French speakers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. In the weird position of having a whole lot of online dictionaries claiming it means "French-speaking", starting with wikt:Gallophone, but I can't find a single such usage. Actual usage is rare but seems to be related to Gaul, not France or the French, e.g. Gallocentrism (thought I can't find a single one of its sources to check if they use the word that way). Rusalkii (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried asking wikt:WT:RFV about the Wiktionary entry? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, but it does look like the original creator @Thryduulf is an RfD regular, tagging them in to see if they have thoughts. (Sorry for dragging out decades-old pages!) Rusalkii (talk) 07:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are five quotations on the Wiktionary entry, all giving examples of use. I don't remember creating that (it was 2010) but the quotes have been there since start. A couple of minutes has found another three uses [6] [7][8] on Google books and it can also be found in our Gallocentrism article . I also came across [9] and [10] which use the word with different meanings (the first possibly related to Galilee, the second is in the context of Welsh so I'd guess from Gaelic).

Additionally, I'm seeing a few sources mentioning a Gallophone Records from the 1930s, with one that is probably not a reliable source, stating that it later became Gallo Records, but even if true this would be a partial title match. Thryduulf (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rereading the initial post here, it's not unique in having a meaning related to France while being etymologically related to Gaul - wikt:Gallic being the most obvious. Thryduulf (talk) 09:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The attestations provided by wiktionary, plus the additional mentioned above, are enough to a) determine that this is a plausible thing to search, and b) determine that the current target is appropriate. Fieari (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disidrose → Dyshidrosis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Arbitrary non-English redirect (Portugues), subject unrelated to Portuguese or Portugal. —Alalch E. 13:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This word does not occur anywhere on Wikipedia. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RFOR. Fieari (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• JDX → KJDX  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Doesn't appear to be the primary topic for "JDX"; quick google gives "JDX Performance Golf Apparel", "Job Builder JDX", "Jobs and Employment Data Exchange", a racing company, an instagram artist, guitar amplifier, etc. I can't even find the radio station. Hard to create a disambig page because none of these have wikipedia pages. Rusalkii (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate per nom. BD2412 T 19:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Never mind primary topic say, I can't find anything worthy of this becoming a DAB page with nothing created anyway in terms of articles yet, after looking at this title's page history. And BD2412, it seems the nominator was suggesting titles of articles of note worthy topics now but not yet created even to be considered for this at the moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Intrisit (talk • contribs) 17:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate: draft provided. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate per nom. --ted (talk) 02:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambig using Shhhnotsoloud's draft. Thryduulf (talk) 08:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Kirby Wii (tenative title) → Kirby's Epic Yarn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"tenative" is not a word, and this isn't the only kirby game on the wii. it is the first one, though, so i'll give it that cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom BugGhost🪲👻 13:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Would not be an appropriate title even without the misspelling. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 10:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a typo in non-standard disambiguator is two steps removed from a good redirect. Fieari (talk) 23:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Kirby (series). _signed, Rosguill ^talk 13:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Kirby Wii → Kirby's Return to Dream Land  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not the only (or even first) kirby game on the wii, though it is known in japan as "星のカービィ wii", so my unspoken delete vote is slightly weaker than on kirby ds cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 14:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Kirby (series) where the Kirby Wii games are discussed. The Wii section is primarily Kirby (series)#2011–2021: Evolution of 2.5D platforming although Kirby's Epic Yarn is (currently) in the previous section. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Tavix. This is not an implausible search term for someone looking for Kirby games on the Wii, and we have relevant content so there is no reason not to be helpful. Thryduulf (talk) 21:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Byeol ui Kieby: Dauphin Ildang ui Seupgyeok → Kirby: Squeak Squad  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

does wp:rlang apply? truth be told, i have no idea why the korean name is even mentioned in the article. is it disproportionately popular in south korea or something? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete arbitrary non-English redirect.—Alalch E. 14:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unrelated foreign language redirect. WP:RFOR applies. Fieari (talk) 06:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also removed the reference to it in the article. It seems to have been a footnote, except the footnote isn't linked to anywhere in the article, it's just a floating footnote without a sentence to be a footnote of. Fieari (talk) 06:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Amoogus → Among Us  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

either a misspelling of "amogus", in which case fair enough, or of "amoonguss" (ironically usually based on amogus), in which case delete as dabifying between two misspellings used in shitposts would probably be a little unnecessary. this among us meme thing makes my brain go ouch cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's only one letter off from amogus, a well-known meme-spelling of Among Us; meanwhile, it's two letters off from Amoonguss, a mushroom Pokemon that predates Among Us, whose name is a simple reference to the phrase "a Fungus Among Us", and who quickly became associated with Among Us in meme circles just based off the name alone. One is less than two, which solves the WP:XY issue here IMO. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - per Lunamann above. Fieari (talk) 23:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as it is a common mispelling of amongus. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nom, overly vague. The search function exists for a reason. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per above. Amogus remains relevant forever. Even search results will redirect you to Among Us itself. Ahri Boy (talk) 10:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not similar enough to "amoonguss" to be vague. Just a misspelling of "amogus".—Alalch E. 14:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).