Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 July 9

< July 8	July 10 >

July 9

File:Southwest Collection, Lubbock, TX IMG 0015.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't be entirely sure, but this looks like a museum installation, which means that it isn't free. Also, it's orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ann B. Warner IMG 1211.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph is a derivative of another photograph, and there is no indication that the original was out of copyright. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:45, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like an obvious copyright violation with a clearly false license claim. Infrogmation (talk) 22:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Photo-daprvidhuck.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unidentified photo. Uploader claims it is a "Public domain mugshot from April 2007 weapons arrest in Little Rock" and also claims to be licensing it under the GFDL and various Creative Commons licenses. B (talk) 03:59, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wounded Knee Incident South Dakota 1973.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative non-free image being used to depict the Wounded Knee incident. The image is not commented on in the text of the article. In fact, according to the source website, the image is actually a screenshot of a 2009 movie about the incident, not a photo of the incident itself. B (talk) 05:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unacceptable use of a movie clip. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Some asshole with a little too much time on their hands had to list this because they found out about it through the Caylee Anthony picture? Wow. Get a life people. NewYork1956 (talk) 06:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- (1) Please see WP:NPA. (2) Your disdain for the policy is not a reason to keep an obviously non-compliant image. --B (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I removed your tag, we don't delete content on Wikipedia for spite, which is why you put the tag on there. So that means you are willing to disrupt Wikipedia for your petty ego.
You can't even get your facts straight:
"In fact, according to the source website, the image is actually a screenshot of a 2009 movie about the incident, not a photo of the incident itself".
Someone with basic reading comprehension can see that the "film" is a documentary using archival footage shot by Kevin McKiernan. Try reading it again Sherlock:

"A scene from the film "Wounded Knee," a documentary that depicts the 1973 siege that took place on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota." (Photo from PBS.com)

it depicts the 1973 siege' which is known as "The Wounded Knee incident". So it is a a "historically significant fair use image".

This:"Decorative non-free image" is called a flippant comment. People decorate Christmas trees not Wikpedia articles. If you can't refrain from making "flippant" comments maybe you should stick to writing articles like Hairy Dawg, which I think should be merged because it's obviously not a notable topic and is just wasting server space. You also have tags all over your "articles" why don't you concentrate on that of aggavating people who actually do contribute useful content. 7mike5000 (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow ... where to begin. (1) My assumption is that the footage of the documentary was people reenacting the events, as opposed to actual footage from the 1973 event. [1] has the same image and if that's a still from 1973 video footage, that's definitely something. (2) Regardless of whether it's a reenactment or actual 1973 footage, it doesn't meet WP:NFCC#8. (3) You yourself said that this image does not comply with our policies, so I apologize for taking you at your word. (4) I created Hairy Dawg as a one-line stub four years ago. Our treatment of completely unsourced content has changed a lot in that time - it used to be that one-line stubs were a good/useful thing, but now the preference is more to merge the article unless/until it is going to be a meaningful article. If you think this article should be deleted, stick a PROD on it or be bold and redirect it to Georgia Bulldogs. (5) "Decorative" is not a flippant word and, in fact, it was the language that the policy originally used (it was changed in 2007). --B (talk) 19:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Eh? No ones trying to delete anything out of spite, it's just about checking its compliance with the non-free content criteria. It's ironic that you complain about a purported lack of reading ability when you yourself failed to comprehend the text on the file page that says please do not remove this notice while the discussion is in progress.. Anyway, the fact that the film is a documentary is utterly irrelevant, it's that it causes issues with NFFC 10a if not properly attributed. And lastly, if you actually read the NFCC, you would understand that calling an image decorative is not 'flippant', but means that the image does not a)significantly contribute to the reader's understanding or comprehension b)does not have significant contextual significance, or can be described using words alone and c)it's decorative - it serves no purpose other than to look nice and fill up the infobox. I suggest that you read up on the NFCC, and think carefully before making such rash comments - oh, and I agree with the nom's proposal to delete the image, per NFCC 8 and 10a. Acather96 (talk) 20:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The guy from New York said it all, if the shoe fits wear it. I'm not getting myself aggravated. 7mike5000 (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tumhari Yaad - Chand Se Utar KAr copy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, no source, no target article or encyclopaedic use Skier Dude (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Is Had Tak Deewanagi copyy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, no source, no target article or encyc. use Skier Dude (talk) 05:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doc adams.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny web resolution (not even 100x100 pixels), which makes it completely useless. Furthermore, I doubt the own work claim. The Evil IP address (talk) 07:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arny for pres.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image (I assume this) or an officially copyrighted Schwarzenegger election poster. The Evil IP address (talk) 07:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teagueflag.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image. The Evil IP address (talk) 07:32, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The actual Teague Flag looks quite different than this Jolly Roger, though kudos for the effort, and I can find no credible source for this particular version though. Buffs (talk) 02:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kennedy flag.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user image. The Evil IP address (talk) 07:32, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete But not because it is an orphaned image. This is a rather famous Jolly Roger, though a better version exists here. Please WP:AGF and assume that an image might have a use instead of just nominating it because you think it might be amateurish. Buffs (talk) 02:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia is not free webhosting. When an image is not used and not going to be used, we delete it. --B (talk) 03:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dude, really? Stalking my edits around. Nominating my uploads for deletion? Why not ask people first before going to deletion first. In fact, this image is in use. It certainly isn't a "user image". The usual context for "Orphaned user image" is that it was a simple/stupid image that a user uploaded and then didn't use. This is simply a low-res image of a very famous flag. It's just that we already have a higher res version, so there's no need to keep it. It certainly shouldn't be deleted because it is orphaned or that it is a "user image". Buffs (talk) 05:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01728.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of a user who hasn't edited for 3 years, has blanked his userpage, and made <50 edits. No encyclopedic value. Acather96 (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01743.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality. Acather96 (talk) 09:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01764.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality makes this unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 09:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01762.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Un-used crop of File:DSC01764.jpg Acather96 (talk) 09:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC01771.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Un-used crop of File:DSC01772.jpg Acather96 (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Govinddd.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BW21.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 13:51, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Socialdemokraterna.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Closed - the nominator is sock who has now been indeffed. See the ANI thread if interested. --B (talk) 20:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious copyright violation the socialdemokraterna.se does allow using their version as under fair use, but does not allow modification FREESAVELIY^talk 17:04, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. We're using the image under a claim of fair use. What the source website does or does not permit is no concern of our's. --B (talk) 18:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This bad quality version is a copyright violation, the author ie source website have the legal right to give permission under his/hers own conditions, the one that i replaced it with however is perfectly fine with the copyright thing which basically means the disgusting version is not allowed and the one i replaced it with is allowedFREESAVELIY ^talk 19:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to understand what fair use is. The idea of fair use is that we can use an image without permission. As a technical matter, SVG images are preferred to PNG images because they are vector images that can be resized seamlessly. (Well, SVG images can contain raster data, which doesn't resize very well, but that's beside the point.) There is no reason whatsoever for us to use the PNG here. --B (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Qualifies under fair use. Now used in the article again. Freesaveliy is trying to have it replaced with Image:Socialdemokraternalogo.png, however that one is on commons and is going to get deleted procedurally. The only difference between the two is that one is a .png with shadows and the other is a .svg without shadows. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kraljević Proglas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took this to MCQ and the recommendation was to list this for deletion. This is a non-free image of text, meaning that it could be reproduced as text in the article if it were important enough. I'm not sure it is. It does, however, fail NFCC#1 because it could be reproduced in text form. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless it can be shown to be PD. The adjacent text in the article is obviously a translation. The Croatian text is not needed for understanding of the translation, which is a functional replacement of the image. —teb728 t c 21:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ACP EPA Groups.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image; out-of-date (lacks South Sudan); public domain SVG replacement available -- Smurfy 20:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HP7part2poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of another file DisneyFriends (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HPTSMSMVP.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan 123JD (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:201011 cumulative BB Won over Hands Played for ELLTIGRE007 (Allin showdowns) no watermark.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user image, watermarked. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:58, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uncontested. You can speedily delete.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:18, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aerial 1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned; city not identified, without identification it's not useful here Skier Dude (talk) 22:00, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. to closing admin- if kept, please move file to a more descriptive file name. Skier Dude (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's Larnaca, in Cyprus. The uploader also filed File:American Academy of Larnaca Aerial.JPG on the same day; if you look closely, you can see this building just behind the large-curved roof building in the right of the middle of the picture. Rename and Move to Commons. Jheald (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Buffs (talk) 02:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jg4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, leftover from deleted Dave Griffith, no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. to closing admin- if kept, please move file to a more descriptive file name. Skier Dude (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jjm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, possible user-page image, without specific identification of subject no use here Skier Dude (talk) 22:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. to closing admin- if kept, please move file to a more descriptive file name. Skier Dude (talk) 22:29, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture 039.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality image of an undentified fish, possibly Plecostomus. Orphaned. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture 040BW.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned user photo. This file is user's only contributions. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture 042.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, apparently a user photo. Upload is user's only contribution. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.