Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzzball MUCK (second nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 14:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fuzzball MUCK[edit]
A sourceforge project which gets nearly 100 hits some months according to the SouceForge stats [1]. No evidence of significance per WP:SOFTWARE. Guy 10:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and comment - If notable among furry community, consider using wikifur instead for the article =) Gekedo 11:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to
MUD orMUSH. This is not a MUCK, but a specific kind of MUCK server, akin to PennMUSH (which redirects to MUSH). Shimeru 11:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]- After a further look at the articles, it seems clear to me that MUSH is the more appropriate choice. Shimeru 14:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've gone ahead and merged a blurb to MUSH. Will redirect the article tomorrow unless someone objects to that course of action. Shimeru 11:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I object, wait until the community comes to a determination before you do so. --Pinkkeith 14:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I've gone ahead and merged a blurb to MUSH. Will redirect the article tomorrow unless someone objects to that course of action. Shimeru 11:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- After a further look at the articles, it seems clear to me that MUSH is the more appropriate choice. Shimeru 14:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to MUSH per Shimeru. GarrettTalk 09:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Abstain The nominator doesn't convince me that this isn't significant to support the nomination. Please provide me with more information why you feel that it isn't. --Pinkkeith 14:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per Gekedo - this is nn and not encyclopedic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pete Fenelon (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.