Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/April-2024

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2024 at 17:30:57 (UTC)

Reason

Recently featured unanimously on Commons, used in the article's infobox.

Articles in which this image appears

East End of Rundle

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

The Cosmonaut

• Support as nominator – The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Nice photo but I prefer the one with blue sky. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support oh wow what a shot LegalSmeagolian (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:East End of Rundle and Whitemans Pond.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2024 at 22:19:43 (UTC)

Reason

High quality. Good composition. Good EV. Also it can be featured in the upcoming POTD on the day of the feast.

Articles in which this image appears

Eid al-Fitr

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology

Creator

Iansourav

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 22:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Way down in the article so not so much EV. Taj Mahal not at its best in this 'side' view with two towers obscured. Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Oppose – Composition seems quite predictable. Little visual interest or EV – Cf. this pic of the bldg. – Sca (talk) 13:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – per Charles, but mostly per Sca. Also, the blown highlights near the minarets and the overexposed sky. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose on EV. The article text doesn't mention the Taj Mahal at all, nor is it clear which part of the text the image is illustrating. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Are these colours natural? They look a little oversaturated for the robes Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 01:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2024 at 02:38:17 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image used as lead. High resolution, high EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Laura Clay, Gerhard Sisters

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others

Creator

Gerhard Sisters, restored by FatCat96

• Support as nominator – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 02:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Watermark. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That's just th artist's signature. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 11:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I left the watermark to add EV to Gerhard Sisters. If you want me to upload an alt without the watermark, I will. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 13:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support in that (per Adam) case. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Though I'd suggest using the brush tool set to hue in order to fix some colour deviations. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - serious damage/artifacts around the face, visible posterisation/JPEG artifacts towards the bottom. MER-C 19:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:MER-C, I fixed the area next to her face (next to her chin), and I restored the pixel level integrity of the nom version to that of the original scan from the source (University of Kentucky). Now the restored (nominated) image differs from the original only in the retouched areas. It's as good as it gets (given the original). User:FatCat96, I took the liberty of taking (and using) your restored version and uploading an updated version on top. I hope you don't mind. Thank you for your restorations and nominations. Bammesk (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll remain in the oppose column. That removed the artifacts around the face but the face and neck has the same problem. MER-C 11:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's on the original itself. It looks very much like brushwork to add texture to her skin. Not defects. That’s not something we restore or remove, unless there was a good reason for it. Bammesk (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's generally signs of image editing that aged poorly Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 02:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Victorian image editing. Like, physical edits to the negative. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 05:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 23:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Laura Clay by the Gerhard Sisters, 1916.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to People/Political instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2024 at 11:44:13 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last year, where it was featured unanimously. Illustrates article well (infobox image). Near threatened.

Articles in which this image appears

Grey-breasted partridge

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

JJ Harrison

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Good environmental capture, but suggest a moderate crop from right. (Target is a rather stumpy 130 words, but that's probably enough for a copy block.) – Sca (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The environments looks great, but I won't mind a crop either. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support agree about the crop but only the photographer should make the crop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs)

Previous comment posted by MER-C – Sca (talk) 16:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was Charlesjsharp, not me. MER-C 17:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. -- Sca (talk) 16:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 10:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Gray-breasted Partridge 0A2A3088.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2024 at 15:52:29 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image by Archimboldo, used as prominent works in the artist's page as well as an example of synesthesia in artworks.

Articles in which this image appears

Giuseppe Arcimboldo and Synesthesia in art

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Giuseppe Arcimboldo

• Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 10:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Giuseppe Arcimboldo - Four Seasons in One Head - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2024 at 15:24:01 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality and resolution

Articles in which this image appears

Leo von Klenze etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Artists and writers

Creator

Franz Hanfstaengl

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Not a very good scan, I fear. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support OK for a 1856 picture. – Yann (talk) 23:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 23:30:39 (UTC)

Reason

Not sure why this failed to reach quorum last month. There's examples - I should prepare one - of the process from this sort of thing to a 3D maquette (and presumably to stage, but the actual stages were rarely photographed; you sometimes got newspaper impressions) and they're clearly stages of a design process, so it's pretty fair to call this a set design.

Articles in which this image appears

Gustave III (Auber), Pierre-Luc-Charles Cicéri

FP category for this image

WP:FP/THEATRE

Creator

Pierre-Luc-Charles Cicéri, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I don't think you should renominate so soon, Adam. I gave a reasoned argument against the nomination so you shouldn't be unsure why it failed to reach quorum. Not quite the same as my juvenile wombat which just failed - 4 support votes and no negative comments. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Okay. To make this a simple series of points instead of a rant:

  1. This is a very standard sort of image for FP status. We've regularly promoted similar artworks for opera - there's seventeen in Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Theatre. Indeed, we promoted one earlier in February.
  2. I read your statement; I responded to your statement at the time, and you never commented again. You still haven't clarified your point.
  3. Nothing about your previous statement was framed as an objection. It was a comment about whether this counted as a set design, which I responded to both there, and in the introduction here.
  4. You did not vote oppose last nomination. There were zero opposes.
  5. You've never stated how this being an early stage in the set design - from which we know the final designs were made - ruins its EV.
  6. Even if we accept this isn't finished set design but a concept for one, no other parts of the process exist except this one for this opera. It's from 1833; before illustrated newspapers and before photography, and this opera neither has a maquette like File:Marcel Jambon - Giuseppe Verdi - Otello Act I set design model.jpg nor a post-production artwork like File:Luigi Verardi after Dominico Ferri - Gaetano Donizetti - Carrefour de St Jean et Paul. Dans l'Opéra Marino Faliero.jpg (Well, there's this image of a different scene but that has major issues of its own: Stages don't exist in portrait orientation, so its probably much, much more inaccurate and impressionistic than anything under consideration.) As such, this is the most reliable source for the opera.
  7. This the only image of his work in Cicéri's article, and I'd say an example of Ciceri's work is of high EV in the other article.
  8. I've reviewed every single example of Cicéri's work on Gallica (at least that comes up from a author search by him), and
     • Due, I presume, to when he worked, the vast, vast majority of his work isn't able to be assigned an opera or play.
     • There's not a lot of his more finished works that survive. This, and the unidentified [1] are probably his best surviving work, at least on Gallica. (Ones I'd consider somewhat close are: [2], [3] (unidentified ), [4], [5], [6], [7])
     • In one, and only one case, can I compare one of his works to a post-production lithograph. Now, I wouldn't necessarily trust a lithograph or other published illustratiosn of an opera to be perfectly accurate in pre-photography days, but this set design from Robert le Diable and this lithograph) are similar enough that I'd presume a lot of the differences are down to inaccuracies in the lithograph (after all, it's by necessity an impression of the stage design, probably not actually sketched from the same angle it's presented from) at least as much as any changes in the design later on.
       • File:William Waud - Burning of McPhersonville 1865 - original sketch.jpg is what Alfred Waud sent Harper's Weekly. File:William Waud - Burning of McPhersonville 1865 - final Harper's Weekly version.jpg is what got published. Hence why one need be careful about presuming that illustrations from old newspapers or books are perfectly accurate. I'd be more inclined to trust Cicéri's original.

  --Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 22:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• My oppose here is because I don't think we should be nominating again so soon. There isn't rule against it but that doesn't mean I have to agree with it. I saw your explantion on the first nomination but my comment still stands: 'This is the artist's signed watercolour which was presumably used for the set design. It is not the set design.' So the problem is not the EV of the image, it is the description which the rules say 'Properly identifies the main subject'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I mean, I don't see how it's any different than any other illustration of the set design. People know it's not a photograph of the stage. Do you disagree that Gallica labels it as a set design? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 15:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 00:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 23:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Moonreach (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pierre-Luc-Charles Cicéri - Act III set design for the première production of Daniel Auber's Gustave III.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2024 at 15:51:02 (UTC)

Reason

High quality and resolution. Good digitization

Articles in which this image appears

James VI and I etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility

Creator

Portrait attributed to John de Critz

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Great digitalization and quality EV. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 01:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - I disagree this is high resolution, it is only 38 dpi. MER-C 17:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• It's different colours than the Museo del Prado version. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 11:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:JamesIEngland.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 16:43:06 (UTC)

Reason

First and foremost, the EV. It's a high quality image, selcted as the lead image of Man after very rigorous discussion and consensus.

Articles in which this image appears

Man

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People

Creator

Goodfreephotos.com, uploaded by Levivich to Commons

• Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Has zero EV. Discussion was not rigorous, just a few self-appointed people who think they have the right to choose this image. Undemocratic nonsense. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Oppose As previously noted, has zero EV. Also not visually interesting, looks almost generated by AI. Under no circumstances should this be a "featured picture". - LegalSmeagolian (talk) 23:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• It does have a bit of a "passport photo" composition, doesn't it? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 11:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose This is a good photo of this person, but not of FA standard. Without even wanting to look into the discussion in the article, it seems odd to only have a single lead image given that huge differences in appearance are one of the features of humans as a species. Nick-D (talk) 21:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – A single image should not be representing a topic as broad as Man. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 18:30:05 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image

Articles in which this image appears

Europa Clipper

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Others

Creator

NASA/JPL Photolab Studio

• Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 03:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. – Sca (talk) 12:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  that's why there is a caption that describes what one can see there. Artem.G (talk) 15:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The character of the image influences whether readers choose to read captions. -- Sca (talk) 16:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Creative. High quality photo. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Moonreach (talk) 14:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment lighting seems needlessly uneven.©Geni (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's distracting. I suppose it's an artistic choice. It would've been better with uniform lighting. Bammesk (talk) 02:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Europa Clipper commemorative plate 1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 18:36:03 (UTC)

Reason

This is my first time nominating a featured picture, I think this is a quality picture that is able to accurately depict the effects of one of the most successful defences against Cross-site leaks in the last decade. Cache partitioning is a feature in most modern browsers that prevent cache timing attacks (a type of Cross-site leak) from occuring. Before the introduction of Cache partitioning, an attacker could gain information about a different site (say Gmail) by checking how long a particular image took to load. If a image took a small amount of time to load, the attacker could infer that the image was previously used by the website (since the image would be stored in the Web cache). Similarly, if the image took too long to load, a attacker could infer that the image had not been previously loaded by the other website. With cache partitioning, both a cached image and an uncached image from a different site will take approximately the same amount of time to resolve blocking this kind of information leakage.

Articles in which this image appears

Cross-site leaks

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Diagrams,_drawings,_and_maps/Diagrams

Creator

Sohom Datta

• Support as nominator – Sohom (talk) 18:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - too esoteric and difficult to understand for the average viewer. Visually, it's just a couple of diagrams. --Janke | Talk 19:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Janke The fact that this diagram illustrates a fairly esoteric concept itself should be a reason for a FP. To my knowledge, a graph demonstrating the effect of cache partitioning on cache timing attacks does not exist even on the wider internet as of yet. Also, even if we do find one, there is a very slim chance that it will be near the quality of this picture since those tend to be pixelated and embedded in research paper (which are mostly non-free).

  Additionally, this picture would also be a good addition to Timing attacks since it demonstrates the concept behind the attack. Sohom (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm open to open-sourcing the dataset and methodology if that helps my case :) Sohom (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – Visual information not readily intelligible to general readers/viewers. Gobbledygook. No target article. – Sca (talk) 14:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd like to withdraw my nom here. Based on the opposes, it's clear to me that FP is not the intended audience here. I assume the opposers have access to an abundance of high quality graphs that depict and demonstrate timing attacks in much better ways than mine and my contributions are indeed just gobbledygook and intelligible. Thank you for the feedback. Sohom (talk) 15:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2024 at 19:29:07 (UTC)

•  
  ALT 1: Original, TIFF
•  
  ALT 2: Original, edited, JPEG
•  
  ALT 3: Crop 1, JPEG
•  
  ALT 4: Crop 2, JPEG
•  
  ALT 5: Crop 3, JPEG
•  
  ALT 6: Crop 4, edited, JPEG
•  
  ALT 7: Crop 5, AI enhanced, JPEG

Reason

While it is a rather blurry photo, it is the only we will ever have of the single encounter between these two historical figures.

Articles in which this image appears

Civil rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, ,Civil Rights Act of 1964, African-American history, Black suffrage, The Meeting (play)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Marion S. Trikosko

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why the cropped one, though? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 20:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The uncropped original isn't present anywhere in the English Wikipedia. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 21:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose I don't think this AI-enhancement brought anything useful. Beside this, File:MLK and Malcolm X USNWR cropped (Remini enhanced).jpg is sharper. Yann (talk) 13:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  if it's AI enhanced, straight Oppose. There's probably cases for AI usage in restoration - to generate a missing bit of paper texture, say - but the AI tools are not meant for "hit button and you're done" use on archival imagery, and the lack of documentation thereof is a problem Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 21:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I wasn't aware the nominated image was AI enhanced in any way. In that case, we could merely replace all instances of the image with the uncropped original. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Yann, Adam Cuerden, and Howardcorn33:, the nom image is not the AI enhanced version. The AI enhanced version is File:MLK and Malcolm X USNWR cropped (Remini enhanced).jpg and it is clearly distinct when viewed at full size. FYI, on 8 June 2022 an AI version was uploaded Here, but shortly after a few hours it was correctly reverted to the previous non-AI version. I have gone on and uploaded the original TIFF file from the Library of Congress Here, and I have updated the "other versions" fields in all of our now seven versions of this photo. Bammesk (talk) 02:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Personally I prefer This crop, or similar. It is the least distracting. I would vote support if it was created from the full resolution TIFF original (possibly with some adjustments to contrast, etc.). Bammesk (talk) 02:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still oppose. I think File:MartinLutherKingMalcolmX.jpg is better. Why not feature the original version? I changed the gallery nom's category. Yann (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure User:Yann meant, diff, the "nomination's category", not "gallery", so I fixed it. Bammesk (talk) 00:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Yes. For me, a category is in the Category namespace. Yann (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose Wikipedia should not feature cropped archive images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I've taken it upon myself to include all variations of the photo and shown it in the gallery. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howardcorn33 (talk • contribs)
• Comment Personally, I prefer the uncropped image, although I take Howard's point that it can't be nominated if it isn't used in an article. Another problem, not yet mentioned, is that all the versions, including the edited and enhanced ones, still have quite a bit of dust, hair, and other blemishes that need to be cleaned up before they meet the standards expected of most historical FPCs. In my opinion all of the enhanced versions are unsuccessful, partly because they don't address this problem, and partly for other reasons. The Remini AI version, in particular, is a monstrosity from some kind of hell dimension, with its weird blue halos around the eyeglasses and its unnatural juxtaposition of noisy textured surfaces and waxy smooth surfaces. (My opinion, which I admit has no support in policy, is that this kind of vandalism of historical photos ought to be banned from the Commons as having no conceivable educational purpose.) I wonder if better results might be achieved by going back to the original tiff, cropping the black borders, increasing the contrast by a small amount, carefully removing all the dust and crud, and leaving the rest alone. Choliamb (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree about the AI-enhanced version. Please nominate it for deletion. Yann (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2024 at 23:34:40 (UTC)

Reason

1942 Pulitzer Prize for Photography

Articles in which this image appears

Ford Strikers Riot, Pulitzer Prize for Photography, 1942 Pulitzer Prize, Milton Brooks, etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Milton Brooks

• Support as nominator I found a copy large enough for FPC. Quality is so-so, but this is a Pulitzer Prize winner. – Yann (talk) 23:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I cleaned more scratches and spots. Yann (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It is a bit JPEG-artifacty. A lot of the blurriness is from that Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Conditional Support, once the original crop is restored – It's an action shot, with expected motion blur, and it's a historic photo. I suspect a higher quality scan wouldn't be much different, so it's a 'Support' for me. Good lead image in the riot article, and it's a Pulitzer winner. Bammesk (talk) 02:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Yann: your last upload on March 31 needs to be fixed. On the center of the image, on the back of the man being hit, there is a long horizontal 'cloned trace'. The previous uploads don't have that. Bammesk (talk) 01:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• OOPS. Fixed. Thanks for noticing. Yann (talk) 19:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Yann: I think the uncropped version is much better. The crop just made the composition more busy. Also, it's the uncropped version that won the Pulitzer, so we shouldn't change it. Bammesk (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I changed my vote to conditional support. I am open to cropping historic photos, but I don't think we should change the composition (the crop) of an award winning photograph. Bammesk (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Bammesk: I think it is the opposite. I followed Toohool with this crop (3rd version), who said as upload summary: "re-cropped to the portion that was printed in 1941 - cropped portions could still be under copyright". And my crop is actually a few pixels larger, avoiding cutting the man at left. Yann (talk) 07:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yann, Ok thanks. I changed to full support. Bammesk (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – Tells the story fairly well, but question whether it meets Criterion No. 3, even tho it's 1942. Wartime strikes presumably were widely covered. (Perhaps Ford Strikers Riot should be the first target?) – Sca (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per Bammesk. (I do however see what looks to me like a fairly obvious scratch on the extended right arm of the young man at left. It's not too conspicuous, but as usual with these things, once you see it you can't unsee it.) Choliamb (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok, done. Yann (talk) 16:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Ford Strikers Riot.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2024 at 08:55:13 (UTC)

Reason

A really good image with beautiful composition, excellent EV (for both Aurora and the church) and previous nom could not reach necessary quorum with no opposes.

Articles in which this image appears

Aurora and Vík í Mýrdal

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Atmospheric optics

Creator

AstroAnthony in Commons

• Support as co-nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as co-nominator --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 13:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Very nice. – Yann (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Moonreach (talk) 14:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as Principle Skinner would approve. – LegalSmeagolian (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Church of light.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2024 at 18:04:29 (UTC)

Reason

Featured recently on Commons. Objections were due to the nomination being an incoherent set and not the images themselves. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

Victorious Youth, Bronze sculpture

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture

Creator

Unknown, photograph: The J. Paul Getty Museum

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 02:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 21:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Statue of a Victorious Youth, front - Getty Museum (77.AB.30).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2024 at 18:11:24 (UTC)

Reason

Featured on Commons two years ago. Not the lead image but illustrates predator and prey.

Articles in which this image appears

Wood stork, Yacare caiman

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Others

Creator

Charles J. Sharp

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Thanks for the nomination. When I snapped the bird I hadn't seen the caiman! Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - I think it's too hard to see the darker parts of the bird against the background. Moonreach (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Per Moonreach - the bird and caiman are indistinct against the background, which limits EV Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, great photo! Artem.G (talk) 11:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have uploaded what I hope is a better version @Nick-D and Moonreach: Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I can't notice any difference I'm afraid: the water reflections still make it hard to distinguish the caiman and stork. It's a good photo, but the reflections limit the EV. Nick-D (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It's very distinct at full size, and, honestly, a certain amount of blending is probably unavoidable. Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support the better version that has been uploaded, I agree with previous editors that the first version was too indistinct, but it is my belief that this new one is an improvement and the subjects are more clear against the water. Nominator might be well served pinging the previous voters. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 16:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Wood stork (Mycteria americana) and Yacare caiman.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Added image to Animals/Birds instead. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 02:20:19 (UTC)

Reason

High quality lead image in the Tanis Sphinx article. This sculpture potentially dates back to around 2000 BC or perhaps earlier. I placed the image in the infobox today. It replaced a very similar lower quality image, so I think we can take an exception to the 7-day waiting period. The resolution is high 9700x7900 pixels. It was shot with a medium format camera. The uploader and photographer User:Shonagon works at the Louvre museum according to their Wikidata page.

Articles in which this image appears

Great Sphinx of Tanis

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Sculpture

Creator

Unknown, Louvre Museum, photographer: Shonagon

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 02:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Has to stay in article for longer for nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great picture. I think the argument that this replaces a longstanding lesser-quality image is just convincing enough to waive the wait period. At the same time, this isn't a 1:1 replacement of a lower-res image, it's a new photo of the same sculpture from a similar angle, and a week wouldn't have been that long to wait before making the nomination. Since this is the nomination in front of us, I'll support it, but waiting out the week would have been better. Moonreach (talk) 14:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Quite good rez of a striking subject. (Crop could be tightened a bit at sides, tho.) – Sca (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose the lighting is not great, I understand the subject is in a museum where the photographer does not control the lighting but alas. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Grand sphinx de Tanis - Musée du Louvre Antiquités égyptiennes N 23 ; A 23 ; Salt 3837.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 03:28:02 (UTC)

Reason

Quality image shows the physical phenomenon Fraunhofer lines, which are the absorption dips in the optical spectrum of the sun. The dips are caused by the absorption of sun's radiated energy by atoms in the sun's atmosphere. This phenomenon was first observed in 1814. The nominated image is a recent quality measurement and dates to 2022. The image is not in the infobox, but it is properly placed next to a corresponding table which lists the dips, their wavelengths and the corresponding atoms.

Articles in which this image appears

Fraunhofer lines

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding

Creator

Cyamahat

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 15:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 23:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Solar spectral irradiance.svg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 05:11:45 (UTC)

Reason

Odd format, but incredible encyclopedic value.

Articles in which this image appears

Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse (lead image of which is a still)

FP category for this image

We have another bridge collapse at Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History, so...

Creator

National Transportation Safety Board

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 05:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Too long and not very interesting. The EV would be in the amazing live video of the collapse. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Same. For what it's worth, I'd propose this image. There are a lot of very good images connected to this event, it's just a question of finding which ones are best. Moonreach (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – Sorry, but vids of the event have flooded the net since March 26, along with countless news stories. All too familiar. – Sca (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Seems to pass all criteria, high EV, good quality. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 03:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak oppose – interesting and high EV but also unwieldy to have such a long video, will users even watch the whole thing? LegalSmeagolian (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – For the EV. Users interested in the subject will appreciate having the video in the article as they read the text. It shows a clear close-up view on the day of the collapse. Bammesk (talk) 00:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• oppose Still reviewing but the first 21 seconds isn't really needed and the drone propellers enter the shot at 5:15. Might be worth trying to cut something together as an edited highlight.©Geni (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 10:51:52 (UTC)

Reason

I found the timing of the shot to be perfect for capturing a unique location in Oran, Algeria called Sebkha.

Articles in which this image appears

Sebkha of Oran

FP category for this image

Natural phenomena

Creator

Terki hassaine samir

• Support as nominator – Riad Salih (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose does not have sufficient EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Aye. A very pretty picture, but at the cost of showing much detail of the subject Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 19:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination transcluded to WP:FPC. MER-C 10:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - agree with Charles. MER-C 10:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, per Charles. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 19:49:57 (UTC)

Reason

Since nothing by Jackson Pollock appears to be available with a free license, this is a good substitute, showing an (admittedly less-than-abstract) example of the technique. Large, colorful, eye-catching, with a free CC-BY-SA license. The article is short, but informative. (Oops, just noted it's been only 5 or 6 days in the article... does that matter?)

Articles in which this image appears

Drip painting

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Ole Hedeager

• Support as nominator – Janke | Talk 19:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment As this is appears to be an original artwork by a living artist, I suspect that a VRT ticket confirming that they have released it under Wikipedia-friendly licences is needed. At present all we've got to go on is that an account with the same name as the claimed artist uploaded this, and that's a bit risky. Googling the name of the artist also doesn't return anything indicating their notability - all the returns seem to be websites or sales listings linked to them rather than works about the artist. Nick-D (talk) 21:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, the nomination is not about the artist, but the drip painting technique, of which we have no other example, AFAIK. His contact info is on https://www.olehedeager.com/, somebody more experienced could ask for a VRT (assuming there is some support for this FPC)... --Janke | Talk 07:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I emailed the artist myself, and asked him to send his permission to VRT. --Janke | Talk 13:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Conditional support if the author affirms a permissive license. Moonreach (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 22:16:22 (UTC)

Reason

Image is OGL licensed, high resolution, and with the round in motion, showing gaseous discharge. Captures a very cool dynamic moment.

Articles in which this image appears

Challenger 2

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land

Creator

Cpl Si Longworth

• Support as nominator – LegalSmeagolian (talk) 22:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 17:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 03:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support High quality photo that clearly illustrates one of the key features of this tank, so the EV is also very high. Nick-D (talk) 10:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 23:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Moonreach (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Challenger 2 Tank Firing a Shell MOD 45157421.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 05:18:56 (UTC)

Reason

FP on Commons; used in the article's infobox

Articles in which this image appears

Oxybelis aeneus

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles

Creator

The Cosmonaut

• Support as nominator – The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Though I'd have preferred more of the snake, rather than just the head for better EV. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, some people like to give head. I mean, Support Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 18:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lmao, man. Good one. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 23:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 19:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mexican vine snake.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 07:43:12 (UTC)

Reason

It has good composition

Articles in which this image appears

Muzhappilangad Beach

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support as nominator – Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Good shot, and apt EV for the beach article The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. It's a very heavily illustrated article, and I'm not really clear what this image adds to it. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Minimal EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 13:36:49 (UTC)

Reason

Signing of an international peace accord, high EV, good quality

Articles in which this image appears

Paris Peace Accords, The Peninsula Paris, Vietnam stab-in-the-back myth

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War

Creator

Robert LeRoy Knudsen, uploaded and cleaned by Hohum

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like it's been taken a little too blue while trying to fix yhe yellowing Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 14:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I corrected that. I added the original as alternative. It was in Adobe, and I moved it RGB color profile, which may explain the color issue. Yann (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The caption isn't correct: the Vietnam War ended several years later. Nick-D (talk) 01:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, two years later, but that was the objective of this diplomatic agreement. I edited the description to be more precise. Yann (talk) 11:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Alt 2 – Bammesk (talk) 15:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - visible grain and posterisation at file description page size, perhaps even in the thumbnail here. The TIFF has much less grain. MER-C 19:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Adam Cuerden, Nick-D, Bammesk, and MER-C: I made a new version, starting again from the TIFF file. Yann (talk) 11:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Support Alt 2 Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my vote to Alt 2. Bammesk (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt 2 is certainly better, enough to withdraw my oppose. MER-C 18:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Alt 2 – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support alt 2 – per all. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 2 - Giles Laurent (talk) 10:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Vietnam peace agreement signing, 27580141, new.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 16:38:37 (UTC)

Reason

good quality copy of an iconic picture

Articles in which this image appears

Edward Weston, List of photographs considered the most important, AK Steel

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Machinery

Creator

Edward Weston, restored and uploaded by Yann

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 16:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Question whether being a Weston photo makes this one interesting or informative. It's one of over a dozen pix in the Weston article. EV? – Sca (talk) 13:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. I added a bit more about it to the Weston article, though there was already a fair amount there. Weston isn't really known for industrial photographs but this is probably his most important picture in that genre. blameless 02:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've also added it to AK Steel, replacing two very poor photographs. blameless 02:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – The original is a print [8] at MoMA. I am not sure about removing its tone. Otherwise it would be a support for me. Bammesk (talk) 02:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• This was printed from a black & white negative. We don't even know if the print was in sepia. In the 19th century, prints were done in sepia, but in 1922? I also proposing a sepia version. Yann (talk) 10:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1922? Very common. That said, why is the MOMA one subtle sepia and this one all-in on sepia? Adobe RGB to sRGB conversion error?Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the original print's tone is a flaw, or damage needing modification (FP criterion #8). Bammesk (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 01:41:50 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality. High resolution

Articles in which this image appears

Joh Bjelke-Petersen etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

Premier's Department, State Public Relations Bureau, Photographic Unit (Queensland Government)

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Man in suit & tie. – Sca (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes – Vinícius O. (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose Not a special image - unrestored. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 11:45:21 (UTC)

Reason

Featured on Commons two months ago. Headline image. Endangered.

Articles in which this image appears

Iberian lynx

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 07:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 23:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, España, 2021-12-19, DD 07.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 12:06:58 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons. Clear EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Clementine

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits

Creator

Rhododendrites

• Support as nominator – MER-C 12:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – I doubt the EV, primarily because the lead image already is a very descriptive one and two, the image is pretty down in the article. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - An excellent, simple photograph that illustrates the subject perfectly. While it's true this is the fourth photo down on the page, it's not an enormous article where the photo gets lost. Moonreach (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Are these clementines from the Death Star cafeteria? What's with the black mirror background? It would be nicer if they were on a plate or wooden cutting board or something where they didn't look so out of place. Nosferattus (talk) 03:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Mainly responding to say "death star cafeteria" made me laugh. I feel like the reason people (like me in this case) use surfaces like this are to try to make an ordinary, everyday subject into something dramatic. It's like, if I'm going to take the time to set up a whole photo shoot for a piece of fruit, focus stack a whole lot of shots of that fruit, meticulously peel it, and do the whole thing over again then I might as well be consistent with treating it like a celebrity. That's a "why the photographer did this" explanation, though, and not a "what someone thinks would be most natural in an article" explanation. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Stupid question, maybe, but is only the highlighted area on the front of the left one in focus, or is that an illusion? Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 15:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It should all be in focus (it's two focus-stacked pictures composited next to each other). It got by the pixel peeping on Commons, anyway. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Support then. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 03:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Clementines (01014)s.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 01:41:48 (UTC)

Reason

High quality and resolution

Articles in which this image appears

Amália Rodrigues

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Anefo

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Vinícius94: Could you indicate whether you support the proposed crop too or not? Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Armbrust: I support the proposed crop (Alt). Vinícius O. (talk) 00:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support either – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Dark. – Sca (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I added Alt, with the top and right side trimmed. It's a temporary CSS image crop. If it passes, we will upload a real crop. Bammesk (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Alt – Bammesk (talk) 02:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• @Bammesk: Your proposed alternative has passed. Could you create the actually cropped image? Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Armbrust, I uploaded the cropped version at This link. Bammesk (talk) 01:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. I replaced the CSS image crop with the actual image (for backlinks). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Alt – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Any crop as Alt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt - Giles Laurent (talk) 10:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Amalia Rodrigues, Bestanddeelnr 922-1813 (cropped).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2024 at 20:19:00 (UTC)

Reason

The framing of the image, is of high resolution, and the Washington Monument at the bottom half of the frame serves almost as a leading line pointing up to the eclipse. The foggy background adds to the dramatic effect.

Articles in which this image appears

Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Others

Creator

NASA/Bill Ingalls

• Support as nominator – (Discuss 0nshore's contributions!!!) 20:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that's the top of the monument, rather than the top half. -- Sca (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural oppose – Opposing all 2024 eclipse pictures for 10 days due to stability issues. Try renominating after a month or so, so that the image is stable in the articles The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Agreed. This is a great photo (well-composed, everything in focus, good color and gamut), it's just too soon. Moonreach (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Aye. Little too soon. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural oppose– As per above. X (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 03:00:59 (UTC)

Reason

Seems like a good example of Vainakh tower architecture, dating back to first century and medieval times in Chechnya and Ingushetia regions of Northern Caucasus. This photo is a military fortification in the medieval village of Erzi. According to the file description, these towers are around 95 feet (29 meters) high. I saw this on Commons FPC recently.

Articles in which this image appears

Erzi (village), Vainakh tower architecture, Ingush towers, Nakh peoples, +2

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Vyacheslav Argenberg

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 03:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Moonreach (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• I had a look at this, and saw this image can be used in many other articles. MER-C 19:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• MER-C, I put it in the Erzi and Ingush towers articles. Let me know if there are more articles. Bammesk (talk) 01:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 17:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Vyacheslav Argenberg put red a bit down. Too much now. --Petar Milošević (talk) 17:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Caucasus, Ingushetia, Ингушские боевые и смотровые башни, горы Кавказа.jpg --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 12:02:05 (UTC)

Reason

While it does not fulfill the first criterion, it is undeniably a historical photo. This specific image is probably the most published version, and even appeared on the cover of The Economist. An alternate photo does exist, however this is the less widely distributed version and appears on no English wikipedia articles.

Articles in which this image appears

Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, Abu Ghraib prison, Charles Graner, Seymour Hersh, Torture, Hooding, Criticism of the war on terror, Outline of the Iraq War, United States war crimes, List of photographs considered the most important

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/War

Creator

Ivan Frederick

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 12:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - "appears on no English wikipedia articles" makes it ineligible. --Janke | Talk 16:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Absolutely we should not promote the worse copy. Replace the image and then nominate. Though, really, we want a bigger copy if one exists. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 17:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Added a cropped version of the alternate. This one does not, however, meet the size requirement.

Waaay too tightly cropped. If it's cropped at all, it should be the same way as the original Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 16:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 09:05:44 (UTC)

Reason

High quality FP worthy picture with high EV, and a FP in various Wikis and Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Cat and Carnivora

FP category for this image

Mammals

Creator

Von.grzanka on Commons

• Support as nominator – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose No EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of the lead images in a GA infobox is not encyclopedic enought? We have promoted images with even lesser exposure. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – Per Charles. Cute kitty, but nothing special. Przepraszam. – Sca (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, per Charles. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – I am puzzled by Charles' "No EV" oppose rationale. Can Charles or others elaborate as to what characteristic(s) must a photo have to pass the EV criterion #5 in regard to the Cat article? Also, can you point to a photo in the domestic cat category (or elsewhere on the web) that meets the EV criterion (not on the technical or compositional basis, but just on the EV basis)? Thanks. Pinging @Charlesjsharp: since he does not participate here on a regular basis. Bammesk (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Fails on criterion #5. Does not add significant encyclopedic value to the article and does not help readers to understand the article. Unless you have never seen a cat before. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp, correct me if I am wrong, you are saying "cat" is a common subject, therefore no image of a cat can "add significant encyclopedic value to the (cat) article and help readers to understand the (cat) article"? Bammesk (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been pondering over the same question raised by Bammesk for the past 2 days. I don't understand the EV rationale by the oppose votes either. It says in the criterion that the image should add significant encyclopedic value to an article and helps readers to understand an article which this image fulfills clearly. The criterion also says picture's encyclopedic value (referred to as "EV") is given priority over its artistic value. The current candidate is used as an example of the member of species Cat in it's infobox. How can you add any more of encyclopedic value to a picture? When you imagine a cat, this is how it looks like. When you google a cat, this is what it shows. When you see an animal that looks like this, you can understand this is a cat. This is clear cut EV right there. I'd like to ping @Sca and Hamid Hassani: also to the discussion for their take on encyclopedic value of a cat image. Any take would be much appreciated and will help me chose a better image next time (Since per FPC guidelines, All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image.) Also, you may suggest any alternate image too. Additionally, I'd like to ask Charles how this candidate is any different than your black kite nomination that seemingly is in the similar context. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 20:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All black kites, as wild animals, look much the same. A high quality image can represent the species, either perched or flying, male or female (if you can tell the difference). Domesticated animals all look different and one image cannot represent them. Quite apart from that, this is a very ordinary image and there are hundreds of excellent cat images to choose from. Finally, we already have an FP. It is not as silly as the attempt to nominate a picture to represent 'MAN'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cat. Period. -- Sca (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Note existing FP. I'd observe also that, while we have FPs of ubiquitous species, the technical standards tend to be higher, since such photographs are easier to take. blameless 02:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• True, but this is a ubiquitous wild animal, not one of 600 million cats. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Good, cute picture; but the cat is hunched over, and its body is not completely visible, esp. from the side. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I do understand the oppose votes. Personally, I think this fails criterion #3: "Is among Wikipedia's best work." --Janke | Talk 16:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My inquiry (puzzlement) wasn't/isn't about the oppose "votes", my inquiry (call it critique) is about the oppose "rationale". Charles' rationale being "no EV" followed by ZERO elaboration. That's what was puzzling. As User:The Herald said above: "All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image" (per instructions on top of WP:FPC). The keyword is "specifics". User:Sca did offer some specifics when he wrote "nothing special", i.e. not an impressive image. But Charles' original oppose "rationale" offered ZERO specifics. Eventually, Charles finally offered some specifics in This diff by saying "very ordinary image". . . . . . On another note: not "among Wikipedia's best work" is a criterion, but by itself, with no elaboration whatsoever, it lacks "specifics". When you reject a nom, give the nominator "specifics", or at least give the nominator something, instead of nothing. Bammesk (talk) 03:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – I personally don't understand the reluctance to support this image. I thought it would be pretty obvious per the nominated reason. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – EV is fine for me. Yann (talk) 06:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – I personally think it’s a very nice image of a very cute kitty. I don’t understand all the oppose votes. It represents the article well. Also, as the Herald stated, I don’t see how this nomination is any different from many of Charles nominations.  Kentuckian |💬   05:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• No consensus to promote. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 23:37:53 (UTC)

Reason

Quite a nice image, a nightmare to restore; It's not absolutely perfect, but after a month on it, methinks I've gotten anything obvious, so...

Articles in which this image appears

William Howard Taft (One that includes the cabinet card is in Pach Brothers.

FP category for this image

WP:Featured pictures/People/Political

Creator

Pach Brothers, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 23:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I like this very famous 1908 picture of President Taft. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 06:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –  ⚜ Kentuckian ⚜  | talk to me 02:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cabinet card of William Howard Taft by Pach Brothers - Cropped to image.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 10:27:52 (UTC)

Reason

Featured unanimously on Commons last year. Headline image on two articles.

Articles in which this image appears

Tyniec, Action of Tyniec Abbey, Kraków

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Jakub Hałun

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – The abbey is barely 1/3rd of the image. I'd prefer a tighter crop, with less vegetations, which can boost EV too. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Agree. Too much leafy foreground. Narrower framing would improve accessibility. Leaning toward oppose. – Sca (talk) 12:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 10:31:43 (UTC)

Reason

Unanimously featured on Commons two week ago. Headline image.

Articles in which this image appears

African blue flycatcher

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Giles Laurent

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Brilliant colors...wow. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 11:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Argenberg (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – caw caw. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Noise could be cleaned. --Petar Milošević (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:020 African blue flycatcher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 02:41:01 (UTC)

Reason

Quality lead image in Vela Supernova Remnant article. The image is large so if your browser can't open it, consider opening it at 2048 x 2048 pixels at This link, or download and view it in a photo viewing/editing software. The image is FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Vela Supernova Remnant

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out

Creator

ESO/TIMER survey

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 02:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Astro images after so long :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – --Janke | Talk 16:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 06:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Vela supernova - VST - Eso2214a.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 19:08:58 (UTC)

Reason

Recently featured unanimously on Commons, used in the article's infobox.

Articles in which this image appears

Lady Peak

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

The Cosmonaut

• Support as nominator – The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Add elevation. --Petar Milošević (talk) 16:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lady Peak panorama2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 17:04:44 (UTC)

Reason

Nice picture overall. Interesting looking fruit. Good composition.

Articles in which this image appears

Buddha's hand

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits

Creator

Kaldari

• Support as nominator – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 17:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Can be added to fruits category. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Sorry, I forgot to enter the link of the category. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – I wouldn't believe this exists if I didn't see the picture. Yann (talk) 06:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HORRORS BEYOND MANS COMPREHENSION. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It's a fruit. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Aaaaaahhhhh! Fruit! Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 22:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –  Kentuckian |💬   01:07, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Buddhas hand 1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 13:24:59 (UTC)

Reason

high quality portrait of an historical figure used in 11 pages

Articles in which this image appears

Dred Scott, Dred Scott v. Sandford, Timeline of events leading to the American Civil War, Birthright citizenship in the United States, Citizenship, History of Minnesota, History of St. Louis, History of St. Louis (1804–1865), Political career of Abraham Lincoln (1849–1861), Origins of the American Civil War, Portal:Minnesota

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Louis Schultze / Missouri History Museum, uploaded by Ooligan

• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Ooligan (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- LegalSmeagolian (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Moonreach (talk) 15:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Oil on Canvas Portrait of Dred Scott (cropped).jpg --The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 8 support, 0 oppose. Promoted to featured picture. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 01:44:16 (UTC)

Reason

High quality portrait of an historical ruler. Good digitization.

Articles in which this image appears

Isabella I of Castile, Granada War, Expulsion of Jews from Spain etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility

Creator

Author unknown

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – "why so serious?" The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per nom. Brandmeister^talk 18:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:IsabellaofCastile03.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 01:53:31 (UTC)

Reason

High quality and resolution. Good digitization.

Articles in which this image appears

Lady Cockburn and Her Three Eldest Sons, Joshua Reynolds etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Joshua Reynolds

• Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –  Kentuckian |💬   01:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sir Joshua Reynolds - Lady Cockburn and Her Three Eldest Sons (1773-1775).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 02:22:44 (UTC)

Reason

Iconic, high quality painting with high EV. The image does fall a bit short on resolution being 36px away from meeting the criteria, but I don't think that really matters considering the EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Daniel Boone, Wilderness Road, Appalachia, Cumberland Gap, Elizabethton, Tennessee, History of Kentucky, History of Virginia, Transylvania Colony, Rebecca Boone, Cherokee-American wars, Upland South, American pioneer,

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

George Caleb Bingham

• Support as nominator –  ⚜ Kentuckian ⚜  | talk to me 02:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Good nomination and excellent EV, but sadly this is not a good scan. Even if we forget the below par resolution, the colors are way off the original (see here). If you can find an alt scan with a higher resolution and better color to the original, I'd consider supporting. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per above. MER-C 10:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 12:35:48 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of a railcar on a rack railway; good EV as the toothed rack rail is clearly visible; lead image in the Dolderbahn rack railway article; recently promoted to FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Dolderbahn

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land

Creator

User:Kabelleger

• Support as nominator – —Bruce1ee^talk 12:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support –The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 09:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dolderbahn Bhe 1-2 1 Waldhaus Dolder - Bergstation Dolderbahn.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 17:46:35 (UTC)

Reason

This image significantly contributes to its article and allows the reader to understand the topic in a way that they absolutely would not be able to without it. It's cool and useful, and it has clear enough instructions for how to use it. I'm very new to this sort of thing but I think it should be considered, as it's definitely one of Wikipedia's most unique images. (Image is in SVG format)

Articles in which this image appears

Impossible color

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Drawings

Creator

Zowie

• Support as nominator – TypoEater (talk) 17:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Moonreach (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Always liked this one. It's simple but effective. SupportAdam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.9% of all FPs.} 14:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support - A good demonstration, high EV. --Janke | Talk 20:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 11:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Chimerical-color-demo.svg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 15:43:18 (UTC)

Reason

Quality image of Manarola, Italy, and surroundings. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Manarola

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Urban

Creator

Timothy A. Gonsalves

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 15:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Great picture, high EV. Yann (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 15:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support--Petar Milošević (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Thanks @Bammesk: for this nomination. --Tagooty (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 08:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Giles Laurent (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Manarola NW Cinque Terre Sep23 A7C 07233.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]