Next Article in Journal
Influence of ACTN3 R577X Polymorphism on Blood Creatine Kinase Levels Relative to Number of Sprints in Brazilian Professional Soccer Players
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms and Future Research Perspectives on Mitochondrial Diseases Associated with Isoleucyl-tRNA Synthetase Gene Mutations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Early Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation

1
Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, 455 00 Ioannina, Greece
2
Department of Molecular Genetics, Genomedica S.A., 185 37 Piraeus, Greece
3
Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Arta, 471 00 Arta, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(7), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070895
Submission received: 6 June 2024 / Revised: 3 July 2024 / Accepted: 4 July 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024

Abstract

:
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is usually performed beyond 10 weeks of gestation, because earlier in pregnancy, the fetal fraction is low, resulting in failure to obtain reliable results. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT earlier in pregnancy using a method for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis that eliminates the need for polymerase chain reaction (PCR), DNA sequencing, or microarrays (Vanadis® system, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Cell-free DNA was extracted from the maternal plasma of 30 singleton pregnancies at 6–9 weeks of gestation (group 1) and at 11–14 weeks of gestation of the same patients (group 2). The mean crown-rump length (CRL) and gestational age in group A was 16.12 mm and that in group B was 61.45 mm. In group A, results were obtained in all, but one, cases (97%). From the remaining pregnancies, one miscarried at 8 weeks and, therefore, the follow-up NIPT at 12 weeks could not be performed. The fetal sex was diagnosed correctly in the 28 cases that had a successful early test, and the results were in accordance with the examination at 12 weeks. There were no cases of aneuploidies and disomy was diagnosed correctly in all. The “Vanadis” prenatal NIPT assay can successfully be used early during the first trimester at 6–9 weeks of gestation (early NIPT) to identify the fetal sex. Further studies are needed to explore the diagnostic potential for aneuploidies.

1. Introduction

Numerous studies have shown that non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the most effective method for screening for chromosomal abnormalities; therefore, it is currently used widely in different clinical settings [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. This technique comprises the extraction of fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from maternal plasma and, with the use of several molecular methods, it can detect over 99% of the most common fetal trisomies [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. NIPT is less accurate in detecting other chromosomal aberrations, namely sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) (Klinefelter, Turner, Triple X) or microdeletion syndromes (Cri-du-chat, Prader–Willi, Angelman, DiGeorge, 22q12 deletion, 1p36 deletion) and microduplication syndromes (Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome, Silver–Russell syndrome) [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Specifically, the larger the fragment, the higher the NIPT detection sensitivity, whereas the sensitivity of copy number variations (CNVs) for fragments <5 M is low with a high missed detection rate [9,10,11,12,13]. Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that in the case of positive results, invasive prenatal diagnosis should be applied for confirmation since the combined false positive rate is about 0.13% for trisomies 13, 18, and 21 and considerably higher for other abnormalities [1,3,4,8].
At present, most commercial NIPT assays use the digital quantification capabilities of advanced sequencing platforms. However, the use of these assays is limited beyond 10 weeks of gestation, because a certain amount of fetal cell-free DNA is required for the successful diagnosis. A low fetal fraction (FF) (<4%) of cfDNA is associated with a high failure rate and a high risk for false negative results [15,16,17,18]. Several factors including maternal body mass index (BMI), twin pregnancy, maternal age, drugs, assisted reproductive technology (ART), and gestational age are considered to affect the fetal fraction of cfDNA [17]. Of those, the latter is proven to be the most important factor [17]. Recent studies have shown that fetal cfDNA can be detected in maternal blood from as early as five weeks of gestation, while its percentage increases with the progress of the gestational age and, at 10 weeks, is about 10% of the total cfDNA, which allows reliable testing and diagnosis [17,19,20,21].
A different method using a high-precision non-next-generation sequencing (NGS) test “Vanadis assay” (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was developed recently. This method is designed for both the diagnosis of fetal sex and the examination of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 [22,23,24]. It uses a rolling-circle replication-based cfDNA system that screens chromosomes by converting chromosome-unique fragments into digitally quantifiable objects for the evaluation of the common aneuploidies [23,24]. Vanadis achieves high precision by targeting thousands of specific chromosomal sequences, eliminating the need for PCR and performing a high-yield counting of 650,000 molecules per chromosome, which enables the analysis of all samples, including those with low fetal fraction. It could therefore be used earlier in pregnancy when the fetal fraction is low [22,23,24].
The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of non-invasive prenatal testing, from as early as six weeks of gestation, using the Vanadis assay.

2. Materials and Methods

In Greece, it is a common practice for pregnant women to have an early first trimester ultrasound scan for confirmation of fetal viability, dating of the pregnancy, and diagnosis of multiple and ectopic pregnancies. Women with a viable singleton pregnancy and a measured CRL of 10–21 mm, corresponding to 6–9 weeks of gestation, were offered an early NIPT with the Vanadis system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) (group 1). It was explained that a second blood sample would be collected at the time of the 11–14-week scan as it was calculated by measuring the CRL at the first visit (group 2). It was also mentioned that the results of the first NIPT would not be available for the patients while they would be informed of the results of the second test. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committee of the University hospital, Ioannina, Greece (NO 27/27-12-2022). All women were counseled in detail and gave written informed consent.
In women who accepted to participate, the demographics, family, personal, and obstetric history were recorded using the Astraia database. The BMI was calculated. The CRL, gestational, and yolk sac diameters and fetal heart rate were also recorded. The 11–14-week scan was performed according to the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) protocol. All scans were performed by a single operator (GM), certified by the FMF. During the first visit (group1), 10 mL of blood was drawn and collected in a Cell-free DNA BCT® blood collection tube (Streck company, La Vista, NE, USA). These tubes maintain cell-free DNA for up to 14 days at 6 °C to 37 °C and eliminate the need for immediate plasma isolation, easing concerns about pre-analytical variation that arises during shipping and handling. The tube was labeled with a serial number corresponding to each woman and sent the same day to the laboratory. The patient’s demographics and ultrasound data were not accessible by the laboratory staff. The second sample was drawn immediately at the 11–14-week scan (group 2). This sample was appropriately labeled with the name of the pregnant woman and the personal details were given to the laboratory.
The Vanadis NIPT assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions [22]. After successive centrifugations at 1300× g for 30 min and 2400× g for 10 min, the isolated plasma was placed at −80 °C until the next step of analysis. The cfDNA was extracted from 3 mL of maternal plasma using the Vanadis Extract platform. This was followed by the generation of rolling-circle-labeled replication products (RCPs) on the Vanadis Core platform, which were then imaged and measured with the Vanadis View instrument. Specifically, the extracted cfDNA is first subjected to specific fragmentation using a restriction enzyme. The resulting target cfDNA fragments are similar in size and GC content and are derived from the chromosomes of interest. Probes, designed to hybridize to the target cfDNA fragments to form circular DNA complexes, are mixed with the target cfDNA fragments, backbone oligos, and DNA ligase. By allowing the target cfDNA fragments to hybridize to the probe complex and DNA ligase to seal the nicks, covalently closed circles are generated that each includes a cfDNA target fragment and a corresponding chromosomal tag. All DNA that is not circularized is removed with exonucleases. The DNA circles are copied about 1000 times by rolling-circle amplification (RCA) to generate one rolling circle replication product (RCP), a single stranded concatemer amplification product. The RCPs self-assemble to submicron-sized DNA objects. Because each RCP includes copies of a chromosomal tag, it can be recognized by a corresponding fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide. The labeled RCPs are then deposited to a 96-well nanofilter microplate. The microplate has a nanofilter membrane in the bottom to allow the RCPs to be captured on the plate bottom, while buffer and non-hybridized fluorophores are washed through the membrane. The deposited RCPs are finally imaged and therefore counted through the nanofilter using the Vanadis View imaging instrument [22].
Samples were analyzed in groups of 48 with <50% being the 6–9-week gestation group and the remainder being the 11–14-week gestation controls. The total run time was approximately 48 h per group. Samples were anonymized and they were used in compliance with all applicable laws. This study was conducted single-blindly by identification of the fetuses’ sex in the EARLY NIPT sample which was compared to that (NIPT) at 11–14 weeks of gestation.

3. Results

In total, 30 pregnant women agreed to participate in this study (Table 1). The median maternal age was 33 (range: 20–39). The median CRL in group 1 was 16.05 mm (range: 5–29 mm) and the median gestational age was 8.1 weeks (range: 5.8–9.7 weeks). In group 2, the median CRL was 60 mm (range: 49.9–76 mm), while the median gestational age was 12.2 weeks (range: 11.71–13.57). One woman (no 8, Table 1) miscarried at 10 weeks of gestation and the results of the early examination could not be verified. In all, but one (no 6, Table 1) in which the early NIPT failed, the results of the early examination were in accordance with the results of the NIPT at 12 weeks of gestation. There was one case (no 3, Table 1) where the woman decided to undergo amniocentesis due to anxiety, and the karyotype revealed that the fetus was affected by Klinefelter syndrome. This fetus was diagnosed as male in both early and 12-week NIPT. There were no cases of aneuploidies for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 and disomy was diagnosed correctly in all samples when screened at 6–9 weeks (group 1). Disomy was confirmed for either sample at the NIPT performed at 11–14 weeks (group 2).

4. Discussion

The results of this study, involving 30 pregnancies at 6–9 weeks of gestation, demonstrated that the Vanadis prenatal test can be used from as early as six weeks for the determination of fetal sex. Results were obtained in all, but one, cases, excluding one woman that miscarried at 10 weeks, in which the confirmation of the fetal sex was not possible. In the remaining 28 cases, the fetal sex diagnosed early was confirmed at 11+0–13+6 weeks of gestation. It was also demonstrated that chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 can also be examined successfully in this early stage of pregnancy; however, since there were no cases affected by trisomies in the study group, further studies are needed to prove the efficacy.
Currently, prenatal screening using NIPT is the most effective screening method for common fetal aneuploidies. Compared to the more established combined first trimester screening test (nuchal translucency and biochemical markers), it has the advantage of a higher detection rate, over 99% vs. about 90%, with a very low combined false positive rate of approximately 0.13% vs. 5%, respectively [1,2,3,4,8]. However, this technique is complex to perform with high cost and it is only used widely for patients classified as high risk following the first trimester’s combined test [2]. Cf-DNA testing is also used after parental request; however, most national health systems do not cover the cost.
Additionally, a major limitation for the use of NIPT is that it requires a certain amount of cfFDNA, expressed as the percentage of fetal-to-total DNA fraction (FF), to obtain reliable results [15]. This is because the vast majority of the available NIPT solutions use the power of advanced sequencing platforms or microarray technology [18]. Studies have shown that the lowest FF is considered 4% as, if it is less, the results may become unclear [4,16]. It was reported that at 10 to 11 weeks of gestation, the median percentage of fetal cfDNA is about 10%, and that between 10 and 21 weeks of gestation, the fetal fraction increases 0.10% per week, while after 21 weeks of gestation, it increases at a rate of 1% per week [20]. Maternal factors such as age, weight, race, drugs, ART, autoimmune diseases, and fetal–placental factors such as gestational age, multi-fetal pregnancy, aneuploidies, and certain lab procedures may potentially affect the FF ratio [17]. A recent meta-analysis examining the relation of maternal age, gestational age, maternal weight, and BMI concluded that the only statistically significant association is between gestational age and low FF, emphasizing that the other parameters have no significant relationship with low FF [17]. The authors of this study suggested that NIPT should be offered only beyond 10 weeks of gestation.
NIPT allows the direct screening from maternal plasma for fetal chromosomal abnormalities as early as 10 weeks of gestation [25,26]. The Vanadis system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) has two major advantages. First, this method does not depend on advanced genetic readout systems like sequencing or microarrays and that by eliminating the need for NGS and PCR, it reduces the complexity of the test and therefore both the workflow and cost [22,23,27]. Secondly, by directly targeting fragments of chromosomes using specific probes, it may reduce the amount of fetal DNA needed, providing a result with a lower fetal DNA fraction, while presenting a comparable sensitivity and specificity to traditional NIPT assays [22,24]. Previous studies have shown that Vanadis can be successfully performed in cases with low fetal fraction, typically less than 2%, and provide reliable results [22].
The results of this study have shown that NIPT can be applied for the diagnosis of fetal sex from as early as six weeks of gestation. That is extremely important for pregnancies at risk for severe sex-linked disorders. In these cases, the diagnosis of a female fetus could provide early reassurance and reduce the anxiety of the parents and, in those with male fetuses, allow the choice to perform invasive prenatal diagnosis much earlier. Celocentesis, which involves the transvaginal insertion of a needle into the celomic cavity and aspiration of celomic fluid, can be used from 6 weeks of gestation and provide reliable results [28,29,30]. In our recent study of 402 pregnancies undergoing celocentesis, we have shown that celomic fluid was successfully aspirated in 99.8% cases and that the vast majority of women had no or only mild discomfort. The use of specific antibodies for the positive selection of fetal cells and the use of a micromanipulator to pick up individual cells resulted in obtaining reliable results following celocentesis. Finally, the fetal loss rate was 2.3%, which is remarkable in this early stage of pregnancy [30]. Therefore, celocentesis could also be performed for the confirmation of pathological results following the early NIPT (e.g., an aneuploidy) the same way chorionic villus sampling is used, if the abnormal NIPT results are provided beyond 10 weeks of gestation.

5. Limitations

The main limitation of our study is the relatively small number of cases included. Furthermore, in the study population, no chromosomal abnormality was detected; therefore, the ability of diagnosing aneuploidies was not verified. However, in 97% of the cases, the test provided results.

6. Future Work

In order to more accurately validate “Early NIPT” at 6–9 weeks of gestation, we are designing a much larger double-blind study, employing 1000 patients for testing both at 7 and 12 weeks.

7. Conclusions

The “Vanadis” prenatal NIPT assay can successfully be used early during the first trimester at 6–9 weeks in order to identify the fetal sex.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M. and H.K.; methodology, G.M. and A.K.; software, H.K.; validation, A.K., G.M. and C.S.; formal analysis, K.K.; investigation, A.K., G.M. and C.S; resources, H.K. and K.K.; data curation, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K. and G.M; writing—review and editing, A.K. and G.M; visualization, G.M. and H.K.; supervision, G.M.; project administration, A.K.; funding acquisition, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research partly received external funding, as the analysis of the samples was provided without charge by Genomedica laboratoties. The APC was funded by Harry Kontos CEO of Genomedica SA, Greece.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University hospital, Ioannina, Greece NO 27/27-12-2022 (protocol number:1082).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data of our study are fully provided in Table 1. No additional supporting data is available.

Conflicts of Interest

Harry Kontos is CEO of Genomedica SA, which distributes and provides genetic screening tests in Greece. The rest of the authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gil, M.M.; Accurti, V.; Santacruz, B.; Plana, M.N.; Nicolaides, K.H. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: Updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 302–314, Erratum in Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 53, 734–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics; Committee on Genetics; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226. Obstet Gynecol. 2020, 136, e48–e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nicolaides, K.H.; Syngelaki, A.; Ashoor, G.; Birdir, C.; Touzet, G. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies in a routinely screened first-trimester population. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 207, 374.e1–374.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Norton, M.E.; Brar, H.; Weiss, J.; Karimi, A.; Laurent, L.C.; Caughey, A.B.; Rodriguez, M.H.; Williams, J., 3rd; Mitchell, M.E.; Adair, C.D.; et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: Results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 207, 137.e1–137.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Taylor-Phillips, S.; Freeman, K.; Geppert, J.; Agbebiyi, A.; Uthman, O.A.; Madan, J.; Clarke, A.; Quenby, S.; Clarke, A. Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e010002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mackie, F.L.; Hemming, K.; Allen, S.; Morris, R.K.; Kilby, M.D. The accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies: A systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. BJOG 2017, 124, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Geppert, J.; Stinton, C.; Johnson, S.; Clarke, A.; Grammatopoulos, D.; Taylor-Phillips, S. Antenatal screening for fetal trisomies using microarray-based cell-free DNA testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prenat. Diagn. 2020, 40, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dan, S.; Wang, W.; Ren, J.; Li, Y.; Hu, H.; Xu, Z.; Lau, T.K.; Xie, J.; Zhao, W.; Huang, H.; et al. Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal noninvasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11,105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors. Prenat. Diagn. 2012, 32, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tian, W.; Yuan, Y.; Yuan, E.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Guo, J.; Cui, X.; Li, P.; Cui, S. Evaluation of the clinical utility of extended non-invasive prenatal testing in the detection of chromosomal aneuploidy and microdeletion/microduplication. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2023, 28, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Zaninović, L.; Bašković, M.; Ježek, D.; Katušić Bojanac, A. Validity and Utility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Copy Number Variations and Microdeletions: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Wang, C.; Mei, L.; Wan, Y.; Li, H.; Luan, S.; Lu, J.; Wang, P.; Wen, L.; Han, X.; Li, X.; et al. Clinical value of positive CNVs results by NIPT without fetal ultrasonography-identified structural anomalies. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2024, 12, e2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  12. Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Lou, H.; Wu, M.; Liu, F.; Chang, W.; Zhao, X. The detection efficacy of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) for sex chromosome abnormalities and copy number variation and its differentiation in pregnant women of different ages. Heliyon 2024, 10, e24155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Luo, X.; Liu, W.; Hu, L.; Cong, X.; Liu, X.; Niu, H.; Zhou, F.; Li, G.; Wen, L.; Guo, Y. Prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy determination and follow up of sex chromosome aneuploidy screened by non-invasive prenatal testing from 122 453 unselected singleton pregnancies: A retrospective analysis of 7-year experience. Congenit. Anom. 2024, 64, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Soukkhaphone, B.; Lindsay, C.; Langlois, S.; Little, J.; Rousseau, F.; Reinharz, D. Non-invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2021, 9, e1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Ganick, J.A.; Palomaki, G.E.; Kloza, E.M.; Lambert-Messerlian, G.M.; Haddow, J.E. The impact of maternal plasma DNA fetal fraction on next generation sequencing tests for common fetal aneuploidies. Prenat. Diagn. 2013, 33, 667–674. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kinnings, S.L.; Geis, J.A.; Almasri, E.; Wang, H.; Guan, X.; McCullough, R.M.; Bombard, A.T.; Saldivar, J.S.; Oeth, P.; Deciu, C. Factors afecting levels of circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma and their implications for non-invasive prenatal testing. Prenat. Diagn. 2015, 35, 816–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mousavi, S.; Shokri, Z.; Bastani, P.; Ghojazadeh, M.; Riahifar, S.; Nateghian, H. Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cuckle, H.; Benn, P.; Pergament, E. Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy as a clinical service. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 48, 932–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ashoor, G.; Syngelaki, A.; Poon, L.C.; Rezende, J.C.; Nicolaides, K.H. Fetal fraction in maternal plasma cell-free DNA at 11-13 weeks’ gestation: Relation to maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 41, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, E.; Batey, A.; Struble, C.; Musci, T.; Song, K.; Oliphant, A. Gestational age and maternal weight effects on fetal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. Prenat. Diagn. 2013, 33, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hui, L.; Bianchi, D.W. Fetal fraction and noninvasive prenatal testing: What clinicians need to know. Prenat. Diagn. 2020, 40, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dahl, F.; Ericsson, O.; Karlberg, O.; Karlsson, F.; Howell, M.; Persson, F.; Roos, F.; Stenberg, J.; Ahola, T.; Alftrén, I.; et al. Imaging single DNA molecules for high precision NIPT. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Ericsson, O.; Ahola, T.; Dahl, F.; Karlsson, F.; Persson, F.; Karlberg, O.; Roos, F.; Alftrén, I.; Andersson, B.; Barkenäs, E.; et al. Clinical validation of a novel automated cell-free DNA screening assay for trisomies 21, 13, and 18 in maternal plasma. Prenat. Diagn. 2019, 39, 1011–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Saidel, M.L.; Ananth, U.; Rose, D.; Farrell, C. Non-Invasive prenatal testing with rolling circle amplification: Real-world clinical experience in a non-molecular laboratory. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2023, 37, e24870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Rafi, I.; Hill, M.; Hayward, J.; Chitty, L.S. Non-invasive prenatal testing: Use of cell-free fetal DNA in Down syndrome screening. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2017, 67, 298–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  26. Health Quality Ontario. Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont. Health Technol. Assess Ser. 2019, 19, 1–166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. Gormus, U.; Chaubey, A.; Shenoy, S.; Wong, Y.W.; Chan, L.Y.; Choo, B.P.; Oraha, L.; Gousseva, A.; Persson, F.; Prensky, L.; et al. Assessment and Clinical Utility of a Non-Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Technology. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 43, 958–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Makrydimas, G.; Georgiou, I.; Bouba, I.; Lolis, D.; Nicolaides, K.H. Early prenatal diagnosis by celocentesis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 23, 482–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Giambona, A.; Leto, F.; Passarello, C.; Vinciguerra, M.; Cigna, V.; Schillaci, G.; Picciotto, F.; Lauricella, S.; Nicolaides, K.H.; Makrydimas, G.; et al. Fetal aneuploidy diagnosed at celocentesis for early prenatal diagnosis of congenital hemoglobinopathies. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2018, 97, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Makrydimas, G.; Damiani, G.; Jakil, C.; Cigna, V.; Orlandi, M.; Picciotto, F.; Schillaci, G.; Cassarà, F.; Vinciguerra, M.; Leto, F.; et al. Celocentesis for early prenatal diagnosis of hemoglobinopathy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 56, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristics, measurements, and results between the two groups. * An amniocentesis was performed due to maternal anxiety. The fetus’s karyotype revealed an additional X chromosome (XXY)—Klinefelter syndrome. Brackets point out the origin of either sample: (1) = NIPT at 6–9 weeks—group 1; (2) = NIPT at 11–14 weeks—group 2. Abbreviations used in table: Mat.Age = maternal age, BMI = body mass index, CRL = crown rump length, GA = gestational age.
Table 1. Characteristics, measurements, and results between the two groups. * An amniocentesis was performed due to maternal anxiety. The fetus’s karyotype revealed an additional X chromosome (XXY)—Klinefelter syndrome. Brackets point out the origin of either sample: (1) = NIPT at 6–9 weeks—group 1; (2) = NIPT at 11–14 weeks—group 2. Abbreviations used in table: Mat.Age = maternal age, BMI = body mass index, CRL = crown rump length, GA = gestational age.
NOMat.AgeBMI (1)CRL (mm) (1)GA (1)SEX (1)BMI (2)CRL (mm) (2)GA (2)SEX (2)
12725.813.47.85FEMALE23.671.013.28FEMALE
2392112.97.71FEMALE22.152.011.71FEMALE
33219.323.48.71MALE21.370.312.71MALE *
43321.514.37.71MALE22.557.412.28MALE
53624.518.28.14FEMALE25.255.012.14FEMALE
63722.112.77.14FAILURE22.165.612.85MALE
73319.519.98.71MALE20.951.711.85MALE
83021.817.08.28MALE22MISCARRIAGE
92620.311.87.71FEMALE19.852.111.85FEMALE
103827.519.98.71MALE27.976.013.57MALE
113824.419.18.28MALE24.675.113.57MALE
123021.215.18.28FEMALE20.971.812.28FEMALE
133325.317.38.14MALE2670.413.14MALE
143831.216.98.28MALE3260.012.28MALE
153527.516.17.85FEMALE27.955.812.0FEMALE
162922.716.08.00FEMALE23.368.313.0FEMALE
173721.114.07.71MALE2255.812.14MALE
18352116.08.14FEMALE21.855.212.14FEMALE
192929.121.08.71FEMALE30.154.611.85FEMALE
20262619.08.42FEMALE2664.512.85FEMALE
212922.520.08.57FEMALE23.649.911.71FEMALE
222733.211.67.57FEMALE33.659.212.0FEMALE
232025.305.05.85MALE26.370.213.14MALE
24303220.69.0FEMALE29.757.712.28FEMALE
253420.923.88.57FEMALE20.956.911.71FEMALE
263332.410.07.0MALE32.659.212.57MALE
273725.516.08.14MALE23.660.012.57MALE
283722.329.09.71MALE22.360.912.57MALE
292822.815.08.14MALE23.160.712.57MALE
302922.610.57.14MALE22.164.912.71MALE
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Katrachouras, A.; Kontos, H.; Konis, K.; Skentou, C.; Makrydimas, G. Early Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation. Genes 2024, 15, 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070895

AMA Style

Katrachouras A, Kontos H, Konis K, Skentou C, Makrydimas G. Early Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation. Genes. 2024; 15(7):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Katrachouras, Alexandros, Harry Kontos, Kyriacos Konis, Chara Skentou, and George Makrydimas. 2024. "Early Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing at 6–9 Weeks of Gestation" Genes 15, no. 7: 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15070895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop