Next Article in Journal
Digital Papillary Adenocarcinoma: The Detection of Low-Risk Human Papillomaviruses and the BRAF p.V600E Mutation in a Subset of Cases
Previous Article in Journal
Giant Morpheaform Basal Cell Carcinoma Mimicking Scarring Alopecia: Exception Prone to Neglect
 
 
Journals
Dermatopathology
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/dermatopathology11020017
dermatopathology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Prognostic Value of Histopathological Features in Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: Insights from a Retrospective–Prospective Cohort Study

by
Sandra Jerkovic Gulin
1,2,*,
Ivana Ilic
3 and
Romana Ceovic
4
1
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Ryhov County Hospital, 551 85 Jonkoping, Sweden
2
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linkoping University, 581 85 Linkoping, Sweden
3
Department of Pathology and Cytology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dermatopathology 2024, 11(2), 161-176; https://doi.org/10.3390/dermatopathology11020017
Submission received: 9 April 2024 / Revised: 22 May 2024 / Accepted: 7 June 2024 / Published: 14 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinico-Pathological Correlation in Dermatopathology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs), especially mycosis fungoides (MF), pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aims to correlate initial histological features with the disease course and survival in MF patients. A retrospective–prospective cohort study was conducted on 83 patients diagnosed with early-stage MF at the Departments of Dermatovenerology and Pathology, UHC Zagreb, from January 2003 to December 2012. The analyzed histopathological parameters included lichenoid dermal lymphocyte infiltrate, Pautrier microabscesses, and lymphocyte atypia. Patients with more than 30 guardian lymphocytes per 100 keratinocytes exhibited worse overall and progression-free survival. Furthermore, those with over 50% atypical lymphocytes demonstrated a faster progression rate. A dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate and a high count of lymphocyte “keepers” significantly increased the mortality risk within five years of diagnosis. This study did not fully confirm the hypothesis regarding the prognostic value of large Pautrier microabscesses but highlighted the importance of dense lichenoid infiltrates. The study identified new potential histopathological prognostic factors in early-stage MF, suggesting the need for larger studies to confirm these findings. The identification of such predictors could enhance the prognostic stratification and guide more tailored therapeutic approaches for MF patients.

1. Introduction

Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) represent extranodal neoplasms affecting T, NK, or B lymphocytes with a particular affinity for the skin. It is imperative to distinguish them from skin involvement in extracutaneous leukemias and lymphomas. PCLs, also referred to as skin lymphomas, encompass various types, and an accurate classification mandates the integration of several different features, especially correlating clinical manifestations and disease course with histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular data [1,2,3].
MF stands as the most prevalent T-cell skin lymphoma, constituting 50% of primary skin lymphomas [3]. MF encompasses various clinical stages, including premycotic, plaque-infiltrative, and tumor stages. Most patients with early-stage MF do not progress to advanced disease [4]. The incidence has shown regional variability and an increasing trend [5,6,7]. Despite numerous studies, the etiology of MF remains elusive, though associations with other hematological disorders and malignant and autoimmune diseases have been noted [8,9,10].
The diagnosis of MF relies on correlating clinical presentation, disease course, and histological and immunohistochemical analyses of skin biopsy samples. Notable histological criteria for diagnosing premycotic MF include Pautrier microabscesses, epidermal lymphocyte alignment, disproportionate epidermotropism, and lichenoid dermal infiltrates. However, diagnosing early-stage MF can be challenging due to similarities with inflammatory skin diseases [11].
MF is an epidermotropic T-cell skin lymphoma cytologically characterized by the proliferation of small to medium-sized pleomorphic, cerebriform lymphocytes. Several histological criteria for the diagnosis of early-stage MF include Pautrier microabscesses, lymphocytes aligned along the dermo-epidermal junction, intraepidermal lymphocytes larger than lymphocytes in the dermis, disproportionate epidermotropism (epidermotropic lymphocytes with scant spongiosis), intraepidermal lymphocytes with a clear area (halo lymphocytes) around the nucleus, enlarged papillary dermis with mild fibrosis and coarse collagen bundles, and a lichenoid dermal infiltrate of lymphocytes [12,13,14]. Intraepidermal clusters of lymphocytes (Pautrier microabscesses), which were considered a hallmark of the disease for decades, are present only in a smaller number of cases of premycotic-stage MF (prediagnostic stage) and often do not exist in advanced stages of the disease [15]. Early lesions of MF most often show a lichenoid infiltration of lymphocytes in the enlarged papillary dermis, hyperplastic, normal, or atrophic epidermis with a dominance of small lymphocytes. Atypical cells are extremely rare in early lesions. Also, solitary epidermotropism (epidermotropism of individual lymphocytes) is found significantly more often than Pautrier microabscesses in early lesions. Diagnostic criteria in the early stage of MF include (a) epidermotropic lymphocytes with nuclei that are larger than the nuclei of lymphocytes in the upper dermis; (b) lymphocytes arranged along the basal membrane of the epidermis; (c) intraepidermal lymphocytes in areas with scant spongiosis (disproportionate epidermotropism) [12,16]; (d) the expression of CD2, CD3, and CD5 in less than 50% of T lymphocytes; (e) the expression of CD7 in less than 10% of T lymphocytes; and (f) the aberrant expression of CD2, CD3, CD5, or CD7 on epidermal and dermal T lymphocytes [12]. Disproportionate epidermotropism can be seen in many inflammatory dermatoses. In about 5% of cases of early-stage MF, epidermotropism is minimal or non-existent, which may be a result of prior treatment. In the papillary dermis, pronounced fibrosis with coarse collagen fiber bundles, along with a band-like or patchy lichenoid infiltrate of lymphocytes, is found. Often, there is no edema of the dermis, eosinophils may be present but are not a common finding in patch and plaque lesions of early-stage MF, while the number of Langerhans cells is typically elevated [12,17].
MF plaques are characterized by the finding of a dense, band-like infiltrate of lymphocytes in the upper dermis, with a very frequent presence of Pautrier microabscesses and a dominance of small to medium-sized pleomorphic, cerebriform T lymphocytes [11,12,16].
In MF tumors, there is a dense, nodular, or diffuse infiltration of lymphocytes throughout the dermis, which commonly involves the subcutaneous fat tissue, while epidermotropism is often lost. Flat tumors are histopathologically characterized by the dense infiltration of lymphocytes only in the superficial and middle dermis, and in some cases, the infiltrate in the interstitium may dominate. In advanced stages of MF, patients may develop lesions containing numerous large cells, including immunoblasts, large pleomorphic cells, and large anaplastic cells [14,18,19,20,21]. The large-cell transformation of MF is defined by the presence of large cells making up more than 25% of the infiltrate or large cells forming microscopic nodes, and it is found in about 50% of cases of the tumor stages of MF [14,19,20,21,22,23]. The course of MF is indolent until large-cell transformation occurs, which is rare, and is associated with an aggressive clinical course and shortened survival [19].
MF is characterized by the infiltration of α/β helper memory T lymphocytes (βF1+, TSR-γ−, CD3+, CD4+, CD5+, CD8−, CD45Ro+, and TIA-1−). Rare cases express a T-cytotoxic (βF1−, TSR-γ−, CD3+, CD4−, CD5+, CD8+, and TIA-1+) or γ/δ (βF1−, TSR-γ+, CD3+, CD4−, CD5+, CD8+, and TIA-1+) phenotype, and neither clinically nor prognostically differ from the former [12,13,14,16,24,25,26]. The loss of pan-T-cell markers (CD2, CD3, and CD5) supports the diagnosis of MF and T-cell lymphomas but is very rare in early MF lesions [13,14,16,27]. Rarely, the early stage of MF shows an aberrant CD4+/CD8+ or CD4−/CD8− phenotype [16,28]. MF cases that are CD4−/CD8− may be positive for PD-1 [29,30]. Apart from MF, malignant lymphocytes in Sézary syndrome can also be PD-1-positive [29]. In the late stages of MF, lesions may contain numerous CD20+ B lymphocytes, which can even form germinal centers and mask the neoplastic T-lymphocyte infiltrate. Such cases must not be mistaken for B-cell skin lymphomas. Also, the occurrence of composite skin lymphomas, defined as neoplasms of T- and B-cell origin in one anatomical region or within the same lesion (e.g., the spectrum of T-cell neoplasms combined with different B-cell lymphomas/leukemias), should not be overlooked [13,14,16,28,31,32,33,34].
The immunohistochemical characteristics of MF cells are similar to those in many inflammatory skin diseases [11,35]. Staining with CD3 and CD4 markers will help highlight the epidermotropism of T lymphocytes, but intraepidermal lymphocytes cannot be considered pathognomonic for MF. It is believed that in the early stage of MF, there is a loss of CD7 antigen [36]. However, some studies have shown that inflammatory dermatoses can also exhibit the loss of CD7 antigen in some cases [11,37,38].
A recent study that investigated the possibility of distinguishing the premycotic stage MF (prediagnostic stage) from benign skin conditions based on histological criteria found that convoluted lymphocytes, subcutaneous infiltration, and follicular mucin are 100% specific for MF, and the absence of edema is 100% sensitive and a specific criterion for differentiating MF from inflammatory imitators [22,39].
A comprehensive study on early-stage mycosis fungoides revealed a common histopathological pattern of lichenoid dermal infiltrate with varied epidermotropism and highlighted the need for multiple biopsies and clinical–histological correlation to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support detailed immunohistochemical analysis [13]. It is advised to always perform more than one biopsy of different lesions to ensure enough material for further immunohistochemical and molecular procedures and to increase the sampling sites and diagnostic yield [12,13].
Numerous studies have failed to identify a reliable marker for the diagnosis of early-stage MF [40,41]. PCLs, particularly MF, present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

2. Objectives

The aim of this study is to systematically assess the prognostic implications of specific histopathological features observed in the initial biopsies of patients with early-stage MF (IA, IB, and IIA), including dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate of lymphocytes and the presence of Pautrier microabscesses (Darier’s nests). Through a detailed analysis combining retrospective and prospective cohort data, this research aims to establish a clear correlation between these early histological markers and the subsequent disease course and prognosis. By identifying these predictive indicators, this study endeavors to contribute to the enhancement of diagnostic accuracy, inform therapeutic strategies, and ultimately improve patient outcomes in early-stage MF.

3. Materials and Methods

In this retrospective–prospective cohort study, patients diagnosed with early-stage MF (stages IA, IB, and IIA) between January 2003 and December 2012 at the Clinic for Dermatovenerology and the Clinical Institute for Pathology and Cytology of the Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb were included. These patients had comprehensive clinical data and sufficient stored samples for additional histological and immunohistochemical analysis. This study comprised 83 patients. Excluded from the study were patients with a suspected diagnosis of MF that was not confirmed by histological analysis and clinical course, as well as those lacking adequate samples for further analyses.
The analysis of existing medical documentation included age, sex, clinical presentation, duration of the premycotic stage (prediagnostic stage MF), response to therapy, and occurrences of relapse and disease progression. The staging of the disease utilized the TNMB classification for MF/SS of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Clinical presentation was defined by the type of skin lesions (patch, plaque, or tumor), the extent of skin lesions (≤10% of body surface area, >10% of body surface area), and lymph node size (enlarged, not enlarged). Disease progression was defined by at least one of the following criteria: (a) progression from plaque to tumor stage or erythroderma; (b) histologically confirmed lymph node involvement in patients previously limited to the skin; (c) visceral involvement in patients previously limited to the skin or lymph nodes; and (d) death due to lymphoma. Response to therapy was defined as (a) complete response (complete clinical regression of all MF lesions), (b) partial response (any response less than complete), or (c) no response (no visible clinical response to therapy).
Skin samples from patients stored in the archives of the Clinical Institute for Pathology and Cytology, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, were utilized. The samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, dehydrated in alcohol concentrations, embedded in paraffin blocks, and sliced into 4-micron-thick sections before being stained with the standard hematoxylin-and-eosin method, followed by immunohistochemical staining using commercially available antibodies for CD2 (clone AB75, Novocastra, UK), CD3 (clone F7.2.38, Dako, Denmark), CD4 (clone 4B12, Dako, Denmark), CD5 (clone 4C7, Dako, Denmark), CD7 (clone CBC.37, Dako, Denmark), and CD8 (clone C8/144B, Dako, Denmark). For antigen demasking, a microwave oven was used (95 °C, 15 min, target retrieval solution pH 9.0). Expression of markers was visualized using the standard avidin–biotin immunohistochemical method (LSAB, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) with an automatic staining machine (TechMate, Dako) that utilizes capillary action. Positive reactions for antibodies CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD7, and CD8 were identified by the membrane staining of tumor cells. Positive and negative control stains were performed, with lymph node tissue serving as the positive external control.
In the examined preparations, the following histological and immunohistochemical parameters were analyzed: (1) the quantity of lichenoid dermal infiltrate of lymphocytes (classified semi-quantitatively as scant, moderate, or dense); (2) Pautrier microabscesses (intraepidermal collections of atypical lymphocytes) classified as absent or the presence of small (3–10 atypical lymphocytes per cluster) or large (more than 10 atypical lymphocytes) lymphocytes; (3) “haloed” lymphocytes named lymphocyte “keepers” in the basal layer of the epidermis (at least 4 lymphocytes in a row) presented as the number of consecutive lymphocytes per number of keratinocytes (Figure 1); and (4) the amount of lymphocyte atypia determined semi-quantitatively as no lymphocyte atypia, ≤10%, ≤50%, or >50% of lymphocytes showing signs of atypia. These histological criteria were quantified in the preparations across 10 visual fields.
For statistical analysis, appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests were used. Results with p-values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were considered statistically significant. The impact of each observed variable on disease progression and mortality was analyzed. Qualitative variables are presented in absolute numbers and percentages. Their association with progression and mortality was tested using the chi-square test. Quantitative variables are presented as the median and corresponding range. Their differences regarding progression and mortality were tested using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test. The correlation between the initial stage of the disease and the stage after progression was examined using the non-parametric Spearman correlation. The relative risk for the examined outcome (progression or death) for each variable was analyzed using logistic regression. Survival and time to progression were determined using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and the differences in survival between groups of patients were examined using the log-rank test and chi-square test. Statistical data analysis was performed on a personal computer using Statistica for Windows, ver. 6.0.

4. Results

This study included 83 patients aged between 7 and 85 years, with an average age of 60 years (Table 1). Of these, 49 were males, with an average age of 63 years (7–85), and 34 were females, with an average age of 59.5 years (25–82). At the time of diagnosis, 27 patients were in stage IA, 35 patients in stage IB, and 21 patients in stage IIA. The median follow-up of patients was 25 months (range 1–130). In 36 (43%) patients, the disease progressed. The median survival without disease progression was 48 months. Ten patients (12%) died, all from lymphoma following disease progression. The five-year survival rate was 86% (Figure 2). The median survival after progression was 58 months.

5. Survival

Patients with a dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate had worse survival than those with sparse and moderately dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate. The difference was statistically significant (Figure 3). None of the patients with large Pautrier microabscesses died during the observed period (Figure 4). Patients with more than 30 lymphocyte “keepers” per 100 keratinocytes had worse survival than those with 30 or fewer lymphocyte “keepers” per 100 keratinocytes. The difference was statistically significant (Figure 5). Patients with more than 50% atypical lymphocytes exhibited a trend toward worse survival than those with 50% or fewer atypical lymphocytes, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Using the log-rank test, statistically significant unfavorable prognostic factors for survival were disease stage IIa, plaques in the initial clinical picture, a premycotic phase shorter than 4 years, enlarged lymph nodes, dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate, a large number of halo lymphocytes, a lack of response to treatment, and the occurrence of disease progression. Of these, the lack of response to treatment was the most significant, followed by pretherapeutic factors like dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate (Table 2).
If the data were analyzed using univariate logistic regression, both parameters listed in Table 3 increased the risk of mortality within the first five years after diagnosis.

6. Progression

There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of disease progression in patients divided into three groups based on the characteristics of the lichenoid dermal infiltrate (chi-square test: p = 0.0881, Figure 6). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of disease progression in patients divided into two groups based on the characteristics of the lichenoid dermal infiltrate. There was no statistically significant difference in disease progression regarding Pautrier microabscesses when patients were divided into three groups (chi-square: p = 0.4708). There was no statistically significant difference in progression regarding Pautrier microabscesses even when patients were divided into two groups. Patients with more than 30 lymphocyte “keepers” per 100 keratinocytes exhibited a trend of faster progression than those with 30 or fewer lymphocyte “keepers” per 100 keratinocytes. The difference was on the border of statistical significance (Figure 7). The difference in progression-free survival between three groups of patients divided according to the proportion of atypical lymphocytes was on the border of statistical significance (chi-square: p = 0.0513, Figure 8). Patients with more than 50% atypical lymphocytes had faster progression than those with 50% or fewer atypical lymphocytes. The difference was statistically significant (Figure 9).
Using the log-rank test, statistically significant unfavorable prognostic factors for progression-free survival was a large number of atypical lymphocytes (Table 4). None of the variables examined listed in Table 5 were significant for the risk of disease progression.

7. Discussion

In our single-center cohort retrospective–prospective study, we assessed 83 patients over a median period of nearly 2 years. The study’s limitations include its single-center design, relatively brief follow-up duration, modest cohort size, and a small number of deceased subjects (n = 10), which constrained the logistic regression analysis for mortality. However, a strength of our research lies in the comprehensive data availability for all investigated variables across participants, enabling complete analyses for the cohort (N = 83). Despite its mixed retrospective–prospective nature, accurate records of disease progression or mortality were obtained for all cases, facilitating the precise application of the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. We observed disease progression in 43% of the cohort (n = 36), with a median post-progression survival of 58 months, and a five-year survival rate of 86%. Consistent with prior findings, early-stage MF (IA-IIA) typically predicts favorable outcomes with survival spanning 10–35 years, though approximately 25% of cases escalate to advanced stages, resulting in a median survival under 4 years. Subjects with lymph node involvement exhibited a median survival of merely 13 months, aligning with established prognoses indicating worse outcomes for patients with advanced disease stages, higher TNMB classifications, extensive skin involvement, or appearance of changes [2,4,14,20,21,25,42,43,44,45,46,47]. In studies on MF and Sézary syndrome, the key prognostic factors for disease progression were identified. Patient age, TNMB classification, and the presence of extracutaneous disease were significant predictors [9]. Agar et al. highlighted survival differences based on lesion types in early-stage MF [47].
In our study, we attempted to determine histological criteria that influence survival and disease progression. Patients with dense lichenoid infiltrates more frequently had fatal outcomes compared to patients with moderately dense and sparse lichenoid dermal infiltrates. None of the patients with sparse lichenoid dermal infiltrates died. Contrary to our expectations, there was no statistically significant difference in disease progression based on sparse, moderately dense, and dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate. Previous studies have not investigated the impact of lymphocytic lichenoid dermal infiltrates on survival and disease progression, making these results exceptionally valuable.
Contrary to expectations, we did not find a statistically significant difference in survival and disease progression based on the presence of small and large Pautrier microabscesses. None of the patients with large Pautrier microabscesses died during the observed period. Vonderheid et al. conducted a study on 33 patients with early-stage MF exhibiting disease progression, comparing them to 70 control patients without progression. They delineated negative prognostic indicators as large Pautrier microabscesses, atypical lymphocytes with distinct nuclear features in the dermal infiltrate, a dermal infiltrate composition of less than 20% CD8+ cells, and serum IgE levels exceeding 122 U/mL [17,19,48,49]. Our results only partially confirm the results of that study. Our study found that patients with more than 50% atypical lymphocytes had faster progression than those with 50% or fewer atypical lymphocytes, but it did not identify large Pautrier microabscesses as a negative prognostic factor associated with faster disease progression.
The analysis of lymphocyte “keepers” count showed the value of this histological criterion. Patients with more than 30 lymphocyte “keepers” per 100 keratinocytes had poorer survival and faster disease progression than those with 30 or fewer lymphocyte “keepers” per 100 keratinocytes. The impact of this criterion on survival and disease progression has not been analyzed in previous studies, making these results exceptionally valuable.
Patients with more than 50% atypical lymphocytes in the first biopsy had faster progression than those with 50% or fewer atypical lymphocytes. Although the results of comparing progression among the three groups of patients (<10%, 10–50%, and >50%) were not statistically significant, it should be noted that our sample size had a small number of deceased patients (n = 10). These results are consistent with previous research [17].
The results of univariate logistic regression for the basic model of mortality outcome within five years of diagnosis for MF show that dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate and >30 lymphocyte “keepers” per 100 keratinocytes increase the risk of mortality within the first five years after diagnosis.
The results of univariate logistic regression for the basic model of disease progression within 5 years of diagnosis for MF show that the presence and number of lymphocyte “keepers” greater than 30 per 100 keratinocytes, as well as atypical lymphocytes >50%, increase the risk of disease progression within 5 years of diagnosis, while large Pautrier microabscesses reduce this risk. Although these results were at the threshold of statistical significance, they indicated an association with progression.
This study has fulfilled the specified specific objectives. We determined which morphological features in the initial biopsy represent unfavorable prognostic factors for survival (dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate, a large number of lymphocyte “keepers”) and survival without progression (a large number of atypical lymphocytes).
The hypothesis that patients with early-stage MF who have a dense lichenoid dermal infiltrate of lymphocytes and large Pautrier microabscesses in the initial biopsy will have a more aggressive course of the disease and a poorer prognosis was not fully confirmed. Patients with dense LDI had a poorer prognosis, but none of those with large PM (n = 12) died. Regarding disease progression, the thesis that progression occurred more frequently and rapidly in those with dense or moderately dense LDI than in patients with sparse LDI was proven, while large PM was not associated with disease progression.

8. Conclusions

This study suggests new prognostic factors for the early stage of MF. Larger studies are needed to confirm and implement these data into histological criteria that would become standard in diagnosis to identify patients at increased risk of disease progression and poorer prognosis. The identification of these prognostic factors may also serve to create a better prognostic index for MF.

Author Contributions

All authors (S.J.G., I.I. and R.C.) contributed to the conception and design of the study, data analysis, and manuscript writing. S.J.G. and R.C. were involved in data collection, interpretation of results, and critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. I.I. provided expertise in histopathological analysis, contributed to the design of the methodology, and assisted in manuscript preparation and review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the project “Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas in Croatia”, with the project code 214-2180056-0052.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval for this study, titled “Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas in Croatia”, project code 214-2180056-0052, was granted on 27 June 2014, No. 02/21/JG, by the Ethical Board of the School of Medicine, Zagreb University, Croatia, and the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia. This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting reported results are available upon request from authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Willemze, R.; Jaffe, E.S.; Burg, G.; Cerroni, L.; Berti, E.; Swerdlow, S.H.; Ralfkiaer, E.; Chimenti, S.; Diaz-Perez, J.L.; Duncan, L.M.; et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood 2005, 105, 3768–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Latzka, J.; Assaf, C.; Bagot, M.; Cozzio, A.; Dummer, R.; Guenova, E.; Gniadecki, R.; Hodak, E.; Jonak, C.; Klemke, C.-D.; et al. EORTC consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome—Update 2023. Eur. J. Cancer 2023, 195, 113343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Willemze, R.; Cerroni, L.; Kempf, W.; Berti, E.; Facchetti, F.; Swerdlow, S.H.; Jaffe, E.S. Special Report The 2018 Update of the WHO-EORTC Classification for Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas. Available online: http://ashpublications.org/blood/article-pdf/133/16/1703/1726414/blood881268.pdf (accessed on 25 March 2024).
  4. Kim, Y.H.; Liu, H.L.; Mraz-Gernhard, S.; Varghese, A.; Hoppe, R.T. Long-term outcome of 525 patients with mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: Clinical prognostic factors and risk for disease progression. Arch. Dermatol. 2003, 139, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Korgavkar, K.; Xiong, M.; Weinstock, M. Changing incidence trends of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2013, 149, 1295–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kaufman, A.E.; Patel, K.; Goyal, K.; O‘Leary, D.; Rubin, N.; Pearson, D.; Bohjanen, K.; Goyal, A. Mycosis fungoides: Developments in incidence, treatment and survival. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, 2288–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ghazawi, F.M.; Netchiporouk, E.; Rahme, E.; Tsang, M.; Moreau, L.; Glassman, S.; Provost, N.; Gilbert, M.; Jean, S.-E.; Pehr, K.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) incidence and mortality in Canada reveals changing trends and geographic clustering for this malignancy. Cancer 2017, 123, 3550–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Joshi, T.P.; Black, T.A.; Fernandez, B.; Friske, S.; Stafford, H.; Strouphauer, E.; Duvic, M. Comorbidities associated with mycosis fungoides: A case-control study in the All of Us database. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2023, 88, 686–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ai, W.Z.; Keegan, T.H.; Press, D.J.; Yang, J.; Pincus, L.B.; Kim, Y.H.; Chang, E.T. Outcomes after diagnosis of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome before 30 years of age: A population-based study. JAMA Dermatol. 2014, 150, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Davis, T.H.; Morton, C.C.; Miller-Cassman, R.; Balk, S.P.; Kadin, M.E. Hodgkin’s disease, lymphomatoid papulosis, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma derived from a common T-cell clone. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 326, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Burg, G.; Kempf, W.; Cozzio, A.; Feit, J.; Willemze, R.; Jaffe, E.S.; Dummer, R.; Berti, E.; Cerroni, L.; Chimenti, S.; et al. WHO/EORTC classification of cutaneous lymphomas 2005: Histological and molecular aspects. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2005, 32, 647–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pimpinelli, N.; Olsen, E.A.; Santucci, M.; Vonderheid, E.; Haeffner, A.C.; Stevens, S.; Burg, G.; Cerroni, L.; Dreno, B.; Glusac, E.; et al. Defining early mycosis fungoides. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 53, 1053–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Massone, C.; Kodama, K.; Kerl, H.; Cerroni, L. Histopathologic features of early (patch) lesions of mycosis fungoides: A morphologic study on 745 biopsy specimens from 427 patients. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005, 29, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Massone, C.; Crisman, G.; Kerl, H.; Cerroni, L. The prognosis of early mycosis fungoides is not influenced by phenotype and T-cell clonality. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 159, 881–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cribier, B.J. The myth of Pautrier’s microabscesses. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2003, 48, 796–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wiley: Skin Lymphoma: The Illustrated Guide, 4th Edition—Lorenzo Cerroni. Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Skin+Lymphoma%3A+The+Illustrated+Guide%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781118492536 (accessed on 11 February 2016).
  17. Vonderheid, E.C.; Pavlov, I.; Delgado, J.C.; Martins, T.B.; Telang, G.H.; Hess, A.D.; Kadin, M.E. Prognostic factors and risk stratification in early mycosis fungoides. Leuk. Lymphoma 2014, 55, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cerroni, L.; Rieger, E.; Hödl, S.; Kerl, H. Clinicopathologic and immunologic features associated with transformation of mycosis fungoides to large-cell lymphoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1992, 16, 543–552. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1599034 (accessed on 30 August 2016). [CrossRef]
  19. Diamandidou, E.; Colome-Grimmer, M.; Fayad, L.; Duvic, M.; Kurzrock, R. Transformation of mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome: Clinical characteristics and prognosis. Blood 1998, 92, 1150–1159. [Google Scholar]
  20. van Doorn, R.; Van Haselen, C.W.; van Voorst Vader, P.C.; Geerts, M.-L.; Heule, F.; de Rie, M.; Steijlen, P.M.; Dekker, S.K.; van Vloten, W.A.; Willemze, R. Mycosis fungoides: Disease evolution and prognosis of 309 Dutch patients. Arch. Dermatol. 2000, 136, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zackheim, H.S.; Amin, S.; Kashani-Sabet, M.; McMillan, A. Prognosis in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma by skin stage: Long-term survival in 489 patients. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1999, 40, 418–425. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10071312 (accessed on 28 August 2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Santucci, M.; Biggeri, A.; Feller, A.C.; Massi, D.; Burg, G. Efficacy of histologic criteria for diagnosing early mycosis fungoides: An EORTC cutaneous lymphoma study group investigation. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2000, 24, 40–50. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10632486 (accessed on 28 August 2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vergier, B.; de Muret, A.; Beylot-Barry, M.; Vaillant, L.; Ekouevi, D.; Chene, G.; Carlotti, A.; Franck, N.; Dechelotte, P.; Souteyrand, P.; et al. Transformation of mycosis fungoides: Clinicopathological and prognostic features of 45 cases. French Study Group of Cutaneious Lymphomas. Blood 2000, 95, 2212–2218. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10733487 (accessed on 30 August 2016).
  24. Kim, Y.H.; Willemze, R.; Pimpinelli, N.; Whittaker, S.; Olsen, E.A.; Ranki, A.; Dummer, R.; Hoppe, R.T. TNM classification system for primary cutaneous lymphomas other than mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: A proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force of the European Organization of Resear. Blood 2007, 110, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Quaglino, P.; Pimpinelli, N.; Berti, E.; Calzavara-Pinton, P.; Lombardo, G.A.; Rupoli, S.; Alaibac, M.; Bottoni, U.; Carbone, A.; Fava, P.; et al. Time course, clinical pathways, and long-term hazards risk trends of disease progression in patients with classic mycosis fungoides: A multicenter, retrospective follow-up study from the Italian Group of Cutaneous Lymphomas. Cancer 2012, 118, 5830–5839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Benner, M.F.; Jansen, P.M.; Vermeer, M.H.; Willemze, R. Prognostic factors in transformed mycosis fungoides: A retrospective analysis of 100 cases. Blood 2012, 119, 1643–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Howard, M.S.; Smoller, B.R. Mycosis fungoides: Classic disease and variant presentations. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2000, 19, 91–99. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10892710 (accessed on 28 August 2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wada, D.A.; Wilcox, R.A.; Weenig, R.H.; Gibson, L.E. Paucity of intraepidermal FoxP3-positive T cells in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in contrast with spongiotic and lichenoid dermatitis. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2010, 37, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kempf, W.; Kazakov, D.V.; Cipolat, C.; Kutzner, H.; Roncador, G.; Tomasini, D. CD4/CD8 double negative mycosis fungoides with PD-1 (CD279) expression--a disease of follicular helper T-cells? Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2012, 34, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pham-Ledard, A.; Prochazkova-Carlotti, M.; Laharanne, E.; Vergier, B.; Jouary, T.; Beylot-Barry, M.; Merlio, J.-P. IRF4 gene rearrangements define a subgroup of CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: A study of 54 cases. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 816–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gjerdrum, L.M.; Woetmann, A.; Odum, N.; Burton, C.M.; Rossen, K.; Skovgaard, G.L.; Ryder, L.P.; Ralfkiaer, E. FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: Association with disease stage and survival. Leukemia 2007, 21, 2512–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tobisawa, S.I.; Honma, M.; Ishida-Yamamoto, A.; Saijo, Y.; Iizuka, H. Prognostic factors in 105 Japanese cases of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: Clusterin expression as a novel prognostic factor. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2013, 71, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ishida, M.; Okabe, H. Reactive lymphoid follicles with germinal centers in granulomatous mycosis fungoides: A case report with review of the literature. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2013, 40, 284–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Schlapbach, C.; Ochsenbein, A.; Kaelin, U.; Hassan, A.S.; Hunger, R.E.; Yawalkar, N. High numbers of DC-SIGN+ dendritic cells in lesional skin of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2010, 62, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ralfkiaer, E.; Lange Wantzin, G.; Mason, D.Y.; Stein, H.; Thomsen, K. Characterization of benign cutaneous lymphocytic infiltrates by monoclonal antibodies. Br. J. Dermatol. 1984, 111, 635–645. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6391533 (accessed on 30 August 2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ormsby, A.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Tubbs, R.R.; Hsi, E.D. Evaluation of a new paraffin-reactive CD7 T-cell deletion marker and a polymerase chain reaction-based T-cell receptor gene rearrangement assay: Implications for diagnosis of mycosis fungoides in community clinical practice. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2001, 45, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wood, G.S.; Abel, E.A.; Hoppe, R.T.; Warnke, R.A. Leu-8 and Leu-9 antigen phenotypes: Immunologic criteria for the distinction of mycosis fungoides from cutaneous inflammation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1986, 14, 1006–1013. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3088069 (accessed on 30 August 2016). [CrossRef]
  38. Wood, G.S.; Volterra, A.S.; Abel, E.A.; Nickoloff, B.J.; Adams, R.M. Allergic contact dermatitis: Novel immunohistologic features. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1986, 87, 688–693. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2431068 (accessed on 30 August 2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Payne, C.M.; Grogan, T.M.; Spier, C.M.; Bjore, C.G.; Richter, L.C.; Cromey, D.W.; Rangel, C.S. A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1992, 16, 99–125. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1557836 (accessed on 30 August 2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Delfau-Larue, M.H.; Laroche, L.; Wechsler, J.; Lepage, E.; Lahet, C.; Asso-Bonnet, M.; Bagot, M.; Farcet, J.P. Diagnostic value of dominant T-cell clones in peripheral blood in 363 patients presenting consecutively with a clinical suspicion of cutaneous lymphoma. Blood 2000, 96, 2987–2992. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11049975 (accessed on 30 August 2016). [CrossRef]
  41. Kuo, P.H.; McClennan, B.L.; Carlson, K.; Wilson, L.D.; Edelson, R.L.; Heald, P.W.; Girardi, M. FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Mol. Imaging Biol. MIB 2008, 10, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Scarisbrick, J.J.; Kim, Y.H.; Whittaker, S.J.; Wood, G.; Vermeer, M.; Prince, H.; Quaglino, P. Prognostic factors, prognostic indices and staging in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: Where are we now? Br. J. Dermatol. 2014, 170, 1226–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. de Coninck, E.C.; Kim, Y.H.; Varghese, A.; Hoppe, R.T. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with extracutaneous mycosis fungoides. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 19, 779–784. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11157031 (accessed on 30 August 2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Benton, E.C.; Crichton, S.; Talpur, R.; Agar, N.; Fields, P.; Wedgeworth, E.; Mitchell, T.; Cox, M.; Ferreira, S.; Liu, P.; et al. A cutaneous lymphoma international prognostic index (CLIPi) for mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 2859–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sanz-Bueno, J.; Lora, D.; Monsálvez, V.; Maroñas-Jiménez, L.; Postigo, C.; Peralto, J.R.; Ortiz-Romero, P. The new Cutaneous Lymphoma International Prognostic index (CLIPi) for early mycosis fungoides failed to identify prognostic groups in a cohort of Spanish patients. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016, 175, 794–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Muniesa, C.; Estrach, T.; Pujol, R.M.; Gallardo, F.; Garcia-Muret, P.; Climent, J.; Servitje, O. Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides: Clinicopathological features and outcome in a series of 20 cases. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2010, 62, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Agar, N.S.; Wedgeworth, E.; Crichton, S.; Mitchell, T.J.; Cox, M.; Ferreira, S.; Robson, A.; Calonje, E.; Stefanato, C.M.; Wain, E.M.; et al. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors in mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: Validation of the revised International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer staging proposal. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 4730–4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Burg, G.; Dummer, R.; Haeffner, A.; Kempf, W.; Kadin, M. From inflammation to neoplasia: Mycosis fungoides evolves from reactive inflammatory conditions (lymphoid infiltrates) transforming into neoplastic plaques and tumors. Arch. Dermatol. 2001, 137, 949–952. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11453817 (accessed on 9 October 2016).
  49. Grange, F.; Bagot, M. Prognosis of primary cutaneous lymphomas. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 2002, 129, 30–40. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11937927 (accessed on 11 October 2016).
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g001
Figure 1. “Haloed” lymphocytes named lymphocyte “keepers” in the basal layer of the epidermis and lichenoid infiltrate in Mycosis fungoides: (a) H&E, magnification ×20; (b) H&E, magnification ×20; (c) cd3, magnification ×10; (d) cd4, magnification ×10.
Figure 1. “Haloed” lymphocytes named lymphocyte “keepers” in the basal layer of the epidermis and lichenoid infiltrate in Mycosis fungoides: (a) H&E, magnification ×20; (b) H&E, magnification ×20; (c) cd3, magnification ×10; (d) cd4, magnification ×10.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g001
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g002
Figure 2. Overall survival curve.
Figure 2. Overall survival curve.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g002
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g003
Figure 3. Lichenoid dermal infiltrate—survival.
Figure 3. Lichenoid dermal infiltrate—survival.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g003
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g004
Figure 4. Pautrier microabscesses—survival.
Figure 4. Pautrier microabscesses—survival.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g004
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g005
Figure 5. Lymphocyte “keepers”—survival.
Figure 5. Lymphocyte “keepers”—survival.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g005
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g006
Figure 6. Lichenoid dermal infiltrate—progression.
Figure 6. Lichenoid dermal infiltrate—progression.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g006
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g007
Figure 7. Lymphocyte “keepers”—progression.
Figure 7. Lymphocyte “keepers”—progression.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g007
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g008
Figure 8. Lymphocyte atypia—progression.
Figure 8. Lymphocyte atypia—progression.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g008
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g009
Figure 9. Lymphocyte atypia—progression.
Figure 9. Lymphocyte atypia—progression.
Dermatopathology 11 00017 g009
Table 1. Patient characteristics and list of histological and immunohistochemical parameters analyzed in the study.
Table 1. Patient characteristics and list of histological and immunohistochemical parameters analyzed in the study.
VariablePatients (N = 83)
Age (years)60 (7–85)
Gender
Male49 (59%)
Female34 (41%)
Disease Stage
Ia27 (33%)
Ib35 (42%)
IIa21 (25%)
Clinical Presentation
Patch27 (33%)
Plaque56 (67%)
Tumor0
Duration of Premycotic Stage (Prediagnostic Stage) (months)48 (0–240)
Extent of Lesions
≤10% of skin surface26 (31%)
>10% of skin surface57 (69%)
Enlarged Lymph Nodes21 (25%)
Disease Progression36 (43%)
Fatal Outcome10 (12%)
Therapeutic Response
No response9 (11%)
Partial response37 (45%)
Complete response37 (45%)
Lychenoid Dermal Infiltrate
Sparse22 (26%)
Moderately dense37 (45%)
Dense24 (29%)
Pautrier Microabscesses
None33 (40%)
Small38 (46%)
Large12 (14%)
Lymphocyte “Keepers” (Present)
≤30/100 keratinocytes49 (59%)
>30/100 keratinocytes34 (41%)
Lymphocyte Atypia
None3 (4%)
≤10%44 (53%)
10–50%23 (28%)
>50%13 (16%)
Table 2. Differences in survival based on all examined variables.
Table 2. Differences in survival based on all examined variables.
Survived
n = 73		Died
n = 10		Log-Rank Test
(p-Value)
Lichenoid Dermal Infiltrate
 Sparse 220p = 0.0484
 Moderate 352
 Dense 168p = 0.0002
Pautrier Microabscesses
 None285p = 0.3182
 Small335
 Large 1200.2344
Lymphocyte “Keepers” (present) 558p = 0.8491
 ≤30/100 keratinocytes472p = 0.0090
 >30/100 keratinocytes268
Lymphocyte Atypia
 None30
 ≤10%404Chi-square:
p = 0.1469
 10–50%203
 >50%103p = 0.1524
Bold p-Value: p < 0.1.
Table 3. Univariate logistic regression for the basic model of mortality outcome within 5 years in patients with MF.
Table 3. Univariate logistic regression for the basic model of mortality outcome within 5 years in patients with MF.
VariableRR95% CI Lower95% CI Upperp-Value
Lichenoid dermal infiltrate—dense11.772.0567.610.0065
Lymphocyte “keepers” >30/100 keratinocytes14.591.60132.990.0184
Table 4. Differences in the occurrence of disease progression based on all examined variables.
Table 4. Differences in the occurrence of disease progression based on all examined variables.
Progression n = 36No Progression n = 47Log-Rank Test
p-Value
Lichenoid Dermal Infiltrate
 Sparse 517Chi-square
p = 0.0881		p = 0.1146
 Moderate 1720
 Dense1410
Pautrier Microabscesses
 None 1419Chi-square
p = 0.4708
 Small 1919
 Large 39p = 0.2664
Lymphocyte “Keepers“ (present)3033p = 0.1438
 ≤30/100 keratinocytes1732p = 0.0722
 >30/100 keratinocytes1915
Lymphocyte atypia
 Absent03
 ≤10%1727Chi-square
p = 0.0513
 10–50%1013
 >50%94p = 0.0196
Bold p-Value: p < 0.1.
Table 5. Univariate logistic regression for the basic model of disease progression within 5 years in MF.
Table 5. Univariate logistic regression for the basic model of disease progression within 5 years in MF.
Relative Risk (RR)95% Confidence Intervalp-Value
Pautrier microabscesses—large 0.222 0.040–1.228 0.0834
Lymphocyte “keepers”—present 4.105 0.947–17.794 0.0588
Lymphocyte “keepers” >30/100 keratinocytes 2.598 0.862–7.833 0.0885
Lymphocyte atypia >50% 3.750 0.866–16.230 0.0761
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jerkovic Gulin, S.; Ilic, I.; Ceovic, R. The Prognostic Value of Histopathological Features in Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: Insights from a Retrospective–Prospective Cohort Study. Dermatopathology 2024, 11, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.3390/dermatopathology11020017

AMA Style

Jerkovic Gulin S, Ilic I, Ceovic R. The Prognostic Value of Histopathological Features in Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: Insights from a Retrospective–Prospective Cohort Study. Dermatopathology. 2024; 11(2):161-176. https://doi.org/10.3390/dermatopathology11020017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jerkovic Gulin, Sandra, Ivana Ilic, and Romana Ceovic. 2024. "The Prognostic Value of Histopathological Features in Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: Insights from a Retrospective–Prospective Cohort Study" Dermatopathology 11, no. 2: 161-176. https://doi.org/10.3390/dermatopathology11020017

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop