research-article

Towards an Understanding of Augmented Reality Extensions for Existing 3D Data Analysis Tools

Authors:

Lonni Besançon,

David Rousseau,

Mickael Sereno,

Mehdi Ammi, and

Tobias IsenbergAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

Pages 1 - 13

https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376657

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We present an observational study with domain experts to understand how augmented reality (AR) extensions to traditional PC-based data analysis tools can help particle physicists to explore and understand 3D data. Our goal is to allow researchers to integrate stereoscopic AR-based visual representations and interaction techniques into their tools, and thus ultimately to increase the adoption of modern immersive analytics techniques in existing data analysis workflows. We use Microsoft's HoloLens as a lightweight and easily maintainable AR headset and replicate existing visualization and interaction capabilities on both the PC and the AR view. We treat the AR headset as a second yet stereoscopic screen, allowing researchers to study their data in a connected multi-view manner. Our results indicate that our collaborating physicists appreciate a hybrid data exploration setup with an interactive AR extension to improve their understanding of particle collision events.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (paper528vf.mp4)

Supplemental video

Download
57.77 MB

MP4 File (paper528pv.mp4)

Preview video

Download
9.63 MB

MP4 File (a528-wang-presentation.mp4)

Download
62.13 MB

References

[1]

George Alverson, Giulio Eulisse, Thomas McCauley, and Lucas Taylor. 2012. iSpy: A powerful and lightweight event display. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 396, 2, Article 022002 (Dec. 2012), 6 pages.

[2]

Sabrina Amrouche, Laurent Basara, Paolo Calafiura, Victor Estrade, Steven Farrell, Diogo R Ferreira, Liam Finnie, Nicole Finnie, Cécile Germain, Vladimir Vava Gligorov, and others. 2019. The Tracking Machine Learning challenge: Accuracy phase. arXiv preprint 1904.06778. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.06778

[3]

Benjamin Bach, Ronell Sicat, Johanna Beyer, Maxime Cordeil, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2018. The hologram in my hand: How effective is interactive exploration of 3D visualizations in immersive tangible augmented reality? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (Jan. 2018), 457--467.

[4]

Matthew Bellis, Riccardo Maria Bianchi, Sebastien Binet, Ciril Bohak, Benjamin Couturier, Hadrien Grasland, Oliver Gutsche, Sergey Linev, Alex Martyniuk, Thomas McCauley, Edward Moyse, Alja Mrak Tadel, Mark Neubauer, Jeremi Niedziela, Leo Piilonen, Jim Pivarski, Martin Ritter, Tai Sakuma, Matevz Tadel, and Ben Waugh. 2018. HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Visualization. arXiv preprint 1811.10309. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10309

[5]

Hrvoje Benko, Edward W. Ishak, and Steven Feiner. 2004. Collaborative mixed reality visualization of an archaeological excavation. In Proc. ISMAR. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 132--140.

Digital Library

[6]

Lonni Besançon, Paul Issartel, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2017. Hybrid tactile/tangible interaction for 3D data exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan. 2017), 881--890.

Digital Library

[7]

Lonni Besançon, Paul Issartel, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2017. Mouse, tactile, and tangible input for 3D manipulation. In Proc. CHI. ACM, New York, 4727--4740.

Digital Library

[8]

Lonni Besançon, Amir Semmo, David J. Biau, Bruno Frachet, Virginie Pineau, El Hadi Sariali, Rabah Taouachi, Tobias Isenberg, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2018. Reducing affective responses to surgical images through color manipulation and stylization. In Proc. Expressive. ACM, New York, Article 4, 13 pages.

Digital Library

[9]

Lonni Besançon, Mickael Sereno, Mehdi Ammi, Lingyun Yu, and Tobias Isenberg. 2019. Hybrid touch/tangible spatial 3D data selection. Computer Graphics Forum 38, 3 (June 2019), 553--567.

[10]

Richard Brath. 2014. 3D InfoVis is here to stay: Deal with it. In Proc. 3DVis. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 25--31.

[11]

Frederik Brudy, Christian Holz, Roman Rädle, Chi-Jui Wu, Steven Houben, Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2019. Cross-device taxonomy: Survey, opportunities and challenges of interactions spanning across multiple devices. In Proc. CHI. ACM, New York, Article 562, 28 pages.

Digital Library

[12]

Sheelagh Carpendale. 2008. Evaluating information visualizations. In Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives. LNCS, Vol. 4950. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 19--45.

[13]

Citi. 2016. Citi HoloLens holographic workstation. Online video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NogltmewmQ. (2016). Accessed: August 10, 2019.

[14]

Carolina Cruz-Neira, Daniel J. Sandin, Thomas A. DeFanti, Robert V. Kenyon, and John C. Hart. 1992. The CAVE: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Communications of the ACM 35, 6 (June 1992), 64--72.

Digital Library

[15]

Gerwin de Haan, Michal Koutek, and Frits H. Post. 2002. Towards intuitive exploration tools for data visualization in VR. In Proc. VRST. ACM, New York, 105--112.

Digital Library

[16]

Zach Duer, Leo Piilonen, and George Glasson. 2018. Belle2VR: A virtual-reality visualization of subatomic particle physics in the Belle II experiment. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38 (May/June 2018), 33--43.

[17]

Alessandro Febretti, Arthur Nishimoto, Terrance Thigpen, Jonas Talandis, Lance Long, JD Pirtle, Tom Peterka, Alan Verlo, Maxine Brown, Dana Plepys, and others. 2013. CAVE2: A hybrid reality environment for immersive simulation and information analysis. In The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality (SPIE Proceedings Series), Vol. 8649. SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, Article 864903, 12 pages.

[18]

Jorge A. Wagner Filho, Carla M. D. S. Freitas, and Luciana Nedel. 2019. Comfortable immersive analytics with the virtualdesk metaphor. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 39, 3 (May 2019), 41--53.

Digital Library

[19]

Andrew Forsberg, Jian Chen, and David Laidlaw. 2009. Comparing 3D vector field visualization methods: A user study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (Nov. 2009), 1219--1226.

Digital Library

[20]

Bernd Fröhlich, Stephen Barrass, Björn Zehner, John Plate, and Martin Göbel. 1999. Exploring geo-scientific data in virtual environments. In Proc. Visualization. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 169--173.

[21]

Chi-Wing Fu, Wooi-Boon Goh, and Junxiang Allen Ng. 2010. Multi-touch techniques for exploring large-scale 3D astrophysical simulations. In Proc. CHI. ACM, New York, 2213--2222.

Digital Library

[22]

Jens Grubert, Lukas Witzani, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, Matthias Kranz, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2018. Text Entry in Immersive Head-Mounted Display-based Virtual Reality using Standard Keyboards. arXiv preprint 1802.00626. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00626

[23]

Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, Xiang Guo, Paymahn Moghadasian, and Pourang Irani. 2014. Consumed endurance: A metric to quantify arm fatigue of mid-air interactions. In Proc. CHI. ACM, New York, 1063--1072.

Digital Library

[24]

Microsoft HoloLens. 2015. Microsoft hololens: Partner demo with Maya by Autodesk. Online video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0K3n0Gf8mA. (2015). Accessed: August 10, 2019.

[25]

Christophe Hurter, Nathalie Henry Riche, Steven M. Drucker, Maxime Cordeil, Richard Alligier, and Romain Vuillemot. 2019. FiberClay: Sculpting three dimensional trajectories to reveal structural insights. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (Jan. 2019), 704--714.

Digital Library

[26]

Daniel F. Keefe. 2008. Free-form VR interactions in scientific visualization. In Proc. IEEE Visualization Workshop on Scientific Workflow with Immersive Interfaces for Visualization. http://ivlab.cs.umn.edu/ generated/pub-Keefe-2008-FreeFormSciVis.php

[27]

Thomas Kittelmann, Vakhtang Tsulaia, Joseph Boudreau, and Edward Moyse. 2010. The Virtual Point 1 event display for the ATLAS experiment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 219, part 3, Article 032012 (May 2010), 10 pages.

[28]

Tijmen Klein, Florimond Guéniat, Luc Pastur, Frédéric Vernier, and Tobias Isenberg. 2012. A design study of direct-touch interaction for exploratory 3D scientific visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 3 (June 2012), 1225--1234.

Digital Library

[29]

Wolfgang Krueger and Bernd Froehlich. 1994. The responsive workbench. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 14, 3 (May 1994), 12--15.

Digital Library

[30]

David López, Lora Oehlberg, Candemir Doger, and Tobias Isenberg. 2016. Towards an understanding of mobile touch navigation in a stereoscopic viewing environment for 3D data exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 5 (May 2016), 1616--1629.

Digital Library

[31]

Claes Lundström, Thomas Rydell, Camilla Forsell, Anders Persson, and Anders Ynnerman. 2011. Multi-touch table system for medical visualization: Application to orthopedic surgery planning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (Dec. 2011), 1775--1784.

Digital Library

[32]

Tahir Mahmood, Erik Butler, Nicholas Davis, Jian Huang, and Aidong Lu. 2018. Building multiple coordinated spaces for effective immersive analytics through distributed cognition. In Proc. BDVA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 119--129.

[33]

Veera Bhadra Harish Mandalika, Alexander I. Chernoglazov, Mark Billinghurst, Christoph Bartneck, Michael A. Hurrell, Niels de Ruiter, Anthony P. H. Butler, and Philip H. Butler. 2018. A hybrid 2D/3D user interface for radiological diagnosis. Journal of Digital Imaging 31, 1 (Feb. 2018), 56--73.

[34]

G. Elisabeta Marai, Angus G. Forbes, and Andrew Johnson. 2016. Interdisciplinary immersive analytics at the electronic visualization laboratory: Lessons learned and upcoming challenges. In Proc. IA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 54--59.

[35]

Stefan Marks, Javier E. Estevez, and Andy M. Connor. 2014. Towards the Holodeck: Fully immersive virtual reality visualisation of scientific and engineering data. In Proc. IVCNZ. ACM, New York, 42--47.

Digital Library

[36]

Kim Marriott, Falk Schreiber, Tim Dwyer, Karsten Klein, Nathalie Henry Riche, Takayuki Itoh, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Bruce H. Thomas (Eds.). 2018. Immersive Analytics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.

[37]

John P. McIntire, Paul R. Havig, and Eric E. Geiselman. 2014. Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review. Displays 35, 1 (Jan. 2014), 18--26.

[38]

Microsoft. 2019. Microsoft HoloLens: A new way to see your world. Web site: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hardware. (2019). Accessed: Jan. 2019.

[39]

Alexandre Millette and Michael J. McGuffin. 2016. DualCAD: Integrating augmented reality with a desktop gui and smartphone interaction. In Proc. ISMAR-Adjunct. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 21--26.

[40]

Ken Nagao, Yucong Ye, Chuan Wang, Issei Fujishiro, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2016. Enabling interactive scientific data visualization and analysis with see-through HMDs and a large tiled display. In Proc. IA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 1--6.

[41]

Jeremi Niedziela and Barthélémy von Haller. 2017. Event visualisation in ALICE -- Current status and strategy for Run 3. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 898, 7, Article 072008 (2017), 8 pages.

[42]

Oculus. 2019. Oculus Rift: VR headset for VR ready PCs. Web site: https://www.oculus.com/rift/. (2019). Accessed: Mar. 2019.

[43]

Prabhat, Andrew Forsberg, Michael Katzourin, Kristi Wharton, and Mel Slater. 2008. A comparative study of desktop, fishtank, and Cave systems for the exploration of volume rendered confocal data sets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 3 (May 2008), 551--563.

Digital Library

[44]

Mickael Sereno, Lonni Besançon, and Tobias Isenberg. 2019. Supporting volumetric data visualization and analysis by combining augmented reality visuals with multi-touch input. In Posters EuroVis. 21--23.

[45]

Marcos Serrano, Barrett Ens, Xing-Dong Yang, and Pourang Irani. 2015. Gluey: Developing a head-worn display interface to unify the interaction experience in distributed display environments. In Proc. MobileHCI. ACM, New York, 161--171.

Digital Library

[46]

Takashi Shibata. 2002. Head mounted display. Displays 23, 1 (April 2002), 57--64.

[47]

Nicole Sultanum, Sowmya Somanath, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2011. "Point it, split it, peel it, view it": Techniques for interactive reservoir visualization on tabletops. In Proc. ITS. ACM, New York, 192--201.

Digital Library

[48]

Erik Sundén, Ingemar Lundgren, and Anders Ynnerman. 2017. Hybrid virtual reality touch table -- an immersive collaborative platform for public explanatory use of cultural objects and sites. In Proc. Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. Eurographics Association, Goslar, Germany, 109--113.

Digital Library

[49]

Ivan E. Sutherland. 1968. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I. ACM, New York, 757--764.

Digital Library

[50]

Zsolt Szalavári, Dieter Schmalsteig, Anton Fuhrmann, and Michael Gervautz. 1998. "Studierstube": An environment for collaboration in augmented reality. Virtual Reality 3, 1 (March 1998), 37--48.

Digital Library

[51]

Rensu P. Theart, Ben Loos, and Thomas R. Niesler. 2017. Virtual reality assisted microscopy data visualization and colocalization analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 2, Article 64 (2017), 16 pages.

[52]

VIVE. 2019. VIVE: Discover virtual reality beyond imagination. Web site: https://www.vive.com. (2019). Accessed: Mar. 2019.

[53]

Ilija Vukotic, Edward Moyse, and Riccardo Maria Bianchi. 2015. ATLASrift -- A Virtual Reality application. arXiv preprint 1511.00047. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00047

[54]

Xiyao Wang, Lonni Besançon, Florimond Guéniat, Mickael Sereno, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2019. A vision of bringing immersive visualization to scientific workflows. In Proc. CHI Workshop on Immersive Analytics. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02053969

[55]

Colin Ware and Glenn Franck. 1996. Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions. ACM Transactions on Graphics 15, 2 (April 1996), 121--140.

Digital Library

[56]

Usher Will, Klacansky Pavol, Federer Frederick, Bremer Peer-Timo, Knoll Aaron, Yarch Jeff, Angelucci Alessandra, and Pascucci Valerio. 2018. A virtual reality visualization tool for neuron tracing. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (Jan 2018), 994--1003.

[57]

Graham Wills. 2008. Linked data views. In Handbook of Data Visualization, Chun-houh Chen, Wolfgang Härdle, and Antony Unwin (Eds.). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Chapter II.9, 217--241.

[58]

Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 7, 3 (June 1998), 225--240.

Digital Library

[59]

Lingyun Yu, Konstantinos Efstathiou, Petra Isenberg, and Tobias Isenberg. 2016. CAST: Effective and efficient user interaction for context-aware selection in 3D particle clouds. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (Jan. 2016), 886--895.

Digital Library

Cited By

Luo W(2024)Exploring Spatial Organization Strategies for Virtual Content in Mixed Reality EnvironmentsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3638181(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3638181
Friedl‐Knirsch JPointecker FPfistermüller SStach CAnthes CRoth D(2024)A Systematic Literature Review of User Evaluation in Immersive AnalyticsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1511143:3Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.15111
Hong JHnatyshyn RSantos EMaciejewski RIsenberg T(2024)A Survey of Designs for Combined 2D+3D Visual RepresentationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.338851630:6(2888-2902)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3388516
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards an Understanding of Augmented Reality Extensions for Existing 3D Data Analysis Tools
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
  2. Visualization
    1. Visualization application domains

Recommendations

STREAM: Exploring the Combination of Spatially-Aware Tablets with Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays for Immersive Analytics
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Recent research in the area of immersive analytics demonstrated the utility of head-mounted augmented reality devices for visual data analysis. However, it can be challenging to use the by default supported mid-air gestures to interact with ...
Read More
MARVIS: Combining Mobile Devices and Augmented Reality for Visual Data Analysis
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

We present Marvis, a conceptual framework that combines mobile devices and head-mounted Augmented Reality (AR) for visual data analysis. We propose novel concepts and techniques addressing visualization-specific challenges. By showing additional 2D and ...
Read More
Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

10688 pages

ISBN:9781450367080

DOI:10.1145/3313831

General Chairs:
Regina Bernhaupt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Australia
,
David Verweij
Newcastle University, UK
,
Josh Andres
RMIT, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Joanna McGrenere
University of British Columbia, Canada
,
Andy Cockburn
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
,
Ignacio Avellino
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
,
Alix Goguey
Grenoble Alpes University, France
,
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Shengdong (Shen) Zhao
National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Briane Paul Samson
Future University Hakodate, Japan & De La Salle University, Philippines
,
Rafal Kocielnik
University of Washington, USA

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 25 - 30, 2020

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI PLAY '24

Sponsor:
sigchi

The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

October 14 - 17, 2024

Tampere , Finland

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

51
Total Citations
View Citations
1,127
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)203
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Luo W(2024)Exploring Spatial Organization Strategies for Virtual Content in Mixed Reality EnvironmentsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3638181(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3638181
Friedl‐Knirsch JPointecker FPfistermüller SStach CAnthes CRoth D(2024)A Systematic Literature Review of User Evaluation in Immersive AnalyticsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1511143:3Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.15111
Hong JHnatyshyn RSantos EMaciejewski RIsenberg T(2024)A Survey of Designs for Combined 2D+3D Visual RepresentationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.338851630:6(2888-2902)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3388516
Seraji MPiray PZahednejad VStuerzlinger W(2024)Analyzing User Behaviour Patterns in a Cross-Virtuality Immersive Analytics SystemIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337212930:5(2613-2623)Online publication date: May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372129
Friedl-Knirsch JStach CPointecker FAnthes CRoth D(2024)A Study on Collaborative Visual Data Analysis in Augmented Reality with Asymmetric Display TypesIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337210330:5(2633-2643)Online publication date: May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372103
In SLin TNorth CPfister HYang Y(2024)This is the Table I Want! Interactive Data Transformation on Desktop and in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.329960230:8(5635-5650)Online publication date: Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3299602
Rau TSedlmair MKöhn A(2024)chARpack: The Chemistry Augmented Reality PackageJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling10.1021/acs.jcim.4c0046264:12(4700-4708)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00462
Iquiapaza YWagner JNedel L(2023)DeAR: Combining Desktop and Augmented Reality for Visual Data AnalysisProceedings of the 25th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality10.1145/3625008.3625021(233-237)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3625008.3625021
Ghaemi ZEns BEngelke UJenny B(2023)Drawing Connections: Designing Situated Links for Immersive MapsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042527:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3604252
Shi RWei YQin XHui PLiang H(2023)Exploring Gaze-assisted and Hand-based Region Selection in Augmented RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35911297:ETRA(1-19)Online publication date: 18-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3591129
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents