skip to main content
poster

How age and gender affect smartphone usage

Published: 12 September 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Smartphone usage is a hot topic in pervasive computing due to their popularity and personal aspect. We present our initial results from analyzing how individual differences, such as gender and age, affect smartphone usage. The dataset comes from a large scale longitudinal study, the Menthal project. We select a sample of 30, 677 participants, from which 16, 147 are males and 14, 523 are females, with a median age of 21 years. These have been tracked for at least 28 days and they have submitted their demographic data through a questionnaire. The ongoing experiment has been started in January 2014 and we have used our own mobile data collection and analysis framework. Females use smartphones for longer periods than males, with a daily mean of 166.78 minutes vs. 154.26 minutes. Younger participants use their phones longer and usage is directed towards entertainment and social interactions through specialized apps. Older participants use it less and mainly for getting information or using it as a classic phone.

    References

    [1]
    Ionut Andone, Konrad Błaszkiewicz, Mark Eibes, Boris Trendafilov, Christian Montag, and Alexander Markowetz. 2016a. Menthal - Running a Science Project as a Start-Up. In Computing in Mental Health, Workshop at CHI 2016. ACM.
    [2]
    Ionut Andone, Konrad Błaszkiewicz, Mark Eibes, Boris Trendafilov, Christian Montag, and Alexander Markowetz. 2016b. Menthal: A Framework for Mobile Data Collection and Analysis. In Ubicomp/ISWC 2016 Adjunct. ACM.
    [3]
    Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Di Jiang, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Beverly Harrison. 2015. Predicting the next app that you are going to use. In Proc. WSDM 2015. ACM, 285--294.
    [4]
    Matthias Böhmer, Brent Hecht, Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger, and Gernot Bauer. 2011. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage. In Proc. MobileHCI 2011. ACM, 47--56.
    [5]
    CIA. 2015. The World Factbook 2014-15. GPO.
    [6]
    Ericsson. 2016. Ericsson Mobility Report. (2016).
    [7]
    Denzil Ferreira, Anind K Dey, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2011. Understanding human-smartphone concerns: a study of battery life. In Pervasive computing. Springer, 19--33.
    [8]
    Andrea Girardello and Florian Michahelles. 2010. AppAware: which mobile applications are hot?. In Proc. MobileHCI 2010. ACM, 431--434.
    [9]
    Daniel T Wagner, Andrew Rice, and Alastair R Beresford. 2014. Device Analyzer: Large-scale mobile data collection. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 41, 4 (2014), 53--56.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Call to Action: Investigating Interaction Delay in Smartphone NotificationsSensors10.3390/s2408261224:8(2612)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Where Do You Look When Unlocking Your Phone? : A Field Study of Gaze Behaviour During Smartphone UnlockExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651094(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Smartphones and attitudes to intimate partner violence: Evidence from AfricaKyklos10.1111/kykl.1237177:2(411-427)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. How age and gender affect smartphone usage

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct
      September 2016
      1807 pages
      ISBN:9781450344623
      DOI:10.1145/2968219
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 12 September 2016

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. data mining
      2. mobile computing
      3. mobile devices
      4. smartphone usage
      5. user behavior observation

      Qualifiers

      • Poster

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      UbiComp '16

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      UBICOMP '24

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)356
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Call to Action: Investigating Interaction Delay in Smartphone NotificationsSensors10.3390/s2408261224:8(2612)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Where Do You Look When Unlocking Your Phone? : A Field Study of Gaze Behaviour During Smartphone UnlockExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651094(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Smartphones and attitudes to intimate partner violence: Evidence from AfricaKyklos10.1111/kykl.1237177:2(411-427)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2024
      • (2024)User Experience (UX) with Mobile Devices: A Comprehensive Model to Demonstrate the Relative Importance of Instrumental, Non-Instrumental, and Emotional Components on User SatisfactionInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2352210(1-12)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Measuring algorithmic bias to analyze the reliability of AI tools that predict depression risk using smartphone sensed-behavioral datanpj Mental Health Research10.1038/s44184-024-00057-y3:1Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
      • (2024)The effect of nomophobic behaviors among nurses on their clinical decision-making perceptionsNurse Education in Practice10.1016/j.nepr.2024.10397877(103978)Online publication date: May-2024
      • (2024)Motivation to Change Direction in Life with a Little Help from a Digital Companion or a Professional AssistanceInternational Journal of Applied Positive Psychology10.1007/s41042-024-00170-5Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Workplace nomophobia: a systematic literature reviewCurrent Psychology10.1007/s12144-024-06222-yOnline publication date: 4-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Sports and exercise‐related smartphone use is antagonistic to hedonic use in regular exercisers: A cross‐sectional study examining the roles of exercise frequency and durationHealth Science Reports10.1002/hsr2.22717:8Online publication date: 29-Jul-2024
      • (2023)Latent profiles of problematic smartphone use severity are associated with social and generalized anxiety, and fear of missing out, among Chinese high school studentsCyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace10.5817/CP2023-5-717:5Online publication date: 16-Nov-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media