Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 674, June 2023
Article Number L4
Number of page(s) 10
Section Letters to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346722
Published online 05 June 2023

© The Authors 2023

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

1. Introduction

In the last five years, two line surveys of the starless cold core TMC-1, QUIJOTE1 (Cernicharo et al. 2020, 2021a, 2023) and GOTHAM2 (McGuire et al. 2018, 2020), have been carried out and have provided the discovery of a panoply of new radicals, aromatic and polyaromatic compounds, cations, anions, and sulphur-bearing species. Roughly one-third of the molecules discovered in space have resulted from these two line surveys. The GOTHAM observations were taken with the Green Bank 100 m radio telescope in the X-, K-, and Ka-bands. Most detections in this line survey were performed through a sophisticated statistical frequency stacking procedure. The QUIJOTE line survey is an ongoing line survey in the Q-band (31.1–50.3 GHz) obtained with the Yebes 40m radio telescope. The detection technique in QUIJOTE is the classical, and reliable, line-by-line detection without any spectral stacking. The present sensitivity of QUIJOTE is 0.12–0.25 mK (Cernicharo et al. 2023).

The modelling of this emission is often tackled with very limited information on the spatial extent of the observed emission. In GOTHAM and QUIJOTE the only available spatial information is provided by the variation of the telescope half power beam with the frequency across the line survey. While GOTHAM fits four velocity components with different spatial sizes, QUIJOTE assumes a source radius of 40″ based on previous observations of TMC-1 in several molecular species. None of these methods is satisfactory to obtain the accurate column densities needed to put constraints on the chemical models of the source. The spatial size of the observed molecules, together with the issues related to the line opacities and radiative transfer, can only be addressed through spatial mapping of the molecular emission.

To overcome these issues, the QUIJOTE line survey has been complemented with high-sensitivity maps obtained with the Yebes 40 m radio telescope and covering a region of 320″×320″ centred on the QUIJOTE position (see Sect. 2). These maps are a faithful companion to the QUIJOTE line survey and we call these supplementary spatial data SANCHO3. The goal of these maps is to permit the study of the spatial distribution of any QUIJOTE line with intensity ≥20 mK with a signal-to-noise ratio ≥10, which means the low-energy transitions of most of the abundant species such as cyanopolyynes and radicals (CnS, CnH, and CnN) among other molecules. Most of the isotopologues 13C, 34S, D, and 15N of these species can be also spatially traced with SANCHO data.

In this Letter we present the first determination of the spatial distribution of an aromatic molecule (benzonitrile, C6H5CN) in the starless cold dark cloud TMC-1, and compare it with that of other molecules.

2. Observations

New receivers, built within the Nanocosmos4 project and installed at the Yebes 40 m radiotelescope, were used for the observations of TMC-1 (αJ2000 = 4h41m41.9s and δJ2000 = +25° 41′27.0″). The present observations of TMC-1 complement the QUIJOTE line survey (Cernicharo et al. 2021a). A detailed description of the telescope, receivers, and backends is given in Tercero et al. (2021). Briefly, the receiver consists of two cold high electron mobility transistor amplifiers covering the 31.1–50.3 GHz band with horizontal and vertical polarisations. Receiver temperatures in the first QUIJOTE observations achieved during 2020 vary from 22 K at 32 GHz to 42 K at 50 GHz. However, some power adaptation in the down-conversion chains in 2021 reduced the receiver temperatures to 16 K at 32 GHz and 25 K at 50 GHz. The backends are 2 × 8 × 2.5 GHz fast Fourier transform spectrometers (FFTs) with a spectral resolution of 38.15 kHz providing the whole coverage of the Q-band in both polarisations. The final Doppler correction was made during the pipeline processing of the raw data and the final spectra have the correct frequency scale in every part of the 31.1–50.3 GHz band.

The telescope beam size varies from 56.7″ at 31 GHz to 35.6″ at 49.5 GHz. The intensity scale used in this work, antenna temperature (), was calibrated using two absorbers at different temperatures and the atmospheric transmission model (ATM; Cernicharo 1985; Pardo et al. 2001). Calibration uncertainties of 10% were adopted. The beam efficiency of the Yebes 40 m telescope in the Q-band is given as a function of frequency by Beff = 0.797 exp[−(ν(GHz)/71.1)2]. The forward telescope efficiency is 0.95.

The SANCHO maps were performed in the on-the-fly mode using frequency switching with a throw of 10 MHz. We prefer this observing mode as many molecular species have extended emission (Cernicharo & Guélin 1987). The speed of the telescope was 5″ s−1 and the data of the whole Q-band in the two polarisations were recorded every two seconds (16 individual spectra per position). The maps were done moving the telescope in right ascension from −130″ to +130″ with a declination step of 10″. Once such a map was achieved, then the telescope was moved in declination from −130″ to 130″ with a right ascension step of 10″. This procedure was repeated until we reached 100 h of observing time on the source. Some additional maps with a total observing time on source of 15 h were added, covering offsets up to ±160″ in right ascension and declination. A total of 3 468 624 spectra, corresponding to 216 789 different positions, two polarisations, and eight FFTs, were recorded in February and December 2022, and January 2023. The raw data file size is near 1 TByte. All data were analysed using the GILDAS package5.

3. Results

For the final SANCHO data, we produced six different types of maps that were obtained by resampling the raw data within a square grid with a point separation of 10″ and 20″ (Sgrid), and with three different spatial tolerances around each position for adding raw data. These tolerance zones correspond to circles of 10″, 15″, and 20″ in radius (Trad). Each position in the maps contains the whole Q-band spectrum, with both polarisations averaged. The highest sensitivity is achieved for the maps with Sgrid = 20″ and Trad = 20″, which are those that we discuss in this work (see Appendix A). In this process no baseline is applied as the whole Q-band spectrum is treated simultaneously (31.13–49.53 GHz with 483 928 channels at each position of the map). These maps are fully sampled spatially. However, due to the spatial tolerance used in creating the maps we expect to have produced some spatial smoothing (i.e., the emission in adjacent positions has some degree of correlation; see Appendix A).

Maps for each individual transition of a given molecule were obtained from the selected final map (with a given Sgrid and Trad) by extracting the spectral data over ±14 km s−1 around the frequency of the line. Transition frequencies were obtained from the spectral information of the MADEX code (Cernicharo 2012), the JPL catalogue (Pickett et al. 1998), or the CDMS database (Müller et al. 2005). A baseline is removed from each extracted spectrum after defining the windows for all lines potentially present in the selected velocity range using the QUIJOTE line survey as a reference for detected lines (only features above 5 mK were blanked in this process). Appendix A provides examples of several molecular lines at the central position of the map without and with baseline removal. The sensitivity over the Q-band as a function of frequency, Trad, and position in the map is provided in Appendix A (see Table A.1).

It is worth noting that all maps produced in this way were observed simultaneously, and hence they have the same pointing and the same calibration uncertainties. Moreover, the relative calibration between different lines of a given molecule is much better than the global calibration uncertainty of 10% (see e.g., Appendix A and Fig. A.1). The achieved sensitivity in each position depends on the adopted Trad in adding data. In Appendix A we show the effect of adopting different gridding steps and tolerance circles. For Sgrid = 20″ and Trad = 20″, the sensitivity is 1.4–4 mK across the Q-band (the sensitivity is the same for Sgrid = 10″). This sensitivity is degraded by a factor of ∼2 outside the square defined by Δα = ±120″ and Δδ = ±120″. Hence, SANCHO provides a whole spectrum of the Q-band over a map of 169 positions gridded every 20″ (240″×240″) with a sensitivity that is similar to that achieved by GOTHAM in a single position. However, the sensitivity towards the centre of the map is worse by a factor of 10 compared to that of the QUIJOTE line survey.

The sensitivity reached by SANCHO allows the detection of all lines with intensities greater than 10 mK in the central position of the maps. This is enough to detect many of the lines of C6H5CN observed with the QUIJOTE line survey presented in Fig. B.1 of Cernicharo et al. (2021b). However, the spatial distribution of the integrated intensity of each individual line appears noisy, which prevents us from reaching a conclusion on the spatial extent of this aromatic species. We therefore used the maps generated for each individual line to produce a spectrally stacked map. We added 49 lines of benzonitrile which are free of resolved hyperfine structure and of blending with lines from other species (see Table B.1). Each line was multiplied by a factor to take into account the observed intensity with respect to a reference line, the strongest one of benzonitrile in the QUIJOTE line survey (the 130, 13 − 120, 12 transition at 32 833.827 MHz). The procedure is described in detail in Appendix B. The stacking scheme allows one to use the parameters of the reference line to estimate the column density and increases the S/N of the stacked spectral map with respect the observed individual line maps of benzonitrile.

The resulting spectra at different positions in the map are shown in Fig. 1. The sensitivity of the map of the stacked lines at the (Δα, Δδ) positions (0″, 0″), (120″, 0″), and (120″, −120″) is 0.4 mK, 0.6 mK, and 0.9 mK, respectively (see Fig. 1). The spatial distribution of the integrated intensity of this aromatic species is shown in Fig. 2. Finally, the spatial distribution of the emission at different velocities is shown in Fig. 3.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Stacked line of C6H5CN obtained from the average in each position of 52 individual lines (see Appendix B). Only the spectra around the region of maximum emission (see Fig. 2) are shown. The offset positions in arcseconds are indicated in each panel. The abscissa in each panel corresponds to the local standard of rest velocity of the stacked data (in km s−1). The intensity scale corresponds to the antenna temperature corrected for atmospheric transmission and antenna losses.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Colour plot of spatial distribution of the integrated intensity between 5.3 and 6.5 km s−1 of the stacked lines of C6H5CN. The colour scale is in mK km s−1. The sampling of the data is 20″ and the integrating area in each position corresponds to a circle of 20″ of radius. The black dot indicates the centre of the map, which corresponds to the position observed with the QUIJOTE line survey.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Spatial distribution of the integrated intensity of the stacked lines of C6H5CN at different velocities. The selected velocity range is ±0.1 km s−1 around the velocity indicated in the upper right corner of each panel (in km s−1). The sampling of the data is 20″ and the integrating area in each position corresponds to a circle of 20″ radius. The white and black contours represent the integrated intensity of the J = 28-27 transition of HC7N at the same velocity (±0.1 km s−1). The first white contour corresponds to 2 mK km s−1 and the step is 4 mK km s−1. The first black contour corresponds to 20 mK km s−1 and the step is 6 mK km s−1. The white or black dot indicates the centre of the map.

4. Discussion

The comparison of the velocity maps of C6H5CN and HC7N shown in Fig. 3 clearly indicates that the two species coexist spatially. The emission of the two species covers the velocity range 5.3–6.3 km s−1, with some weak emission still at 6.5 km s−1. The observed emission follows the well-known filamentary structure of TMC-1 with a dense condensation around the central position. Two different velocities seem to be traced spatially by our data, both with a filamentary aspect: one at 5.5 km s−1 with its maximum over the QUIJOTE position (known as the cyanopolyynes source) and the other at 5.9 km s−1 that peaks at Δα = 40″ and Δδ = −20″, which dominates the line profile. Given our velocity resolution of ∼0.25 km s−1, the observed velocity structure could also be interpreted as resulting from a velocity gradient perpendicular to the TMC-1 filament, or as a twisting motion of filaments, or fibres, similar to those found in other molecular clouds (Kirk et al. 2012; Hacar et al. 2013, 2017). This behaviour is similar for all the species we study in this work. The TMC-1 filament was observed in the emission of molecules such as SO, NH3, and CCS, with higher spatial resolution than we used (see e.g., Lique et al. 2006; Fehér et al. 2016; Dobashi et al. 2019). These authors found a complex spatial velocity structure dominated by clumpy filaments at velocities between 5.3 and 6.3 km s−1.

The spatial coexistence of benzonitrile and other molecules is fully confirmed in Fig. 4, where we compare the spatial distribution of the integrated intensity of several species, including radicals, cyanopolyynes, methyl-bearing species, and isomers of HC3N. This is the first time that many of the selected molecules have been mapped in TMC-1. Moreover, the signal-to-noise ratio of all these maps is extremely high as the selected lines have intensities ≥100 mK, even for the HC7N J = 38-37 for which the upper level energy is 40.1 K. The integrated intensities are proportional to the column densities because the lines are mostly optically thin. The map of HC3N was obtained using the integrated intensity of the weak satellite hyperfine lines, which also guarantees low line opacities.

thumbnail Fig. 4.

Integrated intensity between 5.3 and 6.5 km s−1 of different molecular transitions (colours) compared with that of C6H5CN (black contours; first contour and step are 0.75 mK km s−1). For each molecular transition the integrated intensity has been normalised to the maximum value within the area covered by the map. The colour scale (bottom right) is the same for all molecular transitions. The molecule, transition, and maximum intensity (shown in brackets) are indicated in the bottom right corner of each panel. The black dot corresponds to the centre of the map.

Opacity effects, the beam size of the telescope, different excitation conditions, and the spatial smearing produced by the co-addition of the on-the-fly data could produce some small differences between the maps. However, some of these differences are real and are related to the global aspect of the spatial distribution. For example, cyanopolyynes and benzonitrile are significantly shifted towards the north-east by more than a beam with respect to the radicals CnH and CnN. The spatial shift of the radicals C4H, C6H, and C3N with respect to the cyanopolyynes HC3N and HC5N may be caused by the structure of the H2 density. The HC3N peak is also a local maximum in H2 density (see Pratap et al. 1997), and radicals are probably more efficiently destroyed at high densities than closed-shell molecules. A different spatial distribution was also found in TMC-1 by Fossé et al. (2001) for C6H, c-C3H2, and H2C3. Significant differences are also found for the two transitions of HC7N shown in Fig. 4. This is probably due to the high energy of the J = 38 level, which renders this transition very sensitive to the density or to small changes in the kinetic temperature. The analysis of the spatial distribution of several transitions of radicals, cyanopolyynes, hydrocarbons, and their isotopologues will be published in forthcoming papers.

The formation of aromatic cycles in TMC-1 has been a matter of debate in recent years (McGuire et al. 2018, 2021; Cernicharo et al. 2021b, 2022). It is not yet clear whether these aromatic rings are formed through a bottom-up mechanism or a top-down process. The presence of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in diffuse interstellar clouds is inferred from the observation of intense unidentified infrared bands, and the aromatic cycles observed in TMC-1 could result from the destruction of this reservoir of PAHs inherited from a previous diffuse stage. A similar process has been invoked to account for the formation of small hydrocarbons in photodissociation regions (Pety et al. 2005). Alternatively, aromatic rings could be formed from small hydrocarbons in a bottom-up process. For example, the reaction of propene, an abundant hydrocarbon in TMC-1 (Marcelino et al. 2007), with CH can produce 1,3-butadiene (Loison & Bergeat 2009), which can lead to c–C5H7 upon reaction with CH (Cernicharo et al. 2021b) and to benzene by reacting with C2H (Jones et al. 2011). Even so, chemical models based on these neutral–neutral routes are not able to account for the observed abundances of cycles such as c–C5H7 (Cernicharo et al. 2022), which indicates that ion-neutral reactions may also play a role in the synthesis of aromatic cycles. Whatever the true mechanism of formation of aromatic rings, the fact that benzonitrile has a spatial distribution very similar to that of cyanopolyynes supports the argument that aromatic molecules are formed through a bottom-up chemical process, as is thought to occur for long carbon chains in TMC-1.

5. Conclusions

We have presented the SANCHO maps of TMC-1 in the frequency range 31.13–49.53 GHz. The sensitivity of the spectra over an area of 240″×240″, for a gridding step of 20″ and Trad = 20″, is 2–4 mK across the band. We have determined, for the first time, the spatial distribution of C6H5CN (benzonitrile). We find that it correlates very well with that of cyanopolyynes, and that it extends over the TMC-1 filament. Hence, we conclude that this species is formed through bottom-up chemical processes involving the same type of reactions as those forming the other species found in the cloud.


1

Q-band Ultrasensitive Inspection Journey to the Obscure TMC-1 Environment.

2

GBT Observations of TMC-1: Hunting for Aromatic Molecules.

3

Surveying the Area of the Neighbour TMC-1 Cloud through Heterodyne Observations.

4

ERC grant ERC-2013-Syg-610256-NANOCOSMOS.

https://nanocosmos.iff.csic.es/

Acknowledgments

We thank ERC for funding through grant ERC-2013-Syg-610256-NANOCOSMOS. We also thank Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain (MICIU) for funding support through projects PID2019-106110GB-I00, PID2019-107115GB-C21 / AEI / 10.13039/501100011033, and PID2019-106235GB-I00.

References

  1. Agúndez, M., Cabezas, C., Tercero, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, L10 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cernicharo, J. 1985, Internal IRAM report (Granada: IRAM) [Google Scholar]
  3. Cernicharo, J., & Guélin, M. 1987, A&A, 183, L10 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cernicharo, J. 2012, in ECLA 2011: Proc. of the European Conference on Laboratory Astrophysics, eds. C. Stehl, C. Joblin, & L. d’Hendecourt (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), EAS Publ. Ser., 251 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cernicharo, J., Marcelino, N., Agúndez, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, L8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cernicharo, J., Agúndez, M., Kaiser, R., et al. 2021a, A&A, 652, L9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cernicharo, J., Agúndez, M., Kaiser, R. I., et al. 2021b, A&A, 655, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cernicharo, J., Fuentetaja, R., Agúndez, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, L9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cernicharo, J., Pardo, J. R., Cabezas, C., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, L19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dobashi, K., Shimoikura, T., Ochiai, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 88 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fehér, O., Tóth, L. V., Ward-Thompson, D., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A75 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fossé, D., Cernicharo, J., Gerin, M., & Cox, P. 2001, ApJ, 552, 168 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hacar, A., Tafalla, M., Kauffmann, J., & Kovács, A. 2013, A&A, 554, A55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hacar, A., Tafalla, M., & Alves, J. 2017, A&A, 606, A123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones, B. M., Zhang, F., & Kaiser, R. I. 2011, PNAS, 108, 452 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kirk, H., Myers, P. C., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 766, 115 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lique, F., Cernicharo, J., & Cox, P. 2006, ApJ, 653, 1342 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loison, J.-C., & Bergeat, A. 2009, PCCP, 11, 655 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marcelino, N., Cernicharo, J., Agúndez, M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, L127 [Google Scholar]
  20. McGuire, B. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Kalenskii, S., et al. 2018, Science, 359, 202 [Google Scholar]
  21. McGuire, B. A., Burkhardt, A. M., Loomis, R. A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, L10 [Google Scholar]
  22. McGuire, B. A., Loomis, R. A., Burkhardt, A. M., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 1265 [Google Scholar]
  23. Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, J. Mol. Struct., 742, 215 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pardo, J. R., Cernicharo, J., & Serabyn, E. 2001, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 49, 12 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pety, J., Teyssier, D., Fossé, D., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, 885 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf., 60, 883 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pratap, P., Dickens, J. E., Snell, R. L., et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, 862 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tercero, F., López-Pérez, J. A., Gallego, J. D., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A37 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Appendix A: Baselines, gridding step, tolerance circle, and sensitivity

Our on-the-fly frequency switching observations suffer from frequency ripples. However, the period of these ripples is always larger than 10 MHz, while the lines in the Q-band are typically 0.10-0.18 MHz wide. Hence, it is possible to remove a polynomial baseline to each line of the survey at each position of the map with total confidence that neither the line intensity nor the line profile are perturbed by the baseline removal step. These effects are also present in the QUIJOTE line survey, and we follow a procedure similar to that previously described for these frequency switching observations (Cernicharo et al. 2022).

An example of the baseline removal procedure in the SANCHO maps is shown in Fig. A.1 where we consider the N = 4-3 and N = 5-4 transitions of CCCN. These lines exhibit two line components separated by ∼19 MHz due to the fine structure of the rotational transitions. The lines are shown in Fig. A.1 before and after baseline subtraction. For the N = 4-3 transition the derived sensitivity is 2 mK. The observed intensity ratio of the two fine components is 1.35, while the theoretical value is 1.33 (for optically thin emission). For the two componentes of the N = 5-4 transition the derived sensitivity is 4.2 mK and the line strength ratio is 1.21, which is very close to the theoretical value of 1.24. The number of channels in Fig. A.1 is 630.

thumbnail Fig. A.1.

Observed lines of CCCN before and after baseline subtraction. For each transition of CCCN the upper panel shows the raw data and the fitted baseline (red line) at the centre position of the map with Sgrid = 20″ and Trad = 20″. The panel below each transition shows the data after a polynomial baseline removal.

The folding of the frequency switching data can produce negative features that could affect the intensity and line profile of some of the observed lines. However, at the level of sensitivity of SANCHO (2-4 mK) only a few lines with intensities greater than 10 mK could be affected by this issue. However, at better sensitivities, such as those of the QUIJOTE line survey (Cernicharo et al. 2020, 2021a, 2023), this effect could be a concern and is mitigated by the use of two sets of data with different frequency switching throws and similar sensitivity.

The effect of the gridding step and tolerance circle on the final aspect of the maps was analysed with the J = 28-27 transition of HC7N at 31583.709 MHz (beam size 56″), and the J = 1-0 line of C34S at 48206.942 MHz (beam size 39″). Values of Sgrid = 10″ and 20″, and Trad = 10″, 15″, and 20″ were used. These maps are shown in Fig. A.2.

thumbnail Fig. A.2.

Integrated intensity of the J = 28-27 transition of HC7N (upper panels) and C34S J = 1-0 (lower panels) for different values of Sgrid and Trad. The telescope beam size for the two transitions is 56″ and 39″, respectively. The black dot indicates the centre of the maps. The maximum value of the integrated intensity changes by less than 10% from Trad = 10" to 20″.

For HC7N both values of Sgrid produce oversampled maps. When Trad is changed from 10″ to 20″ the maps show a better aspect, but as a counterpart a considerable spatial smoothing (smearing) is introduced, together with a small dilution of the maximum intensity. The same applies to the maps of C34S, which are fully sampled in this case. Depending on the physical parameters we want to study, different values of Sgrid and Trad can be used depending on the intensity of the mapped lines and on the desired signal-to-noise ratio in each position on the maps. For weak lines the spatial shape of the emission could be analysed with Trad = 20″, while the maps for lines with intensity greater than 100 mK, Trad = 10″ or 15″ could be better adapted. In this work we focus on the study of the extended emission of the weak lines of benzonitrile, and hence we adopt Trad = 20″ and Sgrid = 20″.

We estimated the sensitivity of the adopted values of Sgrid and Trad by selecting 21 frequencies across the Q-band. A range of ±3 MHz (157 channels) was selected. Three different positions are considered at distances from the centre of the map of 0″, 100″, and 170″. The results are given in Table A.1.

Table A.1.

Sensitivity of the maps as a function of the frequency and of the distance to the central position.

Appendix B: Maps of C6H5CN

In order to spectrally stack the lines of C6H5CN and to produce a high signal-to-noise ratio map of its spatial distribution, we defined a selection criterion of the lines to be stacked at each position of the maps. The intensity of all lines of benzonitrile in TMC-1 in the Q-band are below 10 mK (Cernicharo et al. 2021b). Some of these lines have an intensity of 1-2 mK which is well below the detection sensitivity of the maps with Trad = 20″ (see Table A.1). In addition, several of these lines show hyperfine structure (see Fig. B.1 of Cernicharo et al. 2021b). We used the last product of the QUIJOTE line survey (Cernicharo et al. 2023) to select all lines of benzonitrile that appear as a single feature and are free of blending from other lines. The QUIJOTE data were also used to define the windows for baseline removal for each of the selected lines.

A second selection criterion was the intensity of the lines relative to the strongest one that was taken as reference (the 130, 13-120, 12 transition). Only lines with one-third of the intensity of the reference line in the QUIJOTE data were selected. The final list of lines used for stacking corresponds to the 49 transitions given in Table B.1. This table also provides the measured intensity of the lines with QUIJOTE (Cernicharo et al. 2023) and the applied multiplicative factor for stacking. This multiplicative factor scales all lines to the intensity of the reference line. The data were weighted by 1/σ2, where σ is the measured sensitivity of each line after multiplication by the intensity scale factor. Hence, we can add lines scaled to the same intensity to produce a stacked spectrum at each position of the map. Most of the selected lines are seen in the central position of the map without stacking, but with a limited signal-to-noise ratio. Figure B.1 shows a sub-sample of the selected transitions at the centre position. The multiplicative factor and the measured sensitivity (after multiplication to scale the signal to that of the reference line), are indicated in each panel (see also Table B.1).

thumbnail Fig. B.1.

Selected transitions of C6H5CN among the 49 lines (see Table B.1) used to produce the spectrally stacked map of benzonitrile at each position of the map. The spectra shown here correspond to the central position. The transition quantum numbers are indicated in blue in the top left corner of each panel. Each line arises from the individual maps with Sgrid = 20″ and Trad = 20″. Each line spectrum was multiplied by the factor f (shown in black in each panel) to scale its intensity to that of the strongest one (the 130, 13-120, 12 transition). The noise of each spectra, after multiplication by f, is shown in violet (σ; in mK). It is used to weight the data during stacking of all the lines at each position of the map (see text). The vertical dashed red lines in each panel indicate the local standard of rest velocity of 5.86 km s−1. The spectra of the resulting stacked data at different positions of the map are shown in Fig. 1.

Table B.1.

Lines of C6H5CN used for spectral stacking at each position.

The final stacked spectra are shown in Fig. 1. The improvement of sensitivity after stacking is a factor of 3.5 with respect to that of the unstacked strongest lines.

All Tables

Table A.1.

Sensitivity of the maps as a function of the frequency and of the distance to the central position.

Table B.1.

Lines of C6H5CN used for spectral stacking at each position.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Stacked line of C6H5CN obtained from the average in each position of 52 individual lines (see Appendix B). Only the spectra around the region of maximum emission (see Fig. 2) are shown. The offset positions in arcseconds are indicated in each panel. The abscissa in each panel corresponds to the local standard of rest velocity of the stacked data (in km s−1). The intensity scale corresponds to the antenna temperature corrected for atmospheric transmission and antenna losses.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Colour plot of spatial distribution of the integrated intensity between 5.3 and 6.5 km s−1 of the stacked lines of C6H5CN. The colour scale is in mK km s−1. The sampling of the data is 20″ and the integrating area in each position corresponds to a circle of 20″ of radius. The black dot indicates the centre of the map, which corresponds to the position observed with the QUIJOTE line survey.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Spatial distribution of the integrated intensity of the stacked lines of C6H5CN at different velocities. The selected velocity range is ±0.1 km s−1 around the velocity indicated in the upper right corner of each panel (in km s−1). The sampling of the data is 20″ and the integrating area in each position corresponds to a circle of 20″ radius. The white and black contours represent the integrated intensity of the J = 28-27 transition of HC7N at the same velocity (±0.1 km s−1). The first white contour corresponds to 2 mK km s−1 and the step is 4 mK km s−1. The first black contour corresponds to 20 mK km s−1 and the step is 6 mK km s−1. The white or black dot indicates the centre of the map.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

Integrated intensity between 5.3 and 6.5 km s−1 of different molecular transitions (colours) compared with that of C6H5CN (black contours; first contour and step are 0.75 mK km s−1). For each molecular transition the integrated intensity has been normalised to the maximum value within the area covered by the map. The colour scale (bottom right) is the same for all molecular transitions. The molecule, transition, and maximum intensity (shown in brackets) are indicated in the bottom right corner of each panel. The black dot corresponds to the centre of the map.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.1.

Observed lines of CCCN before and after baseline subtraction. For each transition of CCCN the upper panel shows the raw data and the fitted baseline (red line) at the centre position of the map with Sgrid = 20″ and Trad = 20″. The panel below each transition shows the data after a polynomial baseline removal.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. A.2.

Integrated intensity of the J = 28-27 transition of HC7N (upper panels) and C34S J = 1-0 (lower panels) for different values of Sgrid and Trad. The telescope beam size for the two transitions is 56″ and 39″, respectively. The black dot indicates the centre of the maps. The maximum value of the integrated intensity changes by less than 10% from Trad = 10" to 20″.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. B.1.

Selected transitions of C6H5CN among the 49 lines (see Table B.1) used to produce the spectrally stacked map of benzonitrile at each position of the map. The spectra shown here correspond to the central position. The transition quantum numbers are indicated in blue in the top left corner of each panel. Each line arises from the individual maps with Sgrid = 20″ and Trad = 20″. Each line spectrum was multiplied by the factor f (shown in black in each panel) to scale its intensity to that of the strongest one (the 130, 13-120, 12 transition). The noise of each spectra, after multiplication by f, is shown in violet (σ; in mK). It is used to weight the data during stacking of all the lines at each position of the map (see text). The vertical dashed red lines in each panel indicate the local standard of rest velocity of 5.86 km s−1. The spectra of the resulting stacked data at different positions of the map are shown in Fig. 1.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.