Issue
A&A
Volume 661, May 2022
The Early Data Release of eROSITA and Mikhail Pavlinsky ART-XC on the SRG mission
Article Number A43
Number of page(s) 5
Section Stellar structure and evolution
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141653
Published online 18 May 2022

© ESO 2022

1 Introduction

The eROSITA instrument (Predehl et al. 2021) on board the Spektrum-Roentgen-Gamma spacecraft (SRG; Sunyaev et al. 2021) has been scanning the X-ray sky with an imaging telescope in the energy band between 0.2 and 10 keV since December 2019. Eventually, it will perform eight independent all-sky surveys, called eRASSn (n = 1…8), each lasting half a year. At the time of writing, eRASS3 is ongoing.

The sensitivity of eROSITA means that several thousand new compact accreting binaries are expected to be found in the final stacked version of the eROSITA all-sky survey called eRASS:8 (Merloni et al. 2012; Schwope 2012). Identifying them among the several million point-like X-ray sources detected with the sensitive instrument needs comprehensive optical identification programs that have just begun within the SDSS1 or are planned with the 4MOST facility2 (Kollmeier et al. 2017; de Jong et al. 2019). Before arrival of the stacked eROSITA catalogs, new identifications are posssible by exploiting the multidimensional parameter space spanned by time variability (at X-ray and other wavelengths), optical, infrared, and X-ray colors, location in the color-magnitude diagram, and similar.

Cataclysmic variables (CVs) are semidetached close compact binaries containing a Roche-lobe-filling donor star and an accreting white dwarf. While accretion in nonmagnetic CVs occurs through disks that act as mass storage, the accretion processes are much more direct in the magnetic systems that lack a disk as intermediary. This means that changes in the mass transfer rate from the donor to the white dwarf may manifest themselves instantaneously in the observed brightness of a source. Two subclasses are defined among the magnetic CVs: polars, which typically have short orbital periods (Porb < 2 hours) and similar white-dwarf rotation periods, and intermediate polars, which typically are long-period systems (Porb > 3 hours) and posses a more or less freely spinning white dwarf. The two classes are of prime interest for close binary evolution and the formation of strong magnetic fields in white dwarfs (e.g., Schreiber et al. 2021). As a group, they are relevant for the total X-ray output of our own Milky Way galaxy (Revnivtsev et al. 2009).

Here we report the discovery of a bright, eclipsing, magnetic CV as counterpart of a variable eRASS source. It attracted our attention by its pronounced X-ray variability in the first three all-sky X-ray scans. The new eROSITA source was associated with a nearby Gaia object (offset position 2″.6) that was reported earlier by the Gaia alert team to be a possible CV given its extreme photometric variability (Hodgkin et al. 2021).

We describe the initial eROSITA results (Sect. 2), present the data in context with archival X-ray observations (Sect. 3), and report our SALT (Southern African Large Telescope) identification spectra together with time-resolved photometry and polarimetry obtained from SAAO (Sect. 4). Together, this uniquely identifies the source. It offers great potential for in-depth studies of the accretion geometry through detailed eclipse analysis and is comparable to EXOSAT and ROSAT discoveries made some 30 years ago (see, e.g., Beuermann et al. 1988; Schwope et al. 1993, for UZ For and HU Aqr).

thumbnail Fig. 1

Full-band eRASSl and eRASS3 X-ray light curves (0.2–10 keV). Shown are the vignetting-corrected mean rates per eRODAY with blue symbols. The exposure time per eRODAY is indicated with short red dashes (divided by a factor 10).

2 X-ray observations with eROSITA

During eRASS3, eROSITA redetected a source at FX(0.6−2.3 keV) = (2.6 ± 0.4) × 10−12 erg cm−2 s−1 that was undetected in eRASS2 (FX(0.6–2.3keV) < 8 × 10−14 erg cm−2 s−1), but was previously found at FX(0.6−2.3keV) = (1.8 ± 0.3) × 10−12 erg cm−2 s−1 in eRASS1. The X-ray source position determined in eRASS3 is RA(J2000) =19:29:32.9, Dec(J2000) = −56:03:46, with a statistical uncertainty of 1.3 arcsec.

The area of the transient was covered in eRASS1 between 2020-04-12 08:22:21 and 2020-04-13 04:22:41, in eRASS2 between 2020-10-14T20:59:40 and 2020-10-19 01:00:10, and in eRASS3 between 2021-04-11 21:22:14 and 2021-04-12 21:22:44 (all times in UTC). During these surveys 121 (228) and 181 (388) photons were registered with the standard source-detection pipeline in the main band between 0.6 keV and 2.3 keV, respectively (the numbers in parentheses refer to the full band 0.2–10 keV; all numbers given were derived with pipeline version c946, see Brunner et al. 2022, for details of the detection pipeline). The original photon event tables for each sky survey were binned to give mean count rates per scan3. Light curves in the full spectral bandpass, 0.2–10 keV, are shown in Fig. 1. The mean rates in eRASS1 and 3 were 1.32 s−1 and 1.92 s−1, and the summed exposures were 169 s and 223 s. The object showed a variability of up to 100% between eRODAYs. In eRASS3, the fifth scan, centered on 2021-04-12 13:22:32 (UTC) lasting 37 seconds, revealed no source photon.

An X-ray spectral analysis of data obtained during eRASS1 and 3 was performed using the data from all seven telescope modules jointly. The pipeline-processed spectra were grouped using the HEASARC grppha command, so that each bin contained a minimum of 16 photons. Because of the CV nature of the source, a thermal plasma emission model was chosen initially, modified only by some cold interstellar absorbing matter (tbabs*APEC in XSPEC terminology with wilms abundances). The data were well represented by this model with χ2 = 9.1 for 15 degrees of freedom (Fig. 2). We emphasize that it was not necessary to include a soft blackbody-like spectral component to achieve a successful fit, in contrast to all the ROSAT-discovered polars. The fit does not imply strong constraints on the column density. NH was found to be lower than 3 × 1020 cm−2 (90% confidence) and even compatible with zero. The main implication is that there is little or no intrinsic absorption in the system. The best-fit plasma temperature is about 10 keV (>5 keV at 90% confidence, not constrained toward high temperature). The bolometric flux during eRASS3 was 2.6 × 10−12 erg cm−2 s−1, which gives a luminosity of 2.2 × 1031 erg s−1 (assumed distance pc, Bailer-Jones et al. 2021).

thumbnail Fig. 2

eRASS1 (black) and eRASS3 (red) spectra fit with a thermal model. The lower panel shows the fit residuals normalized to their error bars.

3 Archival X-ray and optical photometric observations

Several previous observations of the field of the new transient were made with the Swift/XRT satellite and with XMM-Newton (slew survey, Saxton et al. 2008). In Fig. 3 all data are presented in context. The source was not discovered with XMM-Newton, that is, it was fainter than during eRASS1 or eRASS3. In the Swift/XRT data, the source was detected six times, and all data were consistent with each other at a flux of about 5 × 10−13 erg cm−2 s−1 (0.2–2 keV). One Swift/XRT pointing revealed only a nondetection. In summary, over the past ten years, eRASSt J192932.9–560346 showed X-ray variability by a factor >20.

The new transient X-ray source was associated with the Gaia object 6640165468504197120 at RA = 19:29:33.110, Dec = −56:03:42.98, 2″.6 away from the X-ray position. This source was announced as Gaia transient Gaia21bxo on 2021 March 144. Gaia reported a fading and rebrightening of the source by 4 mag with a floor at about G ≃ 20.0 and fuzzy maximum brightness. It was labeled a CV candidate by the Gaia team. Further archival photometric observations were reported by the CRTS and ASAS-SN automated sky surveys (Drake et al. 2009; Shappee et al. 2014; Kochanek et al. 2017) and uncovered long- and short-term variability between 15th and 19th magnitude. The archival photometric data from CRTS, ASAS-SN, and Gaia are shown together in Fig. 4. Pre-Gaia data, in particular the CRTS, showed a high degree of optical variability on long (years) and short (days) timescales, but the source was never before observed at magnitudes as faint as G = 20.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Long-term X-ray light curve of eRASSt J192932.9–560346 using XMM-Newton, Swift/XKT, and eROSITA data.

thumbnail Fig. 4

CRTS (blue, white-light), ASAS-SN (green, g-filter), and Gaia (red, G) archival photometric data. The magnitudes are shown as published. Vertical dashed lines indicate the first three eRASS epochs.

4 Optical follow-up observations

4.1 SALT spectroscopy

Two pairs of optical spectra, all with 300 s exposure, were obtained using the RSS instrument (Burgh et al. 2003) on SALT (Buckley et al. 2006), beginning on 2021 May 6, 23:53:42 UTC, and finishing at 2021 May 7, 00:17:10. The first pair of spectra covered the wavelength range 3920–6975 Å, and the second pair of redder spectra covered 6035–9000 Å, both at a resolution of 5.5 Å. The blue continuum, which peaks at around 4500 Å, and pronounced emission lines of hydrogen and helium identify the object as a cataclysmic variable. The blue spectra are shown in Fig. 5. No significant features were seen in the red spectra, except for the Hα and Hel λ6678 Å emission lines.

The lines appeared rather symmetric at a blueshift of up to 600 km s−1 and with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) corresponding to about 1500 km s−1. The measured equivalent width of Hβ and of the ionized helium line Hell λ4686 was up to approximately −12 and −8 Å, respectively. The high flux ratio Hell/Hβ ≃ 0.7 suggests a magnetic nature (e.g., Warner 2003), which was later confirmed from polarimetry.

4.2 HIPPO polarimetry and fast photometry

Time-resolved photopolarimetry using the two-channel all-Stokes Polarimeter, HIPPO (Potter et al. 2010), was conducted on the SAAO 1.9 m telescope on 2021 May 9, 10, 11 and 16. Observations were taken with clear broad blueband (Schott BG39, covering ~3300–6000 Å) or broad redband (Schott OG57, covering >5700 Å) filters. The observations lasted from between 1.7 and 3.5 h on each night.

HIPPO is a photon-counting instrument, employing a GaAs photomultiplier with response from ~3500–9000 Å, with an intrinsic 1 ms time resolution, although the polarization data are accumulated at every 0.1 s waveplate rotation cycle. The linear and circular polarization derived from the Stokes parameters were derived after binning the data to 60 s time intervals. The results for the observations on May 10 are presented in Fig. 6. The circular polarization is seen to vary from −20 to 20%. It is higher in the blue. The linear polarization varies from 0 to 10%. This confirms the system as a magnetic CV of the polar subclass. Detailed analysis and modeling of these observations will be the subject of a future paper.

Higher-cadence (1 s) photometry was derived from the HIPPO Stokes I measurements. These revealed deep, structured eclipses, with ingress and egress showing two steps that lasted approximately 1s each, indicating that the system is a two-pole accretor (see Fig. 7 for details of the observation on May 9). Eclipse timings were obtained from all four nights and are listed in Table 1.

For each eclipse, the lefts of the sharp second ingress and first egress, which lasted ~2 s each, were measured by eye. The width of the ingress and egress defined the error. The eclipse length was estimated as the time between ingress (left) and egress (left). In reality, the true eclipse length (defined as the flat bottom part of the eclipse) is ~2 s shorter than the values shown below. The mean eclipse length was 288.0 s, with a standard deviation of 0.4 s. The eclipse lengths are also included in Table 1.

The time taken between the end of the eclipse of the first hot spot and beginning of the eclipse of the second is ~ 15 s, that is, the length of the first step at mid ingress. Likewise, the length of the egress step is ~12 s.

We also note that the eclipses are not strictly flat bottomed, implying that an additional source of luminosity is eclipsed after the white dwarf disappears, which is most likely to be the accretion stream. The depth of the eclipse, estimated from first to second contact (end of ingress), is ~3 mag, while during the eclipse, the system declines by another ~l mag at least. This implies that the minimum brightness during eclipse is ~21, assuming a mean out-of-eclipse g magnitude of 17 (from ASAS-SN).

A linear regression among the optical data points listed in Table 1 (first eight entries) yielded the eclipse ephemeris as given in Eq. (1), (1)

where numbers in parentheses are the 1σ uncertainties in the last digits. This means that with an orbital period of ~92 min, eRASSt J192932.9–560346 belongs to the short-period eclipsing objects.

The X-ray nondetection during one of the eRASS3 scans suggests that it coincided with one of the eclipses of the accreting white dwarf. This initial ephemeris was sufficiently accurate to extend back by one month and determine the cycle number with high accuracy. The corresponding time is given in the last row of Table 1. The timing error was assumed as the eclipse half-length minus the length of the eRODAY (40 s) to stay completely within the eclipse. A linear regression among all data in the table left all values and their errors unchanged within the error margins of Eq. (1). This therefore represents our final result.

The Gaia light curve has a floor at G ~ 20 (see the red data points in Fig. 4), and we were tempted to associate these times with further past eclipse observations. The group of the more recent Gaia events lies 170–270 days before our time zero in Eq. (1). The accumulated timing uncertainty over an interval of 250 days is 51 s (0.009 phase units). None of the Gaia data points lies close to predicted phase zero. We conclude that the low Gaia values are not eclipse events.

thumbnail Fig 5

SALT spectra obtained of eRASSt J192932.9–560346 on 2021 May 6. The larger trace shows the mean of the two blue exposures, and the inset shows both spectra individually zoomed on the spectral range with Hβ and Hell λ14686. The dashed line in the main panel indicates zero spectral flux.

thumbnail Fig 6

HIPPO polarimetry on 2021 May 10. Upper panel: Stokes I values. Middle and bottom panels: percentage of circular and linear polarizations, respectively.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Fast (1 s) photometry from HIPPO observations undertaken on 2021 May 9. Details of the eclipse are shown in the lower panel, in which the ingress and egress resolve the two accretion spots.

Table 1

Optical and X-ray eclipse times of eRASSt J192932.9–560346.

4.3 Results and conclusion

We report the discovery of the bright strongly variable object eRASSt J192932.9–560346, which was detected in the ongoing eROSITA X-ray all-sky surveys. It was identified as a magnetic CV, belonging to the polar subclass, through optical and X-ray spectroscopy, high-speed optical photometry, and polarimetry. While it is expected that the eRASS surveys will uncover many such objects, this object is special through its high brightness and the structured eclipse that was discovered by our initial highspeed polarimetry and photometry. The deep eclipse of ~4 mag lasts about 300 sec and allowed us to derive a precise binary orbital period of 92.5094 ± 0.0002 min. The nondetection of the source during one of the eRASS3 scans was due to a coincidence with the eclipse of the accreting white dwarf.

The nondetection of eRASSt J192932.9–560346 during eRASS2 indicates that the object was in a low state at that time. Low states may occur frequently in polars, but the general properties of these states of reduced accretion (frequency, duration) are not well known. The high-to-low state transitions were studied for a few objects (Kafka & Honeycutt 2005), and for the prototype, AM Herculis, an accretion duty cycle of 50% was derived (Hessman et al. 2000). Some polars show short low states lasting weeks, and other low states may last decades (EF Eri, AR UMa). A short low state as observed in eRASSt J192932.9–560346 during eRASS2 is therefore common.

The eclipses themselves display a very interesting two-step structure (lower panel of Fig. 7) similar to that of UZ For (Perryman et al. 2001), indicating accretion at two poles. Only a small phase offset was observed, therefore it appears likely that there is a northern and a southern pole at perhaps similar stellar longitude (observer located in the northern hemisphere). The northern pole (shorter eclipse) was found to be about 70% brighter in the I band than the southern pole. The bright phase is lefted at phase ~0.75. A pre-eclipse dip occurs and is lefted at phase ~0.2, but it already begins at phase ~0.77, that is, roughly 80 degrees before eclipse left. The pre-eclipse marks the time at which our line of sight crosses the stream that feeds the northern pole. The early phase of this feature and the centroid of the optical light curves point to a somewhat unusual location of the northern (presumably the main) accretion spot approximately a quarter cycle before eclipse. The stellar longitude of the southern spot is currently uncertain, but it must lie closer to the binary meridian (line connecting both stars) because its eclipse is lefted slightly earlier in phase than that of the northern region (as indicated by the different lengths of the slow ingress and egress phases between the steep ingress and egress phases).

Interestingly, eRASSt J192932.9–560346 becomes strongly positively polarized through the pre-eclipse dip. If the light from the northern spot is completely shielded at the dip, this must be synchrotron radiation from the southern spot originating at a different longitude.

Circular polarimetry shows several zero crossings, but no phase of complete absence of polarization. There must always be one of the spots in the field of view of the observer. Even during the extended phase of minimum brightness of the light curve, at about phase 0.25, a linear polarization pulse reaching almost 15% and some positive circular polarization are found, indicating the visibility of at least one of the accretion regions.

The SALT spectra were obtained in the phase interval between 0.42–0.67. Their blue continuum, if interpreted as high-harmonic cyclotron radiation forming a quasi-continuum, is indicative of a moderate field strength of about 20–30 MG (see, e.g., Schwope & Beuermann 1990; Schwope et al. 1993, for cyclotron spectra of polars in this range of field strength). They expectedly do not show any sign of the secondary star. If the donor star in eRASSt J192932.9–560346 were to follow the revised sequence of Knigge (2007) for normal CVs, it would have a mass 0.108 M (spectral type about M6.5), an absolute magnitude MV = 14.9, and an apparent magnitude V = 22.8 for the Gaia-based distance. This is too faint to be detected with our spectroscopy or fast photometry at the bottom of the eclipse.

For an estimate of the orbital inclination, we follow the method outlined by Chanan et al. (1976). For an assumed eclipse length of the white dwarf of 302 seconds and a mass ratio Mwd/M2 = 0.8/0.108 = 7.4, we derive i = 82.5°. For an extreme mass ratio of 10, the maximum inclination is 84.4°.

eRASSt J192932.9–560346 was not detected with ROSAT, likely because it was in a low state in these days. If it had been in a high state during the RASS, it would probably still have escaped identification. It does not show the pronounced soft X-ray component that led to the discovery of many polars from the RASS (e.g., Beuermann & Schwope 1994). The soft component was regarded as a defining criterion of polars in the past, but interestingly, all the X-ray discovered polars since the RASS have not shown a spectral component like this or a soft excess (see, e.g., Schwope et al. 2020; Webb et al. 2018, for recent additions through serendipitous XMM-Newton discoveries). The new source is located at a Galactic latitude of −27.4°. The Galactic Plane Survey (GPS, Motch et al. 1996) observed below |bII| = 20°, while the systematic follow-up of all bright sources, the ROSAT Bright Survey (RBS, Schwope et al. 2000, 2002), observed only above |bII| = 30°. This shows that there is a huge discovery space to be explored with the systematic follow-up of eROSITA sources that will detect objects such as eRASSt J192932.9–560346 out to a discance of 1500 pc.

Acknowledgements

This work is based on data from eROSITA, the soft instrument aboard SRG, a joint Russian-German science mission supported by the Russian Space Agency (Roskosmos), in the interests of the Russian Academy of Sciences represented by its Space Research Institute (IKI), and the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR). The SRG spacecraft was built by Lavochkin Association (NPOL) and its subcontractors, and is operated by NPOL with support from the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (MPE). The development and construction of the eROSITA X-ray instrument was led by MPE, with contributions from the Dr. Karl Remeis Observatory Bamberg and ECAP (FAU Erlangen-Nuernberg), the University of Hamburg Observatory, the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (AIP), and the Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics of the University of Tübingen, with the support of DLR and the Max Planck Society. The Argelander Institute for Astronomy of the University of Bonn and the Ludwig Maximilians Universität Munich also participated in the science preparation for eROSITA. The eROSITA data shown here were processed using the eSASS/NRTA software system developed by the German eROSITA consortium. Some of the observations presented here were obtained with SALT under the transients followup programme 2018-2-LSP-001 (PI: DB), which is supported by Poland under grant no. MNiSW DIR/WK/2016/07. D.B. and S.P. also acknowledge research support from the National Research Foundation. M.G. is supported by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101004719.

References

  1. Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beuermann, K., & Schwope, A. D. 1994, ASP Conf. Ser., 56, 119 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beuermann, K., Thomas, H. C., & Schwope, A. 1988, A&A, 195, L15 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunner, H., Liu, T., Lamer, G., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A1 (eROSITA EDR SI) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buckley, D. A. H., Swart, G. P., & Meiring, J. G. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6267, 62670Z [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgh, E. B., Nordsieck, K. H., Kobulnicky, H. A., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 1463 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chanan, G. A., Middleditch, J., & Nelson, J. E. 1976, ApJ, 208, 512 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. de Jong, R. S., Agertz, O., Berbel, A. A., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drake, A. J., Djorgovski, S. G., Mahabal, A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 870 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hessman, F. V., Gänsicke, B. T., & Mattei, J. A. 2000, A&A, 361, 952 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hodgkin, S. T., Harrison, D. L., Breedt, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A76 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kafka, S., & Honeycutt, R. K. 2005, AJ, 130, 742 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knigge, C. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1982 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kollmeier, J. A., Zasowski, G., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1711.03234] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merloni, A., Predehl, P., Becker, W., et al. 2012, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1209.3114] [Google Scholar]
  17. Motch, C., Haberl, F., Guillout, P., et al. 1996, A&A, 307, 459 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  18. Perryman, M. A. C., Cropper, M., Ramsay, G., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 324, 899 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Potter, S. B., Buckley, D. A. H., O’Donoghue, D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1161 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Predehl, P., Andritschke, R., Arefiev, V., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A1 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Revnivtsev, M., Sazonov, S., Churazov, E., et al. 2009, Nature, 458, 1142 [Google Scholar]
  22. Saxton, R. D., Read, A. M., Esquej, P., et al. 2008, A&A, 480, 611 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schreiber, M. R., Belloni, D., Gänsicke, B. T., Parsons, S. G., & Zorotovic, M. 2021, Nat. Astron., 5, 648 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwope, A. 2012, Mem. Soc. Astron. It., 83, 844 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schwope, A. D., & Beuermann, K. 1990, A&A, 238, 173 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schwope, A. D., Thomas, H. C., & Beuermann, K. 1993, A&A, 271, L25 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schwope, A., Hasinger, G., Lehmann, I., et al. 2000, Astron. Nachr., 321, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schwope, A. D., Brunner, H., Buckley, D., et al. 2002, A&A, 396, 895 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schwope, A. D., Worpel, H., Webb, N. A., Koliopanos, F., & Guillot, S. 2020, A&A, 637, A35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sunyaev, R., Arefiev, V., Babyshkin, V., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A132 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Warner, B. 2003, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
  33. Webb, N. A., Schwope, A., Zolotukhin, I., Lin, D., & Rosen, S. R. 2018, A&A, 615, A133 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

1

Sloan Digital Sky Survey.

2

4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope.

3

Individual scans are separated by 4 hours, the length of one eRODAY. Scans over a given celestial position may reach an exposure time of up to 40 s dependent on the off-axis angle.

All Tables

Table 1

Optical and X-ray eclipse times of eRASSt J192932.9–560346.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Full-band eRASSl and eRASS3 X-ray light curves (0.2–10 keV). Shown are the vignetting-corrected mean rates per eRODAY with blue symbols. The exposure time per eRODAY is indicated with short red dashes (divided by a factor 10).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

eRASS1 (black) and eRASS3 (red) spectra fit with a thermal model. The lower panel shows the fit residuals normalized to their error bars.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Long-term X-ray light curve of eRASSt J192932.9–560346 using XMM-Newton, Swift/XKT, and eROSITA data.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

CRTS (blue, white-light), ASAS-SN (green, g-filter), and Gaia (red, G) archival photometric data. The magnitudes are shown as published. Vertical dashed lines indicate the first three eRASS epochs.

In the text
thumbnail Fig 5

SALT spectra obtained of eRASSt J192932.9–560346 on 2021 May 6. The larger trace shows the mean of the two blue exposures, and the inset shows both spectra individually zoomed on the spectral range with Hβ and Hell λ14686. The dashed line in the main panel indicates zero spectral flux.

In the text
thumbnail Fig 6

HIPPO polarimetry on 2021 May 10. Upper panel: Stokes I values. Middle and bottom panels: percentage of circular and linear polarizations, respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Fast (1 s) photometry from HIPPO observations undertaken on 2021 May 9. Details of the eclipse are shown in the lower panel, in which the ingress and egress resolve the two accretion spots.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.