Issue
A&A
Volume 658, February 2022
Sub-arcsecond imaging with the International LOFAR Telescope
Article Number A4
Number of page(s) 17
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140822
Published online 25 January 2022

© ESO 2022

1 Introduction

Luminous and Ultraluminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs and ULIRGs, respectively) are the most luminous (log(LIRL) ≥ 11.0 for LIRGs, log(LIRL) ≥ 12 for ULIRGs, Sanders & Mirabel 1996) galaxies in the infrared domain, with LIR making up the bulk of their total bolometric luminosity. The number of ULIRGs increases with redshift (Magnelli et al. 2009), suggesting that they were dominant in the infrared sky at z = 1–2. The multifrequency study of their characteristics and behaviour in the local Universe can serve as a template to understand the characteristics of ULIRGs in the high-z universe.

Arp 299 (also known as NGC 3690-A + NGC 3690-B, Mrk 171, VV 118, IRAS 11257+5850) at D = 44.8 Mpc is the brightest LIRG within 50 Mpc, and with LIR ≈ 8 × 1011 L it approaches the ULIRG class. The Arp 299 system consists of a pair of two galaxies in an early major merging process (Keel & Wu 1995), with three well separated regions (Gehrz et al. 1983; Neff et al. 2004). Region A is the nucleus of the eastern galaxy, B is the nucleus of the western galaxy, and C and C′ are off-nuclear star-forming regions in the overlap of the two disk components of the system (Telesco et al. 1985). Both nuclei A and B are known to host AGNs: Arp 299-A hosts a low-luminosity AGN (LLAGN; Pérez-Torres et al. 2010), while Arp 299-B hosts an obscured Seyfert-like AGN (Della Ceca et al. 2002; García-Marín et al. 2006; Alonso-Herrero et al. 2013).

The inner kiloparsec region of Arp 299 harbours a large amount of molecular gas in its circumnuclear regions (M(H2) = 7.5 × 109 M; Aalto et al. 1997), and radio observations with high angular resolution have unveiled an intense star formation burst in their nuclear regions, within the central 100 pc (Pérez-Torres et al. 2009; Bondi et al. 2012; Romero-Cañizales et al. 2011; Alonso-Herrero et al. 2000). The energy released by the compact starburst in the central region of Arp 299A is so large as to power a large-scale superwind, or outflow, as recently unveiled by Ramírez-Olivencia et al. (2018) using the sub-mJy sensitivity and subarcsecond angular resolution capabilities of LOFAR at 150 MHz (LOFAR; van Haarlem et al. 2013).

The high sensitivity and angular resolution of LOFAR allow detailed studies of the very low-frequency (150 MHz corresponds to a wavelength of almost 2 metres) emission and absorption properties of nearby galaxies (e.g. M 82 Varenius et al. 2015 and Arp 220 Varenius et al. 2016). Together with matched-resolution images at higher frequencies, the spatially resolved spectral energy distribution (SED) allows us to disentangle regions with different (thermal and/or non-thermal) spectral properties. For example, synchrotron emission in the subgigahertz regime can suffer significant free-free absorption by H II regions (e.g. Condon 1992). Since H II regions are found within star-forming regions, the radio emission arising from young massive stars and supernovae are expected to be partially suppressed at megahertz frequencies due to the free electrons pervading the H II regions. This absorption can be traced well with LOFAR observations.

In this paper we present the first subarcsecond angular resolution images of the whole Arp 299 system at 150 MHz. We also present a combined interpretation of the LOFAR observations at 150 MHz and JVLA observations at 1.4, 5.0, and 8.4 GHz (L-band, C-band, and X-band, respectively).

Table 1

Summary of LOFAR and JVLA observations and their different configurations.

2 Observations and data reduction

2.1 LOFAR at 150 MHz

We observed Arp 299 with LOFAR between 22 and 23 February 2016 (project code LC5_20; PI: Pérez-Torres, see Table 1), for a total of 12 h, including the international stations. We centred our observations at a frequency of 150 MHz for three simultaneous beams with the same 32 MHz coverage. We used the nearby compact source J1127+5841 for phase calibration, J1128+5925 for delay/rate/amplitude/bandpass calibration, and 3C 295 for absolute flux density calibration. Further details of the LOFAR observations and data reduction are given in Ramírez-Olivencia et al. (2018).

2.2 JVLA at 1.4, 5, and 8.4 GHz

We show in Table 1 the summary for the observations taken at 1.4, 5.0, and 8.4 GHz with the JVLA taken in October 2014 (5.0 GHz, C-configuration), November 2014 (8.4 GHz, C-configuration), and June 2015 (1.4 GHz, BnA to A configuration) under the global VLBI experiment GP053 (PI: Pérez-Torres).

We averaged the data to 10 s in time and 2 MHz per channel before calibration to reduce the processing time. We then used AOFlagger v2.8 to remove radio frequency interference (RFI), and converted the CASA data measurement set into UVFITS using the CASA task exportuvfits. We did all calibration and imaging steps in a standard manner using AIPS release 31DEC16 and ParselTongue 2.3. We referenced the Arp 299 visibility phases to J1128+5925, and derived the flux density scale and bandpass corrections from observations of the primary absolute flux density calibrator, 3C 286. We then imaged the Arp 299 system using the CLEAN deconvolution algorithm as implemented in the AIPS task IMAGR. We applied a primary beam correction using the AIPS task PBCOR.

3 Results

3.1 General description of the LOFAR and JVLA images

We summarize our main results in Figs. 1 and 2, which correspond to our 150 MHz (LOFAR), 1.4, 5.0, and 8.4 GHz (JVLA) images. The overall morphological similarity of the JVLA images with the LOFAR image is striking, considering the factor of ~60 difference infrequency between our 150 MHz LOFAR image and the 8.4 GHz VLA image. The main components of Arp 299 are clearly detected in the LOFAR image: the two nuclei of the interacting galaxies, NGC 3690-A (where the peak of the whole LOFAR image is located) and NGC 3690-B, as well as the two prominent compact radio and IR emitting regions C and C’. We note that component D (see e.g. Neff et al. 2004), which does not belong to the Arp 299 system, is not detected in our LOFAR observations above a 3σ ~ 1 mJy. The diffuse emission is also traced in detail by the LOFAR observations, which show a clear bridge of emission that connects NGC 3690-A and NGC 3690-B. The morphological similarity of all images for the Arp 299 system, both in the compact and diffuse emission, already suggests that the main emission and absorption processes operating in this frequency regime are likely the same.

We show in Table 1 the summary for our LOFAR and JVLA observations. We determined the quoted total integrated flux densities as follows. We first measured the off-source rms and then we set up a 3σ level in all images, to be able to compare the emission from the nuclei and other compact features in Arp 299 at different frequencies. We then blanked out all pixels below a 3σ threshold inthe final images (not shown) and measured the total integrated flux density above this threshold. The associated uncertainties are the result of adding in quadrature the off-source rms, σrms, and the calibration uncertainty, σsyst,i, at each pixel position. Wethen measured σrms in the outer regions of the system and assumed a calibration uncertainty of the flux density per pixel of 15, 10, 5, and 3% for the 150 MHz, and 1.4, 5, and 8.4 GHz observations, respectively.

3.2 Spectral properties at radio wavelengths

In this section we first present the integrated flux densities of the nuclei at different bands, and then the spectral-index maps for the whole Arp 299 system.

thumbnail Fig. 1

150 MHz LOFAR image of the LIRG Arp 299 system. Contours represent [3,5,10,20,35,50,100,200,230] × rms (~98 μJ beam−1). The classicalcomponents are labelled (A, B, C, and C′), and the new outflow from A nucleus (Ramírez-Olivencia et al. 2018) is also indicated. The green ellipse in the lower left corner corresponds to the synthesized beam.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Images of Arp 299 observed with the JVLA at 1.4 GHz (top-left), 5 GHz (top-right), and 8.4 GHz (bottom). Contour levels are drawn at (3,5,10,20,35,50,100,200,230,250) × rms at each band (see Table 1). The green ellipse in the lower left corner corresponds to the synthesized beam.

3.2.1 Integrated flux density of the nuclear components

We turn now to study the nuclear components A, B, C, and C′ detected at all frequencies. In Table 2 we show the peak and total flux density for the nuclei of Arp 299. We used the same physical sizeat each frequency for a direct comparison of our results. We first convolved the images of the nuclear components A, B, C, and C′ at each frequency to the largest beam, which corresponds to that of the 1.4 GHz observations (θFWHM ~ 1.4 arcsec), using a circular beam for simplicity. We also regridded the JVLA images to the coordinate system of LOFAR with the CASA task imregrid. We then used the region delimited by the 50% of the peak of the convolved 1.4 GHz image, as a common angular size for all images.

We estimated the flux density uncertainties following the same procedure described in Sect. 3.1. Specifically, we obtained an uncertainty map based on the total flux density map, where each pixel has a flux density uncertainty given by the sum in quadrature of the thermal noise of the image and the systematic uncertainties: (see Table 2).

We note that, for both C and C′, the maximum of the peaks occurs at 150 MHz, while in the case of A and B the maximum is located at 1.4 GHz. The A nucleus is the brightest component at all frequencies. Most of the emission from the Arp 299 system comes from the extended emission, with only ~20, ~30, ~33, and ~20% at 150 MHz, and 1.4, 5, and 8.4 GHz, respectively, arising from the compact nuclear regions.

Table 2

Summary of LOFAR and JVLA observations and map details.

3.2.2 Spectral index maps

We obtained two-point spectral index images (α, according to the power law Sν = να) by combining our LOFAR and JVLA observations. We first used the previously convolved and regridded images at each frequency, as describedin the previous subsection, and then applied the CASA task immath to the following pairs of images: 150 MHz–1.4 GHz; 1.4–5.0 GHz; 5.0–8.4 GHz (left panels in Fig. 3).

We computed the pixel-wise spectral index uncertainty as in Kim & Trippe (2014); Varenius et al. (2016): (1)

where is the uncertainty in the total intensity at νi. We blankedout all pixels in the spectral index maps that had an uncertainty larger than 3σ in both frequencies, in the convolved and regridded images (see blanked out images in Fig. 3).

The spectral index maps in Fig. 3 help us understand the nature of the emission of the different regions. In the spectral index map between 5 and 8.4 GHz (Fig. 3a) the general trend is within the range α8.4 GHz−5 GHz ∈ (−0.3, −2.), suggesting that the whole galaxy is dominated by non-thermal synchrotron emission. The spectral index of the radio emission in the nuclear regions in Arp 299 starts to depart from the spectral index of the diffuse emission at some frequency between 1.4 and 5 GHz (Fig. 3c). This trend becomes more evident in Fig. 3e, where the contrast between the spectral index, α1.4 GHz−150 MHz, clearly distinguishes the diffuse emitting regions, α1.4 GHz−150 MHz ≤ −0.5, from the nuclear emission, α1.4 GHz−150 MHz ~ 0.0. This different low-frequency behaviour of the synchrotron emitting regions (the nuclei display flat spectra, while the diffuse emission outside of the nuclei shows a rather steep spectrum) can be easily explained if for example free-free absorption becomes increasingly relevant at frequencies around and below 1.4 GHz within the nuclear regions. In this case, the radio spectra will flatten in those regions, diverging from the pure synchrotron behaviour observed in the regions outside the nuclei.

3.2.3 Spectral energy distributions of compact components

We show in Table 3 the flux density per solid angle, Sν ∕Ω, for each compact component and frequency of Arp 299, where we used the sizes obtained as described in Sect. 3.2.1. We plot these values against frequency in Fig. 4 to build up broadband SEDs between 150 and 8400 MHz. The spectra of all four components are inconsistent with a pure, unabsorbed synchrotron power law, but show instead signs of flattening. In the next section we fit these spectra using models with mixed synchrotron and free-free emission and absorption.

3.3 Magnetic field

We show in Table 3 the minimum equipartition magnetic field for the nuclei of Arp 299, which is the field obtained by assuming equipartition between the cosmic ray energy and the magnetic field energy (Pacholczyk 1970), (2)

where c12 is a slowly varying function of the spectral index, α; ϕ is the filling factor of fields and particles; R is the linear radius of the emitting region; LR is the radio luminosity of the source; and ψ is the ratio of the total heavy particle energy to the electron energy. Depending on the mechanism that generates the relativistic electrons, this ratio ranges between ψ ≈ 1 and ψmpme ≈ 2000 (where mp and me are the proton and electron mass, respectively). For simplicity, we used here ϕ = 0.5 and ψ = 100.

We calculated the magnetic field for each nuclear region by following the prescription of Eq. (2). As the physical size, R, of each component, we used the values in Table 3. We note that these values correspond to the continuous case discussed in Sect. 4.1.1 since in the clumpy model (Sect. 4.1.2) the size of each clump is not considered.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Blanked spectral index maps (left) and its spectral uncertainties (right). Plots for the spectral index maps; (a) corresponds to α8.4−5 GHz) at a resolution of 0.8″ × 0.8″, (c) to α(5.0−1.4 GHz) at a resolution of 1.4″ × 1.4″, and (e) to α(1.4 GHz−150 MHz) at a resolution of 1.4″ × 1.4″. Right: total spectral index error (taking into account Eq. (1)) at the frequencies given by the left image of each one. For more details, see Sect. 3.2.3.

Table 3

Fitted spectral model parameters for each compact component and derived physical quantities.

4 Discussion

4.1 Emission models for compact components

Radio emission in LIRGs comes from a combination of synchrotron and free-free emission. Synchrotron emission arises from relativistic electrons accelerated in supernovae (with possible contributions from buried AGN and associated radio jets), interacting with magnetic fields. The free-free emission component is bremsstrahlung emission from ISM gas ionized by massive stars. While the free-free thermal gas makes only a small emission contribution at gigahertz frequencies and below, it can have a large effect on the overall spectrum at low radio frequencies because it can effectively absorb background synchrotron emission. Such low-frequency absorption effects of thermal ionized gas can readily explain the peaked spectra observed in the radio spectra of the compact components in Arp 299 (Fig. 4).

The standard model of radio emission in LIRGs (Condon et al. 1991; Condon 1992) assumes that both the synchrotron and free-free media are smooth and co-extensive. In Sect. 4.1.1 we apply this model to fit the observed spectra of the Arp 299 compact components and discuss the results. In reality, it is probable that the free-free emission and/or absorption in LIRGs is not smooth, but is instead concentrated within discrete HII regions (Lacki 2014). Both Lacki (2014) and Conway et al. (2018) have presented spectral models which take into account this fundamentally clumpy nature of the free-free absorbing medium. In Sect. 4.1.2 we fit models based on the clumpy medium formalism of Conway et al. (2018) and compare these results to those obtained by fitting the continuous model.

4.1.1 Continuous free-free medium model fitting

The continuous free-free medium model (Condon et al. 1991), following the formulation of Varenius et al. (2016), predicts a radio brightness versus frequency given by (3)

where Sν is the surface brightness in units of mJy arcsec−2, the frequency ν in units of GHz, and Te is the free electron temperaturein Kelvin; fth is the ratio of thermal to synchrotron emission at 1 GHz (assuming both emission mechanisms are optically thin, i.e. ignoring absorption effects); and α is the non-thermal synchrotron spectral index. The free-free opacity versus frequency in this model follows , where νt is the turnover frequency at which free-free opacity through the continuous source medium is unity. If we fix Te =104 K the model has three free parameters (α, fth, νt); the turnover frequency (Mezger & Henderson 1967) is given by (4)

where the emission measure (EM) through the source medium equals the integral of through the source where ne is the thermal electron density.

We used the model given in Eq. (3) to fit the spectrum of each compact component, setting the electron temperature Te =104 K and solving for the three remaining free parameters. We used the Python fitting lmfit package to minimize the square of the difference between the data and the different models. We show the results of this fit in Fig. 4 and Table 3. Generally, the continuous model provides excellent fits to the data with the possible exception of component A. For this component we find that in order to accommodate both the 150 MHz and the higher frequency spectral points a free-free turnover is required at the relatively low frequency of 230 MHz; with the consequence that at 1.4 GHz and above the model spectrum is very close to power law. The resulting straight high-frequency spectrum cannot therefore provide a good fit to the apparent spectral curvature implied by the 1.4, 5, and 8 GHz spectral points.

We also find that our model fitting requires synchrotron spectral indices of − 0.33 ± 0.11 and − 0.39 ± 0.02 for components A and C′ respectively,which are significantly flatter spectral indices than are normally observed in star-forming galaxies (α ≈ −0.8; e.g. Herrero-Illana et al. 2017; Pérez-Torres et al. 2021). The flatter spectral indices required for components A and C′ in Arp 299 could be explained (see Sect. 4.2) by the effects of bremsstrahlung and/or ionization loss effects on the energy spectrum of the synchrotron emitting relativistic electrons in dense regions. Such loss mechanisms can flatten the energy spectrum of relativistic electrons at lower energies, in turn giving flattened synchrotron spectra below a critical frequency. Given the relatively high densities implied by the EM values obtained towards the four compact regions, a flattened spectral index around 1.4 GHz and below is plausible (see Sect. 4.2). More exact modelling, which is beyond the scope of this paper, would take into account the combined effects of bremsstrahlung, ionization, and synchrotron losses, which in general are expected to generate a curved synchrotron spectrum rather than one that is asingle power law at all frequencies, as assumed by Eq. (3). Another potential reason for the relatively flat radio spectral index of the A nucleus could be the existence of an AGN (Pérez-Torres et al. 2010). This AGN is very faint, however, about 1 mJy at centimetre wavelengths, and it therefore makes a negligible contribution to the overall radio spectral index of the A component.

Fitting Eq. (3) to the four compact components shows that all require similar free-free absorption frequencies close to 0.2 GHz. This implies for each component an EM of ~ 105 pc cm−6 (see Eq. (4)). This value is more than seven orders of magnitude larger than the EM of the Milky Way (10−2 pc cm−6; Nakashima et al. 2018), consistent with the expectation of a much denser ISM in Arp 299. Somewhat surprising, however, is the similarity of the fitted turnover frequencies of the four components given that they span an order of magnitude in radio surface brightness. The empirically established correlation between radio synchrotron brightness and star formation rate (SFR) per unit area, combined with the expectation that the free-free EM also scales with area SFR (Murphy et al. 2011), means that we would expect brighter radio components to also have larger EM values, and hence higher turnover frequencies. Another way to view the same issue is that the fitted 1 GHz thermal fractions fth for the bright sources A and B are only 0.7 and 2%, respectively, significantly smaller1 than for C and C′ or for normal star-forming galaxies (~10%; Condon 1992, Niklas et al. 1997). Such small thermal fractions for A and B compared to C and C′ are forced by the model fitting because these bright components have high synchrotron brightness at 1 GHz, and yet their thermal gas content must be the same as for the weaker components C and C’ because all components have similar turnover frequencies. The required anomalously low fth in the bright components A and B could theoretically arise if for some reason these components have an overabundance of synchrotron emission relative to their SFRs. However, this explanation is in conflict with A and B being much brighter in the IR (see Pérez-Torres et al. 2021), implying that these components have significantly larger SFR. A more plausible explanation for the small fth fractions in A and B is that the synchrotron emission closely follows SFRs, but that the free-free EM is partially suppressed in these bright components. A possible reason could be dust absorption, as suggested by Barcos-Muñoz et al. (2015) to explain a similar suppression of free-free emission in Arp 220. Dust absorption in dense regions could reduce the number of high-energy photons available to ionize gas, which in turn reduces the EM and the turnover frequency.

In summary, we find that the continuous free-free absorption model provides excellent fits to the spectral data for the four compact components. However, for the bright components A and B these fits require a mechanism (possibly dust absorption of ionizing photons) to suppress the amount of free-free emitting/absorbing gas. Additionally, in two components (the brightest component A and component C′) relatively flat synchrotron spectral indices (i.e. − 0.33 and − 0.39, respectively) are required. Such spectral indices could be explained, however, by the effects of bremsstrahlung and ionization losses in these dense regions.

thumbnail Fig. 4

SEDs of the nuclei in Arp 299. Their sizes are defined by 50% of the peak in the convolved (1.4 arcsec2 beam) of 1.4 GHz JVLA image. The solid blue lines and dash-dotted lines correspond to the best fit to the smooth continuum and clumpy models, respectively.

4.1.2 Clumpy HII region free-free medium model fits

Lacki (2013) has argued that in (U)LIRGs free-free gas is confined within discrete compact HII regions surrounding high-mass stars or super star clusters. Such a physical origin for thermal gas contrasts with the assumption of the continuous free-free absorption model fitted in Sect. 4.1.1. Nevertheless it can be shown (see Conway et al. 2018 and Appendix A) that the continuous model provides a good approximation to the emerging spectrum as long as individual clumps remain optically thin down to the lowest frequency observed.

In this section we present fits to the observed compact component spectral data using a model that explicitly takes into account the effects of clumping and which therefore applies even when individual clumps are optically thick. Appendix A uses the formalism of Conway et al. (2018) to derive an expression for the clumpy spectrum (Eq. (A.4)). For fixed electron temperature this expression has four free parameters, three of which are shared with the continuous case, namely the thermal/synchrotron ratio at 1 GHz (fth), the synchrotron spectral index (α), and the frequency (νt) at which total free-free opacity through the clump population is unity (roughly the turnover frequency). The fourth free parameter is Ncl the mean number of clumps intercepted per line of sight (LOS). As described in Appendix A down to the frequency at which individual clumps become optically thick (i.e. ) the clumpy medium spectrum closely tracks that of a continuous medium spectrum, which has the same values as fth, α, and νt. At the frequency νturn-up, however, the emission reaches a local minimum, below which it increases again, eventually becoming power law with spectral index α (see an example of the spectrum for component A in Fig. 4).

We fitted the observed spectra of the compact components in Arp 299 using the clump spectral model of Eq. (A.4). The four free parameters of the clump model equal the number of spectral points to fit, so that if all parameters are adjusted the fitting has no degrees of freedom. In order to stabilize the fitting and not to be too sensitive to noise, we therefore chose to fix one of the parameters and fit for the other three. For components A, B, and C we fixed the spectral index at α = −0.6 (acceptable fits were found for all α > −0.5), which is in the range of synchrotron spectral index typically observed in star-forming galaxies. For component C’ it was not possible to get a good fit assuming this spectral index, so instead the number of clumps per LOS was fixed at Ncl = 5 forcing a solution similar to the continuous model.

The best fitting clump models are shown by the dash-dotted lines in Fig. 4, which use the model parameters shown in italics in Table 3. The clump fits shown for components A and B are quite different from the continuous models for these components; they show a significantly larger initial turnover frequency, followed at lower frequencies by a spectral ‘turn-up’ that occurs above the frequency of the LOFAR data point. In contrast, the clump fits for C and C′ are very similar to the continuous model over the range of the observations. For these components, which have relatively low turn-over frequencies, the clump induced spectral turn-ups occur well below the lowest observed data point. It is interesting to note in Fig. 4 how the turnover frequencies for the clump models show a decrease as we progress from brighter to weaker components. This is as expected assuming an approximately constant ratio of free-free to synchrotron, which implies that brighter components have more free-free gas and hence have higher turnover frequencies. For components A and B it should be noted that there are alternative clump models that provide fits to the data that are just as good as those plotted in Fig. 4. These alternative fits, like those for C and C′, track the continuous model closely over the range of frequencies observed and have turn-up frequencies significantly below the lowest observed data point. Since these alternative clump models do not show the expected progression of turnover frequency with peak component brightness and, in any case, these have essentially the same physical properties of the continuous model (e.g. EM), we do not discuss these alternative clump models further.

If we compare in detail the clump fit shown in Fig. 4 for component A (blue curve) with the continuous model fit from Sect. 4.1.1 (dashed black curves) we find that (1) the clump fits gives a better, though still not perfect, fit to the apparent spectral curvature defined by the three highest frequency points; (2) for the clump case a good solution exists having a synchrotron spectral index (α = −0.6) closer to values typically observed in intense star-forming galaxies (i.e. Basu et al. 2015) than the flat value of −0.33 required for the continuous model; and (3) the required thermal fraction for the clump model is 18% compared to the 0.7% for the continuous model. This higher thermal fraction is much closer to the typical value of about 10% found in normal star-forminggalaxies. Turning to component B we find that (1) the clump and continuous fits are equally good; (2) the synchrotron spectral indices are very similar for the two models, with both being close to values commonly observed in star-forminggalaxies; (3) the required thermal fraction is 5% for the clump model rather than the 1.8% required for the continuous model, which again is closer for the clump case to the value commonly observed in star-forming galaxies. Overall, these results show that the clump model fits the spectral data either somewhat better than (component A) or equally as well as (components B, C, and C’) the continuous model. The thermal fractions derived from the clump model are more similar between components and closer to values typical of star-forming galaxies. Finally, good clump fits can be made assuming (for components A, B, and C) a synchrotron spectral index of −0.6 which is more consistent with the normal range observed in star-forming galaxies (C’ still requires a flat spectral index even in the clump case). Whilethe above arguments broadly support the clump model we note that alternative explanations exist (see Sect. 4.1.1) within the frame of the continuous model for their somewhat non-standard spectral indices and thermal fractions.

4.1.3 Deciding between continuous and clumpy free-free models

It is interesting to consider possible future observations that could clearly distinguish between the continuous and clump models for A and B. One systematic difference between the two models is in their thermal fractions (for component A 0.7 and 18% for continuous and clump models, respectively). This in turn predicts different amounts of flat spectrum high-frequency free-free emission in the two cases, which could be distinguished via high-frequency VLA observations. Another clear difference in spectral shape for the two models occurs between 150 MHz and 1.4 GHz, and this could potentially be distinguished using uGMRT observations at 200, 600, and 800 MHz. Additionally, the clump and continuous models predict respectively negative and positive spectral indices at 150 MHz. A spectral index measured internally over the LOFAR HBA observing band should in principle be able to distinguish between these different predictions, but the internal data calibration of the present LOFAR data is not of high enough accuracy to do this. Finally, there is the possibility of using future LOFAR Low Band Array international baseline observations to observe around 60 MHz. There is a clear prediction from the clump model that at this frequency emission from components A and B should be significantly brighter than at 150 MHz, while the continuous model predicts the opposite (Fig. 4).

4.2 Energy losses and the spectral index of the Arp 299 nuclei

If relativistic electrons are injected with a power law p = 2.1 (N(E) ∝ Ep) and the cooling of electrons is due to synchrotron and/or inverse Compton (IC) losses, then the index p would steepen by unity (i.e. = p + 1). In the absence of other energy losses, the observed radio spectrum Sννα steepens, and becomes equal to /2 = − p∕2. If p = 2.1, then α = −1.05. However, this is not observed, as indicated in Table 3, which shows that all nuclei have radio spectra significantly flatter than α = −1.0. Hence, the observed spectral flattening suggests that electron losses other than radiative losses (synchrotron and IC) are likely affecting the observed spectrum.

To determine the importance of synchrotron cooling relative to other losses, we can compare the lifetimes of electrons. The synchrotron cooling timescale for cosmic ray (CR) electrons emitting at frequency ν is (5)

where B100 = B∕100 μG is the minimum equipartition magnetic field, Beq for each of the nuclei in Arp 299, and ν is the critical frequency at which we are calculating the lifetime of the electrons, in GHz.

The lifetimes of electrons for the Arp 299 nuclei are in accordance with other studies of LIRGs at similar frequencies (see e.g. Romero-Cañizales et al. 2011), with the most long-lived ones in the B nucleus at the lower frequencies of LOFAR.

The synchrotron lifetime of the electrons must be compared against escape, ionization, and bremsstrahlung losses. For Arp 299-A, we know there is a starburst-driven outflow with a speed vw ~ (370−890) km s−1 (Ramírez-Olivencia et al. 2018). Winds, whether AGN or starburst-driven, can advect cosmic rays out of their host regions on relatively short timescales. The corresponding lifetime is (6)

where h = 100 h100 pc is the scale height of the nuclear disk, which is about 100 pc for compact LIRGs (e.g. Lacki et al. 2010; Herrero-Illana et al. 2012), and vw = 400 v,400km s−1. For the magnetic field values expected to exist in dense starbursts like Arp 299-A (≳100 μG and larger), tsynch is shorter than even the advection timescale (Eq. (6)), and therefore escape losses can be neglected, compared to synchrotron losses.

The electron lifetime due to inverse Compton losses can be written as (e.g. Lacki et al. 2010) (7)

where Uph = 10−12 Uph, −12 ergs cm−3 is the photon energy density.

In LIRGs synchrotron cooling is expected to dominate over IC cooling. However, we cannot neglect bremsstrahlung and ionization losses of CR electrons, whose efficiency increases with the density of the ISM. Specifically, the bremsstrahlung and ionization energy loss timescales are (8)

and (9)

Bremsstrahlung and ionization processes can flatten significantly the equilibrium electron spectra. If bremsstrahlung losses dominate over all other losses, the injected spectrum is not modified (i.e. and α = (1 − p)∕2; Pacholczyk 1970). For p = 2.1, the spectral index would then become α = −0.55. Similarly, if ionization losses are the only relevant ones, and α = 1 − p∕2 (i.e. α = −0.05 for p = 2.1; Pacholczyk 1970). When tsynch = tbrems at some energy, and all other losses are negligible, then and α = 1∕4 − p∕2 (Lacki et al. 2010). Similarly, when tsynch = tion and there are no other losses and α = (1 − p)∕2 (Lacki et al. 2010). For p = 2.1 we have α = −0.8 and α = −0.55 when bremsstrahlung and ionization losses, respectively, are as important as synchrotron losses.

As an illustrative example, we show in Fig. 5 the different timescale losses for the A nucleus. For particle densities below ~500 cm−3, synchrotron losses dominate the emission at 1.4 GHz, and therefore the observed radio spectrum becomes steep. However, for particle densities above ~500 cm−3, as seems to be the case in Arp 299-A and, most likely, for all other nuclei, bremsstrahlung and ionization losses can be as important, or even dominate over synchrotron losses, so that the radio spectrum flattens significantly.

In Table 3 the (assumed) spectral index value of α =−0.6 in the clumpy scenario would correspond to an injected population of relativistic electrons with p = 2.2 that is essentially unaffected by energy losses at our observed frequencies, or only by bremsstrahlung losses. Alternatively, the smooth continuous model leads to spectral indices for the nuclei in the range from α ≃−0.33 up to α− 0.59. If we neglect all energy losses, as assumed in the clumpy scenario, so that the injected spectrum is not modified, the different spectral indices would imply injected indices for the relativistic electrons of 1.6, 2.12, 2.18, and 1.78 for the A, B, C, and C′ nuclei. While we cannot exclude this possibility, it seems more realistic to assume the same injected spectrum for all nuclei. If we assume a standard injected electron index of p = 2.1, subject to synchrotron, bremsstrahlung, and ionization losses, the observed spectral indices of the nuclei can be explained within the continuous model by the increasing relevance of bremsstrahlung and ionization losses due the high gas densities encountered in those regions.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Lifetime of electrons (in yr) emitting at 1.4 GHz, as a function of the particle number density (in cm−3), and subjected to bremsstrahlung (long dashes), ionization (short dashes), synchrotron (solid line), and inverse Compton (dash-dotted line) losses. Synchrotron and inverse Compton losses are appropriate for the A nucleus. We note that at low particle densities, which are appropriate for most extra-nuclear regions in galaxies, radiative losses (i.e. synchrotron and IC) dominate, while at high particle densities like those encountered in the nuclear regions of LIRGs, bremsstrahlung and ionization losses dominate (see main text for details).

4.3 The A nucleus

We reported in Ramírez-Olivencia et al. (2018), based on our 150 MHz LOFAR observations, the detection of an outflow in the A nucleus. From energy arguments, Ramírez-Olivencia et al. (2018) concluded that the outflow was driven by the powerful nuclear starburst, where VLBI observations have detected large amounts of supernovae and supernova remnants (Pérez-Torres et al. 2009), with a SFR of 140 M yr−1 (Alonso-Herrero et al. 2000).

Apart from that, here we discuss another findings from our LOFAR observations. We detected emission in the southern part of NGC 3690-A in all our JVLA images arising from three regions of ~300 pc in size (a1, a2, and a3; yellow rectangles in Fig. 6). Interestingly, the LOFAR image does not show any radio emission above the noise in these regions. If they are star-forming regions, their non-detection at the LOFAR frequencies can be explained by free-free absorption associated with the presence of the interstellar medium ionized by young, massive stars. Since the emission of the southern part of the outflow is absorbed at 150 MHz by these three regions, this suggests that they belong to the disk of NGC 3690-A.

This result may have implications regarding the rotation mode of the galactic disk in NGC 3690-A, which in turn may impact the way bar formation proceeded in this galaxy in particular, and in galaxies in general (Kim & Ostriker 2007; Seo et al. 2019). Pereira-Santaella et al. (2010) suggested, based on spectroscopic observations, that the western part of the disk of NGC 3690-A is moving away from us, while the eastern part is moving toward us. However, knowing the inclination of the disk and its Doppler rotation is not sufficient to determine its rotation mode, as the orientation at which we are observing the disk would still allow for two possible rotation modes of the disk in NGC 3690-A (Fig. 7): leading mode (left) and trailing mode (right).

As mentioned earlier, we detected three free-free absorbing regions (a1, a2, and a3, Fig. 6). For a1 and a2 the absorption at 150 MHz is observed as a lack of emission, due to the free-free absorption occurring in the knot itself. For a3 the background synchrotron emission of the outflow is absorbed, as well as its own knot emission (the hole of emission in the southern part of the outflow). This indicates that we are observing the disk from the northern part (Fig. 7, right), and therefore the disk rotation follows the trailing mode.

4.4 The B nucleus

As shown in Sect. 3.1, the B nucleus in the LOFAR images is resolved into two main components: B1 (nucleus), the emitting region B2 to the north-west, and another source point-symmetric to B2 with respect to the B1 nucleus (see Fig. 8, lower panel). We suggest that it is connected with a structure shown by Alonso-Herrero et al. (2000), but not reported as a source in that work. To follow this notation we have dubbed it B17, and it is highlighted with a green square in Fig. 8, top panel, edited from Alonso-Herrero et al. (2000). Region B17 appears to be connected to the B1 nucleus by means of a bridge of extended emission.

thumbnail Fig. 6

Detail of free/free absorption in NGC 3690 East. From left to right, and top to bottom: magnifications of the 150 MHz, and 1.4, 5, and 8.4 GHz images of Arp 299, showing the southern region of the NGC 3690-A nucleus. The different regions are named a1, a2, and a3, and are highlighted with yellow rectangles.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Sketch of the two scenarios of the disk and the outflow of NGC 3690-A. The disk is coloured in a gradient from red to blue, which represents the motion away or towards the observer, respectively. In the leading scenario (left) the observer sees the southern part of the disk, while in the trailing scenario (right) the observer sees the northern part. The schematic shape of the spiral arms observed in the optical and near-IR (see Randriamanakoto et al. 2019) is shown in light green.

4.4.1 An AGN-powered outflow in the B nucleus?

One of the most outstanding characteristics of the nuclear region of NGC 3690-B observed at 150 MHz is its bowshock-like structure surrounding B1 to the north, east, and west (Fig. 8, lower panel). This bowshock could be produced by an outflow, emanating from the AGN within the B1 nucleus since it has a well-defined synchrotron behaviour (see the white contours of Fig. 8, lower panel, with values of α1.4 GHZ−5.0 GHZ of −0.6, −0.65, and −0.7). Supporting this scenario, we refer to observations at other wavelengths that trace AGN shocks. Since the extended emission of the [FeII] infrared line is related with the shocked material due to global nuclear outflows (Greenhouse et al. 1997), we compare the [FeII] B1 map shown in the background in Fig. 9 with the LOFAR counterpart, in white contours. There appears to be weak FeII emission in the structure of the bow-shock seen in LOFAR. This [FeII] emission reinforces the scenario of an outflow or jet interacting with the surrounding medium. Another hint of this bowshock was previously presented by García-Marín et al. (2006), in which the map of the ratio [OI]λ6300/Hα, very sensitive to shocked medium in the optical regime, presents an ionization cone emerging from B1 in the same direction as the observed bowshock. Finally, the presence of an H2 O maser associated with B1 also supports an outflowing scenario in this nucleus, since this line emission is known to trace shocks in the interstellar medium (Tarchi et al. 2007). Very recently, a tidal disruption event (TDE) has been discovered (Mattila et al. 2018) in the B nucleus. We can rule out a scenario where the bowshock is produced by the TDE, since the TDE is very recent (the event started in 2005) and the bowshock is at least ~500 pc away from the central region, so it would an intrinsic propagation speed greater than the speed of light.

thumbnail Fig. 8

Detail of NGC 3690 West. Top panel: NIC2 F160W image extracted from Alonso-Herrero et al. (2000) of the B nucleus with the names of the sources reported in it. New confirmed source B17 is indicated by a green box. Bottom panel: zoom-in on the 150 MHz image of the B nucleus, showing the positions of the nucleus (B1), a star-forming region to the north-west (B2), and B17. The white contours correspond to the spectral index between 1.4 and 5.0 GHz (−0.65, −0.7, −0.75) in the region associated with a filamentary structure, presumably a bow-shock (see main text).

thumbnail Fig. 9

Region B1. In the background, continuum-subtracted NIC3 F166N, from Alonso-Herrero et al. (2000), corresponding to [FeII] emission, and LOFAR at 150 MHz, in white contours.

4.4.2 Nature of the possible outflow

Assuming the existence of an outflow in Arp 299-B1, we studied its nature by following a similar procedure to the case of the A outflow in Ramírez-Olivencia et al. (2018) that was shown to be powered by star formation.

Let us discuss first the possibility that the outflow is AGN-powered. Considering that the luminosity of the B nucleus is Lbol = 3.2 × 1044 erg s−1 (Alonso-Herrero et al. 2013), we would obtain an accretion rate of ≈ 0.06 M yr−1. In that case the energy rate due to the mass accretion would be , able to explain the observed outflow. Alternatively, if the outflow is driven by star formation, we can estimate the energy rate by assuming the core collapse supernova (CCSN) rate of rSN,B1 ≃ 0.3 yr−1 from Romero-Cañizales et al. (2011). Using a typical SN total energy of ESN ≃ 1051 erg, and assuming an efficiency of 10% for the conversion of energy of the explosion into mechanical energy (Thornton et al. 1998), we roughly obtain an energy rate from a starburst of Ėsb = 9.5 × 1041 erg s−1, about 20 times lower than for the AGN-driven scenario. Thus, we favour the scenario in which the outflow is generated by the AGN accretion activity on the B1 nucleus, at odds with the case of the A nucleus. Moreover, the SFR in the A nucleus is SFR = 140 M yr−1, while in the B nucleus it is significantly lower, SFR = 40 M yr−1, consistent with the nature of the outflow obtained for each case.

4.5 An intrinsic shift in the emission peaks between LOFAR and JVLA frequencies?

We determined the positions of the flux density peaks for the compact components at different frequencies in Sect. 3.2.1. As shown in Table 2, the position of the peaks of the 150 MHz LOFAR image systematically differ from the position of the same peaks at all other frequencies. The position of each peak differs by less than 0.1 arcsec among all JVLA images (see Table 4), while it is much higher between the LOFAR and JVLA bands.

Differential ionospheric effects between the target and the reference fields could in principle cause apparent shifts of the target field. However, given the small separation of only 10 arcminutes, the shifts would be negligible. We also considered the potential shift due to the source structure. We show in Fig. 10 an image of the phase calibrator for our LOFAR observations. The source displays an extended structure towards the north-east. A shift of the peak of emission in the phase-calibrator with respect to its catalogue position would produce an additional contribution to the phase solutions that propagate to the target source image. Based on the calibrator image, we estimate that the phase calibrator may contribute up to 0.5 arcsec to a (systematic) shift of all components in the north-east direction.

The amplitude of the shift due to the source structure of the phase calibrator could in principle account for the maximum shift observed for the peaks of the A and B nuclei (Table 4). However, this shift should be observed with the same orientation for all components, which is not the case (see the black arrows of Fig. 11, which indicate different shift directions). Therefore, the existing evidence strongly suggests a physical origin for at least some of the observed shifts.

For the A nucleus we find that the direction of the shift is coincident with the average direction of the starburst-driven outflow (black and grey arrows, respectively, in Fig. 11a). Similarly, we also find that the direction of the shift in the B nucleus is nearly coincident with that of its suggested outflow (Fig. 11b). As discussed in Sect. 4.1.1, high EM regions are associated with the presence of dense ionized clouds formed at the heart of star-forming regions. Given the compactnature of the synchrotron sources (supernova remnants), the intrinsic synchrotron emission at any frequency, from LOFAR to the VLA frequencies, should come from the same location. However, the observed peaks in the LOFAR images are located at different positions than the peaks at higher frequencies due to the absorption by the ionized medium. The peaks observed at 1.4, 5, and 8.4 GHz are located at the maxima of the intrinsic emission, whereas the low-frequency peaks are located where the medium starts to be barely transparent to the emission. This would naturally explain that the observed shifts in the nuclei point in different directions, as mentioned in the previous paragraph.

Table 4

Shift in the flux density peaks between pairs of frequencies for each component of Arp 299.

thumbnail Fig. 10

Phase calibrator J1127+5841 with contours at [20, 40, 60, and 80%] × peak = 108 mJy beam−1. A north-east extension is visible, with 40% contours extending about 0.5 arcsec from the assumed catalogue position.

4.6 C and C′ regions

At the four frequencies, the emission for these two off-nuclear regions is extended and partially resolved, in contrast with the compact sources present in nuclei A and B. Making use of the spectral index maps (see Fig. 3) it is evident that the central areas of nuclei C and C′ have a flatter spectral index than the extended emission surrounding them, which is of synchrotron origin. This synchrotron emission would come from the star-forming regions C and C′ (HII regions) resulting from the interaction between NGC 3690-A and NGC 3690-B. The flat spectral index on these physical scales (tens to hundreds of pc) at lower frequencies (150 MHz–1.4 GHz) can be completely explained by the absorption from H II regions, excluding the presence of an AGN (spatial scales of a few pc). This is the case of C and C′, which have a relatively flat spectral index between 1.4 GHz and 150 MHz, although they do not harbour any AGNs.

5 Summary and conclusions

We have presented the first map ever of Arp 299 at 150 MHz, obtained from observations with the International LOFAR telescope. We summarize our main findings as follows:

  • Our deep, subarcsecond angular resolution LOFAR observations allowed us to trace in detail the radio emission from the nuclear regions up to the largest scales of several kiloparsecs, at a spatial resolution better than 100 pc. The brightestcomponents correspond to the well-known nuclei A and B (which have identified AGNs), and to the compact components C and C′. However, most of the 150 MHz emission comes from diffuse extended structures.

  • We combined our 150 MHz LOFAR, high-resolution, deep image with deep JVLA images at 1.4, 5.0, and 8.4 GHz to obtain spatially resolved spectral index maps. The diffuse emission shows a two-point synchrotron spectral index between 150 MHz and 1.4 GHz, α ≈ −0.7, typical of star-forming regions. In contrast, the two-point spectral index becomes flatter for the compact components.

  • We fit the radio SED of the nuclear regions using two different models of the free-free absorbing and emitting thermal gas, distributed in a smooth continuous medium and a clumpy medium, respectively. Both models fit the existent data well. The smooth continuous model can explain the SED of the nuclei by a standard injected population of relativistic electrons subjected to synchrotron, bremsstrahlung, and ionization losses. The clumpy model can explain the data by a population of relativistic electrons with negligible energy losses, and yields thermal fractions that are more typical of star-forming galaxies compared to the continuous model. LOFAR observations at frequencies shorter than 100 MHz, or uGMRT observations at frequencies below 1 GHz would unambiguously distinguish between these two scenarios.

  • We found tentative evidence of the presence of an outflow in the B nucleus from our 150 MHz LOFAR observations. From energy considerations, this possible outflow is more likely to be AGN-driven, unlike the case of the starburst-driven outflow in Arp 299-A.

  • We found three regions of about 300 pc in the A component, which are detected at high frequencies, but not in our our LOFAR image. One of the regions is likely absorbing the southern part of the starburst-driven outflow. This, combined with the existing Doppler information of the disk in the A component, suggests that the rotation of the disk follows a trailing mode.

  • We found a shift between the emission peaks of LOFAR and those at JVLA frequencies in the A and B nuclei. The direction of the shift aligns well with the average direction of the outflow in the A nucleus. We also find that the direction of the shift in the B nucleus is nearly coincident with that of its putative outflow. These shifts are not in the same direction, strongly suggesting that the shifts are of an intrinsic nature, and we suggest that differential absorption is the cause of these shifts.

The results obtained on Arp 299 confirm the usefulness of combining spatially resolved radio imaging in the ~100–200 MHz (LOFAR) up to about 1–8 GHz frequencies (JVLA) to characterize in detail the radio emission properties of a LIRG from the central 100 pc out to the kiloparsec, galaxy-wide scales.

The SKA, which is expected to become a reality during this decade, will allow us to obtain a continuous frequency range from ~100 MHz up to at least 5–8 GHz (and possibly up to around 20 GHz), so the perspectives characterizing in detail the radio emission and absorption processes in local LIRGs and ULIRGs, will be done in a systematic way.

thumbnail Fig. 11

Contour plots of Arp 299-A (a), Arp 299-B nuclei (b), and (c) C and (d) C′ compact components. The red and blue contours represent the local brightest values at 150 MHz and 8.4 GHz, respectively.The grey contours in a and b show the values that shape the structures present in the two nuclei (the starburst driven outflow for A-nucleus and the assumed bowshock for B-nucleus) and detected at 150 MHz by LOFAR (see Ramírez-Olivencia et al. 2018, for A-nucleus). The black crosses give the location of the maximum for each frequency. The arrows represent the directions of the shift (black) and the structure (grey).

Acknowledgements

N.R.O., M.P.T. and A.A. acknowledge support by the Spanish MCIU through grant PGC2018-098915-B-C21 cofunded with FEDER funds and from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the “Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa” award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). A.A-H. and M.P.S. acknowledge support through grant PGC2018-094671-B-I00 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER,UE). A.A-H. and M.P.S. workwas done under project No. MDM-2017-0737 Unidad de Excelencia “María de Maeztu” – Centro de Astrobiología (INTA-CSIC). M.P.S. acknowledges support from the Comunidad de Madrid, Spain, through Atracción de Talento Investigador Grant 2018-T1/TIC-11035 and PID2019-105423GA-I00 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER,UE).

Appendix A Spectral models for a clumpy free-free medium

We derive here an expression for the spectrum emerging from a mixed synchrotron emitting and clumpy free-free absorbing or emitting medium. This derivation is based on the clumpy medium formalism of Conway et al. (2018). Similar spectra are predicted by Lacki (2013) who considered the detailed physical properties of the HII regions that likely comprise the free-free absorbing clumps in luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs). An advantage of the more phenomenological based derivation presented here is that the final expression has the same free parameters as the continuous free-free model (Eq. 3) with the addition of Ncl the mean number of clumps intercepted per LOS. A detailed comparison of the phenomenological and physical approaches of respectively Conway et al. (2018) and Lacki (2013) is deferred to a future paper (Conway et al. in prep.).

For the mixed medium under consideration there are two components of emission comprising (A) clumpy free-free emission and (B) smooth synchrotron emission mixed with a clumpy free-free absorbing medium. Although in LIRGs it is invariably the B component that dominates the radio spectrum below 10 GHz, it is convenient to consider first the A component. An expression for emission from this component is given in Eq. 15 of Conway et al. (2018). Converting to radio astronomy units the brightness in mJy/arcsec2 is given by (A.1)

where the frequency ν is in units of GHz, Te is in Kelvin, and the effective opacity τeff,ν, incorporating all clumping effects, is defined by (A.2)

In this expression, Ncl is the mean number of clumps intercepted per LOS, and τcl,ν represents the opacity at frequency ν along a LOSthrough an individual clump. The diagonal brackets denote an average over all impact parameters through all types of clumps within the clump population. Here, we assume for simplicity one type of identical uniform emissivity spherical clump2 so the average is taken only over the impact parameter.

The effective opacity τeff,ν, once the clump geometry is defined, is exactly determined via Eq. A.2 by the values of Ncl and of < τcl,ν >, the mean clump opacity averaged over all impact parameters at a frequency ν. If νt is defined as the frequency at which the total opacity (the mean opacity through all clumps along a LOS) equals unity, then . For a spherical clump with uniform internal emissivity the opacity across a diameter (zero impact parameter) at frequency ν is (3∕2) < τcl,ν > (Conway et al. 2018). The value ofτcl,ν in Eq. A.2 for other impact parameters simply scales with path length through the clump. Given the above, after taking the average in Eq. A.2 over all impact parameters the value of τeff,ν versus frequency is then fully determined by the choice of νt and Ncl.

An expression for the second (B) emission component, of synchrotron emission modified by clumpy free-free absorption, is given by Equation 42 of Conway et al. (2018) as (A.3)

where Sν is the unabsorbed synchrotron spectrum. Following Condon et al. (1991) we assume that this underlying synchrotron emission is a power law with spectral index α, linked in brightness to the free-free emission by the parameter fth, the thermal-to-synchrotron ratio at that frequency. The parameter fth is defined more precisely as the ratio of the unabsorbed free-free to unabsorbed synchrotron emission at 1 GHz. Defining the thermal-to-synchrotron ratio in this way makes it proportional to the ratio of respectively the efficiencies of thermal emission per unit star formation and of synchrotron emission per unit star formation.

The unabsorbed free-free emission at 1 GHz extrapolated from high frequency can be calculated by taking the high-frequency limit of Eq. A.1 at which the effective opacity τeff,ν << 1 and is equal to , and then setting ν= 1 GHz. This gives an extrapolated unabsorbed thermal brightness at 1 GHz of with the unabsorbed synchrotron emission at this frequency being, by definition, times this value. Using this normalization for Sν in Eq. A.3 and adding the expression for the free-free clumpy emission component from Eq. A.1, the total emerging spectrum is (A.4)

in units of mJy/arcsec2, where ν and νt are measured in GHz and Te in Kelvin. The effective free-free opacity τeff,ν in the above equation, as described earlier, is a function of Ncl and νt.

It is interesting to consider Eq. A.4 in the limits of very high or very low frequencies. At high frequencies, when the opacity through individual clumps (τcl,ν) is much less than unity, ; in other words, the effective opacity is the same as the total mean opacity through all clumps along a line of sight. In this case , where νt is the frequency at which total opacity equals unity. Substituting this expression into Eq. A.4 we recover Eq. 3 which in turn describes a spectrum peaking close to frequency νt. If we now consider very low frequencies such that individual clumps are completely optically thick, then τeff,νNcl, meaning that the effective opacity is a constant versus frequency, and thus (ignoring the very small contribution at low frequencies from free-free emission), from Eq. A.4, the spectrum follows the intrinsic synchrotron power-law shape after multiplication by a constant factor equal to (1 − exp(−Ncl))∕Ncl).

The high- and low-frequency limits above give rise, for interesting cases with mean number of clumps intercepted per LOS Ncl > 1, to a characteristic clump model spectrum shape (see the clump models in the top two panels of Fig. 4 and Conway et al. (2018) Fig. 6). At high frequencies this spectrum is identical to that of the continuous model spectrum (Eq. 3) calculated for the same values of fth, Te, α, and νt (i.e. a spectrum showing a spectral peak close to frequency νt). Below this turnover frequency the spectrum at first decreases rapidly until a local minimum is reached, below which the spectrum turns up again. This spectral turn-up occurs at the frequency at which the opacity of individual clumps becomes unity; this occurs at times the turnover frequency, νt, at which the total opacity through the medium is unity. In fitting the observed data, given a low turnover frequency and a sufficiently high mean number of clumps, the spectral turn-up can occur at a frequency below that of the lowest observed frequency data point. In such cases the continuous model can provide a good fit to the data even if the free-free medium is in fact clumpy in nature. A truly continuous free-free absorbing medium is one in which the effective number of clumps goes to infinity, in which case the turn-up frequency goes to zero and the continuous free-free medium spectral model then applies at all frequencies. We note that Conway et al. (2018) wrongly claimed in a footnote that the expression in Condon et al. (1991) leaves out a factor of 1∕τν. As shown above, the general expression (Eq. A.4), which does include this factor, reduces to the expression of Condon et al. (1991) in the limit of an infinite number of clumps and hence of a continuous medium.

References

  1. Aalto, S., Radford, S. J. E., Scoville, N. Z., & Sargent, A. I. 1997, ApJ, 475, L107 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso-Herrero, A., Rieke, G. H., Rieke, M. J., & Scoville, N. Z. 2000, ApJ, 532, 845 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso-Herrero, A., Roche, P. F., Esquej, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, L14 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barcos-Muñoz, L., Leroy, A. K., Evans, A. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 10 [Google Scholar]
  5. Basu, A., Beck, R., Schmidt, P., & Roy, S. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3879 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bondi, M., Pérez-Torres, M. A., Herrero-Illana, R., & Alberdi, A. 2012, A&A, 539, A134 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Condon, J. J. 1992, ARA&A, 30, 575 [Google Scholar]
  8. Condon, J. J., Huang, Z.-P., Yin, Q. F., & Thuan, T. X. 1991, ApJ, 378, 65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Conway, J. E., Elitzur, M., & Parra, R. 2018, ApJ, 865, 70 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Della Ceca, R., Ballo, L., Tavecchio, F., et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, L9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. García-Marín, M., Colina, L., Arribas, S., Alonso-Herrero, A., & Mediavilla, E. 2006, ApJ, 650, 850 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gehrz, R. D., Sramek, R. A., & Weedman, D. W. 1983, ApJ, 267, 551 [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenhouse, M. A., Satyapal, S., Woodward, C. E., et al. 1997, ApJ, 485, 438 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrero-Illana,R., Pérez-Torres, M. Á., & Alberdi, A. 2012, A&A, 540, L5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Herrero-Illana,R., Pérez-Torres, M. Á., Randriamanakoto, Z., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1634 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keel, W. C., & Wu, W. 1995, AJ, 110, 129 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, W.-T., & Ostriker, E. C. 2007, ApJ, 660, 1232 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, J.-Y., & Trippe, S. 2014, J. Korean Astron. Soc., 47, 195 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lacki, B. C. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lacki, B. C. 2014, MNRAS, 444, L39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lacki, B. C., Thompson, T. A., & Quataert, E. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Magnelli, B., Elbaz, D., Chary, R. R., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 57 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mattila, S., Pérez-Torres, M., Efstathiou, A., et al. 2018, Science, 361, 482 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mezger, P. G., & Henderson, A. P. 1967, ApJ, 147, 471 [Google Scholar]
  25. Murphy, E. J., Condon, J. J., Schinnerer, E., et al. 2011, ApJ, 737, 67 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakashima, S., Inoue, Y., Yamasaki, N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 862, 34 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Neff, S. G., Ulvestad, J. S., & Teng, S. H. 2004, ApJ, 611, 186 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Niklas, S., Klein, U., & Wielebinski, R. 1997, A&A, 322, 19 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pacholczyk, A. G. 1970, Radio Astrophysics, Nonthermal processes in galactic and extragalactic sources (New York: W. H. Freeman) [Google Scholar]
  30. Pereira-Santaella, M., Alonso-Herrero, A., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2010, ApJS, 188, 447 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pérez-Torres,M. A., Romero-Cañizales, C., Alberdi, A., & Polatidis, A. 2009, A&A, 507, L17 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pérez-Torres,M. A., Alberdi, A., Romero-Cañizales, C., & Bondi, M. 2010, A&A, 519, L5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pérez-Torres,M., Mattila, S., Alonso-Herrero, A., Aalto, S., & Efstathiou, A. 2021, A&ARv, 29, 2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ramírez-Olivencia, N., Varenius, E., Pérez-Torres, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 610, L18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Randriamanakoto, Z., Väisänen, P., Ryder, S. D., & Ranaivomanana, P. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2530 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Romero-Cañizales, C., Mattila, S., Alberdi, A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2688 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanders, D. B., & Mirabel, I. F. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 749 [Google Scholar]
  38. Seo, W.-Y., Kim, W.-T., Kwak, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tarchi, A., Castangia, P., Henkel, C., & Menten, K. M. 2007, New Astron. Rev., 51, 67 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Telesco, C. M., Decher, R., & Gatley, I. 1985, ApJ, 299, 896 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thornton, K., Gaudlitz, M., Janka, H. T., & Steinmetz, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 95 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Varenius, E., Conway, J. E., Martí-Vidal, I., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A114 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Varenius, E., Conway, J. E., Martí-Vidal, I., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A86 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

1

The thermal fraction of component A is comparable to that estimated by Varenius et al. (2016) for the high radio surface brightness East and West nuclei of Arp 220 (thermal fractions 0.8 and 0.4%, respectively).

2

Lacki (2013) investigated models involving a distribution of non-identical clumps (i.e. HII regions) showing only small spectral effects. Additionally, Conway et al. (2018) shows that the exact clump shape also has little effect.

All Tables

Table 1

Summary of LOFAR and JVLA observations and their different configurations.

Table 2

Summary of LOFAR and JVLA observations and map details.

Table 3

Fitted spectral model parameters for each compact component and derived physical quantities.

Table 4

Shift in the flux density peaks between pairs of frequencies for each component of Arp 299.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

150 MHz LOFAR image of the LIRG Arp 299 system. Contours represent [3,5,10,20,35,50,100,200,230] × rms (~98 μJ beam−1). The classicalcomponents are labelled (A, B, C, and C′), and the new outflow from A nucleus (Ramírez-Olivencia et al. 2018) is also indicated. The green ellipse in the lower left corner corresponds to the synthesized beam.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Images of Arp 299 observed with the JVLA at 1.4 GHz (top-left), 5 GHz (top-right), and 8.4 GHz (bottom). Contour levels are drawn at (3,5,10,20,35,50,100,200,230,250) × rms at each band (see Table 1). The green ellipse in the lower left corner corresponds to the synthesized beam.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Blanked spectral index maps (left) and its spectral uncertainties (right). Plots for the spectral index maps; (a) corresponds to α8.4−5 GHz) at a resolution of 0.8″ × 0.8″, (c) to α(5.0−1.4 GHz) at a resolution of 1.4″ × 1.4″, and (e) to α(1.4 GHz−150 MHz) at a resolution of 1.4″ × 1.4″. Right: total spectral index error (taking into account Eq. (1)) at the frequencies given by the left image of each one. For more details, see Sect. 3.2.3.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

SEDs of the nuclei in Arp 299. Their sizes are defined by 50% of the peak in the convolved (1.4 arcsec2 beam) of 1.4 GHz JVLA image. The solid blue lines and dash-dotted lines correspond to the best fit to the smooth continuum and clumpy models, respectively.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Lifetime of electrons (in yr) emitting at 1.4 GHz, as a function of the particle number density (in cm−3), and subjected to bremsstrahlung (long dashes), ionization (short dashes), synchrotron (solid line), and inverse Compton (dash-dotted line) losses. Synchrotron and inverse Compton losses are appropriate for the A nucleus. We note that at low particle densities, which are appropriate for most extra-nuclear regions in galaxies, radiative losses (i.e. synchrotron and IC) dominate, while at high particle densities like those encountered in the nuclear regions of LIRGs, bremsstrahlung and ionization losses dominate (see main text for details).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Detail of free/free absorption in NGC 3690 East. From left to right, and top to bottom: magnifications of the 150 MHz, and 1.4, 5, and 8.4 GHz images of Arp 299, showing the southern region of the NGC 3690-A nucleus. The different regions are named a1, a2, and a3, and are highlighted with yellow rectangles.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Sketch of the two scenarios of the disk and the outflow of NGC 3690-A. The disk is coloured in a gradient from red to blue, which represents the motion away or towards the observer, respectively. In the leading scenario (left) the observer sees the southern part of the disk, while in the trailing scenario (right) the observer sees the northern part. The schematic shape of the spiral arms observed in the optical and near-IR (see Randriamanakoto et al. 2019) is shown in light green.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Detail of NGC 3690 West. Top panel: NIC2 F160W image extracted from Alonso-Herrero et al. (2000) of the B nucleus with the names of the sources reported in it. New confirmed source B17 is indicated by a green box. Bottom panel: zoom-in on the 150 MHz image of the B nucleus, showing the positions of the nucleus (B1), a star-forming region to the north-west (B2), and B17. The white contours correspond to the spectral index between 1.4 and 5.0 GHz (−0.65, −0.7, −0.75) in the region associated with a filamentary structure, presumably a bow-shock (see main text).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Region B1. In the background, continuum-subtracted NIC3 F166N, from Alonso-Herrero et al. (2000), corresponding to [FeII] emission, and LOFAR at 150 MHz, in white contours.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

Phase calibrator J1127+5841 with contours at [20, 40, 60, and 80%] × peak = 108 mJy beam−1. A north-east extension is visible, with 40% contours extending about 0.5 arcsec from the assumed catalogue position.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11

Contour plots of Arp 299-A (a), Arp 299-B nuclei (b), and (c) C and (d) C′ compact components. The red and blue contours represent the local brightest values at 150 MHz and 8.4 GHz, respectively.The grey contours in a and b show the values that shape the structures present in the two nuclei (the starburst driven outflow for A-nucleus and the assumed bowshock for B-nucleus) and detected at 150 MHz by LOFAR (see Ramírez-Olivencia et al. 2018, for A-nucleus). The black crosses give the location of the maximum for each frequency. The arrows represent the directions of the shift (black) and the structure (grey).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.