User talk:Sreejithk2000

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sreejithk2000.

This is the user talk page of Sreejithk2000, where you can send messages and comments to Sreejithk2000.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.


Hello, thanks for your split but I think you forgot to undelete this file? Jonteemil (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could not complete the file split due to a software bug. I have filed it here: . Lets wait for a resolution. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Thanks for info. Jonteemil (talk) 21:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I tried again today and it worked this time. I moved the overwritten file to File:Boston Bruins 100th anniversary logo (with ®).svg--Sreejith K (talk) 13:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the author of these files and want to only keep the version as shown "File:Peng Shilu (cropped).jpg" because it is the better version. Could you please delete the current "File:Peng Shilu.jpg" and rename "File:Peng Shilu (cropped).jpg" as "File:Peng Shilu.jpg"? That will let all other wikis use this file showing the better version. And if done so, "File:Peng Shilu (2).jpg" is not needed anymore. Thank you. Lvhis (talk) 23:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Sreejith K (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! But the image file in the article "Peng Shilu" in English, Russian and Vietnamese pages cannot display the better version. I am quite confused. What causes this incorrect result? Maybe the file File:Peng Shilu (cropped).jpg should also be deleted? Lvhis (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its the cache. Try Purging --Sreejith K (talk) 20:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. The problem has been solved per your suggestion. Thank you very much! Lvhis (talk) 18:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo EPFL

[edit]

After your split, the old logo is shown in all Wikipedia articles, not the current one (since 2019). 194.230.148.152 12:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 02:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronx Whitestone Bridge 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

廣九直通車 (talk) 03:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Whpq (talk) 11:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of British Columbia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 22:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]