Maryland Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Maryland Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment
Flag of Maryland.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Abortion
Status
On the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

The Maryland Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment is on the ballot in Maryland as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024.[1][2]

A "yes" vote supports adding a new article to the Maryland Constitution's Declaration of Rights establishing a right to reproductive freedom, defined to include "the ability to make and effectuate decisions to prevent, continue, or end one's own pregnancy."

A "no" vote opposes amending the state constitution to establish a right to reproductive freedom.


Additional information on abortion-related ballot measures

As of July 25, 2024, six statewide ballot measures related to abortion were certified in Colorado, Florida, Maryland, New York, Nevada, and South Dakota for the ballot in 2024.

Overview

What would the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

The measure would amend the Declaration of Rights in the Maryland Constitution to add a new section that guarantees a right to reproductive freedom, defined to include "the ability to make and effectuate decisions to prevent, continue, or end one's own pregnancy." The ballot measure is designed to prohibit the constitutional right from being denied or infringed unless there is a compelling state interest, which would need to be achieved using the least restrictive means.[2]

Currently, abortion is legal in Maryland until viability. Abortion is legal after viability if the woman's life or health is endangered or there is a fetal anomaly. In 1991, the Maryland State Legislature passed Senate Bill 162, which said "the state may not interfere with the decision of a woman to terminate a pregnancy" before fetal viability. A veto referendum was filed to repeal the law, and the question went before voters in November 1992. Question 6 was approved upholding SB 162 by a vote of 62% to 38%.[3][4]

Who supports and opposes the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

The amendment has been endorsed by Gov. Wes Moore (D), Lt. Gov. Aruna Miller (D), Maryland State Education Association, Pro-Choice Maryland, and Maryland AFL-CIO. Gov. Moore said, "I’ve been very clear from the beginning that as long as I am the Governor of Maryland, our state will be a safe haven for abortion access. This constitutional amendment will make sure it remains that way, no matter who is in office."[5]

The amendment is opposed by Maryland Catholic Conference, Maryland Family Institute, and Maryland Right to Life PAC. Dr. Frank Arlinghaus submitted testimony in opposition to the amendment saying, "[A]mending the Maryland Constitution is an unusual and extreme measure, and this bill would take an extreme position on abortion, restricting the legislature’s opportunities to pass reasonable restrictions on abortion in late pregnancy or to restrict it as other healthcare."[6]

How did the amendment get on the ballot?

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a 60% supermajority vote is required in both the Maryland State Senate and the Maryland House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Bill 798 (SB 798) on February 6, 2023. On March 14, 2023, the state Senate passed SB 798 in a vote of 32-15. All Democrats except two voted in favor of the bill. On March 30, the state House passed SB 798 in a vote of 98-38 with three absent or not voting.[1]

What states have decided on abortion ballot measures recently?

See also: History of abortion ballot measures

In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Dobbs. v. Jackson Women's Health Organization that there is no federal constitutional right to abortion and overturned Roe. v. Wade, effectively returning abortion policy decisions to the states. Since 2022, seven ballot measures addressing abortion have been on the ballot, with 2022 having the highest number of abortion ballot measures on record in a single year. Four measures—in Vermont, Michigan, California in 2022, and Ohio in 2023— were sponsored by campaigns that described themselves as pro-choice and created state constitutional rights to abortion. All four measures were approved. Three measures—in Kansas, Kentucky, and Montana— were sponsored by campaigns describing themselves as pro-life and were designed to explicitly provide that there is no right to abortion in the state constitution. All three were defeated.

What other states are voting on abortion ballot measures in 2024?

See also: 2023 and 2024 abortion-related ballot measures

The following table provides a list of abortion-related measures that are on the ballot in 2024:

State Date Measure Description
Colorado Nov. 5, 2024 Right to Abortion Initiative • Provide a constitutional right to abortion in the state constitution and allow the use of public funds for abortion
Florida Nov. 5, 2024 Florida Amendment 4 • Provide a constitutional right to abortion before fetal viability, which is estimated to be around 24 weeks, or when necessary to protect the patient's health, as determined by the patient's healthcare provider
Maryland Nov. 5, 2024 Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment • Amend the Maryland Constitution to establish a right to reproductive freedom, defined to include "decisions to prevent, continue, or end one's own pregnancy"
New York Nov. 5, 2024 Equal Protection of Law Amendment • Add language to the New York Bill of Rights to provide that people cannot be denied rights based on their "ethnicity, national origin, age, and disability" or "sex, including sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and reproductive healthcare and autonomy."
Nevada Nov. 5, 2024 Right to Abortion Initiative • Establish the constitutional right to an abortion, providing for the state to regulate abortion after fetal viability, except where medically indicated to protect the life, physical health, or mental health of the pregnant patient.
South Dakota Nov. 5, 2024 Constitutional Amendment G • Provide a trimester framework for regulating abortion in the South Dakota Constitution

Text of measure

Constitutional changes

See also: Declaration of Rights, Maryland Constitution

The measure would add a new article to the Declaration of Rights in the state constitution. The following underlined text would be added:[2]

That every person, as a central component of an individual's rights to liberty and equality, has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, including but not limited to the ability to make and effectuate decisions to prevent, continue, or end one's own pregnancy. The state may not, directly or indirectly, deny, burden, or abridge the right unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means.[7]

Support

Freedom in Reproduction Maryland is leading the campaign in support of the amendment.[8]

Supporters

Officials

Unions

  • 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East
  • Maryland AFL-CIO

Organizations

  • Common Cause Maryland
  • Jewish Community Relations Council
  • Pro-Choice Maryland

Arguments

  • Common Cause Maryland: "As reproductive rights are being eroded across the country, the General Assembly must act affirmatively to ensure that all Marylanders have the fundamental right to reproductive liberty, regardless of what the Supreme Court or any other state determines. The Constitutional Amendment provides the highest possible level of protection of reproductive freedom in Maryland, and for these reasons we strongly urge a favorable report on SB 798."
  • Sharon Blugis, interim executive director of Pro-Choice Maryland: "Access to safe, legal, and accessible abortion and reproductive health care is not only a moral imperative, but it also has enormous social, economic, and health benefits to individuals, families, and communities. Bans and restrictions on abortion and reproductive care harm pregnant people with particular impact on people of color, inappropriately interfere in the trusted doctor-patient relationship, are linked to negative maternal health outcomes, and serve an agenda that would have all pregnancy outcomes scrutinized, controlled, and criminalized."
  • Gov. Wes Moore: "I’ve been very clear from the beginning that as long as I am the Governor of Maryland, our state will be a safe haven for abortion access. This constitutional amendment will make sure it remains that way, no matter who is in office."


Opposition

Health Not Harm MD is leading the campaign in opposition to the amendment.[8]

Opponents

Organizations

  • Maryland Catholic Conference
  • Maryland Family Institute
  • Maryland Right to Life PAC
  • The Hope Movement

Arguments

  • Maryland Catholic Conference: "Senate Bill 798 would establish a fundamental right to reproductive freedom and would enshrine abortion, at any stage, into our State Constitution. We believe that every person is created in the image and likeness of God and all life should be protected and respected from conception to natural death."
  • Dr. Frank Arlinghaus: "[A]mending the Maryland Constitution is an unusual and extreme measure, and this bill would take an extreme position on abortion, restricting the legislature’s opportunities to pass reasonable restrictions on abortion in late pregnancy or to restrict it as other healthcare."


Campaign finance

The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recently scheduled reports processed by Ballotpedia, which covered through January 17, 2024. The deadline for the next scheduled reports is August 27, 2024.


See also: Campaign finance requirements for Maryland ballot measures

Ballotpedia identified one committee registered in support of the measure—Freedom in Reproduction. The committee had not reported any contributions. One committee registered in opposition to the committee—Health Not Harm MD. The committee reported over $5,000 in contributions.[9]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $5,704.99 $0.00 $5,704.99 $367.78 $367.78

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the ballot measure.[9]

Committees in support of Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Freedom in Reproduction - Maryland, Inc. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Opposition

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to the ballot measure.[9]

Committees in opposition to Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Health Not Harm MD $5,704.99 $0.00 $5,704.99 $367.78 $367.78
Total $5,704.99 $0.00 $5,704.99 $367.78 $367.78

Donors

The following table shows the top donor to the committee registered in opposition to the ballot measure.[9]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Law Office of Robert A. Brocate, PA $5,000.00 $0.00 $5,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Background

Status of abortion in Maryland

Currently, abortion is legal in Maryland until viability. Abortion is legal after viability if the woman's life or health is endangered or there is a fetal anomaly.[3]

In 1991, the Maryland State Legislature passed Senate Bill 162, which said "the state may not interfere with the decision of a woman to terminate a pregnancy" before fetal viability. A veto referendum was filed to repeal the law, and the question went before voters in November 1992. Question 6 was approved upholding SB 162 by a vote of 62% to 38%.[4]

Abortion rights provided by statute and constitutional law by state

As of 2024, 11 states provided a state constitutional right to abortion based on court rulings or constitutional provisions, including five states that have also guaranteed abortion rights through statute. An additional 11 states have provided abortion rights solely through state statutes.[10][11]

Right to abortion in state constitutions

The following states have voted or will be voting on adding a right to abortion to their respective state constitutions.

State Year Measure Yes No Outcome
Colorado 2024 Right to Abortion and Health Insurance Coverage Initiative N/A N/A
N/A
Florida 2024 Amendment 4, Right to Abortion Initiative N/A N/A
N/A
Maryland 2024 Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment N/A N/A
N/A
Nevada 2024 Right to Abortion Initiative N/A N/A
N/A
New York 2024 Equal Protection of Law Amendment N/A N/A
N/A
South Dakota 2024 Constitutional Amendment G, Right to Abortion Initiative N/A N/A
N/A
Ohio 2023 Issue 1: Right to Make Reproductive Decisions Including Abortion Initiative 56.78% 43.22%
Approveda
California 2022 Proposition 1: Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment 66.88% 33.12%
Approveda
Michigan 2022 Proposal 3: Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative 56.66% 43.34%
Approveda
Vermont 2022 Proposal 5: Right to Personal Reproductive Autonomy Amendment 76.77% 23.23%
Approveda


U.S. Supreme Court rulings on abortion

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022)

See also: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

On June 24, 2022, in a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court of the United States found there is no constitutional right to abortion and overruled Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). In a 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Mississippi's abortion law at issue in the case. Roe v. Wade found that state laws criminalizing abortion prior to fetal viability violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the essential holding of Roe v. Wade but rejected the trimester framework established in the case. The high court affirmed that states could not ban abortions before fetal viability.

In 2018, Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a clinic and abortion facility in Mississippi, challenged the constitutionality of the "Gestational Age Act" in federal court. The newly-enacted law prohibited abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy except in cases of medical emergencies or fetal abnormalities. The U.S. district court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, holding that the law was unconstitutional, and put a permanent stop to the law's enforcement. On appeal, the 5th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. Click here to learn more about the case's background.[12]

Amendments declaring no state constitutional rights

As of April 2023, four states had constitutional amendments declaring that their constitutions do not secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion. The first state to pass a constitutional amendment was Tennessee in 2014. In 2018, Alabama and West Virginia passed constitutional amendments. In 2020, Louisiana voters approved Amendment 1. Arkansas has a constitutional amendment, passed in 1988, that says, "The policy of Arkansas is to protect the life of every unborn child from conception until birth, to the extent permitted by the Federal Constitution."

In August 2022, Kansas voters were the first to decide on one of these amendments following the ruling of Dobbs. The constitutional amendment was defeated by a margin of 59% opposing to 41% supporting. In November 2022, voters defeated a similar amendment in Kentucky by a vote of 52% opposing to 48% supporting it. Massachusetts and Florida also defeated similar amendments in 1986 and 2012, respectively.

History of abortion on the ballot

See also: History of abortion ballot measures

Since the 1970s, abortion-related policies have been a topic for statewide ballot measures across the U.S.

The most recent vote on an abortion-related ballot measure was Ohio Issue 1, which voters approved. Issue 1 provided a state constitutional right to "make and carry out one’s own reproductive decisions," including decisions about abortion, contraception, and other reproductive matters.[13]

In 2022, there were six ballot measures addressing abortion — the most on record for a single year. Measures were approved in California, Michigan, and Vermont. Measures were defeated in Kansas, Kentucky, and Montana.

From 1970 to November 2023, there were 54 abortion-related ballot measures, and 43 (80%) of these had the support of organizations that described themselves as pro-life. Voters approved 11 (26%) and rejected 32 (74%) of these 43 ballot measures. The other 11 abortion-related ballot measures had the support of organizations that described themselves as pro-choice or pro-reproductive rights. Voters approved eight (73%) and rejected three (27%).

Before Roe v. Wade in 1973, three abortion-related measures were on the ballot in Michigan, North Dakota, and Washington, and each was designed to allow abortion in its respective state.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Maryland Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a 60% supermajority vote is required in both the Maryland State Senate and the Maryland House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Bill 798 (SB 798) on February 6, 2023. On March 14, 2023, the state Senate passed SB 798 in a vote of 32-15. All Democrats except two voted in favor of the bill. On March 30, the state House passed SB 798 in a vote of 98-38 with three absent or not voting.[1]

Vote in the Maryland State Senate
March 14, 2023
Requirement: Three-fifths (60 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 29  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total32150
Total percent68.1%31.9%0.0%
Democrat3220
Republican0130

Vote in the Maryland House of Representatives
March 30, 2023
Requirement: Three-fifths (60 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 84  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total98383
Total percent70.5%27.3%2.2%
Democrat9802
Republican0381

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Maryland

Click "Show" to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Maryland.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Maryland State Legislature, "Senate Bill 798 Overview," accessed March 13, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Maryland State Legislature, "Senate Bill 798 Text," accessed March 13, 2023
  3. 3.0 3.1 Maryland State Legislature, "Health & Gen. §§20-207," accessed April 10, 2023
  4. 4.0 4.1 Maryland State Board of Elections, "1992 Presidential Election Official Results for Statewide Questions," accessed May 5, 2022
  5. Governor of Maryland, "Statement," accessed April 21, 2023
  6. Maryland General Assembly, "Senate Bill 798 Testimony," accessed April 21, 2023
  7. 7.0 7.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  8. 8.0 8.1 Baltimore Sun, "Proponents of Maryland’s 2024 ballot question on abortion aim to match success of earlier era," December 26, 2023
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Maryland Campaign Finance Information System, "Search," accessed April 10, 2023
  10. The Guttmacher Institute, "Ensuring Access to Abortion at the State Level: Selected Examples and Lessons," January 9, 2019
  11. Center of Reproductive Rights, "What if Roe Fell?" accessed February 23, 2022
  12. SCOTUSblog, "Court to weigh in on Mississippi abortion ban intended to challenge Roe v. Wade," May 17, 2021
  13. Ohio Attorney General, "The Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and Safety," accessed February 22, 2023
  14. Maryland State Board of Elections, "Rules and Information for Voters," accessed April 18, 2023
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Maryland State Board of Elections, "Introduction," accessed April 18, 2023
  16. Maryland Attorney General, "Voting FAQ," accessed April 13, 2023