X-ray spectral and timing evolution during the 2018 outburst of MAXI J1820+070
Abstract
We made use high-cadence observations from the -HXMT and to scrutinize the spectral and timing evolution during the 2018 outburst of the black hole X-ray binary (BHXRB) MAXI J1820+070. Itβs hardness-intensity diagram (HID) displays a βqβ-like track including all the spectral states, along a unique loop in the hard state. The tracks observed in the HID is anticipated in the evolution of the components responsible for Compton and reflection emission. This is substantiated by the relationship between the X-ray luminosity and photon index , as well as the relationship between X-ray luminosity and the ratio of Compton to disk luminosities . Both of these relationships exhibit a pattern reminiscent of HID. During the hard state, the hardness (also ) is determined by either reflection component ( ) or Compton component () depending on the value reflection fraction . So the distinctive evolution of leads to the unique loop in the HID (also in the β plane) of hard state. Additionally, we found a negative correlation between frequency of the type-C quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) () and the optical depth of the Compton emission (), and a positive correlation between and . These correlations strongly suggest a coupling between the QPO properties and the underlying process responsible for Comptonization.
keywords:
accretion, accretion discs β black hole physics β X-rays: binaries β stars: individual: MAXI J1820+0701 Introduction
The majority of Galactic black hole X-ray binaries (BHXRBs) behave as transient sources that spend years to decades in a quiescent state. Occasionally, they undergo outbursts lasting for weeks to months before returning to quiescence (Yan & Yu, 2015; Corral-Santana et al., 2016). These outbursts may involve transitions through distinct accretion states, which are characterized by a variety of X-ray spectral and timing features, along with associated radio emission (see reviews by Remillard & McClintock, 2006; Done et al., 2007; Belloni, 2010). Given their proximity at kiloparsec distances and their dramatic variability on timescales spanning from days to months, BHXRBs serve as excellent targets for real-time monitoring the accretion flow and jet behavior. The high-cadence observations yield valuable insights into the physics of accretion and its interplay with jet across different accretion states.
The outburst usually starts from the hard state (HS) when the luminosity is low. The X-ray spectrum of HS is dominated by Comptonized emission produced from a hot plasma usually called corona (Sunyaev & Truemper, 1979), a weak thermal component from the accretion disk is also detected. In this state, the strong low-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (LFQPOs) and broad line noises (BLNs) are usually detected in the power density spectrum (PDS, e.g. Belloni et al., 2002; Casella et al., 2004). As the outburst goes on, the disk component becomes stronger. When the spectra is dominated by the thermal component from an optically thick disk extending to the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) of the BH (Novikov & Thorne, 1973; Shakura & Sunyaev, 1973), the outburst enters the soft state (SS). In contrast to HS, SS shows low X-ray variability amplitude with a few percent fractional root mean square (RMS), and LFQPOs are rarely detected (Motta et al., 2012). The transition between the HS and SS is called intermediate state (IMS). During the outburst decay, the disk temperature and luminosity decrease. At some point, the corona restrengthens and dominates over the disk component, which indicates the outburst return to HS.
A large fraction of outbursts experience a transition from the HS to SS state (H-S) during the outburst rise, and conversely, from SS to HS (S-H) during the outburst decay (e.g. Yu & Yan, 2009; Tetarenko et al., 2016). Through the comprehensive X-ray spectral and timing analysis, we can conduct detailed research on different spectral states and state transitions (e.g. Belloni, 2010). The characteristics extracted from X-ray spectral-timing data reveal the properties and evolution of the accretion flow across different spectral states (e.g. Kara et al., 2019; Fabian et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2021; You et al., 2023a). Notably, the X-ray spectral and timing properties exhibit pronounced changes during these state transitions, providing valuable insights into the changes in innermost accretion flow and/or ejection around the BH.
2 MAXI J1820+070
In this work, we focus on the evolution of the very bright outburst of MAXI J1820+070. The X-ray outburst MAXI J1820+070 was first detected by Monitor of All-sky X-ray Image (MAXI) on March 11, 2018 (MJD 58188, Kawamuro et al., 2018). The optical counterpart ASASSN-18ey was discovered by the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) (Shappee et al., 2014) around several days earlier (Tucker et al., 2018; Denisenko, 2018). Soon after, the source was classified as a BHXRB according to the follow-up observations in different wavelengths (Baglio et al., 2018; Bright et al., 2018; Uttley et al., 2018). Atri et al. (2020) measured the distance of kpc by using the radio parallax method and a jet inclination angle of with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) observations. Torres et al. (2020) estimated the mass of black hole is . The spin of the BH was estimated as 0.14 (Zhao et al., 2021).
Like other transient BHXRBs, MAXI J1820+070 is in HS at the beginning of the outburst. It is a very long HS, extending until around MJD 58290. Subsequently, the source enters the IMS. The above two periods are referred to as rising HS and IMS states. The transient jet ejected around MJD 58306 (Bright et al., 2020; Wood et al., 2021), coinciding with the transition between hard intermediate state (HIMS) and soft intermediate state (SIMS; Fender et al., 2004). The SS lasts from MJD 58310 to 58383. At about MJD 58393, the source returns to the HS. In order to distinguish from the outburst rise phase, the period between MJD 58383 to 58393 and after are referred to as decaying IMS and HS states, respectively. The time intervals of different spectral states are shown in Figure 1 (see also Shidatsu et al., 2019).
Due to its high X-ray brightness (see the public lightcurve in Sakamoto et al., 2016) and low interstellar absorption/extinction (Uttley et al., 2018), MAXI J1820+070 serves as an ideal source for studying outburst evolution across multiple wavelengths. Extensive multi-wavelength campaigns, involving various X-ray missions, have been conducted. By concurrently applying X-ray spectral and timing analysis during this outburst, it is very helpful to uncover the properties and evolution of accretion flows around black holes (e.g. Stiele & Kong, 2020; Wang et al., 2020; You et al., 2021). -Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (HXMT) is one of the best missions for performing X-ray spectral and timing study in a very broad energy band 1β250 keV (Zhang et al., 2020). It carries three slat-collimated payloads: low energy X-ray telescope (LE, 1β15 keV, Chen et al., 2020), medium energy X-ray telescope (ME, 5β30 keV, Cao et al., 2020) and high energy X-ray telescope (HE, 20β250 keV, Liu et al., 2020). All three instruments have large collecting areas and high time resolution, which are beneficial to do X-ray spectral and timing analysis for bright targets. -HXMT observed MAXI J1820+070 from March 14, 2018 to October 21, 2018, and obtained a total of more than 310 exposures with an average interval of 0.63 days. The -HXMT observations extensively cover the different spectral states through almost the entire outburst Figure 1. We also used the data from Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer () in some cases. Due to its high time resolution and large effective area, data can provide X-ray spectral and timing analysis in the 0.2β12 keV.
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x1.png)
3 Data reduction and data analysis
3.1 -HXMT data reduction
The -HXMT data and products were processed and extracted by using the -HXMT Data Analysis Software package (HXMTDAS). We first screened the original event data of three instruments by using lescreen, mescreen and hescreen with the recommended criteria in the user manual 111http://hxmten.ihep.ac.cn/SoftDoc.jhtml. The spectra and light curves were extracted by using the tools lespecgen, mespecgen, hespecgen, lelcgen, melcgen and helcgen for the target, and using the tools lebkgmap, mebkgmap and hebkgmap for the background, respectively. All the spectra were grouped with a minimum count of 25 per bin.
The net light curves were calculated with lcmath. We then used the powerspec in XRONOS package to compute the power density spectrum (PDS) in Leahy normalization (Leahy et al., 1983). The net light curves with a time resolution of 1/512 seconds were divided into segments with a length of 512 seconds for producing the PDSs. So the frequency resolution of the PDS is 1/512 Hz and the Nyquist frequency is 256 Hz.
3.2 data reduction
The raw data were first reprocessed by using task nicerl2 in the software package NICERDAS. The source and background spectra, ancillary response files (ARFs) and response matrix files (RMFs) were all extracted by using the pipeline task nicerl3-spect. During the above procedure, the SCORPEON background model was chosen, and the recommended systematic error from the calibration file was applied. The spectra were grouped with a minimum count of 25 per bin.
3.3 X-ray timing analysis
We excluded the soft state from MJD 58310 to 58383 for timing analysis of -HXMT data. The PDSs were then logarithmically re-binned with an increment factor of 0.025 in frequency and formatted to be compatible with XSPEC (Ingram & Done, 2012). We then used a combination of Lorentzian functions and a constant to fit the PDSs in XSPEC (v12.12.1): two or four Lorentzians for the BLNs, two or three Lorentzians for the QPO and its harmonic and/or subharmonic and a constant for the white noise. The PDS of the data from LE and ME detectors on the -HXMT can be described by a QPO and two BLN components while the data from HE detectors will use two additional Lorentzians to supply the BLN components. Some observations during the IMS were used since -HXMT observation is absent during the period of MJD 58301β58305 (obsID 1200120192β1200120197). Notably, the QPOs in the observations 1200120196 and 1200120197 exhibited dramatic and rapid changes (Stiele & Kong, 2020; Homan et al., 2020). Consequently, we divided the two observations into several segments based on the dynamic power spectra (Homan et al., 2020), in order to study the timing evolution in detail. The PDSs consist of one to three BLN components and one or two QPO components. The uncertainties of all the parameters were calculated from the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method by the implementation of emcee in XSPEC 222https://github.com/zoghbi-a/xspec_emcee. Using the best-fitting results of PDSs, we calculated the fractional RMS , where is the normalisation of the Lorentzian function and is the mean count rate(Leahy et al., 1983; van der Klis, 1989).
3.4 X-ray spectral analysis
We performed the spectral fitting through XSPEC v12.12.1 by using the chi statistic. Different models were applied in different spectral states. During the hard and intermediate states of the outburst rise phase, we applied the model constant*TBabs*(diskbb+relxillCp+gaussian) to fit X-ray spectra in the 2β150 keV. The constant factor was used to coordinate calibration differences between different instruments, where the constant for LE was fixed at 1. The equivalent hydrogen column density () of TBabs was fixed at (Uttley et al., 2018). The diskbb is a multi-blackbody component, which accounts for the accretion disk radiation. The relxillCp (version 2.3) is a relativistic reflection model that calculates the spectrum from an accretion disk illuminated by the corona (GarcΓa et al., 2014; Dauser et al., 2022). In our spectral fitting, we fixed the black hole spin at a = 0.14(Zhao et al., 2021) and the inclination angle at (Atri et al., 2020). We tied the normalization of the diskbb to the inner disk radius (in unit of ) in relxillCp as 816 (Gao et al., 2023) by ignoring the uncertainties of the distance and inclination angle. On the other hand, the real is affected by the color-correction factor, boundary condition and disk wind (e.g. Kubota et al., 1998; Zdziarski et al., 2022). For simplicity, we only used a continuous power-law emissivity and fixed the index at , and a constant ionization (iongrad_type=0 ). The gaussian was used to account for a narrow component near the iron K emission line (6.4 keV). Finally, we used the cflux to get the flux of the diskbb and relxillCp in the 0.1β100 keV energy band, then got the flux of reflection and Comptonization components by setting reflection fraction refl_frac as zero. During and after the soft state, we applied the model constant*TBabs*(diskbb+nthComp+gaussian) to fit the broadband X-ray spectrum. Then, we also used cflux to calculate the flux of the diskbb and nthComp in 0.1β100 keV energy band. The uncertainties of all the parameters were calculated using the emcee in XSPEC.
Because of the absence of -HXMT observation around MJD 58301 to 58305 in the IMS, we used the data as the supplementary. We also generated the energy spectra for each segment of obsID 1200120196 and 1200120197. Then we applied the same model as used for -HXMT data during this period to fit the spectra in the 1β10 keV. For simplicity, we fixed the electron number density , iron abundance and electron temperature at , 5.0 and 100.0 keV, respectively.
4 X-ray spectral and timing evolution during the 2018 outburst
4.1 Unique evolution of rising HS
The count rates of MAXI J1820+070 from LE and HE of -HXMT are plotted in Figure 1a, and the hardness-intensity diagram (HID) and absolute RMS-intensity diagram (RID) are also shown in Figure 1b and c. The light curve of MAXI J1820+070 shows a multi-peaked outburst profile (Chen et al., 1997). The first peak remains in the hard state, while its HID exhibits a small loop, which looks like a ββ track (Figure 1b). The rising HS is divided into three phases: the rise, plateau and bright decline phases (e.g. Stiele & Kong, 2020; De Marco et al., 2021), which roughly corresponds to the three curves of the small ββ. The rise phase is from the start of the outburst to MJD 58200 when the count rate reaches the peak and then begins to decrease slowly. The plateau phase is from MJD 58200 to 58260, and the bright decline phase is from 58260 to MJD 58290. The absolute RMS and count rate do not follow a single positive correlation (Figure 1c; see also Stiele & Kong, 2020). This loop evolution of rising HS in HID/RID has never been shown in other BHXRBs (Belloni, 2010; Belloni & Motta, 2016). Even in the other outbursts with multiple peaks, their HID/RID usually do not show a loop trend during the rising HS, such as the outbursts in XTE J1550564, GX339-4 and GRO J165540 (e.g. Sobczak et al., 2000; Debnath et al., 2008; Clavel et al., 2016).
During the rising HS, our timing and spectral analysis results show a clear distinction between this special plateau phase with the rise and bright decline phase. Notably, despite the gradual decline of the count rate during the plateau phase, the Comptonization Luminosity calculated from model relxillCp remains almost constant (see Figure 3). The reflection fraction is large () during the plateau phase, which is the largest among BHXRBs at this luminosity level (You et al., 2023b). The QPO frequency exhibits a positive and parallel correlation with the total X-ray luminosity during the rise and the bright decline phases while the correlation is negative in the plateau phase (see Figure 7a).
4.2 X-ray luminosity and spectral parameter evolution
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x2.png)
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x3.png)
Based on spectral analysis, we present the evolution of the main parameters of the models in Figure 2. The hard and intermediate state are applied with a complex model constant*TBabs*(diskbb+relxillCp+gaussian). The reflection fraction increases in the rise phase of HS and subsequently undergoes a gradual decline until the SS. Please note that the definition of from relxillCp with version older than 1.4.1 is different 333http://www.sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de/dΜauser/research/relxill/index.html. The electron temperature decreases in the rise phase of HS, increases slowly until the end of hard state, and drops again in the HIMS. During other periods of the outburst, it is not well-constrained. The normalization initially decreases quickly in the rise phase and decreases slowly in the plateau and bright decline phase of the HS. Then it begins to increase during the IMS. The photon index manifests different growth rates between the rise and plateau phases of HS, followed by a decrease during the bright decline phase and a rapid increase during the IMS. The inner disk temperature increases rapidly in the rise phase of the HS and increases slowly before the IMS is reached. During the IMS, sharply increases and reaches the level of SS.
During and after the SS, we applied the model constant*TBabs*(diskbb+nthComp+gaussian) for spectral fitting. Then the starts to decrease exponentially until the end of SS accompanied by a relatively constant , which is consistent with the standard thin disk (Shakura & Sunyaev, 1973). Due to the hard X-ray tail in the -HXMT spectra, at an early stage of SS is lower than that in SIMS (see also Fabian et al., 2020; Mummery et al., 2024). shows fluctuations until we cannot constrain well and fix it at for the rest of SS. During the decaying IMS, gradually drops to the HS level. The evolution of the spectral parameters in different spectral states is also reported in You et al. (2021); Peng et al. (2023); Fan et al. (2024).
The X-ray luminosity of different spectral components calculated in the energy range of 0.1β100 keV is presented in Figure 3. In the rise phase of HS, , and all increase. However, reaches peak synchronously with , and reaches its peak earlier. Subsequently, and decrease until the end of HS. Notably, remains relatively constant during the plateau phase and then decreases in the bright decline phase of HS. During the rising IMS, there is a significant increase in luminosities of different spectral components except , particularly around the period of transient jet ejection (Figure 3). Afterward, surpasses . During the SS, exhibits an exponential decline. In the decaying IMS, continues to decrease at a steeper rate, while experiences a small flare (Figure 3).
4.2.1 Relationships between and spectral parameters
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x4.png)
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x5.png)
The relationship between photon index and total X-ray luminosity is presented in Figure 4a. It is evident that and show almost identical ββ-like evolution with HID even the small ββ-like track during the rising HS. When the reflection fraction exceeds 1, the reflection component surpasses the Compton component below the energy of the reflection hump ( 30 keV; Dauser et al., 2014). Consequently, the photon index (also hardness ratio) is primarily influenced by the reflection component rather than the Compton component in X-ray spectra when . Notably, the slope of the reflection spectra in the 2β10 keV energy range are always steeper than that of the Compton spectra (Figure 9), resulting in a larger and also hardness. So the (also hardness) is determined by either Compton () or reflection () component depending on the . The positive correlation observed between luminosity and the photon index in the bright hard state of other BHXRBs is primarily driven by Compton emission (e.g. Yang et al., 2015; Yan et al., 2020; You et al., 2023b). As a result, this behavior is not observed during the rising HS with in MAXI J1820+070. So the distinctive evolution of leads to the unique ββ-like track in β and HID during the rising HS.
The relationship between the and the ratio of to is shown in Figure 4b. At the end of outburst decay, the diskbb is no longer required for the spectral fitting. So the is calculated by using the last best-fitting . This diagram also presents a βqβ-like pattern similar to HID and -. Notably, the parameters and hardness follows an ββ-like track during the rising HS, which is not observed in (Figure 4). This result also highlights that the during the rising HS is not always determined by the Compton component. Since the exhibits a monotonically negative correlation with the in the Comptonization scenario (e.g. Haardt & Maraschi, 1991; Beloborodov, 1999).
The relationships between total X-ray luminosity and both the reflection fraction and electron temperature are respectively shown in Figure 5a and Figure 5b. During the rising HS, a positive correlation is observed between and (see also You et al., 2023b), which then inverts to a negative correlation in the IMS. Concurrently, demonstrates a uniform negative correlation with when it can be accurately constrained by our model during both the HS and HIMS (e.g. Yan et al., 2020; You et al., 2023b).
4.3 Type-C QPO evolution
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x6.png)
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x7.png)
The evolution of centroid frequency of type-C QPO is present in Figure 6. We could detect the type-C QPO from around MJD 58193.42 until MJD 58305.61 when the source reaches the SIMS. The centroid frequency of QPO ranges from 0.01 to 8.05Hz and the values obtained from the same exposure ID in different detectors (LE, ME and HE) are nearly identical. The evolution obtained from -HXMT is almost the same as that from data (Stiele & Kong, 2020).
The QPO frequency apparently changes at different rates during different phases (Figure 6). Buisson et al. (2018) has claimed that the QPO frequency exponentially increases with time. We also used exponential function to fit the at different phases. The best-fitting -folding time scales are 7.63 0.78, 23.99 0.65, -50.27 7.86 days for the rise, plateau and bright decline phases of HS, respectively (Figure 6). The evolution during the IMS obviously experiences two different increasing rates with -folding time scales of 8.28 0.76, and 1.02 0.05 days Figure 6.
We also performed timing analysis for the -HXMT data during the decaying IMS and HS. But no significant QPO signals were detected. We noticed that there are some QPO detections with data reported in Stiele & Kong (2020). However, only six QPO signals are considered to be significant (). Their frequency and fractional RMS vary chaotically. Consequently, it is difficult to conclusively determine the type and evolution of the detected QPOs during the decaying IMS and HS.
We then investigated the relationships between type-C QPO frequency and spectral parameters during the rising HS and HIMS (Figure 7). The exhibits a complex correlation with the total X-ray luminosity . Two positive correlations parallelly exist in the rise and bright decline phases of HS and IMS. However, a negative correlation is observed in the plateau phase of HS (Figure 7a). The and photon index exhibit an overall positive correlation in the HS and HIMS, with varying slopes across different phases (Figure 7b). It appears that the slopes during the rise, plateau, and bright decline phases of HS and HIMS differ. We also calculated the optical depth of Compton component from and according to the equation in (Zdziarski et al., 1996). As present in Figure 7c, the and follow a single negative correlation. The best-fitting slope of this correlation is obtained as using the Bayesian method in Buchner (2021). However, the correlation displays a large scatter, with a value of .
4.4 Dramatic changes around the transient jet ejection
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x8.png)
We are already aware that significant X-ray spectral and timing changes in the transition between HIMS and SIMS (see Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 6), coinciding with two transient jet ejections and a radio flare around MJD 58306 (Bright et al., 2020; Homan et al., 2020; Wood et al., 2021). Approximately 4 hours subsequent to the first ejection, a radio flare is observed. The peak of the radio flare coincides with the second ejection (see Figure 8 and Wood et al., 2021). It is currently uncertain which ejection the radio flare corresponds to. Both ejection times are the best-constrained among BHXRBs (Carotenuto et al., 2024). Due to the extensive coverage of observation, we are able to investigate the spectral and timing variation before and after the ejection.
We divided the two observations around jet ejection into 11 segments. The parameters of QPOs detected in each segment are listed in Table 1. Notably, the type-C QPO is present in every segment except the last one, which occurs just after the first ejection on MJD 58305.60 0.04. Additionally, a type-B QPO around 4 Hz emerges roughly 0.4 days before this ejection. It is first detected on MJD 58305.22 and persists for approximately 14 hours. Although the type-B QPOs are not prominently visible in the dynamic PDSs prior to the ejection (see Homan et al., 2020), they are significantly detected in the averaged PDS of certain segments (Table 1).
In Figure 8, we also present spectral parameters and X-ray luminosity. Prior to the first ejection, the spectral parameters, specifically the disk temperature and photon index , exhibit a sharp increase. After the first ejection, the and reach the SS level, the and show a decrease.
5 Discussion
5.1 The βqβ-like HID and the evolution of -
Similar evolution tracks are anticipated in both the β and HID, as the calculated hardness (3β10keV/1β3keV) depends on the slope of the X-ray spectrum, also known as the photon index. Figure 4a displays a βq"-like track between and when all data from the entire outburst are included, and a small β"-like track during the rising HS, which is similar to HID (Figure 1). We have also gathered data from several outbursts with comprehensive observations that span the full duration of the outburst from the literature (Sobczak et al., 2000; Debnath et al., 2008; McClintock et al., 2009). We found that and follow a roughly βq"-like track in all three outbursts similar to the HID (see Figure 10). The data in the hard state (right part of the βq") roughly follows a βv"-like correlation, aligning with previous work. The significant scatter of the right branch of βv"-like correlation (e.g. Fig.2 in Yan et al., 2020) is evidently due to the different bend points at the upper right of the βqβ track in different outbursts, i.e., the luminosity where the HS can reach.
In the case of thermal Comptonization, the photon index monotonically decreases with (e.g. Haardt & Maraschi, 1991; Beloborodov, 1999). In this work, the and can be represented by the Compton and disk luminosity, respectively. The and indeed follows a similar βq" track to and (see Figure 4b and also Dunn et al., 2010). So the evolution of the corona, which is responsible for the Comptonization, determines the βqβ-like tracks (Figure 1b and Figure 4).
The H-S transition luminosity during the outburst rise is usually several times larger than the S-H transition luminosity during the outburst decay(e.g. Yu & Yan, 2009; Tetarenko et al., 2016), even the hardness ratio or photon index is similar. This phenomenon is called hysteresis effect, which is universal in outbursts experiencing state transitions (e.g. Maccarone, 2003). According to the definition in Yu & Yan (2009), the transition luminosities of H-S and S-H correspond to hard X-ray peaks before and after the SS. For MAXI J1820+070, the H-S transition luminosity is 1.8 erg s-1, which is almost one order of magnitude higher than the S-H transition luminosity (1.9 erg s-1, see also Figure 4). The Compton luminosity of H-S transition is also roughly ten times higher than that of S-H transition (1.4 and 1.5 erg s-1). So the discrepancy of the transition luminosity is dominated by the Compton component.
Non-stationary accretion flow has been proposed to drive the H-S transition luminosity during outburst rise, i.e. the transition luminosity is higher when the mass accretion rate increases faster (Yu et al., 2004; Yu & Yan, 2009). During the outburst decay, the S-H transition luminosity remains in a very narrow range (e.g. Maccarone, 2003; Vahdat Motlagh et al., 2019), since S-H transition occurs from a stationary standard accretion disk (Yu & Yan, 2009). For MAXI J1820+070, the rapid increase of the hard X-ray flux before transition and the corresponding H-S transition luminosity (Figure 3 and Figure 4) is consistent with the above scenario. So the hysteresis effect is mainly driven by the non-stationary accretion flow during the outburst rise, which produces the Compton emission dominated the hard X-ray.
Hot accretion flow is the predominant model to produce the Compton component (see reviews by Yuan & Narayan, 2014; Liu & Qiao, 2022). In such a framework, the hot accretion flows can only exist below the critical luminosity (e.g. Esin et al., 1997; Xie & Yuan, 2012), where the is the viscosity parameter of hot accretion flow and the is the Eddington luminosity. So an increasing can maintain the how accretion flow at high luminosity regime, to make the H-S transition luminosity higher (Begelman & Armitage, 2014; Cao, 2016; Li & Qiao, 2023). As a result, the increasing may play a similar role as the proposed non-stationary accretion flow in Yu & Yan (2009). The enhancement of the magnetic field and/or outflow is able to increase (Bai & Stone, 2013; Cao, 2016).
Jet or its base is also an alternative origin of the Compton emission. Some X-ray spectral and timing properties during the state transition can be well explained by jet-like corona (see the discussions in subsequent sections). Marcel et al. (2019) has fine-tuned two independent parameters and of the jet-accretion disk model to replicate the βqβ-like evolutionary track, where is the transition radius between jet and accretion disk, is the mass accretion at the inner disk radius. This model is quite similar to the truncated disk model (Esin et al., 1997; Done et al., 2007). However, it is still unknown what mechanism drives the evolution of .
5.2 Inner radius of accretion disk/reflected component
We used the multiple blackbody model diskbb to fit the thermal component in HS, IMS and SS. The square root of the normalization of this model can be used as the proxy of the inner radius of the accretion disk (Kubota et al., 1998). The nearly constant and exponential decreasing of during the SS Figure 2 are consistent with standard accretion disk that the inner radius reaches the innermost stable circular orbit (Shakura & Sunyaev, 1973).
In the spectral fitting of the rising HS and IMS, we employed the relativistic reflection model relxillCp and linked the inner radius of the reflected component to the . During the HS, the continuously decreases (Figure 2), coinciding with a decrease in the reverberation time lag between the corona and the reflected component. This behavior agrees with the expected reflection from a truncated accretion disk or a contracting corona (Kara et al., 2019; De Marco et al., 2021). However, the increases after entering the IMS (Figure 2), which is also consistent with the evolution of the reverberation time lag (De Marco et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). Wang et al. (2021) proposed that a jet-like corona vertically contracts/expands resulting in the observed evolution of the reverberation time lag before and after the state transition (see also Kylafis et al., 2008; You et al., 2021; Cao et al., 2022; MΓ©ndez et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022b).
However, the best-fitting during the IMS are obviously smaller than those during the SS (Figure 2, see also Motta et al., 2009), which indicates that the reflected component may not be an accretion disk if the constant in the SS represents the . In such a case, the may be the proxy of the area of the reflected component. During the HS, the corona contracts, resulting in a natural decrease in time lag and a reduction in the irradiated area. Conversely, during the IMS, the corona expands, leading to an increase in both the time lag and irradiated area. The spectral fitting by Buisson et al. (2019) also reveals that the height of the upper corona varies in a similar manner when the two lampposts geometry is applied. On the other hand, the unusual decreasing of reflection fraction after the rise phase of HS (Figure 2) also can be explained by the jet-like corona (You et al., 2021). So the spectral evolution during the HS and IMS is consistent with a contracting/expanding jet-like corona.
However, the nature of reflected component during the plateau and bright decline of HS remains puzzling, if its size is smaller than the of the accretion disk. The cold cloud embedded in the hot plasma is a possible candidate (e.g. Krolik, 1998; Wang et al., 2012). In such a geometry, the reflection fraction is expected to be large. So the unusually large and the additional narrow iron line also support this conjecture (see e.g. Malzac & Celotti, 2002; Merloni et al., 2006; Yu et al., 2018).
5.3 Type-C QPO frequency, corona geometry and Comptonization
The type-C QPO is a predominant characteristic detected in the HS and HIMS, the oscillated photons of which are generally believed to originate from the component producing the Compton emission (e.g. Lee & Miller, 1998; Psaltis & Norman, 2000; Bellavita et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2023). So it is important to investigate the QPO properties and the spectral parameters of Compton component. The correlation between the QPO frequency and the photon index of the Compton component has been widely studied (e.g. Vignarca et al., 2003; Shaposhnikov & Titarchuk, 2009; Stiele et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2022a). The usually positively correlates with the over two orders of magnitude frequency range, and the becomes saturated above a certain frequency in few sources (e.g. Vignarca et al., 2003; Shaposhnikov & Titarchuk, 2009). It is generally believed that the mass accretion rate drives the evolution of both X-ray spectral and timing properties of BHXRB(see reviews in Done et al., 2007; Gilfanov, 2010). The and the both increase with X-ray luminosity, resulting in a positive correlation (e.g. Revnivtsev et al., 2001; Mereminskiy et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2022a). However, in MAXI J1820+070 displays a complex correlation with (Figure 7a), and exhibits a ββ-like track along (Figure 4). These results suggest that the mass accretion rate is not the only factor influencing the evolution of the spectral and timing properties of the corona.
MAXI J1820+070 also shows a positive correlation between and with varying slopes across different phases of HS and HIMS (Figure 7b). The and exhibit a consistent negative correlation across various phases of HS and HIMS (Figure 7c). These correlations provide compelling evidence that the Comptonization is the driving force behind the evolution of the QPO frequency. Recently, some models have been proposed to explain the properties of the type-C QPO based on the Comptonization process (e.g. Bellavita et al., 2022; Mastichiadis et al., 2022). Specifically, the interplay between thermal and Compton components, which influences optical depth and electron temperature during Comptonization, can produce an oscillation roughly consistent with type-C QPO (Mastichiadis et al., 2022).
In some other models, the QPO frequency is usually thought to inversely correlate to the characteristic scale of the corona and/or the inner radius of the accretion disk (e.g. Ingram et al., 2009; Cabanac et al., 2010; Marcel et al., 2020; Rawat et al., 2023; Motta & Belloni, 2024). So the increasing of QPO frequency during the rise and plateau phases of HS (Figure 6) can be accounted for the shrinking of the inner radius of a truncated accretion disk (De Marco et al., 2021; Zdziarski et al., 2021) or a contracting corona (Kara et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021, 2022b). However, the observed decreasing in QPO frequency during the bright decline, and its subsequent increasing during the IMS (Figure 6), is challenging to be explained by the behavior of a contracting and then expanding jet-like corona inferred from the reverberation lag and X-ray spectral evolution (Wang et al., 2022b).
The QPO frequency may alternatively be proportional to a characteristic timescale for ejecting mass as a damped oscillator in a jet-like corona model. As a result, the (Kylafis et al., 2008), where the is the jet base, and is the electron number density of the jet base. The expanding jet-like corona during the IMS naturally causes the rapid increase of the QPO frequency. The optical depth in such corona should also be a function of and . However, the specific relation between and in the jet-like corona should be investigated in order to quantitatively understand the correlations between and /.
5.4 The association between rapid transition and radio ejection
It is widely recognized that transient jet ejections are associated with X-ray spectral state transitions (Fender et al., 2004), wherein Compton-dominated spectra shift to thermally dominated spectra. The well-sampled observations of MAXI J1820+070 offer a unique opportunity to investigate the temporal connection between ejection events and spectral state transitions. Remarkably, the last occurrence of type-C QPO coincided precisely with the first ejection within one hour. Subsequent to this ejection, the Compton luminosity sharply decreased more than two times within 0.19 days. So the observations of MAXI J1820+070 establish a temporal connection between the corona and ejection within timescale of hours (see also Homan et al., 2020), which the corona is responsible for the Compton emission and the type-C QPO. One plausible scenario is that the corona or part of the corona is ejected, subsequently allowing the disk component to dominate the X-ray spectrum. The dominance of ions in the ejection composition further supports this hypothesis (Zdziarski & Heinz, 2024). Additionally, the corona transforming into an ejected jet has been proposed in the microquasar GRS 1915+105 (Mirabel et al., 1998; MΓ©ndez et al., 2022). A similar scenario has been proposed for the active galactic nuclei (AGNs) harboring super-massive BH, such as 3C 120 (Marscher et al., 2002) and 3C 111 (Chatterjee et al., 2011), in which the observed X-ray dips are associated with the radio ejections.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thanks the helpful discussion with Bei You, Fuguo Xie and Phil Uttley. This work made use of the data from Insight-HXMT mission, a project funded by China National Space Administration (CNSA) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of China (grants U1838203, U1938114, 12373049, 12361131579 and 12373050).
Data Availability
The Insight-HXMT and data underlying this article are available in the public archive http://archive.hxmt.cn/proposal and https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/archive.html.
References
- Atri et al. (2020) Atri P., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 493, L81
- Baglio et al. (2018) Baglio M. C., Russell D. M., Lewis F., 2018, The Astronomerβs Telegram, 11418, 1
- Bai & Stone (2013) Bai X.-N., Stone J. M., 2013, ApJ, 767, 30
- Begelman & Armitage (2014) Begelman M. C., Armitage P. J., 2014, ApJ, 782, L18
- Bellavita et al. (2022) Bellavita C., GarcΓa F., MΓ©ndez M., Karpouzas K., 2022, MNRAS, 515, 2099
- Belloni (2010) Belloni T. M., 2010, in Belloni T., ed., , Vol. 794, Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p. 53, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76937-8_3
- Belloni & Motta (2016) Belloni T. M., Motta S. E., 2016, in Bambi C., ed., Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 440, Astrophysics of Black Holes: From Fundamental Aspects to Latest Developments. p. 61 (arXiv:1603.07872), doi:10.1007/978-3-662-52859-4_2
- Belloni et al. (2002) Belloni T., Psaltis D., van der Klis M., 2002, ApJ, 572, 392
- Beloborodov (1999) Beloborodov A. M., 1999, ApJ, 510, L123
- Bright et al. (2018) Bright J., Fender R., Motta S., 2018, The Astronomerβs Telegram, 11420, 1
- Bright et al. (2020) Bright J. S., et al., 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 697
- Buchner (2021) Buchner J., 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001
- Buisson et al. (2018) Buisson D., Fabian A., Alston W., Walton D., Kara E., Garcia J., Homan J., Tomsick J., 2018, The Astronomerβs Telegram, 11578, 1
- Buisson et al. (2019) Buisson D. J. K., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 490, 1350
- Cabanac et al. (2010) Cabanac C., Henri G., Petrucci P. O., Malzac J., Ferreira J., Belloni T. M., 2010, MNRAS, 404, 738
- Cao (2016) Cao X., 2016, ApJ, 817, 71
- Cao et al. (2020) Cao X., et al., 2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249504
- Cao et al. (2022) Cao Z., Lucchini M., Markoff S., Connors R. M. T., Grinberg V., 2022, MNRAS, 509, 2517
- Carotenuto et al. (2024) Carotenuto F., Fender R., Tetarenko A. J., Corbel S., Zdziarski A. A., Shaik G., Cooper A. J., Di Palma I., 2024, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2405.16624
- Casella et al. (2004) Casella P., Belloni T., Homan J., Stella L., 2004, A&A, 426, 587
- Chatterjee et al. (2011) Chatterjee R., et al., 2011, ApJ, 734, 43
- Chen et al. (1997) Chen W., Shrader C. R., Livio M., 1997, ApJ, 491, 312
- Chen et al. (2020) Chen Y., et al., 2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249505
- Clavel et al. (2016) Clavel M., Rodriguez J., Corbel S., Coriat M., 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 435
- Corral-Santana et al. (2016) Corral-Santana J. M., Casares J., MuΓ±oz-Darias T., Bauer F. E., MartΓnez-Pais I. G., Russell D. M., 2016, A&A, 587, A61
- Dauser et al. (2014) Dauser T., Garcia J., Parker M. L., Fabian A. C., Wilms J., 2014, MNRAS, 444, L100
- Dauser et al. (2022) Dauser T., GarcΓa J. A., Joyce A., Licklederer S., Connors R. M. T., Ingram A., Reynolds C. S., Wilms J., 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3965
- De Marco et al. (2021) De Marco B., Zdziarski A. A., Ponti G., Migliori G., Belloni T. M., Segovia Otero A., DzieΕak M. A., Lai E. V., 2021, A&A, 654, A14
- Debnath et al. (2008) Debnath D., Chakrabarti S. K., Nandi A., Mandal S., 2008, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 36, 151
- Denisenko (2018) Denisenko D., 2018, The Astronomerβs Telegram, 11400, 1
- Done et al. (2007) Done C., GierliΕski M., Kubota A., 2007, A&ARv, 15, 1
- Dunn et al. (2010) Dunn R. J. H., Fender R. P., KΓΆrding E. G., Belloni T., Cabanac C., 2010, MNRAS, 403, 61
- Esin et al. (1997) Esin A. A., McClintock J. E., Narayan R., 1997, ApJ, 489, 865
- Fabian et al. (2020) Fabian A. C., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 493, 5389
- Fan et al. (2024) Fan N., et al., 2024, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2404.12161
- Fender et al. (2004) Fender R. P., Belloni T. M., Gallo E., 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1105
- Gao et al. (2023) Gao C., Yan Z., Yu W., 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5544
- GarcΓa et al. (2014) GarcΓa J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 782, 76
- Gilfanov (2010) Gilfanov M., 2010, in Belloni T., ed., , Vol. 794, Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag. p. 17, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76937-8_2
- Haardt & Maraschi (1991) Haardt F., Maraschi L., 1991, ApJ, 380, L51
- Homan et al. (2020) Homan J., et al., 2020, ApJ, 891, L29
- Ingram & Done (2012) Ingram A., Done C., 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2369
- Ingram et al. (2009) Ingram A., Done C., Fragile P. C., 2009, MNRAS, 397, L101
- Kara et al. (2019) Kara E., et al., 2019, Nature, 565, 198
- Kawamuro et al. (2018) Kawamuro T., et al., 2018, The Astronomerβs Telegram, 11399, 1
- Krolik (1998) Krolik J. H., 1998, ApJ, 498, L13
- Kubota et al. (1998) Kubota A., Tanaka Y., Makishima K., Ueda Y., Dotani T., Inoue H., Yamaoka K., 1998, PASJ, 50, 667
- Kylafis et al. (2008) Kylafis N. D., Papadakis I. E., Reig P., Giannios D., Pooley G. G., 2008, A&A, 489, 481
- Leahy et al. (1983) Leahy D. A., Darbro W., Elsner R. F., Weisskopf M. C., Sutherland P. G., Kahn S., Grindlay J. E., 1983, ApJ, 266, 160
- Lee & Miller (1998) Lee H. C., Miller G. S., 1998, MNRAS, 299, 479
- Li & Qiao (2023) Li J., Qiao E., 2023, MNRAS, 521, 3237
- Liu & Qiao (2022) Liu B. F., Qiao E., 2022, iScience, 25, 103544
- Liu et al. (2020) Liu C., et al., 2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249503
- Ma et al. (2021) Ma X., et al., 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 94
- Maccarone (2003) Maccarone T. J., 2003, A&A, 409, 697
- Malzac & Celotti (2002) Malzac J., Celotti A., 2002, MNRAS, 335, 23
- Marcel et al. (2019) Marcel G., et al., 2019, A&A, 626, A115
- Marcel et al. (2020) Marcel G., et al., 2020, A&A, 640, A18
- Marscher et al. (2002) Marscher A. P., Jorstad S. G., GΓ³mez J.-L., Aller M. F., TerΓ€sranta H., Lister M. L., Stirling A. M., 2002, Nature, 417, 625
- Mastichiadis et al. (2022) Mastichiadis A., Petropoulou M., Kylafis N. D., 2022, A&A, 662, A118
- McClintock et al. (2009) McClintock J. E., Remillard R. A., Rupen M. P., Torres M. A. P., Steeghs D., Levine A. M., Orosz J. A., 2009, ApJ, 698, 1398
- MΓ©ndez et al. (2022) MΓ©ndez M., Karpouzas K., GarcΓa F., Zhang L., Zhang Y., Belloni T. M., Altamirano D., 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 577
- Mereminskiy et al. (2019) Mereminskiy I. A., Semena A. N., Bykov S. D., Filippova E. V., Lutovinov A. A., Poutanen J., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 1392
- Merloni et al. (2006) Merloni A., Malzac J., Fabian A. C., Ross R. R., 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1699
- Mirabel et al. (1998) Mirabel I. F., Dhawan V., Chaty S., Rodriguez L. F., Marti J., Robinson C. R., Swank J., Geballe T., 1998, A&A, 330, L9
- Motta & Belloni (2024) Motta S. E., Belloni T. M., 2024, A&A, 684, A209
- Motta et al. (2009) Motta S., Belloni T., Homan J., 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1603
- Motta et al. (2012) Motta S., Homan J., MuΓ±oz Darias T., Casella P., Belloni T. M., Hiemstra B., MΓ©ndez M., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 595
- Mummery et al. (2024) Mummery A., Ingram A., Davis S., Fabian A., 2024, MNRAS, 531, 366
- Novikov & Thorne (1973) Novikov I. D., Thorne K. S., 1973, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus). pp 343β450
- Peng et al. (2023) Peng J. Q., et al., 2023, MNRAS, 518, 2521
- Psaltis & Norman (2000) Psaltis D., Norman C., 2000, arXiv e-prints, pp astroβph/0001391
- Rawat et al. (2023) Rawat D., Husain N., Misra R., 2023, MNRAS, 524, 5869
- Remillard & McClintock (2006) Remillard R. A., McClintock J. E., 2006, ARA&A, 44, 49
- Revnivtsev et al. (2001) Revnivtsev M., Gilfanov M., Churazov E., 2001, A&A, 380, 520
- Sakamoto et al. (2016) Sakamoto T., et al., 2016, PASJ, 68, S2
- Shakura & Sunyaev (1973) Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, A&A, 24, 337
- Shaposhnikov & Titarchuk (2009) Shaposhnikov N., Titarchuk L., 2009, ApJ, 699, 453
- Shappee et al. (2014) Shappee B. J., et al., 2014, ApJ, 788, 48
- Shidatsu et al. (2019) Shidatsu M., Nakahira S., Murata K. L., Adachi R., Kawai N., Ueda Y., Negoro H., 2019, ApJ, 874, 183
- Sobczak et al. (2000) Sobczak G. J., McClintock J. E., Remillard R. A., Cui W., Levine A. M., Morgan E. H., Orosz J. A., Bailyn C. D., 2000, ApJ, 544, 993
- Stiele & Kong (2020) Stiele H., Kong A. K. H., 2020, ApJ, 889, 142
- Stiele et al. (2013) Stiele H., Belloni T. M., Kalemci E., Motta S., 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2655
- Sunyaev & Truemper (1979) Sunyaev R. A., Truemper J., 1979, Nature, 279, 506
- Tetarenko et al. (2016) Tetarenko B. E., Sivakoff G. R., Heinke C. O., Gladstone J. C., 2016, ApJS, 222, 15
- Torres et al. (2020) Torres M. A. P., Casares J., JimΓ©nez-Ibarra F., Γlvarez-HernΓ‘ndez A., MuΓ±oz-Darias T., Armas Padilla M., Jonker P. G., Heida M., 2020, ApJ, 893, L37
- Tucker et al. (2018) Tucker M. A., et al., 2018, ApJ, 867, L9
- Uttley et al. (2018) Uttley P., et al., 2018, The Astronomerβs Telegram, 11423, 1
- Vahdat Motlagh et al. (2019) Vahdat Motlagh A., Kalemci E., Maccarone T. J., 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2744
- Vignarca et al. (2003) Vignarca F., Migliari S., Belloni T., Psaltis D., van der Klis M., 2003, A&A, 397, 729
- Wang et al. (2012) Wang J.-M., Cheng C., Li Y.-R., 2012, ApJ, 748, 147
- Wang et al. (2020) Wang Y., et al., 2020, ApJ, 896, 33
- Wang et al. (2021) Wang J., et al., 2021, ApJ, 910, L3
- Wang et al. (2022a) Wang P. J., et al., 2022a, MNRAS, 512, 4541
- Wang et al. (2022b) Wang J., et al., 2022b, ApJ, 930, 18
- Wood et al. (2021) Wood C. M., et al., 2021, MNRAS, 505, 3393
- Xie & Yuan (2012) Xie F.-G., Yuan F., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 1580
- Yan & Yu (2015) Yan Z., Yu W., 2015, ApJ, 805, 87
- Yan et al. (2020) Yan Z., Xie F.-G., Zhang W., 2020, ApJ, 889, L18
- Yang et al. (2015) Yang Q.-X., Xie F.-G., Yuan F., Zdziarski A. A., GierliΕski M., Ho L. C., Yu Z., 2015, MNRAS, 447, 1692
- You et al. (2021) You B., et al., 2021, Nature Communications, 12, 1025
- You et al. (2023a) You B., et al., 2023a, Science, 381, 961
- You et al. (2023b) You B., Dong Y., Yan Z., Liu Z., Tuo Y., Yao Y., Cao X., 2023b, ApJ, 945, 65
- Yu & Yan (2009) Yu W., Yan Z., 2009, ApJ, 701, 1940
- Yu et al. (2004) Yu W., van der Klis M., Fender R., 2004, ApJ, 611, L121
- Yu et al. (2018) Yu X.-D., Ma R.-Y., Li Y.-P., Zhang H., Fang T.-T., 2018, MNRAS, 476, 2045
- Yuan & Narayan (2014) Yuan F., Narayan R., 2014, ARA&A, 52, 529
- Zdziarski & Heinz (2024) Zdziarski A. A., Heinz S., 2024, ApJ, 967, L7
- Zdziarski et al. (1996) Zdziarski A. A., Johnson W. N., Magdziarz P., 1996, MNRAS, 283, 193
- Zdziarski et al. (2021) Zdziarski A. A., DzieΕak M. A., De Marco B., Szanecki M., NiedΕΊwiecki A., 2021, ApJ, 909, L9
- Zdziarski et al. (2022) Zdziarski A. A., You B., Szanecki M., 2022, ApJ, 939, L2
- Zhang et al. (2020) Zhang S.-N., et al., 2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249502
- Zhao et al. (2021) Zhao X., et al., 2021, ApJ, 916, 108
- van der Klis (1989) van der Klis M., 1989, in Γgelman H., van den Heuvel E. P. J., eds, NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C Vol. 262, Timing Neutron Stars. p. 27, doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2273-0_3
Appendix A Some extra materials
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x9.png)
Time | RMSC,QPO | QC,QPO | RMSB,QPO | QB,QPO | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(s) | (s) | (MJD) | (Hz) | (Hz) | ||||||
142237907 | 142238873 | 58304.2728 | 5.6347 | 10.314 | β β | β β | β β | β β | ||
142269824 | 142271003 | 58304.6423 | 7.2508 | 12.419 | β β | β β | β β | β β | ||
142275663 | 142276722 | 58304.7098 | 6.0187 | 13.3546 | β β | β β | β β | β β | ||
142292969 | 142294468 | 58304.9101 | 6.05 | 8.7983 | β β | β β | β β | β β | ||
142298630 | 142300026 | 58304.9757 | 8.514 | 12.8107 | β β | β β | β β | β β | ||
142308700 | 142314902 | 58305.0922 | 7.7465 | 8.8628 | β β | β β | β β | β β | ||
142319818 | 142333386 | 58305.2209 | 4.9696 | 18.6406 | 2.7874 | 13.0669 | ||||
142336496 | 142344002 | 58305.4139 | 7.3527 | 14.2943 | 3.2001 | 10.0584 | ||||
142347614 | 142350064 | 58305.5426 | 3.3794 | 8.0053 | 5.542 | 6.8117 | ||||
142353173 | 142355624 | 58305.6069 | 4.4178 | 3.4635 | β β | β β | β β | β β | ||
142358915 | 142383043 | 58305.6734 | β β | β β | β β | β β | 5.6398 | 12.8465 |
Notes:
: the start time of segments; : the end time of segments; : centroid frequency; RMS: root mean square; Q: quality factor; : significance. The subscript B and C represent the type-B and type-C QPOs.
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x10.png)