\authorinfo

Send correspondence to Paolo Saracco: paolo.saracco@inaf.it

SHARP - A near-IR multi-mode spectrograph conceived for MORFEO@ELT

P. Saracco INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 P. Conconi INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 C. Arcidiacono INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo Osservatorio 5, Padova, Italy, 35122 E. Portaluri INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico d’Abruzzo,Via Mentore Maggini, Teramo, Italy, 64100 H. Mahmoodzadeh INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano, Italy, 20133 V. D’Orazi Universita�� degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Via Cracovia 50, Roma, Italy, 00133 D. Fedele INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, Firenze, Italy, 50125 A. Gargiulo INAF - IASF, Via Alfonso Corti 12, Milano, Italy, 20133 E. Vanzella INAF - Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, via Gobetti 93/3, Bologna, Italy, 40129 P. Franzetti INAF - IASF, Via Alfonso Corti 12, Milano, Italy, 20133 I. Arosio INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 L. Barbalini INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 G. Lops INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 E. Molinari INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 E. Cascone INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 V. Cianniello INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 D. D’Auria INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 V. De Caprio INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 I. Di Antonio INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico d’Abruzzo,Via Mentore Maggini, Teramo, Italy, 64100 B. Di Francesco INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico d’Abruzzo,Via Mentore Maggini, Teramo, Italy, 64100 G. Di Rico INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico d’Abruzzo,Via Mentore Maggini, Teramo, Italy, 64100 C. Eredia INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 M. Fumana INAF - IASF, Via Alfonso Corti 12, Milano, Italy, 20133 D. Greggio INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo Osservatorio 5, Padova, Italy, 35122 G. Rodeghiero INAF - Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, via Gobetti 93/3, Bologna, Italy, 40129 M. Scalera INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 J. M. Alcalá INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 S. Bisogni INAF - IASF, Via Alfonso Corti 12, Milano, Italy, 20133 R. Bonito INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, Palermo, Italy, 90134 G. Bono Universita’ degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Via Cracovia 50, Roma, Italy, 00133 A. Caratti o Garatti INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 E. Dalla Bontà Universita’ degli Studi di Padova, Via F. Marzolo 8, Padova, Italy, 35131 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo Osservatorio 5, Padova, Italy, 35122 Jeremiah Horrocks Institute, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK M. Dall’Ora INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 G. Fiorentino INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy, 00078 A. R. Gallazzi INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, Firenze, Italy, 50125 M. Guarcello INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, Palermo, Italy, 90134 L. Izzo INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 F. La Barbera INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 C. Lardo Universita’ degli Studi di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, Bologna, Italy, 40129 M. Longhetti INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, Milano, Italy, 20121 A. Longobardo INAF - IAPS, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, Roma, Italy, 00133 L. Magrini INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, Firenze, Italy, 50125 C. Mancini INAF - IASF, Via Alfonso Corti 12, Milano, Italy, 20133 A. Mura INAF - IAPS, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, Roma, Italy, 00133 E. Piconcelli INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy, 00078 A. Pizzella Universita’ degli Studi di Padova, Via F. Marzolo 8, Padova, Italy, 35131 L. Podio INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, Firenze, Italy, 50125 M. Polletta INAF - IASF, Via Alfonso Corti 12, Milano, Italy, 20133 L. Prisinzano INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, Palermo, Italy, 90134 F. Ricci Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Universitá Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 84, Roma, Italy, 00146 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy, 00078 V. Ripepi INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello 16, Napoli, Italy, 80131 V. Roccatagliata INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, Firenze, Italy, 50125 G. Vietri INAF - IASF, Via Alfonso Corti 12, Milano, Italy, 20133
Abstract

The Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs), thanks to their large apertures and cutting-edge Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) systems, promise to deliver sharper and deeper data even than the JWST. SHARP is a concept study for a near-IR (0.95-2.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm) spectrograph conceived to fully exploit the collecting area and the angular resolution of the upcoming generation of ELTs. In particular, SHARP is designed for the 2nd port of MORFEO@ELT. Composed of a Multi-Object Spectrograph, NEXUS, and a multi-Integral Field Unit, VESPER, MORFEO-SHARP will deliver high angular (similar-to\sim30 mas) and spectral (Rsimilar-to-or-equals\simeq300, 2000, 6000, 17000) resolution, outperforming NIRSpec@JWST (100 mas). SHARP will enable studies of the nearby Universe and the early Universe in unprecedented detail. NEXUS is fed by a configurable slit system deploying up to 30 slits with similar-to\sim2.4” length and adjustable width, over a field of about 1.2’×\times×1.2’ (35 mas/pix). Each slit is fed by an inversion prism able to rotate by an arbitrary angle the field that can be seen by the slit. VESPER is composed of 12 probes of 1.7”×\times×1.5” each (spaxel 31 mas) probing a field 24”×\times×70”. SHARP is conceived to exploit the ELT aperture reaching the faintest flux and the sharpest angular resolution by joining the sensitivity of NEXUS and the high spatial sampling of VESPER to MORFEO capabilities. This article provides an overview of the scientific design drivers, their solutions, and the resulting optical design of the instrument achieving the required optical performance.

keywords:
ELT, near-infrared, multi-object spectrograph, optics, integral field spectroscopy, mechanics

1 Introduction

1.1 Overview

The Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs) are expected to provide unique and unparalleled data, deeper than that of the JWST and from four (GMT telescope) to six (ESO-ELT) times sharper. These capabilities result from the synergy between the large apertures of these telecopes and the Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) systems. In Particular, the ESO’s ELT will provide unique data thanks to the world’s largest aperture and the state-of-the-art MCAO system MORFEO[1, 2], designed to uniformly correct atmospheric turbulence over an encircled area of diameter 160”. This capability enables supported instruments to delve into the Universe with unparalleled depth and clarity. Initially working with the ELT’s first-light instrument, MICADO[3, 4], a near-infrared camera, MORFEO is also engineered to feed a second instrument in the future. A spectrograph intended for the 2nd port of the MCAO system MORFEO@ELT will be the most powerful instrument of the JWST[5] era, able to go beyond NIRSpec [6] at JWST.

SHARP111http://sharp.brera.inaf.it is the concept study of a multi-mode Near-IR spectrograph designed for the 2nd port of MORFEO@ELT. It is intended to be submitted in ESO’s next call for new instrumentation. Coupled with MORFEO, SHARP delivers unprecedented high angular (similar-to\sim30 mas) and spectral resolution (R=300, 2000, 6000, 17000), outperforming NIRSpec@JWST (100 mas). SHARP aims at being the near-IR nearly diffraction limited multi-object spectrograph of ELT.

1.2 Why SHARP: scientific drivers and resulting requirements

Understanding and reconstructing how baryonic matter assembled at early cosmic times to form the first stars, galaxies and structures, and how these evolved over cosmic time are the main scientific drivers behind the development of SHARP. Some of the fundamental issues that determined SHARP’s main requirements are as follows:

  • Understanding the extreme physical conditions that govern star formation and quenching in the early Universe, allowing the formation of the massive galaxies observed at high redshift (e.g., Ref. 7);

  • Determining the dark matter (DM) content in high-z galaxies since DM should drive the assembly of the baryonic matter in the standard model of galaxy formation (e.g., Ref 8);

  • Determining the role played by massive black holes in the formation and evolution of galaxies, whether they are the seeds for galaxy formation and powerful extinction mechanisms of star formation (e.g., Ref 9);

  • Searching for and, hopefully, detecting the elusive PopIII of primordial stars, necessary to address the shortage of elements heavier than Li after the Big Bang and explaining the presence of metals in the older stars belonging to PopII (e.g., Ref 10).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: - The observed wavelength λobssubscript𝜆𝑜𝑏𝑠\lambda_{obs}italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_o italic_b italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT=λem×(1+redshift)subscript𝜆𝑒𝑚1𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑠𝑖𝑓𝑡\lambda_{em}\times(1+redshift)italic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT × ( 1 + italic_r italic_e italic_d italic_s italic_h italic_i italic_f italic_t ) of the main nebular emission (black solid lines) and absorption (dashed lines) atomic lines are shown as a function of the redshift of the galaxy. The blue horizontal line marks the wavelength limit at λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ=1.8 μ𝜇\muitalic_μ of the next generation spectrograph at ELT (MOSAIC and ANDES) and at VLT (MOONS).

Understanding the physics driving these phenomena needs tracking galaxy properties from their early stages to the present. These properties, encompassing gas and stellar kinematics, chemical abundances, star formation rate and stellar population age, are encoded in the atomic emission and absorption lines. Most of them requires observations in the near-IR when observed in high-redshift galaxies. Specifically, wavelengths longer than λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ>>>1.8 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm for galaxies at z𝑧zitalic_z>>>2.5 (see Fig. 1), coupled with suited spectral resolution (R=λ/Δλ>1000𝜆Δ𝜆1000\lambda/{\Delta\lambda}>1000italic_λ / roman_Δ italic_λ > 1000) are requested. Therefore, the first requirement is to reach the near-IR limit where sky transmission is still high and sky emission can be still efficiently removed, i.e. λlimsimilar-to-or-equalssubscript𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚absent\lambda_{lim}\simeqitalic_λ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_l italic_i italic_m end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≃2.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm.

To tackle the above issues, sizes comparable to those of giant molecular gas clouds (similar-to\sim150-200 pc) must be resolved. In fact, such clouds, containing even more than 106superscript10610^{6}10 start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 6 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT Mdirect-product\odot of molecular gas, are the places where massive star formation and enrichment take place, being also the best tracers of the galaxy dynamics. Fig. 2 shows that an angular resolution of similar-to\sim30 mas (blue curve) is needed to resolve giant gas clouds over the whole cosmic time. Therefore, AO-supported observations coupled with a pixel scale similar-to\sim30 mass/pix are required.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: - The linear size [pc] subtended by an angle θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ=0.031” (blue curve), the SHARP pixel scale, and by θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ=0.1” (red curve), the pixel scale of NirSpec@JWST are shown as a function of redshift. The light-blue stripe represents the size of giant molecular gas clouds, 150-200 pc. The typical half light radius (500 pc) of compact high-redshift galaxies (dashed line), is also shown.
Table 1: - SHARP main requirements resulting from the scientific drivers.
Wavelength limit 2.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm
Spectral range (simultaneous) 0.95-2.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm
Angular resolution similar-to\sim30 mas
AO-corrected FoV similar-to\sim1x1 arcmin
Observing modes MOS + multi-IFU
Spectral resolution R>>>1000

These measurements should be carried out for many galaxies simultaneously, allowing us to study protoclusters, over-densities and the multiple clumps seen by JWST in the early Universe. Therefore, multiplexing capabilities coupled with a large area uniformly corrected for atmospheric turbulence are required. These are provided by MORFEO-SHARP. Table 1 summarizes the main requirements of SHARP.

2 SHARP

Refer to caption
Figure 3: - Components and optical path from the 2nd port of MORFEO to SHARP. SHARP is fed by an Atmospheric Dispersion Corrector (ADC) and a Natural Guide Stars (NGS) unit.

Figure 3 shows the components and the optical path from the 2nd port of MORFEO to SHARP. SHARP is fed by an Atmospheric Dispersion Corrector (ADC) and a Natural Guide Stars (NGS) unit. Describing the ADC and NGS is beyond the scope of this article. Briefly, the light coming from MORFEO will pass through the ADC which allows SHARP to collect spectra simultaneously over the whole wavelength range at any zenith distance and rotation angle. The NGS wavefront sensors, monitoring up to three stars, pass the information to MORFEO which uses also six laser guide stars (LGS) to remove the effects of the atmospheric turbulence over a field (at the 2nd port) of diameter 160”, encompassing the field of view of SHARP spectrographs. The NGS unit will be the same as the one feeding MOSAIC, with the exception of the SCAO module not used by SHARP.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: - The Field of View (FoV) of NEXUS (blue square, 1.2’×\times×1.2’) and the area probed by the IFSs of VESPER (red rectangle, similar-to\sim24”×\times×70”) are shown on the MORFEO 2nd port corrected area (black circle, diameter Dsimilar-to\sim160”). For comparison, the FoV of MICADO (green dashed square) is also shown. The purple filled circles represent the wavefront sensors for the 6 Laser Guide Stars used by MORFEO, while the yellow circles are those for the 3 Natural Guide Stars.

SHARP consists of two main units: NEXUS, a slitlets Multi-Object Spectrograph (MOS), and VESPER, a multi-Integral Field Unit (mIFU). Given the operative wavelength range SHARP is cryogenic. Just below the entrance window of SHARP there is the unit selector which switches the light between NEXUS and VESPER. There are no aspheric surfaces in SHARP.

2.1 NEXUS

NEXUS, the MOS, operates over an AO corrected field similar-to\sim1.2’×\times×1.2’ (35 mas/pix; see Fig. 4). It is fed by a Configurable Slit System (CSS hereafter) switching among mechanical slit masks able of deploying up to 30 slits of similar-to\sim2.4” length. The spectroscopic resolutions for extended sources, i.e., larger than the diffraction-limited Point Spread Function (PSF) of ELT (similar-to\sim12 mas at 2.2 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm), are Rsimilar-to\sim6000, similar-to\sim2000 and similar-to\sim300 for a reference slit width of 0.2”. For point sources the resolution is Rsimilar-to\sim17000. The whole wavelength range (0.95-2.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm) is simultaneously covered.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: - NEXUS optical design from the focal plane of MORFEO to the four detectors. The Configurable Slit System (CSS), not shown in the figure, is placed onto the focal plane. Three folding mirrors provide a compact design, while three dichroics split the beam into four wavelength ranges feeding 4 cameras. The whole wavelength range 0.95-2.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm is thus simultaneously covered.

Fig. 5 shows the optical design of NEXUS from the focal plane of MORFEO to the four cameras. Onto the focal plane of MORFEO there is the CSS whose description is further on. The light coming from MORFEO and coming out of the CSS is folded by three folding mirrors to compact the design and splitted into four wavelength ranges, approximately [0.95-1.15]μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, [1.15-1.45]μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, [1.45-1.9]μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, [1.9-2.45]μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, thanks to three dichroics. Each range is fed by a dedicated camera optimized for the operating wavelength range. Each camera includes a grism wheel supporting three grisms with resolution R=λ/Δλabsent𝜆Δ𝜆similar-to-or-equalsabsent=\lambda/{\Delta\lambda}\simeq= italic_λ / roman_Δ italic_λ ≃300, 2000 and 6000 for a reference slit with of 0.2”. A cold stop pupil to limit the thermal background feeds the two cameras operating at λ>𝜆absent\lambda>italic_λ >1.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm.

In Fig. 6 (left) it is shown the Encircled Energy (EE) distribution as a function of radial distance at wavelength 2.19 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm (fourth channel) for the central position and four positions offset by ±plus-or-minus\pm±36 arcsec. The data are scaled by the diffraction limit of ELT. The Figure shows that >>>90% of the flux fall within one NEXUS pixel (15 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, similar-to\sim35 mas).

In the right panel of Fig. 6 it is shown the spot diagram for the different positions on the field obtained. The mean Airy radius is similar-to\sim5.9 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, almost 1/3 of the pixel size.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: - Left: Fraction of Encircled Energy as a function of radial distance for NEXUS at wavelength λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ=2.19 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm. The data are scaled for the diffraction limit of ELT. The curves refer to 5 different positions on the detector. More than 90% of the flux fall within one NEXUS pixel (15 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, similar-to\sim35 mas). - Right: Spot diagram for the five different positions (central and four offsets) on the field, as shown in the legend.

2.1.1 The Configurable Slit System (CSS) of NEXUS

The CSS of NEXUS is conceptually similar to the one described in Ref. 11 feeding MOSFIRE at Keck telescope[12] and EMIR at GTC telescope[13]. A slit is formed at the position of the selected object by translating two opposite bars toward each other on the focal plane of NEXUS. The two bars block the light coming from outside the slit formed by the bars themselves. Both slit position and slit width are adjustable and are controlled with a micrometric precision [11]. The minimum length of the configurable slit is similar-to\sim2.4” (the size of the bar being 7.5mm), according to the recommendation of the SHARP Science Team, this limits the maximum number of slits to 30. Longer slits can be obtained aligning two or more slits, resulting in a slit length multiple of 2.4”.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: - Left: Optical design of the Pechan inversion prism. This prism is composed of two paired prisms. The light entering from above undergoes five reflections and comes out from below inverted. Rotating the prism by an angle θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ the coming out image is rotated by a similar angle. Right: Example of an astrophysical application of the inversion prism. All the target galaxies are aligned along the slit according to their major axis to obtain for each of them the rotation curve from which to derive the dynamical mass of the galaxy (dark matter + baryonic mass). From the comparison with the mass derived from the stellar light directly related to the baryons of the galaxy, the dark matter can be derived addressing one the main scientific drivers (see Sec. 1).

Differently from any other slit system (configurable or not), each slit of NEXUS is fed by an inversion prism (see Fig. 7, left panel). The inversion prism can rotate by an arbitrary angle θ𝜃\thetaitalic_θ selected by the user a square field of similar-to\sim2.4”×\times×2.4” aligning the target object to the slit, according to the user’s needs. An example of its application is shown in the right panel of Fig. 7, where a number of selected galaxies are all rotated to align their major axis to the slit. This allow us to derive for all of them their rotation curve from which the total mass of each galaxy can be derived. The comparison with the mass derived from the stellar emission related to the baryonic mass allow us to derive the dark matter content for all the galaxies. This makes unique NEXUS and SHARP.

2.2 VESPER

VESPER, the multi-IFU, is an image slicer covering simultaneously the wavelength range 1.2-2.4 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm. The spectral resolution for extended sources is Rsimilar-to\sim3000 (Rsimilar-to\sim4000 for point source). VESPER is a modular system composed of channels each one comprising 6 probes called Integral Field Selectors (IFS hereafter). In the current configuration VESPER is composed of two channels summing up to 12 IFSs. Each IFS has a field of view of similar-to\sim1.7”×\times×1.5”. The spaxel scale is 31 mas which maximizes also the SNR on the spaxel at λ𝜆\lambdaitalic_λ=2.2 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm, according to the performance (encircled energy distribution) of MORFEO. In the upper panel of Fig. 8 it is shown the encircled energy as a function of the radial distance for thee different positions on a mirror of the slicer for a point source, for the ideal case of no diffraction limit (left panel) and considering the diffraction limit of ELT (right panel). The comparison between the two provides a direct measure of the quality of the VESPER optical design. It can be seen that the image quality is dominated by the optical systems that precede SHARP.

In the lower panel of Fig. 8 it is shown the spot diagram for the three different positions considering the diffraction limit of ELT.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: - Upper panel: Left - Fraction of Encircled Energy as a function of radial distance for an ideal point source not scaled for the diffraction limit of ELT seen by VESPER. The three curves are for three different positions on one of the 288 mirrors of the slicer, at the center (red) and at two corners (blue and green). Right - Same as left panel but scaled for the diffraction limit of ELT. Lower panel: Spot diagram measured for the three different positions on the mirror.

The IFSs are disposed in a cartesian xy𝑥𝑦xyitalic_x italic_y grid, separated by 0.33” along the x direction. These gaps between IFSs are masked on the focal plane to cancel out the contribution to the background from scattered light. The IFSs can be deployed along similar-to\sim70” in y𝑦yitalic_y direction to probe an AO corrected area of similar-to\sim24”x70” (see Fig. 4). The equivalent area of the 12 IFS is 1.7”×\times×1.5”×\times×12similar-to-or-equals\simeq31 arcsec2, summing up to 8 detectors 4k×\times×4k. Figure 9a shows one VESPER channel composed of 6 IFSs. IFSs can be arranged arbitrarily along the y𝑦yitalic_y direction to form n𝑛nitalic_n different fields with FoV=(1.7”×\times×1.5”)*k𝑘kitalic_k, where k𝑘kitalic_k is the number of contiguous IFSs displaced at the same y𝑦yitalic_y.

2.2.1 The Integral Field Selector (IFS) system

Refer to caption
Figure 9: - Schematic view of the Integral Field Selector system feeding one channel of VESPER. Left - The 6 IFSs are aligned along the x𝑥xitalic_x direction and separated by 0.33” each other. The small gaps between the IFSs are masked on the focal plane to cancel out their contribution to the background due to scattered light. The IFSs can be moved along the y𝑦yitalic_y direction to sample an area of \approx12”×\times×70”. Center - Each IFS is composed of a prism having the upper surface with power and a collimator. They rigidly move by ΔyΔ𝑦\Delta yroman_Δ italic_y. Their movement is compensated by the movement (Δy/2Δ𝑦2\Delta y/2roman_Δ italic_y / 2) of the two 45-degree moving mirrors to keep constant the optical path between collimator and camera for all the IFSs. Right - The image formed onto the VESPER focal plane by the 6 IFSs is a strip as if they were contiguous. Onto the VESPER focal plane there is the slicer that sample the image in slices of 0.375”×\times×10”.

The light coming from MORFEO is deviated toward the IFS system by the selector unit. Figure 9 (left) shows the 6 IFSs feeding one channel of VESPER covering half of the total area, i.e. similar-to\sim12”x70”. Each IFS is composed of a prism and a collimator that rigidly move by ΔyΔ𝑦\Delta yroman_Δ italic_y along the y𝑦yitalic_y direction (Fig. 9 center). Two 45-degree movable mirrors bend the beam and move by Δy/2Δ𝑦2\Delta y/2roman_Δ italic_y / 2 each to keep the optical path between the collimator and camera constant, so that all IFSs share the same focal plane. On the focal plane the 6 IFSs form an image 1.5”×\times×10” as if they were all contiguous (Fig. 9 right).

Refer to caption
Figure 10: - Optical design of the Integral Field Selector system of one channel of VESPER. The 6 IFSs move along parallel planes to avoid vignetting.

In Fig. 10 the optical design of the IFS system feeding one channel of VESPER (6 IFSs) is shown. The 6 IFSs move along parallel planes alternatively offset up and down by about 25mm. Furthermore, the prisms are oriented two by two to send the light in opposite directions. This design avoid interference and vignetting among the components.

2.2.2 The slicer

The light coming from the IFS system of VESPER is focused on the slicer, conceptually similar to the slicer of MUSE at VLT (Ref. 14). The slicer of VESPER is composed of four sets of 72 mirrors (the slicer of MUSE is made of sets of 48 mirrors). The mirror sizes are 1.0mm×\times×22 mm. Figure 11b shows the design of two sets of mirrors. Each set of 72 mirrors samples a slice 0.375”×\times×10” of the image along the wide direction. There is a corresponding set of pupil mirrors (Fig. 11c) for each set of mirrors that converges the light toward the camera where there is the spectrograph. The signal from each spaxel (31 mas) is fed into the spectrograph that generates a spectrum for each one of them. The spectral resolution is Rsimilar-to\sim3000 for extended sources and Rsimilar-to\sim4000 for point sources. There is a camera feeding each set of 72 mirrors, therefore 4 cameras (see Fig. 11a) for one channel (6 IFSs), summing up to 8 cameras for the two channels of VESPER.

Refer to caption
Figure 11: - a) Optical design of one channel of VESPER, from the IFS system to the 4 cameras. Each camera feeds a set of mirrors of the slicer. b) Slicer onto the focal plane of VESPER. The slicer is composed of four set of 72 mirrors each. Two set are shown as example. Each set samples a slice of 0.375”×\times×10” of the image provided by the 6 IFSs. c) Particular of two set of pupil mirrors bringing the light to the corresponding cameras.

Table 2 summarizes the main properties of NEXUS and VESPER.

Table 2: - Properties of the Multi-Object Spectrograph NEXUS and the Multi-Integral Field Unit VESPER of SHARP.
NEXUS VESPER
Spectral range (simultaneous) 0.95-2.45 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm 1.2-2.4 μ𝜇\muitalic_μm
FoV/Area probed 1.2’×\times×1.2’ 24”×\times×70”
Multiplexing up to 30 slits (2.4” slit length) 12 IFSs (1.7”×\times×1.5” each)
Pixel scale 35 mas 31 mas
Spectral resolution (ext. source) 300, 2000, 6000 3000
Spectral resolution (point source) similar-to\sim17000 similar-to\sim4000

3 Conclusions

In this paper, we presented the scientific motivations of the SHARP near-IR multimode spectrograph and the consequent main requirements that guided the optical design and some opto-mechanical choices. SHARP is designed for the 2nd port of MORFEO to exploit the capabilities of ELT, i.e. the world’s largest collecting area and unmatched angular resolution. We have reached an advanced and stable optical design whose opto-mechanical design is ongoing. Most of the key optical performances have already been verified through qualification models.

The final aim of the project is to propose SHARP to ESO’s next call for new instrumentation. In this view, we are spreading SHARP to the scientific and technological community to generate interest and find partners. Our plan is to assemble an international team and consortium and to carry out a complete feasibility study of the instrument by mid 2026. More information, contacts and tools can be found at the website of the SHARP project http://sharp.brera.inaf.it.

MORFEO-SHARP exceeds the observational limits fixed by NIRSpec@JWST allowing us to explore the new paths that JWST is opening. SHARP can take up the baton left by JWST when its mission ends.

Acknowledgments

The SHARP team acknowledges support by grant ”Bando INAF Ricerca Fondamentale 2022”, Techno-Grant SHARP - 1.05.12.02.01. PS would like to thank V. Lynd for the useful discussions.

References

  • [1] P. Ciliegi, G. Agapito, M. Aliverti, et al., “MAORY/MORFEO at ELT: general overview up to the preliminary design and a look towards the final design,” in Adaptive Optics Systems VIII, L. Schreiber, D. Schmidt, and E. Vernet, Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 12185, 1218514 (2022).
  • [2] P. Ciliegi, G. Agapito, M. Aliverti, et al., “MAORY: A Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for ELT,” The Messenger 182, 13–16 (2021).
  • [3] R. Davies, V. Hörmann, S. Rabien, et al., “MICADO: The Multi-Adaptive Optics Camera for Deep Observations,” The Messenger 182, 17–21 (2021).
  • [4] R. Davies, J. Alves, Y. Clénet, et al., “The MICADO first light imager for the ELT: overview, operation, simulation,” in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, C. J. Evans, L. Simard, and H. Takami, Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 10702, 107021S (2018).
  • [5] J. P. Gardner, J. C. Mather, R. Abbott, et al., “The James Webb Space Telescope Mission,” PASP 135, 068001 (2023).
  • [6] P. Jakobsen, P. Ferruit, C. Alves de Oliveira, et al., “The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities,” A& A 661, A80 (2022).
  • [7] A. Dekel, K. C. Sarkar, Y. Birnboim, et al., “Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free starbursts,” MNRAS 523, 3201–3218 (2023).
  • [8] G. de Lucia, “Galaxies in the Cosmological Context,” in Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems. Volume 6: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology, T. D. Oswalt and W. C. Keel, Eds., 6, 451 (2013).
  • [9] S. L. Finkelstein and M. B. Bagley, “On the Coevolution of the AGN and Star-forming Galaxy Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions at 3 <<< z <<< 9,” ApJ 938, 25 (2022).
  • [10] E. Vanzella, F. Loiacono, P. Bergamini, et al., “An extremely metal-poor star complex in the reionization era: Approaching Population III stars with JWST,” A& A 678, A173 (2023).
  • [11] S. Henein, P. Spanoudakis, P. Schwab, et al., “Mechanical slit mask mechanism for the James Webb Space Telescope spectrometer,” in Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Space Telescopes, J. C. Mather, Ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 5487, 765–776 (2004).
  • [12] I. S. McLean, C. C. Steidel, H. W. Epps, et al., “MOSFIRE, the multi-object spectrometer for infra-red exploration at the Keck Observatory,” 8446, 84460J (2012). Conference Name: Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV ADS Bibcode: 2012SPIE.8446E..0JM.
  • [13] F. Garzón, M. Balcells, J. Gallego, et al., “EMIR, the near-infrared camera and multi-object spectrograph for the GTC. EMIR at GTC,” Astronomy and Astrophysics 667, A107 (2022). ADS Bibcode: 2022A&A…667A.107G.
  • [14] F. Henault, R. Bacon, H. Dekker, et al., “MUSE optomechanical design and performance,” in Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, A. F. M. Moorwood and M. Iye, Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 5492, 909–920 (2004).

Paolo Saracco is Prime Researcher at INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera in Milan, Italy. He received his MS degrees in Astronomy from the University of Bologna in 1992 and his PhD degree in Astrophysics from the University of Milano 1995. He is the author of more than 85 refereed journal papers on galaxy evolution. His current research interests include instrumentation for the ELT.