Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 4 Dec 2018 (this version), latest version 20 May 2019 (v2)]
Title:Cluster Cosmology Constraints from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ Survey: Inclusion of Weak Gravitational Lensing Data from Magellan and the Hubble Space Telescope
View PDFAbstract:We derive cosmological constraints using a galaxy cluster sample selected from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ survey. The sample spans the redshift range $0.25<z<1.75$ and consists of 377 cluster candidates with SZ detection significance $\xi>5$. The sample is supplemented with optical weak gravitational lensing measurements of 32 clusters in the range $0.29<z<1.13$ (using data from Magellan and the Hubble Space Telescope) and X-ray measurements of 89 cluster in the range $0.25<z<1.75$ (from Chandra). We rely on minimal modeling assumptions: i) weak lensing provides an accurate means of measuring halo masses, ii) the mean SZ and X-ray observables are related to the true halo mass through power-law relations in mass and dimensionless Hubble parameter $E(z)$ with a-priori unknown parameters, iii) there is (correlated, lognormal) intrinsic scatter and scatter due to measurement uncertainties relating these observables to their mean relations. Assuming a flat $\nu\Lambda$CDM model, in which the sum of neutrino masses is a free parameter, we measure $\Omega_\mathrm{m}=0.276\pm0.047$, $\sigma_8=0.781\pm0.037$, and the parameter combination $\sigma_8(\Omega_\mathrm{m}/0.3)^{0.2}=0.766\pm0.025$. The redshift evolution of the X-ray $Y_X$--mass and $M_\mathrm{gas}$--mass relations are both consistent with self-similar evolution to within $1\sigma$. The mass-slope of the $Y_X$--mass relation shows a $2.3\sigma$ deviation from self-similarity. The mass-slope of the $M_\mathrm{gas}$--mass relation is steeper than self-similarity at the $2.5\sigma$ level. In a $\nu w$CDM cosmology, we measure the dark energy equation of state parameter $w=-1.55\pm0.41$ from the cluster data. We perform a measurement of the growth of structure since redshift $z\sim1.7$ and find no evidence for tension with the prediction from General Relativity. (abridged)
Submission history
From: Sebastian Bocquet [view email][v1] Tue, 4 Dec 2018 21:00:33 UTC (7,564 KB)
[v2] Mon, 20 May 2019 09:37:01 UTC (7,574 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.