Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 11 Sep 2018 (v1), last revised 29 Aug 2019 (this version, v2)]
Title:Status of kinematic cosmology with SN Ia: JLA, Pantheon and future constraints with LSST
View PDFAbstract:In this work we derive state-of-the-art model-independent constraints on cosmology from SN Ia by measuring purely kinematical $\left( q,j \right)$ model parameters (where $q$ and $j$ are related to the first and second derivative of the Hubble parameter). For the JLA compilation of SN Ia an agreement within 2$\sigma$ of $\Lambda$CDM expectations is found, where best-fitting kinematical parameters are $q=-0.66 \pm 0.11$ and $j=0.41 ^{+0.32}_{-0.33}$. With $q=-0.73 \pm 0.13$ and $j=0.76 ^{+0.41}_{-0.43}$ the Pantheon sample shows even better agreement with the $\Lambda$CDM expectation of $j=1$ than JLA, hinting at less systematics and/or a higher number of SN Ia alleviating tensions. For the future we predict the precision achievable with SN Ia from the LSST deep survey as $\Delta q \sim 0.05$ and $\Delta j \sim 0.1$, which is systematics-limited and could lead to detect both deviations from $\Lambda$CDM (in $j$) or current expansion rates measured (in $q$). In comparison, for standard cosmological parameters we get $\Delta \Omega_\mathrm{m}=0.01$ and $\Delta w=0.07$ for LSST. Given the high number of SN Ia expected for LSST, kinematical parameters in up to 500 sky regions, each with their own individual Hubble diagram, can be constrained. For each region an individual precision at the 10s of percent level is within reach at current systematics-levels, comparable to present-day full-sky surveys. This will determine anisotropy in cosmic expansion, or the dark energy dipole, at the 10s of percent level at 10s of degree scales.
Submission history
From: Caroline Heneka [view email][v1] Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:22:09 UTC (586 KB)
[v2] Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:24:06 UTC (500 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.