Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
[Submitted on 7 May 2015 (v1), last revised 14 Sep 2015 (this version, v3)]
Title:A general reconstruction of the recent expansion history of the universe
View PDFAbstract:Distance measurements are currently the most powerful tool to study the expansion history of the universe without specifying its matter content nor any theory of gravitation. Assuming only an isotropic, homogeneous and flat universe, in this work we introduce a model-independent method to reconstruct directly the deceleration function via a piecewise function. Including a penalty factor, we are able to vary continuously the complexity of the deceleration function from a linear case to an arbitrary $(n+1)$-knots spline interpolation. We carry out a Monte Carlo (MC) analysis to determine the best penalty factor, evaluating the bias-variance trade-off, given the uncertainties of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova combined sample (JLA), compilations of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and $H(z)$ data. The bias-variance analysis is done for three fiducial models with different features in the deceleration curve. For each fiducial model, we test different reconstructions using, in each case, more than $10^4$ catalogs in a total of about $5\times 10^5$. This investigation proved to be essential in determining the best reconstruction to study these data. We show that, evaluating a single fiducial model, the conclusions about the bias-variance ratio are misleading. We determine the reconstruction method in which the bias represents at most $10\%$ of the total uncertainty. Finally, we apply the Ensemble Sampler Markov Chain Monte Carlo (ESMCMC) method to explore the posterior of the deceleration function up to redshift $1.3$ (using only JLA) and $2.3$ (JLA+BAO+$H(z)$). We obtain that the standard cosmological model agrees within $3\sigma$ level with the reconstructed results in the whole studied redshift intervals. Since our method is calibrated to minimize the bias, the error bars of the reconstructed functions are a good approximation for the total uncertainty.
Submission history
From: Mariana Penna Lima Vitenti [view email][v1] Thu, 7 May 2015 22:32:43 UTC (4,702 KB)
[v2] Tue, 26 May 2015 13:59:19 UTC (4,714 KB)
[v3] Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:05:56 UTC (4,716 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.