Total joint arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors

  • Rasmus Liukkonen Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-3193
  • Venla-Linnea Karjalainen Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9549-6552
  • Reetta Kvist Central Finland Central Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä
  • Matias Vaajala Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere
  • Ville Ponkilainen Central Finland Central Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-4560
  • Teemu Karjalainen Central Finland Central Hospital Nova, Jyväskylä; Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Tampere University Hospital Tampere, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40816

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Implants, Osteoarthrosis, Thumb

Abstract

Background and purpose: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly treated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms of the TJA for thumb CMC OA compared with other treatment strategies.
Patients and methods: We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases on August 2, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of TJA in people with thumb CMC joint OA regardless of the stage or etiology of the disease or comparator. The outcomes were pooled with a random effect meta-analysis.
Results: We identified 4 studies randomizing 420 participants to TJA or trapeziectomy. At 3 months, TJA’s benefits for pain may exceed the clinically important difference. However, after 1-year follow-up TJA does not improve pain compared with trapeziectomy (mean difference 0.53 points on a 0 to 10 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26–0.81). Furthermore, it provides a transient benefit in hand function at 3 months (measured with Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, scale 0–100, lower is better) compared with trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. The benefit in function diminished to a clinically unimportant level at 1-year follow-up (4.4 points better; CI 0.42–8.4).
Conclusion: Transient benefit in hand function for TJA implies that it could be a preferable option over trapeziectomy for people who consider fast postoperative recovery important. However, current evidence fails to inform us if TJA carries long-term higher risks of revisions compared with trapeziectomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

e 2010; 36: 1-48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evidence-Based Mental Health 2019; 22: 153-60. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

Randall D J, Zhang Y, Li H, Hubbard J C, Kazmers N H. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit for the pain visual analog scale in a postoperative hand surgery population. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47: 645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.03.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.03.009

Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G. Minimal clinically important difference of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44: 30-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2014.4893

Bohannon R W. Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci 2019; 31: 75-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.75

Villafañe J H, Valdes K, Bertozzi L, Negrini S. Minimal clinically important difference of grip and pinch strength in women with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis when compared to healthy subjects. Rehabil Nurs 2017; 42: 139-45. doi: 10.1002/rnj.196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rnj.196

Raj S, Clay R, Ramji S, Shaunak R, Dadrewalla A, Sinha V, et al. Trapeziectomy versus joint replacement for first carpometacarpal (CMC 1) joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022; 32: 1001-21. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03070-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03070-5

Qureshi M K, Halim U A, Khaled A S, Roche S J, Arshad M S. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition versus trapeziometacarpal joint replacement for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Wrist Surg 2021; 11: 272-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731818

Froschauer S M, Holzbauer M, Hager D, Schnelzer R, Kwasny O, Duscher D. Elektra prosthesis versus resection-suspension arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a long-term cohort study. J Hand Surg Eur 2020; 45: 452-7. doi: 10.1177/1753193419873230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419873230

Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Sebastia-Forcada E, Lopez-Prats F A. Outcomes of cementless joint prosthesis versus tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur 2019; 44: 151-8. doi: 10.1177/1753193418787151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418787151

Herren D B, Fuchs N, Schindele S, Marks M. Outcomes and recommendations for revision of thumb carpometacarpal resection arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur 2021; 46: 1101-7. doi: 10.1177/17531934211050559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934211050559

Published

2024-06-18

How to Cite

Liukkonen, R., Karjalainen, V.-L., Kvist, R., Vaajala, M., Ponkilainen, V., & Karjalainen , T. (2024). Total joint arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Orthopaedica, 95, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40816

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories