Team-based digital communication reduced patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital and improved patient satisfaction after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial in 70 patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40707Keywords:
digital communication, interdisciplinary communication, patient-provider communication, randomized clinical trial, team-based care, text messagingAbstract
Background and purpose: Post-discharge inquiries to the hospital are predominantly conducted through phone calls. The rigid timing of these calls is inconvenient for patients and disrupts the workflows of healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a team-based digital communication intervention (eDialogue) facilitated through a messenger-like commercial solution on patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital after discharge. Secondarily, we investigated other patient-initiated contacts, patients’ perception of continuity of care, and their perception of feeling safe and satisfied after hospital discharge.
Methods: On the day of discharge, 70 surgically treated orthopedic patients were randomized to the intervention group with access to eDialogue (n = 35) or the control group with standard communication pathways by phone call (n = 35) for the following 8 weeks. Through eDialogue, the intervention group had access to team-based asynchronous digital communication in text and photos with healthcare professionals across disciplines and sectors. Inclusion criteria were discharge to own home and receipt of rehabilitation services from both hospital and primary care after discharge.
Results: We found a significant reduction in the mean number of patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital from 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–4.1) in the control group to 0.5 (CI 0.3–1.0) in the intervention group (P = 0.004). Across groups, patients reported similar perceptions of continuity of care; however, the participants in the intervention group expressed significantly improved perceptions of, and satisfaction with, access to healthcare after discharge.
Conclusion: Access to eDialogue reduced patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital, enhanced patient satisfaction with healthcare accessibility, and did not compromise patients’ perception of continuity of care after discharge compared with standard communication pathways.
Downloads
References
Stoicea N, Magal S, Kim J K, Bai M, Rogers B, Bergese S D. Post-acute transitional journey: caring for orthopedic surgery patients in the United States. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5: 342. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00342
Markiewicz O, Lavelle M, Lorencatto F, Judah G, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. Threats to safe transitions from hospital to home: a consensus study in North West London primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2019; 70(690): e9-e19. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X707105
Indenrigs-og sundhedsministeriet. Sundhedsvæsenet. Available from: https://sum.dk/sundhed/sundhedsvaesenet [accessed 12.11.2023].
Styrelsen for Patientsikkerhed: Årsberetning 2016. Dansk Patientsikkerhedsdatabase; 2017. Available from: https://stps.dk/udgivelser/2017/apr/aarsberetning-for-dansk-patientsikkerhedsdatabase-2016 [accessed 12.11.2023].
Jensen L W H, Rahbek O, Lauritsen R E K, Kold S, Dinesen B. Patient perspectives on communication pathways after orthopedic surgery and discharge and evaluation of team-based digital communication: qualitative exploratory study. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11: e49696. doi: 10.2196/49696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/49696
Jensen L W H, Rahbek O, Lauritsen R E K, Kold S, Dinesen B. Health care professionals’ perspectives before and after use of eDialogue for team-based digital communication across settings: qualitative study. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11: e53391. doi: 10.2196/53391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/53391
Cronin R M, Davis S E, Shenson J A, Chen Q, Rosenbloom S T, Jackson G P. Growth of secure messaging through a patient portal as a form of outpatient interaction across clinical specialties. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6(2): 288-304. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-12-RA-0117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-12-RA-0117
Laukka E, Huhtakangas M, Heponiemi T, Kujala S, Kaihlanen A M, Gluschkoff K, et al. health care professionals’ experiences of patient-professional communication over patient portals: systematic review of qualitative studies. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(12): e21623. doi: 10.2196/21623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/21623
Wainwright T, Middleton R. An orthopaedic enhanced recovery pathway. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.cacc.2010.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacc.2010.01.003
Schulz K F, Altman D G, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152(11): 726-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
ClinicalTrials.gov. The effect of digital team-based communication on patient-initiated telephone contacts to hospital after discharge; 2022. Available from: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05601765 [accessed 01.12.2023].
REDCap 13.1.37. Vanderbilt University; 2023.
LetDialog – sikker SMS [02.02.2023]. Available from: https://letdialog.dk/.
Hadjistavropoulos H, Sharpe D, Bourgault-Fagnou M, Janzen J. Patient perceptions of hospital discharge: reliability and validity of a Patient Continuity of Care Questionnaire. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20(5): 314-23. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzn030
Haggerty J, Reid R, Freeman G K, Starfield B H, Adair C E, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. Br Med J 2003; 327(7425): 1219-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219
Zhou Y Y, Garrido T, Chin H L, Wiesenthal A M, Liang L L. Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. Am J Manag Care 2007; 13(7): 418-24. PMID: 17620037
Katz S J, Moyer C A, Cox D T, Stern D T. Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18(9): 736-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x
Palen T E, Ross C, Powers J D, Xu S. Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services. JAMA 2012; 308(19): 2012-19. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.14126
Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Car J. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD007978. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007978.pub2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007978.pub2
de Jong C C, Ros W J, Schrijvers G. The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16(1): e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3000
Goldzweig C L, Towfigh A A, Paige N M, Orshansky G, Haggstrom D A, Beroes J M. Systematic review: secure messaging between providers and patients, and patients’ access to their own medical record: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency and attitudes. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00006
Johansson M, Guyatt G, Montori V. Guidelines should consider clinicians’ time needed to treat. BMJ 2023; 380: e072953. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072953
Kruse C S, Bolton K, Freriks G. The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17(2): e44. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3171
Nickinson R S, Board T N, Kay P R. Post-operative anxiety and depression levels in orthopaedic surgery: a study of 56 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. J Eval Clin Pract 2009; 15(2): 307-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01001.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01001.x
Janssen S L, Venema-Taat N, Medlock S. Anticipated benefits and concerns of sharing hospital outpatient visit notes with patients (Open Notes) in Dutch hospitals: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23(8): e27764. doi: 10.2196/27764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/27764
Moll J, Rexhepi H, Cajander Å, Grünloh C, Huvila I, Hägglund M, et al. Patients’ experiences of accessing their electronic health records: national patient survey in Sweden. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20(11): e278.. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9492
Ghaffari A, Kildahl Lauritsen R E, Christensen M, Rolighed Thomsen T, Mahapatra H, Heck R, et al. Exploring the feasibility and usability of smartphones for monitoring physical activity in orthopedic patients: prospective observational study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023; 11: e44442. doi: 10.2196/44442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/44442
Saldivar B, Carter C, Filipp S L, Gurka M J, Davis M K. Patient satisfaction surveys in the outpatient clinic setting: the variability of response with positively or negatively toned questions. Inquiry 2019; 56: 46958019875554. doi: 10.1177/0046958019875554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958019875554
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lili Worre Høpfner Jensen , Søren Kold, Birthe Dinesen, Hans-Christen Husum, Regitze Gyldenholm Skals, Søren Peter Eiskjær, Rasmus Elsøe, Ole Rahbek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
