Basicervical femoral neck fractures: an observational study derived from the Swedish Fracture Register

Authors

  • Jonas Sundkvist Department of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, Umeå https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-7276
  • Per Hulenvik Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg
  • Viktor Schmidt Department of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, Umeå https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-9555
  • Per Jolbäck Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg; Department of Research, Development, Education and Innovation, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9402-9506
  • Mikael Sundfeldt Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg
  • Per Fischer Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro; Department of Orthopedics, Karlstad Central Hospital, Karlstad, Region Värmland
  • Cecilia Rogmark Department of Orthopaedics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6556-4320
  • Hans Juto Department of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, Umeå
  • Olof Wolf Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-8715
  • Sebastian Mukka Department of Diagnostics and Intervention (Orthopaedics), Umeå University, Umeå https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5469-2730

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40503

Keywords:

Basal femoral neck fracture, Basicervical femoral neck fracture, Hip, Trauma

Abstract

Background and purpose: Limited research has been conducted on basicervical femoral neck fractures (bFNFs). The importance of displacement in clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to characterize patient demographics, degree of displacement, treatment, treatment failures, and reoperations in a cohort of fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).
Methods: 1,260 fractures in 1,185 individuals ≥ 60 years who had a bFNF registered in the SFR at 6 orthopedic departments from 2011 to 2020 were screened through radiographic review. The final sample included 291 patients with a confirmed bFNF. The medical records of these 291 patients were reviewed. We assessed baseline characteristics, initial fracture dislocation, treatment methods, tip–apex distance, failures, reoperations, and mortality.
Results: The mean age was 82 years (range 60–101, 55% women). 98 (34%) were undisplaced and 193 (66%) displaced. All patients underwent operative treatment. In the undisplaced group 95 (97%) patients received internal fixation (IF) and 3 (3%) had primary hip arthroplasty. In the displaced group 149 (77%) received IF and 41 (21%) had primary hip arthroplasty. 33 (11%) suffered treatment failure. When treating an undisplaced bFNF with IF, only 3 (3%) experienced treatment failure, in contrast to the 24 (16%) failure rate for a displaced bFNF.
Conclusion: Undisplaced bFNFs have a low failure rate when treated with IF. For displaced bFNF treated with IF the failure rate is considerably higher. There is a need for further investigation of classification, treatment, and outcome of bFNF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meinberg E G, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam M D, Kellam J F. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium–2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32(Suppl 1): S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063

Moore J R. Fractures of the upper end of the femur including fracture dislocations at the hip joint. Am J Surg 1939; 44: 117-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(39)90939-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(39)90939-6

Muller M E, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The AO classification of fracture of long bones. Berlin: Springer; 1990. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-61261-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61261-9

Chammout G K, Mukka SS, Carlsson T, Neander G F, Stark AW, Skoldenberg O G. Total hip replacement versus open reduction and internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94(21): 1921-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01615

Lewis S R, Macey R, Stokes J, Cook J A, Eardley W G, Griffin X L. Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 2(2):CD013404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013404.pub2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013404.pub2

Bartels S, Kristensen T B, Gjertsen J E, Frihagen F, Rogmark C, Dolatowski F C, et al. Total HA leads to better results after low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture in patients aged 55 to 70 years: a randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing internal fixation and total HA. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104(15): 1341-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.01411

Saarenpää I, Partanen J, Jalovaara P. Basicervical fracture: a rare type of hip fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122(2): 69-72. doi: 10.1007/s004020100306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004020100306

Mallick A, Parker M J. Basal fractures of the femoral neck: intra- or extra-capsular. Injury 2004; 35(10): 989-93. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.019

Yoo J I, Cha Y, Kwak J, Kim H Y, Choy W S. Review on basicervical femoral neck fracture: definition, treatments, and failures. Hip Pelvis 2020; 32(4): 170-81. doi: 10.5371/hp.2020.32.4.170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2020.32.4.170

Sundkvist J, Brüggeman A, Sayed-Noor A, Möller M, Wolf O, Mukka S. Epidemiology, classification, treatment, and mortality of adult femoral neck and basicervical fractures: an observational study of 40,049 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16(1): 561. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02701-. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02701-1

Kjærvik C, Stensland E, Byhring H S, Gjertsen J E, Dybvik E, Søreide O. Hip fracture treatment in Norway: deviation from evidence-based treatment guidelines: data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, 2014 to 2018. Bone Jt Open 2020; 1(10): 644-53. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.110.BJO-2020-0124.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.110.BJO-2020-0124.R1

Blair B, Koval K J, Kummer F, Zuckerman J D. Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur: a biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (306): 256-63. PMID: 8070205.

Dekhne M S, Thomas H M, Haider T, Mortensen S, Rodriguez E K, Weaver M J, et al. Treatment and outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021; 29(1): 23094990211003344. doi: 10.1177/23094990211003344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23094990211003344

Davanzo D, Previtali D, Tamborini S, Filardo G, Fusco A, Bordoni V, et al. Comparison of the survivorship between arthroplasty and ORIF for basi-cervical femoral neck fractures in the overall population and in polymorbid patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107(3): 102789. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102789

Davis R A, Henningsen J D, Huff S, Schneider AD, Hijji F Y, Froehle A, et al. Primary hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures. Cureus 2022; 14(5): e25210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.25210

Möller M, Wolf O, Bergdahl C, Mukka S, Rydberg E M, Hailer N P, et al. The Swedish Fracture Register: ten years of experience and 600,000 fractures collected in a National Quality Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23(1): 141. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05062-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05062-w

Ludvigsson, J F, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson B U, Ekbom A. The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol 2009; 24, 659-67. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y

Marsh J L, Slongo T F, Agel J, Broderick J S, Creevey W, DeCoster T A, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium–2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (10 Suppl): S1–S6. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001

Knutsson S B, Wennergren D, Bojan A, Ekelund J, Möller M. Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register: a validity study BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20(1): 197. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2579-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2579-z

Swedish Fracture Register. https://sfr.registercentrum.se/om-registret/taeckningsgradsanalys/p/HJedFyVyE (accessed December 12, 2023).

Baumgaertner M R, Curtin S L, Lindskog D M, Keggi J M. The value of the tip–apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77(7): 1058-64. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012

Mundi S, Pindiprolu B, Simunovic N, Bhandari M. Similar mortality rates in hip fracture patients over the past 31 years: a systematic review of RCTs. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(1): 54-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.878831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.878831

Nordström P, Bergman J, Ballin M, Nordström A. Trends in hip fracture incidence, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality in Sweden from 1998–2017: a nationwide cohort study. Calcif Tissue Int 2022; 111(1): 21-8. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-00954-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-022-00954-4

Chen C Y, Chiu F Y, Chen C M, Huang C K, Chen W M, Chen T H. Surgical treatment of basicervical fractures of femur: a prospective evaluation of 269 patients. J Trauma 2008; 64(2): 427-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000239255.47280.6f. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000239255.47280.6f

Kjaervik C, Gjertsen J E, Engeseter L B, Stensland E, Dybvik E, Soereide O. Waiting time for hip fracture surgery: hospital variation, causes, and effects on postoperative mortality: data on 37,708 operations reported to the Norwegian Hip fracture Register from 2014 to 2018. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2(9): 710-20. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.29.BJO-2021-0079.R1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.29.BJO-2021-0079.R1

Hernefalk B, Rydberg E M, Ekelund J, Rogmark C, Möller M, Hailer N P, et al. Inter-departmental variation in surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures: a nationwide observational cohort study. PLoS One 2023; 18(2): e0281592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281592

Watson S T, Schaller T M, Tanner S L, Adams J D, Jeray K J. Outcomes of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with cephalomedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98: 1097-102. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01093

Sjöholm P, Sundkvist J, Wolf O, Sköldenberg O, Gordon M, Mukka S. Preoperative anterior and posterior tilt of Garden I–II femoral neck fractures predict treatment failure and need for reoperation in patients over 60 years. JBJS Open Access 2021; 6(4): e21.00045. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00045

Schmitz P P, Hannink G, Reijmer J, Somford M P, Van Susante J L C. Increased failure rates after the introduction of the TFNA proximal femoral nail for trochanteric fractures: implant related or learning curve effect? Acta Orthop 2022; 93: 234-40. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.1410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.1410

Published

2024-05-22

How to Cite

Sundkvist, J., Hulenvik, P., Schmidt, V., Jolbäck, P., Sundfeldt, M., Fischer, P., Rogmark, C., Juto, H., Wolf, O., & Mukka, S. (2024). Basicervical femoral neck fractures: an observational study derived from the Swedish Fracture Register. Acta Orthopaedica, 95, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40503