My research is at the intersection of technology and autism (but it's mostly technology focused). I'm approaching things from a particular standpoint of autism (i.e. neuroafirmative, neurocosmopolitan, counterventionalist, which basically comes down to saying the world is diverse and autistic people are part of this diversity, they are human beings and don't need to be fixed but there are ways they can be better supported). I'm expecting my lit review to be mostly about previous autism+technology projects and I'm thinking it probably doesn't make sense for the methodology section but maybe I'm wrong?
Can anyone please advise, what chapter of a PhD thesis should this be covered in? Is there a better or more commonly used term for this type of information than "standpoint".
