Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success
- PMID: 17931389
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01322.x
Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success
Abstract
Aims: The aims of this study were (i) to conduct a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on the outcome of primary (initial or first time) root canal treatment; (ii) to investigate the influence of some study characteristics on the estimated pooled success rates.
Methodology: Longitudinal clinical studies investigating outcome of primary root canal treatment, published up to the end of 2002, were identified electronically (MEDLINE and Cochrane database 1966-2002 December, week 4). Four journals (International Endodontic Journal, Journal of Endodontics, Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Endodontics Radiology and Dental Traumatology & Endodontics), bibliographies of all relevant papers and review articles were hand-searched. Three reviewers (Y-LN, SR and KG) independently assessed, selected the studies based on specified inclusion criteria, and extracted the data onto a pre-designed proforma. The study inclusion criteria were: longitudinal clinical studies investigating root canal treatment outcome; only primary root canal treatment carried out on the teeth studied; sample size given; at least 6-month postoperative review; success based on clinical and/or radiographic criteria (strict, absence of apical radiolucency; loose, reduction in size of radiolucency); overall success rate given or could be calculated from the raw data. The findings by individual study were summarized and the pooled success rates by each potential influencing factor were calculated for this part of the study.
Results: Of the 119 articles identified, 63 studies published from 1922 to 2002, fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for the review: six were randomized trials, seven were cohort studies and 48 were retrospective studies. The reported mean success rates ranged from 31% to 96% based on strict criteria or from 60% to 100% based on loose criteria, with substantial heterogeneity in the estimates of pooled success rates. Apart from the radiographic criteria of success, none of the other study characteristics could explain this heterogeneity. Twenty-four factors (patient and operative) had been investigated in various combinations in the studies reviewed. The influence of preoperative pulpal and periapical status of the teeth on treatment outcome were most frequently explored, but the influence of treatment technique was poorly investigated.
Conclusions: The estimated weighted pooled success rates of treatments completed at least 1 year prior to review, ranged between 68% and 85% when strict criteria were used. The reported success rates had not improved over the last four (or five) decades. The quality of evidence for treatment factors affecting primary root canal treatment outcome is sub-optimal; there was substantial variation in the study-designs. It would be desirable to standardize aspects of study-design, data recording and presentation format of outcome data in the much needed future outcome studies.
Comment in
-
New terms for categorizing the outcome of root canal treatment.Int Endod J. 2011 Nov;44(11):1079-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01954.x. Int Endod J. 2011. PMID: 21972838 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature.Int Endod J. 2008 Dec;41(12):1026-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01484.x. Int Endod J. 2008. PMID: 19133093 Review.
-
Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature.Int Endod J. 2010 Mar;43(3):171-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01671.x. Int Endod J. 2010. PMID: 20158529 Review.
-
Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature--Part 2: Comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification.J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Nov 21. J Endod. 2012. PMID: 22152611 Review.
-
Root canal re-treatment with gutta percha - which techniques influence success?Evid Based Dent. 2024 Jun;25(2):104-105. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01019-1. Epub 2024 May 25. Evid Based Dent. 2024. PMID: 38796553 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature--part 1: Comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery.J Endod. 2010 Nov;36(11):1757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 17. J Endod. 2010. PMID: 20951283 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors Influencing Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Outcomes in Mandibular Second Molars: A Retrospective Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 May 16;13(10):2931. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102931. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38792472 Free PMC article.
-
Root Canal Instrumentation: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58045. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58045. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38738101 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting early endodontic treatment failure following primary root canal treatment.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03974-8. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38475776 Free PMC article.
-
Irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth: a cost-effectiveness analysis of pulpotomy versus root canal treatment.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04052-9. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38418999 Free PMC article.
-
A novel simplified approach for endodontic retrograde surgery in short single-rooted teeth.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 31;24(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03879-6. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 38297251 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials