Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floro Fighting System
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I next to no meaningful Ghits out of the 93 unique hits for "Floro fighting system", and 49 unique Ghits for "Ray Flora" + eskrima. Apart from the wiki pages which are the most prominent, the vast majority are blog entries, and a significant collection of wiki mirrors either of the article or of our List of Eskrima systems picked up by other wiki mirrors. Delete as failing WP:NN. Ohconfucius 08:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also looking at the authors history this may fail WP:SPAM. As such it qualifies for speedy. This phrasing We found that especially in weapon sparring, the non-weapon hand gets hit often if it tries to get involved in distances greater than extreme close range. also verifies this. Why say We found if it isn't written by the creators themselves? MartinDK 08:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - conflict of interest. MER-C 08:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't read far from a promotional pamphlet. Danny Lilithborne 11:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Non-notable, and even if it was, there is no way to verify the information on the article other than by going to the author's own personal webpage. Reads like a flyer posted around for classes signup. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 17:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Non-notable advertisement.Peter Rehse 02:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.