Template talk:Lago Maggiore

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lakes Template:Lago Maggiore is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles Italy This template is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Switzerland This template is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles

As the template is fairly large, I'd like to change "state" to "collapsed". -- User:Docu

On articles to which it is relevant but peripheral it should be invoked as

{{Lago Maggiore | state = collapsed}}

On articles to which it is not peripheral, but seems a bit big, the answer is to expand the article, I think;) —Ian Spackman 20:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even on the fairly long Lago Maggiore article, it takes up a lot of space, as it isn't collapsed yet. As all information is already available in the article and/or the infobox, there may not be much use to include it once more. -- User:Docu

I’m well aware of WP:OWN, don’t imagine that I have any authorial rights in the template or its usage, and won’t get at all upset if you are bold;) But The Lake Maggiore article is still pretty short for the topic it’s covering, badly needs both its scope and its depth expanding, and needs to be turned into prose. There is actually quite a lot in the navbox which is relevant and not mentioned or linked in the article. (Not to mention some obvious things, like the Stresa Conference, that aren’t mentioned in either.) By the way, if you add four tildes to your posts on talk pages (~~~~) you’ll get a proper signature. —Ian Spackman 14:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]