Jump to content

Template talk:Christian crosses

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sectioning

[edit]

What's "in Modern use" and what's "historical" possibly borders WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Wouldn't we rather go with some sectioning of "Western", "Eastern", possibly with a couple of few selected subsections such as "Latin Church", "Protestant", "Eastern Orthodox" and "Oriental Orthodox"? PPEMES (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, although some might be more general in use. Also, Uniates as well as Protestants in Eastern Orthodox-dominated lands may be using the Eastern Orthodox crosses. Go ahead and section them out better if you like.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but couldn't you go on in which context first conceived? I couldn't think of any less imperfect solution. PPEMES (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the imgs were highly detailed and thus almost illegible at the 19px display size used here, so I uploaded a bunch of simplified designs. They all have the same line weight (apart from where they flare) so they harmonize well. But flory and budded variants still aren't very distinct, so suggestions for improvement welcome. — kwami (talk) 00:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]