Skip to content
NOWCAST News 9 at 12:30
Live Now
Advertisement

Mother of overdose victim devastated by Supreme Court's rejection of Purdue Pharma settlement

Settlement would have sent tens of millions of dollars to New Hampshire for treatment centers

Mother of overdose victim devastated by Supreme Court's rejection of Purdue Pharma settlement

Settlement would have sent tens of millions of dollars to New Hampshire for treatment centers

THE SUPREME COURT, THAT LIKELY WON’T BE CHANGING ANYTIME SOON. WE’RE ALL DEVASTATED AND WE’RE IN SHOCK, AND IT’S IT’S UNBELIEVABLE. KAY SCARPONI HAS BEEN FIGHTING THE OPIOID CRISIS FOR YEARS. AND WHEN YOU KNOW HER STORY, IT’S EASY TO UNDERSTAND WHY. I’D LIKE TO SHOW YOU JUST A PICTURE OF MY SON. MY SON WAS A SERGEANT IN THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS. HE FOUGHT A YEAR IN THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN, AND HE CAME HOME TO AMERICAN SOIL AND DIED OF AN OVERDOSE. SCARPONI WAS IN THE VICTIMS COUNCIL SPEAKING AT THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AS PART OF THE BANKRUPTCY CASE FOR PURDUE PHARMA, THE CORPORATION THAT HAD SUPERCHARGED THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC THROUGH THE SALE OF ITS DRUG OXYCONTIN. AS PART OF THE DEAL, PURDUE AND ITS OWNERS, THE SACKLER FAMILY, HAD AGREED TO PAY OUT MORE THAN $750 MILLION TO FAMILIES OF OVERDOSE VICTIMS AND ANOTHER $6 BILLION TO STATES AND CITIES TO FIGHT THE ONGOING CRISIS. BUT IN A NARROW 5 TO 4 RULING, THE JUSTICES REJECTED THAT PLAN. IT WAS GOING TO HELP SO MANY VICTIMS, AND IT WAS GOING TO HELP ABATE THE CRISIS. AND WE’VE WORKED SO HARD TO HAVE THIS JUST TAKEN AWAY FROM US. THE REJECTION CAME DOWN TO AN INTERPRETATION OF BANKRUPTCY LAW. THE JUSTICES IN THE MAJORITY AGREEING WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT IT ARGUED AGAINST LANGUAGE IN THE DEAL, SHIELDING THE SACKLERS FROM FUTURE CIVIL LIABILITY. BUT THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THOSE THOUSANDS OF VICTIMS, INCLUDING SCARPONI, SAYS THIS WAS THE BEST POSSIBLE DEAL VICTIMS COULD HOPE FOR. WE GOT MORE THAN WE WOULD GET IN LITIGATION RIGHT NOW. THEY ARE NOT SLATED TO GET A SINGLE PENNY, SO THE $750 MILLION THAT THEY WOULD HAVE GOTTEN IS OUT THE DOOR. THE SUPREME COURT JUST BLEW THAT UP. IT’S NOT FAIR. WE’LL KEEP FIGHTING, THOUGH. WE WON’T GIVE UP. NOW, HERE’S A STARTLING NUMBER FOR YOU. 385 PEOPLE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE LAST YEAR DIED OF OPIOID OVERDOSES. THIS RULING ALSO MEANS THE DOZENS OF ORGANIZATIONS AROUND OUR STATE FIGHTING THE OPIOID CRISIS WON’T BE SEEING A PENNY
Advertisement
Mother of overdose victim devastated by Supreme Court's rejection of Purdue Pharma settlement

Settlement would have sent tens of millions of dollars to New Hampshire for treatment centers

A New Hampshire woman said Thursday she was devasted by a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to reject a settlement that would have given billions of dollars to opioid treatment centers and those impacted by the epidemic.The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 vote to reject the settlement with Purdue Pharma that would have forced the Sackler family, which owns the company, to pay $6 billion to recovery centers and victim families across the country.Kay Scarpone, of Kingston, said she lost her son in 2015 to an opioid overdose. "My son was a sergeant in the U.S. Marine Corps," she said. "He fought for a year in the war in Afghanistan, and he came home to American soil and died from an overdose because of PTSD.">> Download the free WMUR app to get updates on the go: Apple | Google Play <<Scarpone said she was shaken by the court's decision to reject the settlement."It's not fair," she said. "We’ll keep fighting, though. We won't give up."The justices rejected the agreement because the Sackler family would be protected from any civil lawsuits over oxycontin, which was produced and promoted by Purdue Pharma. Under the settlement, New Hampshire would have received $46 million. Scarpone said the settlement was the best plan they could get from the Sackler family, and now, lawyers will try to make a new plan."That settlement money was going to help so many victims, and it was going to help abate the crisis, and we worked so hard just to have it taken away from us," Scarpone said.Scarpone was one of 20 members of the victims' council that spoke to the Supreme Court and the Sackler family as part of the settlement process."We're always going to go back to the drawing board and start over, and if it takes another four years, then so be it."Edward Neiger, the attorney representing Scarpone and other victims, said the ruling from the court will prevent thousands of families from getting the settlement they deserve from the Sackler family. "Right now, they are not slated to get a single penny," Neiger said. "The 750 million they were supposed to get, the supreme court just blew that up."In a statement, Purdue Pharma called the news "heart-crushing.""The decision does nothing to deter us from the twin goals of using settlement dollars for opioid abatement and turning the company into an engine for good," the company said.According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, in 2022, more than 81,000 Americans died from an opioid overdose, more than four times the amount since this data started being recorded in 1999.

A New Hampshire woman said Thursday she was devasted by a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to reject a settlement that would have given billions of dollars to opioid treatment centers and those impacted by the epidemic.

The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 vote to reject the settlement with Purdue Pharma that would have forced the Sackler family, which owns the company, to pay $6 billion to recovery centers and victim families across the country.

Advertisement

Kay Scarpone, of Kingston, said she lost her son in 2015 to an opioid overdose.

"My son was a sergeant in the U.S. Marine Corps," she said. "He fought for a year in the war in Afghanistan, and he came home to American soil and died from an overdose because of PTSD."

>> Download the free WMUR app to get updates on the go: Apple | Google Play <<

Scarpone said she was shaken by the court's decision to reject the settlement.

"It's not fair," she said. "We’ll keep fighting, though. We won't give up."

The justices rejected the agreement because the Sackler family would be protected from any civil lawsuits over oxycontin, which was produced and promoted by Purdue Pharma.

Under the settlement, New Hampshire would have received $46 million. Scarpone said the settlement was the best plan they could get from the Sackler family, and now, lawyers will try to make a new plan.

"That settlement money was going to help so many victims, and it was going to help abate the crisis, and we worked so hard just to have it taken away from us," Scarpone said.

Scarpone was one of 20 members of the victims' council that spoke to the Supreme Court and the Sackler family as part of the settlement process.

"We're always going to go back to the drawing board and start over, and if it takes another four years, then so be it."

Edward Neiger, the attorney representing Scarpone and other victims, said the ruling from the court will prevent thousands of families from getting the settlement they deserve from the Sackler family.

"Right now, they are not slated to get a single penny," Neiger said. "The 750 million they were supposed to get, the supreme court just blew that up."

In a statement, Purdue Pharma called the news "heart-crushing."

"The decision does nothing to deter us from the twin goals of using settlement dollars for opioid abatement and turning the company into an engine for good," the company said.

According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, in 2022, more than 81,000 Americans died from an opioid overdose, more than four times the amount since this data started being recorded in 1999.