Topic on User talk:Matlin

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
#Yes, we have discussed the MnM issue many, many times. But as you have been told repeatedly, there is no obligation to use MnM in a way that you want to. And that’s really the end of the story, I’m afraid. It is your obligation to sanitize any edits that rely on MnM information. If you can’t do it, just don’t import MnM data.
#Yes, we have discussed the MnM issue many, many times. But as you have been told repeatedly, there is no obligation to use MnM in a way that you want to. And that’s really the end of the story, I’m afraid. It is your obligation to sanitize any edits that rely on MnM information. If you can’t do it, just don’t import MnM data.
#I have yet to see any concession or willingness to compromise on your part. You seem to have resorted to trolling me by pinging me in random discussions. While this doesn’t affect any blocking or unblocking decisions, this isn’t really helpful at all.
#I have yet to see any concession or willingness to compromise on your part. You seem to have resorted to trolling me by pinging me in random discussions. While this doesn’t affect any blocking or unblocking decisions, this isn’t really helpful at all.
Maybe you could pledge not to use certain controversial types of edits like MnM imports? That would be a good way to find a way that you can continue to benefit this project. --[[User:Emu|Emu]] ([[User talk:Emu|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Maybe you could pledge not to certain controversial types of edits like MnM imports? That would be a good way to find a way that you can continue to benefit this project. --[[User:Emu|Emu]] ([[User talk:Emu|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:15, 16 October 2022 (UTC)