Sir, Your interview with Sylvia de Bertodano about her recent appointment as a part-time female judge does not reflect the position of many mothers (and fathers) working at the independent Bar (“I hope my new role will encourage others”, Law, June 4). It might deter bright youngsters of talent from entering this vitally independent profession.
Subject to being able and sought after by clients, members of the Bar can accept as many or as few professional commitments as financial and personal circumstances dictate. They can — and do — elect to practise in geographical areas close to their home. Trial advocacy is not work (as the article recognises) that permits two to three-day working weeks. However, it is compatible with extended maternity leave, lengthy family holidays and flexible working. In our chambers we have five women silks (including the head of chambers) and eighteen junior women barristers, and many of us take advantage of this reality.
Ultimately, however, such matters may be of little importance to the court user facing the prospect of removal of children, a term of imprisonment, or achieving an award of substantial damages. Such users may be more interested to know whether they are in the hands of advocates who are committed, experienced, fearless and independent. I fear that suggestions such as those made in the interview may simply serve to reduce the available pool of such advocates.
Rachel Langdale, QC
London WC1