We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Woman allergic to mobile phones wins disability grant

Scientific studies have found no evidence linking electromagnetic exposure to the symptoms that those who suffer EHS claim to experience
Scientific studies have found no evidence linking electromagnetic exposure to the symptoms that those who suffer EHS claim to experience
GETTY IMAGES

A French court has for the first time recognised the alleged physical suffering inflicted by mobile phones and wi-fi as a medical disorder.

Marine Richard, 39, a former radio producer from Marseilles, was awarded a disability allowance of £500 per month after she convinced judges in Toulouse that she had been forced to flee civilisation because of the disagreeable sensations that she felt near electromagnetic radiation.

“This is a breakthrough,” said Ms Richard, whose case was backed by campaigners for the recognition of electromagnetic hypersensitivity syndrome (EHS), a condition rejected by medical experts as unsubstantiated.

French campaigners have recently persuaded local authorities to move mobile phone towers after complaints from residents, but French courts had previously refused to award disability payments to sufferers, a few of whom have set up “radiation-free” colonies in the countryside.

Ms Richard said that she had been forced by her condition to live with relatives in the remote, rural Ariège département, lodging in a barn with no electricity. Alice Terrasse, her lawyer, said that the ruling set a legal precedent for “thousands of people”.

Advertisement