We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Top judge: ‘We’re not out of touch’

Sir Alan Moses, the judge who jailed the Soham murderer Ian Huntley, has dismissed suggestions that members of the judiciary are “out of touch”.

The Court of Appeal judge said it was wrong to “even suggest” that judges were not in tune with public feeling. He also “deeply regretted” moves to stop judges wearing traditional wigs and gowns.

Sir Alan, who was a High Court judge when he presided over the Soham trial at the Old Bailey four years ago, was speaking on the BBC Radio Four programme, Between Ourselves.

Asked whether judges were “out of touch”, he replied: “It is the most monstrous suggestion I think.”

He added: “Is it suggested if we listened to the Arctic Monkeys rather than listening to the South Bank Symphonia we would be more in touch? Why?”

Advertisement

He went on: “Don’t even think that we are not. Don’t even dare suggest that we are not.”

He said judges routinely heard details of life that most members of the public never experience, adding: “(I) have had to listen, because all 999 calls are recorded now, to a tape of a two-year-old saying: ’Don’t kill me daddy’.”

Sir Alan, 61, a barrister for nearly 40 years, said he thought judges should also continue to wear traditional dress.

“I thought it had been decided that, in civil cases, we will not be wearing wigs anymore,” he said. “I regret it deeply. I think we are losing the magic of our position and we blur in the eyes of the public the difference between the judge and the bureaucrat.”