We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.
COURTS

Fashion worker who broke heel on shoot suing Stella McCartney’s label

Chloe Mickelborough claims the injury stops her from doing certain exercise and wearing specific shoes
Stella McCartney’s fashion label is being sued by Chloe Mickelborough, a former worker, who was assisting with a campaign
Stella McCartney’s fashion label is being sued by Chloe Mickelborough, a former worker, who was assisting with a campaign

A fashion worker is suing Stella McCartney’s label for £100,000 over claims that she broke her heel on a photoshoot — leaving her unable to wear high heels.

Chloe Mickelborough has told a court in London that she was working on an advertising campaign at McCartney’s Milan base in 2018 when she crashed through a “walkway” and fell to a lower floor.

The 31-year-old said that she broke her heel in the fall, an injury that left her with ongoing pain and swelling which she says now prevents her from wearing fashionable shoes.

Mickleborough is claiming up to £100,000 in compensation, having told the judge that the accident has meant that she must wear “supportive” trainers and is unable to dance or run. The company is contesting the claim.

Lawyers for the world-renowned designer, 52, have blamed Mickelborough as the “sole author of her misfortune”. McCartney’s label, which was launched in 2001, is popular with celebrities including Melania Trump, Beyoncé and Amal Clooney, a human rights lawyer. It is reported to have annual revenues of more than £32.5 million.

Advertisement

The court has been told that Mickelborough was overseeing the company’s social media content when the fall occurred at its Milan showroom.

She was due to film an interview between Andrew Dershaw and Ida Simonsen, the label’s senior executives, as part of an advertising campaign for the company’s Stella’s World clothing range.

According to written court submissions, Mickelborough was planning to film the interview on a second floor “walkway” as it provided an attractive backdrop.

The walkway was divided into two sections, with one area enclosed by a railing, her barrister, Michael Patrick, told the court.

“The closed area contained flooring which, to an ordinary reasonable person, appeared safe, stable and conventional,” said the lawyer, adding that “the walkway contained no signs warning of any danger, or which otherwise explained the railing’s presence”.

Advertisement

He added that “unbeknownst” to Mickelborough, “the flooring in the closed area could not support her weight”. The lawyer said that as a result the flooring “immediately” gave way and Mickelborough fell through to the floor below.

Stella McCartney ahead of her spring/summer 2019 collection in Milan
Stella McCartney ahead of her spring/summer 2019 collection in Milan
MIGUEL MEDINA/AFP VIA GETTY

She was said to have suffered a fracture to her left heel, which required surgery and a further operation two years later to repair a broken screw and release toe tendons.

However, Mickelborough’s lawyer said that she was left with symptoms of post-traumatic arthritis in her damaged joints and continues to have “pain, stiffness and swelling in her left foot”. He added that she “can only wear supportive trainers, as opposed to more fashionable or high-heeled footwear, and is restricted to sedentary, office-based forms of employment”.

Mickelborough was also said to be able to walk for only about an hour before her pain levels increase. The barrister said that she had been forced to give up dancing and running and has “stopped going to specific gym classes”.

Mickelborough’s barrister told the court that her symptoms were likely to deteriorate and he blamed the company for having failed to provide a safe workplace

Advertisement

In its defence to the claim Nadia Whittaker, the company’s barrister, branded Mickelborough as the “sole author of her misfortune”, arguing that she had climbed a railing to get into an unsafe, unauthorised area.

A date for a full trial at Central London county court has yet to be set.