We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Save Damascus

A UN mandate for Jorgan to defend the city could be the only way to protect Damascus from destruction by Isis, Lord Owen says

Sir, Can the world save Damascus? Should the world save Damascus? Is there time to save Damascus? My answer to the first two questions is “Yes”. But the answer to the last one is that time is fast running out.

Unless a bold, imaginative plan endorsed by the UN Security Council is put together very soon the forces of Isis will engulf the city, and the sort of destruction we have seen in Aleppo and Palmyra could follow.

To save Damascus there is one credible, but difficult, option still open, with historical precedents: to use the short window of opportunity to create a UN mandate for Jordan to administer and defend the city. During the early days of the mandate the Assad forces in the city would hand over control and move to that part of Syria which borders the Mediterranean.

In order for Jordan to undertake this massive task, which will stretch their own defence forces beyond what is safe, Jordan should be authorised to invite regional countries to help in Damascus. For the long Jordanian boundary with Syria, forces from the permanent five members of the Security Council could be part of the mandate but would not enter Syria.

Without such action the world risks losing one of the great cities of civilisation.

Advertisement

Lord Owen

House of Lords