We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Relative answers to poverty

Sir, Mary Ann Sieghart, (Comment, “Why poverty is not all about money”, Nov 24), states that, “the notion of relative poverty is hardly some radical socialist idea” and refers to Adam Smith’s An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776). She asks: “whether we define poverty in absolute or relative terms”.



Am I my brother’s keeper? No, certainly not, but if we have the slightest notion that we live in an advanced, civilised society, then poverty can only be defined in relative terms and every effort must be made to help those in the lowest quartile, or even the lowest two quintiles, out of the poverty trap.

One way to achieve this would be to raise the personal allowance, the level at which people begin to pay income tax, to 60 per cent of the median income, or approximately £10,300 a year, and those with an income of less than that amount would not pay income tax. If the Chancellor needs to fill the gap left by showing such largesse to people in this country, then he must learn to take more from the top; those, for example, on six-figure salaries and perhaps from some of the world’s super-rich who have sought refuge in London’s low-taxation haven.

KENNETH ARMITAGE

Kesgrave, Suffolk

Sir, The Conservatives now wish to eradicate “relative” poverty, defined as those living on less than 40 per cent of average incomes. Simple arithmetic shows that, as you increase the incomes for the relatively poor, the average income would rise, promptly putting some back into the relatively poor category.

Advertisement

Unless we all had identical incomes (something even Mao could never achieve) we will still have the relatively poor with us.

LORD YOUNG OF GRAFFHAM

House of Lords

Sir, Council tax in the UK is the main contributor to pensioner poverty. Many pensioners pay little or no income tax yet have to hand over more than 25 per cent of their total income to the local authority because of the iniquitous system of funding local services.

It is a national disgrace that the basic UK state pension is the lowest in Europe, being only 19 per cent of average earnings.

ARNIE PARR

High Wycombe, Bucks