We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Reality of rescues

Do we expect emergency services personnel just to dive in in all circumstances heedless of the possible consequences?

Sir, As an operational police commander, I have made difficult decisions about rescuing people (report, June 19). One incident that lives with me today is when a young lad got into difficulty in a cold, swiftly flowing, deep river and disappeared. His brother and members of the public had already entered the water to attempt a rescue. A qualified diver also entered the water to search for the lad. The Fire and Rescue commander and myself ordered them out of the river and would not allow police officers or firefighters to enter the water; it was simply too dangerous. As the diver was coming out of the river, he found the lad: he had drowned. But then the diver suffered a heart attack and three other rescuers had to go to hospital suffering from hypothermia.

Lord Young of Graffham makes it all sound so simple. Does he expect emergency services personnel just to dive in in all circumstances heedless of the possible consequences?

Rob Palmer
Barnstaple, Devon