We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Readers’ poll: should the UK spend billions on new nuclear power stations?

Construction is under way on Hinkley Point C in Somerset, the UK’s newest nuclear power station
Construction is under way on Hinkley Point C in Somerset, the UK’s newest nuclear power station
GETTY IMAGES

The government is due to unveil a new energy security strategy this week. It is expected to raise targets for the proportion of our power generated from renewables such as offshore wind stations — but may also include large investment in conventional nuclear power.

Many argue that new nuclear power stations are essential to ensure the UK’s energy security while meeting our net zero targets, and provide the reliable, constant electricity which intermittent renewable sources cannot. Those who oppose such investment say nuclear is vastly expensive to both the government and the consumer, and the long-term disposal of dangerous nuclear waste has still not been adequately addressed.

What’s your view?

See the results of last week’s poll, “Should the UK drop the visa requirement for Ukrainian refugees?”, here.