We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.
VIDEO

Rags to riches: ex wife claims hippy’s fortune 23 years later

Thousands of divorced wives are expected to revive old legal battles after Britain’s highest court said that a woman can claim against her multi-millionaire ex-husband 23 years later.

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court backed the right of Kathleen Wyatt to be able to seek a financial settlement from her husband, a New Age hippy turned green energy tycoon, who amassed his £107 million fortune after the couple divorced.

Ms Wyatt, 55, married Dale Vince, now 53, when they were penniless hippy travellers in 1981. They had a son but separated in 1984 and divorced in 1992. Ms Wyatt already had another son before she met Mr Vince and went on to have two more children after the couple split.

Mr Vince subsequently founded one of the country’s biggest green energy companies, Ecotricity, in 1995. Sixteen years later Ms Wyatt lodged her claim.

Five Supreme Court justices ruled yesterday that despite the length of time that has elapsed, she should be free to argue her claim for £1.9 million because the couple never reached a financial settlement. The judges also took into account the contribution made by Ms Wyatt towards “the welfare of the family” by caring for the couple’s son after they split.

Advertisement

However they cautioned Ms Wyatt that she would at best secure a “modest award” as the couple were only together for three years and the marriage broke down 31 years ago. Mr Vince, they conceded, did not start to create his wealth until 13 years after they split.

Lord Wilson, who announced the decision, said: “Her claim may even be dismissed but there is, in our opinion, a real prospect she will secure a comparatively modest award, perhaps of a size enabling her to purchase a somewhat more comfortable mortgage-free home.”

Mr Vince, who faces paying his wife’s legal costs, likely to top £1 million, condemned the ruling as “mad”. “I am disappointed that the Supreme Court has decided not to bring this case to an end now, over 30 years since the relationship ended,” he said. “We both moved on and started families of our own. It has been so long that there are no records, no court has kept anything and it’s hard to defend yourself in such circumstances.

“I feel we all have a right to move on and not be looking over our shoulders.” he said, adding that the ruling signalled “open season” for those who had brief relationships a quarter of a century ago.

Ms Wyatt hailed the decision as “important”. However Hannah Budd, of the firm International Family Law Group, said that for many people it would be “truly terrifying”. “There is now the prospect of their ex-wives or ex-husbands knocking on the door decades after their separation, seeking financial support.”

Advertisement

Mr Vince, a vegan eco-warrior, was described as a “most improbable candidate for affluence”. But in his lead ruling Lord Wilson said that he had “achieved brilliant success and is clearly a remarkable man.”

Mr Vince, who lives in a £3 million 18th century fort, near Stroud, Gloucestershire, with his new wife and their son, owns Gloucestershire’s Forest Green Rovers football club, where he has banned red meat, and installed an organic pitch.

Ms Wyatt says that she is so poor that she has been travelling to the court hearings from her home in Monmouthshire by bus, and has been sleeping in a bus station.