We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Passes for all

Sir, August has come round again, and with it, no doubt, ridiculously high pass rates in A levels. I am 19 and received my grades last year. Teachers at my school kept many of the old O level papers to give to us as practice. Having done both, I can honestly say that despite being “equivalent” to GCSEs, these O level papers were much harder than my A levels.

Lowering standards so that no child has to hear that they have failed is ridiculous. Students in countries which still use a version of the O level exam perform better in the fundamentals such as maths when judged independently — Singapore being a shining example.

P. GEGAN

Uxbridge, Middx

Sir, Brenda Despontin bemoans the modular style of exams (Comment, Aug 17) but the rot started in 1950 when the School Certificate, which required a pass in a minimum of five subjects all taken at once, was abandoned in favour of the General Certificate of Education (GCE). It was possible to take a GCE in one subject and resit it once the following year.

Advertisement

Employers much preferred that applicants had all the subjects required on one certificate. The demise of “success or failure” exams was accelerated by the abolition of the 11-plus, when the student had only one shot at it.

ALAN M. PARDOE

Malvern Wells, Worcs