We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

On being betrothed

Sir, Rosemary Bennett (Mar 7) asks if the development of pre-engagement represents a sensible period of reflection before making a lifelong commitment or another illustration of contemporary self-obsession.

It may instead be an early sign of the re-emergence of the betrothal, which was often seen in the Dark Ages and early Middle Ages as the first stage of marriage, when sexual intercourse was regarded as licit. It was a public declaration of a non-binding commitment to getting married. A betrothal ring was often given and worn. Pre-engagement “counselling” was not necessary as betrothal and marriage decisions were made by the fathers of the couple — until Pope Alexander III set the cat among the pigeons by decreeing that the validity of marriage required the mutual consent of the spouses themselves.

Anthony Spencer

Hele, Devon