We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Mushroom app ‘couldn’t identify deadly species’

Foragers say some poisonous fungi are indistinguishable from edible varieties without touching or smelling them
Foragers say some poisonous fungi are indistinguishable from edible varieties without touching or smelling them
PA

Foraging for “wild food” remains all the rage, with urbanites inspired by TV chefs descending on woodland in search of orange birch boletes or powdery brittlegills for dinner-party kudos.

The Mushroom app $7.99 (£6) seemed the perfect fit for beginners, promising to harness “revolutionary artificial intelligence” to “identify any mushroom instantly with just a pic”.

Its creator Nicholas Sheriff, a product designer in Silicon Valley, wanted to help prevent poisonings after amateur foragers in northern California ate death caps last year and became very ill. But when mycologists came across the program, they warned that it could be deadly and the premise was flawed: one picture was not enough to tell edible mushrooms apart from toxic lookalikes.

An experienced forager, they said, would study mushrooms from several angles and consider factors such as discolouration and smell. In trials by Gizmodo, the app failed to identify common button or chestnut mushrooms.

As a result of the outcry, the app’s name was changed to Truffle, with different marketing claims. Experts pointed out though that “false truffles” could still be toxic.

Advertisement