We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.
VIDEO

Ministers ‘didn’t envisage’ influx of XL bully dogs to Scotland

Holyrood backs new safeguards for ownership of dog amid concerns over people bringing the breed from the UK
New safeguarding rules for XL bully dogs are to come into force on Friday
New safeguarding rules for XL bully dogs are to come into force on Friday
CHRISTOPHER FURLONG/GETTY IMAGES

Ministers did not envisage people bringing XL bully dogs to Scotland to avoid a ban in England, it has been claimed, as a Holyrood committee backed similar safeguards north of the border.

From Friday owners will be banned from selling, advertising, gifting, exchanging or abandoning the breed. XL bullies must also be muzzled and on a lead in public places.

MSPs on Holyrood’s criminal justice committee “reluctantly” backed the legislative changes, which include a secondary stage — from August 1, it will also be an offence to own an XL bully without having, or applying for, an exemption certificate.

Siobhian Brown, the community safety minister, said a “loophole” had led to some owners bringing the dogs to Scotland
Siobhian Brown, the community safety minister, said a “loophole” had led to some owners bringing the dogs to Scotland
ALAMY

Anyone convicted of breaching the safeguards could face up to six months in prison and/or a fine of up to £5,000.

Siobhian Brown, the minister for community safety, said that the decision to replicate UK government legislation was “not made lightly” but was essential to remove loopholes the laws had created.

Advertisement

It follows concerns over an influx of XL bullies to Scotland since the controls were brought in south of the border at the end of last year.

Brown added: “What became clear, after the legislation came into force, was that the UK government could not confirm that an owner of an XL bully dog who lived in England and Wales and wasn’t able to sell or rehome a dog in England could not do so in Scotland.

The SNP MSP Christine Grahame argued that the UK and Scottish governments had failed to formally define what an XL bully breed was
The SNP MSP Christine Grahame argued that the UK and Scottish governments had failed to formally define what an XL bully breed was
KEN JACK/GETTY IMAGES

“So whilst to do so would be breaching English and Welsh law, it did create a loophole that led to some owners bringing the dogs to Scotland. What we didn’t envisage was people bringing up XL bully dogs during the Christmas period and now obviously community safety has to be paramount and this is why this decision has been made.”

An 18-year-old girl has been reported to the procurator fiscal in connection to an incident where an XL bully-type dog was shot dead by police in South Lanarkshire after an attack left three people injured on Sunday.

Living with my XL Bully after the ban

Christine Grahame, the SNP MSP who introduced the Control of Dogs (Scotland) Act 2010 which gave local authorities powers to impose control notices on dog owners, urged the committee to back her motion to annul the secondary legislation taking effect in Scotland.

Advertisement

Her arguments centred around the failure of the UK and Scottish governments to formally define what an XL bully breed was.

Official guidance states the dogs, which are not recognised as an official breed by the UK Kennel Club, can be defined as having a “muscular body, blocky head, suggesting great strength and power for [their] size”, with males characterised as at least 20 inches from the shoulder to the ground and 19 inches for females.

The motion to annul was unanimously rejected.

Grahame said: “The problem too is the unintended consequences. Dogs will have been put down, others will have been neutered, people will have been persecuted because that social media which is providing this very flimsy evidence of the number of dogs coming up will be a hotspot for reporting people.

“The police will be sent out, who have enough on their plate,to measure a dog with a tape measure to see if it complies to the confirmation that has been invented by Defra [the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs].”

Advertisement

Grahame said there would be court cases challenging the definition.

Russell Findlay, a MSP for the Scottish Conservatives, asked Brown why it had taken so long for ministers in Scotland to replicate UK law, which was in force from December 31.

He said: “We welcome wholeheartedly the Scottish government finally coming to the right decision. Was this a case of spectacular poor judgment, dithering, or simply an opportunity to seek divergence with the rest of the UK?”

Brown replied: “I would say neither of those suggestions.”